This paper was prepared for the Symposium on the Handling of Oilfield Waters of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, to be held in Los Angeles, Calif., Dec. 4–5, 1972. Permission to copy is restricted to an abstract of not more than 300 words. Illustrations may not be copied. The abstract should contain conspicuous acknowledgment of where and by whom the paper is presented. Publication elsewhere after publication in the JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY or the SOCIETY OF publication in the JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY or the SOCIETY OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERS JOURNAL is usually granted upon request to the Editor PETROLEUM ENGINEERS JOURNAL is usually granted upon request to the Editor of the appropriate journal provided agreement to give proper credit is made.

Discussion of this paper is invited. Three copies of any discussion should be sent to the Society of Petroleum Engineers office. Such discussion may be presented at the above meeting and, with the paper, may be considered for publication in one of the two SPE magazines.


Aeration of injection waters can create numerous problems. Corrosion of equipment, scale deposition and injection well plugging can reduce the profitability of a waterflood by affecting the ability to get the correct volumes of water into the proper zones at the proper time for efficient sweep and recovery. Operation of a "closed", air-free system will minimize many of these problems. problems. Practical approaches to the successful operation of such systems involve design and operation of water sources, oxygen removal from aerated sources, and maintenance of oxygen-free conditions throughout the system. Day-today operation, monitoring techniques and "oxygen conscious" personnel are important.


If the statistics were available, we would probably find that aeration of the water is a bigger cause of problems in injection systems than any other single cause.

The role of oxygen in the corrosion reaction in water systems has long been recognized; and corrosion resistant materials, coatings and linings were used in early systems.

Oxygen (air) plays an equally important role in creating problems of deposits and injection well plugging. Aeration of a stable underground water results in the loss of stabilizing gases as well as oxidation of precipitable solids. This leads to the formation of scales, deposits and well plugging solids. Mixing an aerated supply water with a stable subsurface water can lead to similar problems. Installation of a "closed system" has been the approach to minimizing these effects.

The selection of the mode of operation of a water injection system is, of course, an economic balance which must consider the overall profit of a project throughout its life. Some factors are obvious, i.e., costs of failures, failure repairs and well cleanouts. However, many of the less obvious factors may be even more significant in a waterflood, such as, loss of injection capacity, plugging of tight zones, downtime, etc.

This content is only available via PDF.
You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.