Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
MSA
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
NARROW
Peer Reviewed
Format
Subjects
Journal
Publisher
Conference Series
Date
Availability
1-20 of 404 Search Results for
MSA
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
1
Sort by
Images
in Overcoming Fundamental Restrictions: Novel Multistation Measurement While Drilling Survey Correction
> SPE Journal
Published: 21 September 2022
Fig. 3 Red ellipse—conventional MSA correction, green ellipse—multirun MSA correction. More
Images
in Overcoming Fundamental Restrictions: Novel Multistation Measurement While Drilling Survey Correction
> SPE Journal
Published: 21 September 2022
Fig. 9 MSA performance comparison: red ellipse—conventional MSA, blue ellipse—standard MWD toolcode, green ellipse—proposed MSA. More
Images
Published: 15 October 2013
Figure 2 The comparison of the results of the conventional MSA and the improved MSA corrections. More
Images
in Overcoming Fundamental Restrictions: Novel Multistation Measurement While Drilling Survey Correction
> SPE Journal
Published: 21 September 2022
Fig. 5 No-go zones for the conventional and multirun MSA algorithms. More
Images
in Overcoming Fundamental Restrictions: Novel Multistation Measurement While Drilling Survey Correction
> SPE Journal
Published: 21 September 2022
Fig. 10 Correlation of the MSA corrections reduces the relative wellbore positional uncertainty. More
Images
in Precise Interlateral Spacing for Optimal Stimulation and Enhanced Production in North American Shale
> SPE Drilling & Completion
Published: 17 March 2021
Fig. 6 West Texas laterals. MWD + IFR2 + MSA + Sag 2 σ ‐EOUs. More
Images
in Precise Interlateral Spacing for Optimal Stimulation and Enhanced Production in North American Shale
> SPE Drilling & Completion
Published: 17 March 2021
Fig. 7 Minimum distance scan based on the MWD + IFR2 + MSA + Sag 2 σ ‐EOUs between the reference well (blue) and the comparison well (orange) in Fig. 6 . More
Images
in Precise Interlateral Spacing for Optimal Stimulation and Enhanced Production in North American Shale
> SPE Drilling & Completion
Published: 17 March 2021
Fig. 8 MWD + IFR2 + MSA + Sag 2 σ uncertainty (blue, red, and orange ellipses). More
Images
in Precise Interlateral Spacing for Optimal Stimulation and Enhanced Production in North American Shale
> SPE Drilling & Completion
Published: 17 March 2021
Fig. 9 MWD + IFR2 + MSA + Sag 2 σ uncertainty vs. relative ranging uncertainty (green cylinders). More
Images
in Precise Interlateral Spacing for Optimal Stimulation and Enhanced Production in North American Shale
> SPE Drilling & Completion
Published: 17 March 2021
Fig. 10 MWD + IFR2 + MSA + Sag 2 σ uncertainty vs. relative ranging uncertainty at the end of the curve. More
Images
in Dynamic Error Analysis of Measurement While Drilling Using Variable Geomagnetic In-Field Referencing
> SPE Journal
Published: 17 October 2018
Fig. 4 Flow chart of remove-and-restore algorithm in VR-MSA. More
Images
in Dynamic Error Analysis of Measurement While Drilling Using Variable Geomagnetic In-Field Referencing
> SPE Journal
Published: 17 October 2018
Fig. 7 Calculated total magnetic field (green) vs. VR-MSA corrected total magnetic field (red) and the reference value of total magnetic field (black) for Case Study 1. Magf = magnetic field. More
Images
in Dynamic Error Analysis of Measurement While Drilling Using Variable Geomagnetic In-Field Referencing
> SPE Journal
Published: 17 October 2018
Fig. 8 Calculated magnetic dip angle (green) vs. VR-MSA corrected magnetic dip angle (red) and the reference value of magnetic dip angle (black) for Case Study 1. More
Images
Published: 01 August 2022
Figure 5 Colonies from an aliquot of first enrichment grown on MSA (A-I), BHA (J-R) More
Images
Published: 01 August 2022
Figure 6 Colonies from an aliquot of second enrichment grown on MSA (A-I), BHA (J-R) More
Images
Published: 26 October 2009
Figure D-1 The various steps involved in the application of the MSA-requirements. More
Images
Published: 12 June 2006
Fig. 3 Cumulative oil produced by few wells from Sarmatian Margineni (MSA) and from Meotian Margineni (MME) during first production period and after field revitalization. More
Images
Published: 08 March 2021
Figure 14 Combined impact of sag, IFR and MSA corrections over the Well #2 More
Images
Published: 11 November 2019
Figure 8 MSA-Ellipses of Uncertainty More
Images
Published: 17 March 2015
Comparison of MSA Post-Fit Position Uncertainty on ISCWSA Test Well #2 with Standard Error Model ( Table 2 ) and Reduced Uncertainty Error Model ( Table 4 ). (a) 1σ Horizontal Position Uncertainty vs. Measured Depth. (b) Final 1σ Position Uncertainty in High-Side Frame. More
1
Advertisement