Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
MSCF
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
NARROW
Peer Reviewed
Format
Subjects
Journal
Publisher
Conference Series
Date
Availability
1-20 of 4587 Search Results for
MSCF
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
1
Sort by
Images
Published: 01 February 2003
Fig. 19 Pressure increment for all stages at 5 Mscf/D (a. upper left), 7.5 Mscf/D (b. lower left), and 15 Mscf/D (c. right). More
Images
Published: 30 September 2001
Fig. 19 Pressure increment for all stages at 5 Mscf/d (a. left), 7.5 Mscf/d (b. center) and 15 Mscf/d (c. right More
Images
Published: 24 September 2014
Figure 30 Gas Production Rate (Mscf/day) and Cumulative Gas (Mscf) from Case 7. More
Images
Published: 24 September 2014
Figure 34 Gas Production Rate (Mscf/day) and Cumulative Gas (Mscf) from Module V, Case 8. More
Images
Published: 24 September 2014
Figure 38 Gas Production Rate (Mscf/day) and Cumulative Gas (Mscf) from Module V, Case 9. More
Images
in A Methodology of End-of-Tubing Location Optimization for Horizontal Shale Gas Wells with and without Deliquification
> SPE Production & Operations
Published: 13 August 2020
Fig. 9 Δ p total vs. EOT location for q g = 2,300 and 2,350 Mscf/D. More
Images
in A Methodology of End-of-Tubing Location Optimization for Horizontal Shale Gas Wells with and without Deliquification
> SPE Production & Operations
Published: 13 August 2020
Fig. 21 Δ p total vs. EOT location for q g = 2,300 Mscf/D. More
Images
in A Methodology of End-of-Tubing Location Optimization for Horizontal Shale Gas Wells with and without Deliquification
> SPE Production & Operations
Published: 13 August 2020
Fig. 33 h L at three tail‐pipe‐intake locations for GLR = 5,000 Mscf/STB. More
Images
in A Methodology of End-of-Tubing Location Optimization for Horizontal Shale Gas Wells with and without Deliquification
> SPE Production & Operations
Published: 13 August 2020
Fig. 34 h L at three tail‐pipe‐intake locations for GLR = 1,250 Mscf/STB. More
Images
in Impacts of the Number of Perforation Clusters and Cluster Spacing on Production Performance of Horizontal Shale-Gas Wells
> SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Published: 09 February 2012
Fig. 13 Economics of Cases 1 through 4 with a gas price of USD 5/Mscf (cubic relation). More
Images
in Impacts of the Number of Perforation Clusters and Cluster Spacing on Production Performance of Horizontal Shale-Gas Wells
> SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Published: 09 February 2012
Fig. 17 Economics of Cases 1 through 4 with a gas price of USD 5/Mscf (squared relation). More
Images
in Impacts of the Number of Perforation Clusters and Cluster Spacing on Production Performance of Horizontal Shale-Gas Wells
> SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Published: 09 February 2012
Fig. 21 Economics of Cases 1 through 4 with a gas price of USD 5/Mscf (linear relation). More
Images
in Challenges, Uncertainties, and Issues Facing Gas Production From Gas-Hydrate Deposits
> SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Published: 21 February 2011
Fig. 19 Internal rate of return as a function of gas price (USD/Mscf) for onshore GH study. More
Images
in Challenges, Uncertainties, and Issues Facing Gas Production From Gas-Hydrate Deposits
> SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Published: 21 February 2011
Fig. 23 Internal rate of return as a function of gas price (USD/Mscf) for offshore GH study. More
Images
Published: 01 September 1999
Fig. 11 Stable production with nozzle-venturi valve, q g = 90 Mscf/d (Case 3). More
Images
Published: 30 September 2013
Figure 29 Evolution of productivity index (MSCF/DAY/PSI) with respect to gas. The three columns represent the three fluids 1, 2, and 3, i.e., CGR30, CGR75, and CGR150, respectively. The two rows represent the matrix permeability of 20 nD (top) and 200 nD (bottom). More
Images
Published: 10 June 2013
Fig. 9 Normalized gas-to-water production rates (Mscf/D/BWPD) after the fracturing stimulation treatments; fracturing treatments with RPM vs. conventional fracturing treatments. More
Images
Published: 04 August 2015
Figure 4.1 Cost of NAG Feed Versus ROI (Cost of AG Feed=US$0.50/Mscf;Cost of PSG=US$2.00/Mscf) More
Images
Published: 04 August 2015
Figure 4.3 Volume of Feed NAG Versus ROI (Cost of Feed NAG =US$0.50/Mscf, Cost of PSG=US$2.00/Mscf) More
Images
Published: 04 August 2015
Figure 4.4 Feed Gas Concentration (Methane)Versus ROI (Cost of Feed=US$0.00/Mscf;Cost of PSG =US$1.00/Mscf;Cost of NGL-mix/bbl) More
1
Advertisement