Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
Maximum principal stress
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
NARROW
Peer Reviewed
Format
Subjects
Journal
Publisher
Conference Series
Date
Availability
1-20 of 15956 Search Results for
Maximum principal stress
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
1
Sort by
Proceedings Papers
Publisher: American Rock Mechanics Association
Paper presented at the The 6th U.S Symposium on Rock Mechanics (USRMS), October 28–30, 1964
Paper Number: ARMA-64-001
...DETERMINING THE MAXIMUM PRINCIPAL STRESS DIRECTION BY ANALYZING IN SITU FAILURE OF ANISOTROPIC HETEROGENEOUS ROCK by E. W. Gresseth* ABSTRACT In situ occurrences of planar discontinuities on the 5900, 6100 and 6300 levels of the Star mine, Burke, Idaho were analyzed to determine the direction...
Images
Published: 05 November 2013
Fig. 7 Distribution of maximum principal stress (kPa) (a) and maximum principal plastic strain (b) at TVD = 2582.25m More
Images
Published: 05 November 2013
Fig. 9 Distribution of maximum principal stress (kPa) (a) and maximum principal plastic strain (b) at TVD = 2585.25m More
Images
Published: 05 November 2013
Fig. 11 Distribution of maximum principal stress (kPa) (a) and maximum principal strain (b) at TVD = 2585.35m More
Images
Published: 05 November 2013
Fig. 13 Distribution of maximum principal stress (kPa) (a) and maximum principal plastic strain (b) at TVD = 2585.6m More
Images
Published: 05 November 2013
Fig. 15 Distribution of maximum principal stress (kPa) (a) and maximum principal plastic strain (b) at TVD = 2586.2m More
Images
Published: 09 December 2021
Figure 4 Distribution of horizontal maximum principal stress and minimum principal stress after the stress change of a single fracture,σ max (a),σ min (b) More
Images
Published: 09 December 2021
Figure 8 Distribution of horizontal maximum principal stress and minimum principal stress after multi-fracture stress change, σ max (a),σ min (b) More
Images
Published: 08 April 2012
Figure 32 The angle between composite maximum principal stress and the maximum regional principal stress decreases with increasing double plunge. More
Images
Published: 10 March 2013
Figure 32 The angle between composite maximum principal stress and the maximum regional principal stress decreases with increasing double plunge. More
Images
Published: 09 September 2003
Fig. 3b Illustrates the nodal maximum principal stress vector. Stress trajectories are elliptical inside the rectangular marked area. Length of the vector is proportional to its magnitude. More
Images
Published: 08 October 2012
Figure 10 Effective (or total) maximum principal stress (differential stress plus confining pressure at failure) versus effective (or total) minimum principal stress (confining pressure at peak differential stress) shows a linear trend. More
Images
in Interaction between Hydraulic Fracture and Pre-Existing Fracture under Pulse Hydraulic Fracturing
> SPE Production & Operations
Published: 11 August 2021
Fig. 18 Maximum principal stress distribution of hydraulic fractures and pre-existing fractures under different hydraulic fracturing methods. (a), (b), and (c) Approaching angle of 30°. (a) THF. (b) 1-Hz pulse hydraulic fracturing. (c) 5-Hz pulse hydraulic fracturing. (d), (e), and (f) Approaching... More
Images
Published: 17 August 2017
Fig. 13 Maximum-principal-stress distribution around the fracture during lost circulation. More
Images
in 3D Geomechanical Modeling of Salt-Creep Behavior on Wellbore Casing for Presalt Reservoirs
> SPE Drilling & Completion
Published: 27 September 2016
Fig. 7 Maximum-principal-stress distribution. More
Images
Published: 01 June 1986
Figure 7 Computed maximum-principal-stress distribution during steady-state water drilling. More
Images
Published: 01 June 1986
Figure 9 Computed maximum-principal-stress distribution during steady-state air drilling. More
Images
Published: 01 June 1986
Figure 11 Computed maximum-principal-stress distribution during rapid cooling from a steady-state water-drilling condition. More
Images
Published: 01 June 1986
Figure 13 Computed maximum-principal-stress distribution during rapid cooling from a steady-state water-drilling condition. More
Images
Published: 01 June 1986
Figure 15 Computed maximum-principal-stress distribution during gradual reduction in weight on cutter from a steady-state water-drilling condition. More
1
Advertisement