Video: Overview of Joint Industry Project on Measurement Based Wellhead Fatigue
- Bulent Mercan (2H Offshore Inc) | Yenny Chandra (2H Offshore Inc) | Ferdinand Djayaputra (2H Offshore Inc) | Mike Campbell (2H Offshore Inc) | Buba Kebadze (BP) | Michael Ge (BP) | Mike Tognarelli (BP) | Wangming Lu (Chevron) | Adrian Adams (CNOOC International) | Sergey Kuzmichev (Equinor) | Joe Jin (ExxonMobil) | Brad Campbell (ExxonMobil) | P. David Pattillo II (Occidental) | Francisco Roveri (Petrobras) | Rafael Pestana (Petrobras) | Jinbo Chen (Shell Global Solutions, US Inc.) | Heping Zhang (Shell International Exploration and Production Inc.) | Michael Zhang (Shell International Exploration and Production Inc.) | Darryl Fett (Total) | Richard Sanders (Total)
- Document ID
- Offshore Technology Conference
- Publication Date
- Document Type
- 2020. Copyright is retained by the author. This document is distributed by OTC with the permission of the author. Contact the author for permission to use material from this document.
- 1.1 Well Planning, 4.2.4 Risers, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 1.10 Drilling Equipment, 4 Facilities Design, Construction and Operation, 2.1.3 Completion Equipment, 1.1 Well Planning, 1.10 Drilling Equipment, 4.2 Pipelines, Flowlines and Risers
- VIV Fatigue, Wellhead, Wave Fatigue, Drilling Riser, Monitoring
- 0 in the last 30 days
- 1 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|OTC Member Price:||USD 7.00|
|OTC Non-Member Price:||USD 12.00|
The objective of the wellhead fatigue joint industry project (JIP) is to provide a measurement-based foundation for drilling riser and wellhead modeling practice in the oil and gas industry and hence to ensure that the fatigue response assessment is performed with adequate but not overly conservative analysis parameters. To this end, the JIP utilizes field measurements from ten (10) drilling campaigns in GoM and North Sea. In order to maintain drilling campaign diversity, the field measurements are selected for a range of environments, water depths (110 to 1,900 m), soil characteristics, riser and wellhead configurations, and vessel types.
The study commences with field data QA and filtration. Measurements are classified into wave-dominated events, VIV events and combined wave and VIV events. The finite element models of the as-built riser and wellhead systems are generated using industry standard analysis parameters, and simulations are conducted using measured motions near the top of the riser. The resulting numerical responses for the wellhead are compared with the measured motions to determine the level of conservatism (or otherwise) in the wave fatigue analysis. Additionally, SHEAR7 models driven by measured current profiles are used to compare predicted VIV fatigue response to that based on field measurements.
Analysis results indicate that industry standard approach for wave and VIV fatigue assessment is indeed conservative. However, it should be noted that wellhead fatigue predictions through numerical simulations are affected by various analysis parameters, and it is impossible to determine the correct values for each of these parameters by using field measurements alone.
In literature, several previous studies compared measured and predicted wellhead response. However, they often focus on a single drilling campaign, which makes it difficult to apply their findings to another drilling campaign. This JIP is the first in the industry to provide a combined assessment of full-scale field data from multiple drilling campaigns. Using consistent analysis techniques for all datasets offers valuable insight into riser and wellhead response characterization and safe drilling operations.