Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
Mgal
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
NARROW
Peer Reviewed
Format
Subjects
Journal
Publisher
Conference Series
Date
Availability
1-20 of 1598 Search Results for
Mgal
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
1
Sort by
Images
Published: 01 February 2000
Fig. 3 Linear 20 lbm/Mgal guar foams with 5 gal/Mgal anionic foaming agent at varying N 2 qualities. More
Images
Published: 29 November 2021
Figure 1 1 gal/Mgal liquid or 3 lb/Mgal dry FR performance in 100K TDS simple brine at 75°F. More
Images
Published: 29 November 2021
Figure 2 1 gal/Mgal liquid or 3 lb/Mgal dry cationic FR performance in the brines having TDS over 200K at 75°F. More
Images
Published: 29 November 2021
Figure 3 Hydration of 1 gal/Mgal liquid or 3 lb/Mgal dry cationic FRs in 250K TDS simple brine at 75°F. More
Images
Published: 29 November 2021
Figure 4 Hydration of 1 gal/Mgal liquid or 3 lb/Mgal dry cationic FRs in fresh water at 40°F. More
Images
Published: 29 November 2021
Figure 5 Hydration of 1 gal/Mgal liquid or 3 lb/Mgal dry cationic FRs in 100K TDS simple brine at 40°F. More
Images
Published: 05 February 2003
Figure 1 30 lb/Mgal guar based fracturing fluid (left) and 30 lb/Mgal hydrophilically modified polymer based fracturing fluid (right) with encapsulated oxidizer breaker More
Images
Published: 05 April 2000
Fig. 9 Comparison of 20 lb/Mgal Fluid B and 20 lb/Mgal Fluid B with 3 vol. % Rev Dust in 2 3/8 in. Tubing More
Images
Published: 03 April 2000
Figure 10 Yield Stress as a Function of Quality for 20 lb/Mgal and 40 lb/Mgal Guar Foams at Various Temperatures More
Images
Published: 01 February 2016
Figure 2 Pressure-Dependent Viscosity for 25 lbm/Mgal Guar + 1.75 lbm/Mgal Borax blended in 2 gal/Mgal TMAC (pH 10) at 10sec -1 and 150degF. More
Images
Published: 01 February 2016
Figure 3 Pressure-Dependent Viscosity for 25 lbm/Mgal Guar + 1.75 lbm/Mgal Borax blended in 2% potassium chloride (pH 10) at 10sec -1 and 150degF. More
Images
Published: 01 February 2016
Figure 6 Melting Profile of 25 lbm/Mgal Guar +1.75 lbm/Mgal Borax in 2% KCl at Low & High Pressure More
Images
Published: 01 February 2016
Figure 7 Melting Profile of 25 lbm/Mgal Guar +2.95 lbm/Mgal Borax in 10.5ppg NaBr at Low & High Pressure More
Images
Published: 01 February 2016
Figure 8 Melting Profile of 25 lbm/Mgal Guar +2.95 lbm/Mgal Borax in 11.5ppg NaBr at Low & High Pressure More
Images
Published: 04 February 2014
Figure - 15 VES Rheology for 60 gal/Mgal loading with 10 lbm/Mgal encapsulated breaker. Test temperature is 175 degF. More
Images
Published: 24 September 2018
Figure 15 Frac Model F, Horizontal Wolfcamp, 400 Mgal 400 Mgal Slickwater, 400 Mlb 30/50 sand, 80 BPM More
Images
Published: 09 March 1997
Figure 9 Effect of 35lb/Mgal Crosslinked HPG + 25lb/Mgal FLA Leak-off on Regain Permeability of 12 md Oil Core (Test 7) More
Images
Published: 09 March 1997
Figure 10 Effect of35lb/Mgal Crosslinked HPG + 25lb/Mgal FLA Leak-off on Regain Permeability of 35 md Oil Core (Test 8) More
Images
Published: 20 December 2007
Fig. 8 Fanning friction factor vs. generalized Reynolds number of 35 lb/Mgal guar in 1000 ft, 2⅜-in. CT ( n =0.444, K =0.0156 lb f s n /ft 2 , a/R =0.0185). The experimental data from straight tubing (ST) are also shown to illustrate the effect of curvature on friction factor. More
Images
Published: 20 December 2007
Fig. 9 Fanning friction factor vs. generalized Reynolds number of 25 lb/Mgal guar in 1,000 ft, 2⅜-in. CT ( n =0.560, K =0.00455 Ib f s n /ft 2 , a/R =0.0185). The experimental data from straight tubing (ST) are also shown to illustrate the effect of curvature on friction factor. More
1
Advertisement