Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
MMscf
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
- Paper Number
NARROW
Peer Reviewed
Format
Subjects
Journal
Publisher
Conference Series
Date
Availability
1-20 of 6535 Search Results for
MMscf
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
1
Sort by
Proceedings Papers
Publisher: Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)
Paper presented at the SPE International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, February 26–28, 2014
Paper Number: SPE-168118-MS
... the fields with the smallest well count possible. The results from this study could prove useful to production and completion teams supporting large gas field developments. This paper presents a study to determine the feasibility of a subsea sand control gas well producing at rates up to 500 MMscf/D...
Images
Published: 31 October 2022
Figure 17 Gas production reduction from 45 MMscf/D to 10 MMscf/D following workover of 12 OH horizontal wells with cemented liners More
Images
Published: 25 October 2020
Figure 8 Results of Example 1,G 1 = 1,000 MMscf and 2,000 MMscf More
Images
Published: 25 October 2020
Figure 9 Results of Example 1, q i2 = 0.4 MMscf/d and 0.8 MMscf/d More
Images
Published: 23 March 1998
Fig. 3 Comparison of actual production of 183 MMscf, production of 206 MMscf predicted by ANN, and potential production of 396 MMscf predicted by ANN for four new, infield wells. More
Images
Published: 05 October 2003
Fig. 23 Restart to 600 MMscf/D From 150 MMscf/D Before Shutdown - 2-20/24 in. lines More
Images
Published: 05 October 2003
Fig. 24 Restart to 600 MMscf/D From 300 MMscf/D Before Shutdown - 2-20/24 in. lines More
Images
Published: 05 October 2003
Fig. 25 Restart to 600 MMscf/D From 450 MMscf/D Before Shutdown - 2-20/24 in. lines More
Images
Published: 05 October 2003
Fig. 26 Restart to 600 MMscf/D From 400 MMscf/D Before Shutdown - 2-20/36 in. lines More
Images
Published: 05 October 2003
Fig. 27 Restart to 600 MMscf/D From 600 MMscf/D Before Shutdown - 2-20/36 in. lines More
Images
Published: 15 April 2007
FIGURE 4 CASE A, PIGGING AT 90 MMscf/D AND 450 MMscf/D FROM EXISTING FLOWLINE More
Images
Published: 15 April 2007
FIGURE 5 CASE B, PIGGING AT 180 MMscf/D AND 450 MMscf/D FROM EXISTING FLOWLINE More
Images
Published: 15 April 2007
FIGURE 6 CASE C, PIGGING AT 540 MMscf/D AND 450 MMscf/D FROM EXISTING FLOWLINE More
Images
Published: 15 April 2007
FIGURE 7 CASE D, START UP FROM 0 TO 720 MMscf/D IN 8 HOURS AND 450 MMscf/D FROM EXISTING FLOWLINE - WITHOUT LEVEL CONTROLLER More
Images
Published: 15 April 2007
FIGURE 8 CASE D, START UP FROM 0 TO 720 MMscf/D IN 8 HOURS AND 450 MMscf/D FROM EXISTING FLOWLINE - PI LEVEL CONTROLLER More
Images
Published: 15 April 2007
FIGURE 9 CASE D, START UP FROM 0 TO 720 MMscf/D IN 8 HOURS AND 450 MMscf/D FROM EXISTING FLOWLINE - PI LEVEL CONTROLLER - MAXIMUM LIQUID DRAIN FLOWRATE SLOPE=4000 (bbl/D)/hr More
Images
Published: 15 April 2007
FIGURE 10 CASE D, START UP FROM 0 TO 720 MMscf/D IN 8 HOURS AND 450 MMscf/D FROM EXISTING FLOWLINE - PI LEVEL CONTROLLER - MAXIMUM LIQUID DRAIN FLOWRATE SLOPE = 4000 (bbl/D)/hr - MAXIMUM LIQUID DRAIN FLOWRATE = 62000 More
Images
Published: 11 June 2018
Figure 10 Production Rate [MMscf/day] and Cumulative Recoverable Gas [MMscf] for (a) Haynesville (b) Marcellus (c) Barnett for the Well Life (5043 days) More
Images
Published: 11 June 2018
Figure 13 Production Rate [MMscf/day] and Cumulative Recoverable Gas [MMscf] for Haynesville (SVR2) changing (a) Matrix Permeability (b) Fracture Half - Length (c) Fracture Density More
Images
Published: 11 June 2018
Figure 16 Production Rate [MMscf/day] and Cumulative Recoverable Gas [MMscf] for Marcellus (SVR2) changing (a) Matrix Permeability (b) Fracture Half - Length (c) Fracture Density More
1
Advertisement