Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
OOIP
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
NARROW
Peer Reviewed
Format
Subjects
Journal
Publisher
Conference Series
Date
Availability
1-20 of 6156 Search Results for
OOIP
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Proceedings Papers
Hadrien Dumont, Adriaan Gisolf, Melton Hows, Chengli Dong, Hua Chen, Beatriz E. Barbosa, Li Chen, Victor Emanuel, Thomas Pfeiffer, Vinay K. Mishra, Cosan Ayan, Vladislav Achourov
Paper presented at the SPWLA 55th Annual Logging Symposium, May 18–22, 2014
Paper Number: SPWLA-2014-JJJJ
... Abstract Pressure gradients are routinely used to determine fluid contacts. The accuracy of static formation-pressure measurements directly affects the estimation of original oil in place (OOIP). Depth errors, pressure gauge accuracy, gauge temperature sensitivity, gradient-fitting errors...
Proceedings Papers
Publisher: Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)
Paper presented at the North Africa Technical Conference and Exhibition, February 14–17, 2010
Paper Number: SPE-128824-MS
... hole). The OOIP of this southwest extension amounts to more than 100mmbo. An unexpected low velocity anomaly was encountered after B-13H pilot hole well results. The VSPs acquired on the pilot holes of wells B-13H and B-14H revealed that wrong dynamic corrections were applied for Top Mamuniyat due...
Proceedings Papers
Publisher: Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)
Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, September 21–24, 1980
Paper Number: SPE-9382-MS
... Kolodzie Jr., Stanley; Amoco Production Company Abstract This paper describes the development of a method used to define pay and calculate OOIP in the Spindle Field. Traditional methods of calculation do not yield reliable results for pay or OOIP due to the shaly sand nature of the reservoir...
Images
Published: 11 June 2013
Fig. 20 Annual Plateau Production as a percentage of OOIP vs OOIP More
Images
Published: 11 June 2013
Fig. 40 Number of Producers vs OOIP (Sudan) Average OOIP per well = 10MMstb/well More
Images
Published: 11 June 2013
Fig. 41 Number of Producers vs OOIP (Malaysia) Average OOIP per well = 4.7 MMstb/well More
Images
in Recent Advances in Polymer Flooding in China: Lessons Learned and Continuing Development
> SPE Journal
Published: 11 August 2021
Fig. 1 Polymer-flooding development in China. OOIP = original oil in place. More
Images
in Flow Physics of Polymer Nanospheres and Diluted Microemulsion in Fractured Carbonate Reservoirs: An Investigation into Enhanced Oil Recovery Mechanisms
> SPE Journal
Published: 11 August 2021
Fig. 11 Oil recovery in the spontaneous imbibition tests. OOIP = original oil in place. More
Images
in Multicomponent Diffusion Modeling of Cyclic Solvent Injection in Ultratight Reservoirs
> SPE Journal
Published: 16 June 2021
Fig. 9 Reservoir‐hydrocarbon RF (in mass% of OOIP) vs. time for (a) CH 4 ‐HnP and (b) CO 2 ‐HnP with different soaking lengths. More
Images
in Optimization of Recovery by Huff ‘n’ Puff Gas Injection in Shale-Oil Reservoirs Using the Climbing-Swarm Derivative-Free Algorithm
> SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Published: 10 February 2021
Fig. 3 Plot of oil‐recovery factor and cumulative oil vs. production time. OOIP is 1.3 million STB. History matching with real data stops at 60 months. The line of red triangles represents real data from the Eagle Ford pilot well, the green dashed line is a primary production forecast without H&am... More
Images
in Optimization of Recovery by Huff ‘n’ Puff Gas Injection in Shale-Oil Reservoirs Using the Climbing-Swarm Derivative-Free Algorithm
> SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Published: 10 February 2021
Table 2 Comparison of GID and GIRs for four H&P gas‐injection cases. OOIP = 1.29 × 10 6 STB. More
Images
in Experimental and Numerical Study of Strategies for Improvement of Cyclic Solvent Injection in Thin Heavy-Oil Reservoirs
> SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Published: 10 February 2021
Fig. 9 RF (% of OOIP) and recovery rate of CSP, cyclic inverse WAG (Cycles 4 and 5), EWF, and blowdown. More
Images
in Aqueous Solution of Ketone Solvent for Enhanced Water Imbibition in Fractured Carbonate Reservoirs
> SPE Journal
Published: 15 October 2020
Fig. 6 Oil recovery for Core 1. Oil-recovery curves are given in the units of OOIP and PV. The oil-recovery factor is given as a fraction. More
Images
in Aqueous Solution of Ketone Solvent for Enhanced Water Imbibition in Fractured Carbonate Reservoirs
> SPE Journal
Published: 15 October 2020
Fig. 10 Oil recovery of Core 2. Oil-recovery curves are given in the units of OOIP and PV. The oil-recovery factor is given as a fraction. More
Images
in Aqueous Solution of Ketone Solvent for Enhanced Water Imbibition in Fractured Carbonate Reservoirs
> SPE Journal
Published: 15 October 2020
Fig. 14 Oil recovery of Core 3. Oil-recovery curves are given in the units of OOIP and PV. The oil-recovery factor is given as a fraction. More
Images
in Aqueous Solution of Ketone Solvent for Enhanced Water Imbibition in Fractured Carbonate Reservoirs
> SPE Journal
Published: 15 October 2020
Fig. 18 Oil recovery of Core 4. Oil-recovery curves are given in the units of OOIP and PV. The oil-recovery factor is given as a fraction. More
Images
Published: 13 August 2020
Fig. 4 OOIP and cumulative‐oil‐uncertainty reduction. More
Images
Published: 13 August 2020
Fig. 16 OOIP and EUR uncertainty reduction because of filtering. More
Images
in Amino Acid as a Novel Wettability Modifier for Enhanced Waterflooding in Carbonate Reservoirs
> SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Published: 14 May 2020
Fig. 15 Oil recovery curves from forced imbibition experiments in terms of the OOIP, i.e., the initial oil volume before the spontaneous imbibition. The increased oil recovery with the higher flow injection rate indicates the presence of the capillary end effect. More
Images
in Fast Analysis of Optimal Improved-Oil-Recovery Switch Time Using a Two-Factor Production Model and Least-Squares Monte Carlo Algorithm
> SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Published: 15 August 2019
Fig. 16 Histogram of the OOIP samples drawn from the prior distribution. More
Advertisement