1-20 of 3829 Search Results for

Mercury pore measurement

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Articles
Journal: SPE Journal
SPE J. (2022)
Paper Number: SPE-212308-PA
Published: 24 October 2022
...Yunlai Yang Summary This paper presents a new 3D mathematical pore network model for evaluating some important, but hard-to-measure physical properties, including permeability, relative permeability, recovery factor, and sealing capacity from easy-to-measure mercury intrusion data. A 3D pore...
Proceedings Papers

Paper presented at the SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, July 22–24, 2019
Paper Number: URTEC-2019-637-MS
... URTeC: 637 Visualization of Pore Connectivity Using Mercury Injection Capillary Pressure Measurements, Micro X-ray Computed Tomography, and Cryo Scanning Electron Microscopy Mark E. Curtis*, Carl H. Sondergeld, Chandra S. Rai; Mewbourne School of Petroleum and Geological Engineering...
Images
Images
<span class="search-highlight">Pore</span>-size distribution of a Barnett Shale sample <span class="search-highlight">measured</span> by <span class="search-highlight">mercury</span> inject...
Published: 05 April 2016
Fig. 7 Pore-size distribution of a Barnett Shale sample measured by mercury injection capillary pressure (MICP) analysis (Sakhaee-Pour and Bryant 2012 ). More
Images
<span class="search-highlight">Pore</span>-throat-size distribution for the carbonate rocks <span class="search-highlight">measured</span> with <span class="search-highlight">mercury</span>...
Published: 18 December 2015
Fig. 4 Pore-throat-size distribution for the carbonate rocks measured with mercury-injection capillary pressure test. More
Images
Top: <span class="search-highlight">pore</span>-distribution curves <span class="search-highlight">measured</span> on a matrix sample by <span class="search-highlight">mercury</span> inject...
Published: 01 August 2003
Fig. 9 Top: pore-distribution curves measured on a matrix sample by mercury injection; thick curve: volumetric distribution; thin curve: calculated pore-radius distribution. Middle and bottom: SEM images taken on the same matrix. More
Images
<span class="search-highlight">Pore</span>-size distributions <span class="search-highlight">measured</span> by <span class="search-highlight">mercury</span> injection porosimetry for five ...
Published: 01 May 1989
Figure 2 Pore-size distributions measured by mercury injection porosimetry for five different size fractions of Ottawa sand. More
Images
Images
<span class="search-highlight">Pore</span>-size distribution <span class="search-highlight">measured</span> by <span class="search-highlight">mercury</span> intrusion prosimitry (MIP) (a) a...
Published: 03 February 2015
Figure 14 Pore-size distribution measured by mercury intrusion prosimitry (MIP) (a) and nitrogen adsorption (b) for pre-acidizing Bakken and acidized zone of post-acidizing Bakken in acid penetration test. MIP intrusion below 115 Psi, corresponding to pore size above 1787.6 nm, is taken as confirm... More
Images
<span class="search-highlight">Pore</span> throat size distribution <span class="search-highlight">measured</span> by <span class="search-highlight">mercury</span> injection on Berea sandst...
Published: 25 April 2000
Figure 2 Pore throat size distribution measured by mercury injection on Berea sandstone (BD15). More
Images
Above: <span class="search-highlight">Pore</span> distribution curves <span class="search-highlight">measured</span> on a matrix sample by <span class="search-highlight">mercury</span> inje...
Published: 30 September 2001
Fig.9 Above: Pore distribution curves measured on a matrix sample by mercury injection; thick curve: volumetric distribution; thin curve: calculated pore radius distribution. Middle and below: SEM images taken on the same matrix. More
Images
<span class="search-highlight">Pore</span> size distribution of the Pierre 2 Shale <span class="search-highlight">measured</span> by <span class="search-highlight">mercury</span> injection ...
Published: 16 February 1999
Figure 1 Pore size distribution of the Pierre 2 Shale measured by mercury injection porosimetry. Most of the pore volume is between 0.01 and 0.1 μm. More
Proceedings Papers

Paper presented at the SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, June 20–22, 2022
Paper Number: URTEC-3722777-MS
... Abstract We introduce a measurement and analytical workflow for determining poroelastic and textural properties on core samples using multi-step hysteretic mercury intrusion measurements. Texture is understood here as the pore structure as inferred from mercury injection capillary pressure...
Proceedings Papers

Paper presented at the SPE Europec featured at 79th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, June 12–15, 2017
Paper Number: SPE-185801-MS
... is proposed for mercury-airfilled pore systems which are commonly used in Mercury Injection Capillary Pressure (MICP) experiments for the pore volume and pore size distribution measurements. At the highest injection pressure of MICP, the minimum captured size is predicted 4.8nm instead of 3.6nm based...
Proceedings Papers

Paper presented at the Ninth ISOPE Ocean Mining Symposium, June 19–24, 2011
Paper Number: ISOPE-M-11-005
... sediments was measured using mercury injection, which is commonly used to measure capillary pressure. After many measurements, the relationship between the injection pressure and injected volume of mercury was determined. The pore size at the time of injection was calculated from the mercury injection...
Proceedings Papers

Paper presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference, February 21–23, 2022
Paper Number: IPTC-22360-MS
... trims. Sample grain volume was determined directly by measuring in a Helium gas expansion Porosimeter. Bulk volume was measured by immersion in mercury. Pore volume was calculated from grain volume and bulk volume measurements for porosity determination at ambient conditions. Permeability measurements...
Proceedings Papers

Paper presented at the SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, July 26–28, 2021
Paper Number: URTEC-2021-5220-MS
... alterations during core cleaning and require extensive time to reach equilibrium conditions, which challenges traditional core flood measurements using reservoir fluids. Mercury is advantageous as it effectively describes the non-wetting phase connectivity and trapping behavior defined by the pore geometry...
Proceedings Papers

Paper presented at the SPE Canadian Energy Technology Conference, March 16–17, 2022
Paper Number: SPE-208908-MS
... and specific surface area measurements of shales . Paper presented at the International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts . Avignon, France . 21. Westermarck , S. 2000 . Use of mercury porosimetry and nitrogen adsorption in characterisation of the pore structure of mannitol...
Proceedings Papers

Paper presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference, March 26–28, 2019
Paper Number: IPTC-19514-MS
... properties. At high pressure and due to compressibility of both mercury and the glass container; mercury can cause some distortion of the sample and introduces some pore that do not exist in the sample. Core properties measurement. Errors is introduced because of cleanness of the mercury, density stability...
Proceedings Papers

Paper presented at the SPE/CSUR Unconventional Resources Conference, October 20–22, 2015
Paper Number: SPE-175968-MS
... is measured on cores at effective reservoir pressure. Crushed samples are used to obtain mercury capillary pressure, pore size distribution curves, GRI and mercury porosity and matrix permeability. SEM images are used to study pore development and porosity as well as investigating the presence...

Product(s) added to cart

Close Modal