Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
MDT
Update search
NARROW
Peer Reviewed
Format
Subjects
Journal
Publisher
Conference Series
Date
Availability
1-20 of 2478 Search Results for
MDT
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
1
Proceedings Papers
Publisher: American Rock Mechanics Association
Paper presented at the 55th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, June 18–25, 2021
Paper Number: ARMA-2021-2038
..., and velocity check-shots were used in the seismic inversion process to generate acoustic impedance. The acoustic impedance model is then converted into the velocity model from which effective stress can be calculated using the new correlation developed in this study based on Bowers equation and MDT data...
Journal Articles
Publisher: Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)
SPE Res Eval & Eng 5 (02): 116–125.
Paper Number: SPE-77298-PA
Published: 01 April 2002
...F.M. Verga; G. Giglio; F. Masserano; L. Ruvo Summary A new approach was attempted to validate the reconstructed internal geometry of a fractured reservoir by reproducing the reservoir dynamic behavior monitored during modular dynamic tests (MDTs). The description of the reservoir fracture network...
Proceedings Papers
Publisher: Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)
Paper presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, April 20–22, 1999
Paper Number: SPE-54273-MS
... has been developed using the MDT* with a dual packer module. Within Indonesia, this technique has been applied successfully to a fractured carbonate reservoir, a thinly-bedded reservoir and a formation with very low permeability. This wireline conveyed straddle packer has the capability...
Journal Articles
Publisher: Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)
SPE Res Eval & Eng 1 (06): 509–518.
Paper Number: SPE-53002-PA
Published: 01 December 1998
... tester [modular formation dynamics tester (MDT)] consists of a number of modules and is described in detail by Zimmerman et al. 2 It allows an unlimited number of formation pressure measurements, formation testing, and multiple formation fluid sampling. We present an application of the MDT packer...
Proceedings Papers
Publisher: Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)
Paper presented at the SPE India Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, February 17–19, 1998
Paper Number: SPE-39523-MS
... interval test interval pressure transient testing reservoir module wellbore packer pressure transient testing pressure transient analysis artificial intelligence fracture mdt packer-probe module upstream oil & gas interval pressure flow regime derivative horizontal well probe spe 39523...
Proceedings Papers
Publisher: Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)
Paper presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference, March 20–22, 1995
Paper Number: SPE-29270-MS
..., Richardson, TX 75083-3836, U.S.A. Telex, 163245 SPEUT. Abstract This paper discusses exploration cost reduction and improved resource delineation benefits that were realized by use of the MDT* (Modular Formation Dynamic Tester) tool to evaluate exploration prospects in the Malay Basin of the South China...
Images
in Integration of NMR, Wireline Tester, Core and Open Hole Log Data for Dynamic Reservoir Properties
Published: 20 February 1999
Figure 6 Ksdr permeability versus core permeability and MDT mobility and MDT mobility, where premultiplier C is modulated by T2 distribution width More
Images
Published: 13 November 2017
Figure 14 MDT was run in five wells. MDT approach was not applicable to determine the FWL as all recorded pressure data showed oil gradients. More
Images
Published: 21 September 2008
Fig. 9 —Joint match of SGS and MDT pressures results in artificial MDT pressure match. More
Images
in Waterflood Performance Analyses for the Bhagyam Viscous Oil Reservoir
> SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Published: 17 February 2020
Fig. 9 Core permeabilities vs. all MDT data (left) split into oil‐leg and water‐leg MDTs (right). More
Images
in Integrated Permeability Analysis in Tight and Brecciated Carbonate Reservoir
> SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Published: 29 November 2012
Fig. 4 Permeability from the wireline formation tester tool (MDT) vs. porosity from neutron-density crossplot in Zones 2 and 3. Fifteen reliable pressure points are presented. More
Images
in Challenges, Uncertainties, and Issues Facing Gas Production From Gas-Hydrate Deposits
> SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Published: 21 February 2011
Fig. 8 Mount Elbert MDT measured pressures and simulation results. Only Case 10 with slow formation reaction exhibits the inflection point seen in the measurements ( Pooladi-Darvish and Hong 2010 ). More
Images
in Estimation of Near-Wellbore Alteration and Formation Stress Parameters From Borehole Sonic Data
> SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Published: 19 June 2008
Fig. 2 Schematic diagram of the MDT with dual packers for the microhydraulic fracturing of rock for the determination of fracture opening and propagation pressures. More
Images
in Practical Flow-Simulation Method for a Naturally Fractured Reservoir: A Field Study
> SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Published: 19 April 2006
Fig. 18 Pressure comparison between simulation and MDT data at one of the newly drilled wells. More
Images
in An Innovative Approach To Integrate Fracture, Well-Test, and Production Data Into Reservoir Models
> SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Published: 14 August 2005
Fig. 25 Pressure comparison between simulation and MDT data at one of the newly drilled wells. More
Images
in Validation of Near-Wellbore Fracture-Network Models With MDT
> SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Published: 01 April 2002
Fig. 15 Pressure-derivative response and interpretation model for MDT 1 run on Well A. More
Images
in Validation of Near-Wellbore Fracture-Network Models With MDT
> SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Published: 01 April 2002
Fig. 16 Pressure-derivative response and interpretation model for MDT 4 run on Well A. More
Images
in Validation of Near-Wellbore Fracture-Network Models With MDT
> SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Published: 01 April 2002
Fig. 17 Pressure-derivative response and interpretation model for MDT 5 run on Well A. More
Images
in Validation of Near-Wellbore Fracture-Network Models With MDT
> SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Published: 01 April 2002
Fig. 18 Pressure-derivative response and interpretation model for MDT 3 run on Well A. More
Images
in Integrating Pressure Data From Formation Tester Tools and DSTs To Characterize Deepwater Fields, East Kalimantan, Indonesia
> SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
Published: 01 October 2001
Fig. 8 Pressure vs. depth from MDT. More
1
