Prediction of Temperature Propagation Along a Horizontal Well During Injection Period
- Guohua Gao (Chevron Corp.) | Younes Jalali (Schlumberger)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- February 2008
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 131 - 140
- 2008. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.4.6 Thermal Methods, 5.1.5 Geologic Modeling, 5.6.11 Reservoir monitoring with permanent sensors, 4.2 Pipelines, Flowlines and Risers, 2.2.2 Perforating, 6.5.2 Water use, produced water discharge and disposal, 5.1 Reservoir Characterisation, 1.2.3 Rock properties, 5.5.8 History Matching, 5.8.7 Carbonate Reservoir, 5.7.2 Recovery Factors, 3.3.1 Production Logging, 5.6.5 Tracers, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 4.3.4 Scale, 2.4.3 Sand/Solids Control, 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 3.3 Well & Reservoir Surveillance and Monitoring, 2.3 Completion Monitoring Systems/Intelligent Wells, 5.4.1 Waterflooding
- 0 in the last 30 days
- 1,046 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
This paper presents a mathematical model describing the variation of temperature along the length of a horizontal well during the process of water injection. The model is obtained from a theoretical treatment accounting for both mass transfer and heat transfer between a horizontal well and a reservoir. The treatment is 1D linear in the wellbore and 1D radial in the reservoir. A numerical algorithm for reservoir temperature calculation is proposed and an analytical solution is derived on the basis of some realistic assumptions. The analytical solution can be used to generate the temperature profile in a horizontal injection well for any assumed distribution of injection profile along the length of the well, including injection profile that is uniform, skewed toward the heel or the toe, or exhibits some discontinuity (e.g., leakoff into a high permeability streak or fracture). This paper also presents comparison of temperature profiles obtained with the analytical solution given in this paper and those obtained with a numerical reservoir simulator with temperature option (ECLIPSE), which shows that the analytical solution yields reasonable temperature propagation profiles along the wellbore. The effects of injection rate and the injection profile are analyzed, and a quick in-situ injection pattern-recognition method is proposed. Finally, examples are given to show the practical application of the theoretical model.
Use of horizontal wells for injection purposes is now commonplace. This is because maturing fields produce increasing amounts of water, and horizontal wells enable disposal of large volumes of fluid. Therefore, disposal objectives can be met with a fewer number of wells. This is important in offshore operations, in which well numbers are limited because of slot constraints on the platform.
In terms of pressure maintenance, horizontal wells are also attractive. In saturated reservoirs, in which voidage replacement is fundamental to achieve a good recovery factor, horizontal wells help achieve injection volumes commensurate with production volumes in the field. Therefore, they are instrumental in reservoir management. Finally in terms of recovery, horizontal wells are effective in achieving a good volumetric sweep, particularly in thick reservoirs in which gravitational forces and stratification tend to undermine sweep.
Measurement of injection profile in horizontal wells is also a common requirement for assessing the efficiency of drilling or completion process, cleanup or stimulation process, and injection or recovery process.
Injection profile in horizontal wells can be estimated with "production logging?? technology, but this may require coiled tubing to access the full length of the well. Even with coiled tubing, there are practical limits of how far the well can be logged (e.g., currently of the order of 1 to 2 km). "Interventionless?? means of determining the injection profile in horizontal wells are therefore of interest to operators. A feasible interventionless approach in horizontal wells is efficient completion designs for deployment of the fiber optic line. There are published cases in the literature with fiber optic-distributed temperature sensors deployed in horizontal wells. These are deployed either through an extended tail pipe (i.e., "stinger?? completion) (Al-Asimi et al. 2002/2003), or through a groove in the sand screen.
The technology for measurement of distributed temperature on a periodic or continuous basis is a well-established technology and has been widely applied to reservoir and production monitoring (Brown et al. 2000, 2003, 2006; Laurence and Brown 2000; Ouyang and Belanger 2006; Nath et al. 2007; Lee 2006; Johnson et al. 2006).
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||10|
Al-Asimi, M. et al. 2002. Advances in Well and Reservoir Surveillance.Oilfield Review 14 (4): 14-35.
Alves, I.N., Alhanati, F.J.S., and Shoham, O. 1992. A Unified Model for PredictingFlowing Temperature Distribution in Wellbores and Pipelines. SPEPE7 (4): 363-367. SPE-20632-PA. DOI: 10.2118/20632-PA.
Barton, C.A., Moos, D., Peska, P., and Zoback, M.D. 1997. Utilizing WellboreImage Data To Determine the Complete Stress Tensor: Application to PermeabilityAnisotropy and Wellbore Stability. The Log Analyst 38 (6):21-33.
Brown, G.A. 2006. MonitoringMultilayered Reservoir Pressure and Gas/Oil Ration Changes Over Time UsingPermanently Installed Distributed Temperature Measurements. Paper SPE101886 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SanAntonio, Texas, 24-27 September. DOI: 10.2118/101886-MS.
Brown, G.A., Kennedy, B., and Meling, T. 2000. Using Fibre-Optic DistributedTemperature Measurements to Provide Real-Time Reservoir Surveillance Data onWytch Farm Field Horizontal Extended-Reach Wells. Paper SPE 62952 presentedat the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, 1- 4 October.DOI: 10.2118/62952-MS.
Brown, G.A, Storer, D., McAllister, K., al-Asimi, M., and Raghavan, K. 2003.Monitoring Horizontal Producersand Injectors During Cleanup and Production Using Fiber-Optic-DistributedTemperature Measurements. Paper SPE 84379 presented at the SPE AnnualTechnical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, 5-8 October. DOI:10.2118/84379-MS.
Bui, T.D. and Jalali, Y. 2004. Diagnosis of Horizontal Injectorswith Distributed Temperature Sensors. Paper SPE 89924 presented at the SPEAnnual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 26-29 September. DOI:10.2118/89924-MS.
Elsaid, M.E. et al. 2007. Detecting and Analysing Fractures inthe Subsurface: The Critical Steps in Modeling Fractured CarbonateReservoir. Paper SPE 105707 presented at the SPE Middle East Oil and GasShow and Conference, Bahrain, 11-14 March. DOI: 10.2118/105707-MS.
Evensen, G. 2007. Data Assimilation—the Ensemble Kalman Filter. NewYork City: Springer.
Gang, T. and Kelkar, M. 2006. History Matching for Determinationof Fracture Permeability and Capillary Pressure. Paper SPE 101052 presentedat the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas,24-27 September. DOI: 10.2118/10152-MS.
Gao, G. 2005. Data Integration and Uncertainty Evaluation for Large ScaleAutomatic History Matching. PhD dissertation, Tulsa: University of Tulsa.
Gao, G. and Reynolds, A.C. 2006. An Improved Implementation of theLBFGS Algorithm for Automatic History Matching. SPEJ 11 (1):5-17. SPE-90058-PA. DOI: 10.2118/90058-PA.
Gao, G., Zafari, M., and Reynolds, A.C. 2006. Quantifying Uncertainty for thePUNQ-S3 Problem in a Bayesian Setting With RML and EnKF. SPEJ11 (4): 506-515. SPE-93324-PA. DOI: 10.2118/93324-PA.
Gu, Y. and Oliver, D.S. 2006. The Ensemble Kalman Filter forContinuous Updating of Reservoir Simulation Models. Journal of EnergyResources Technology 128 (1): 79-87. DOI: 10.1115/1.2134735.
Izgec, B., Kabir, C.S., Zhu, D., and Hasan, A.R. 2007. Transient Fluid and Heat FlowModeling in Coupled Wellbore/Reservoir Systems. SPEREE 10(3): 294-301. SPE-102070-PA. DOI: 10.2118/102070-PA.
Johnson, D., Sierra, J., Gualitieri, D., and Kaura, J. 2006. DTS Transient Analysis: A New Toolto Assess Well-Flow Dynamics. Paper SPE 103093 presented at the SPE AnnualTechnical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, 24-27 September. DOI:10.2118/103093-MS.
Kocabas, I. 2006. An AnalyticalModel of Temperature and Stress Fields During Cold-Water Injection Into an OilReservoir. SPEPO 21 (2): 282-292. SPE-88762. DOI:10.2118/88762-PA.
Laurence, O.S. and Brown, G.A. 2000. Using Real-Time Fiber OpticDistributed Temperature Data for Optimising Reservoir Performance. PaperSPE 65478 presented at the SPE/Petroleum Society of CIM InternationalConference on Horizontal Well Technology, Calgary, 6-8 November. DOI:10.2118/65478-MS.
Lee, J.H. 2006. AssistedInterpretation of Fiber-Optic Data for Smart-Well Completions. Paper SPE101675 presented at the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition andConference, Abu Dhabi, U.A.E., 5-8 November. DOI: 10.2118/101675-MS.
Li, R. 2001. Conditioning Geostatistical Models to Three-DimensionalThree-Phase Flow Production Data by Automatic History Matching. PhDdissertation, Tulsa: University of Tulsa.
Li, R., Reynolds, A.C., and Oliver D.S. 2001. History Matching of Three-Phase FlowProduction Data. Paper SPE 66351 presented at the SPE Reservoir SimulationSymposium, Houston, 11-14 February. DOI: 10.2118/66351-MS.
Mendes, R.B. et al. 2005. Analytical Solution for TransientTemperature Field Around a Cased and Cemented Wellbore. Paper SPE 94870presented at the SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum EngineeringConference, Rio de Janeiro, 20-23 June. DOI: 10.2118/94870-MS.
Nasrabadi, H., Ghorayeb, K., and Firoozabadi, A. 2006. Two-Phase Multicomponent Diffusionand Convection for Reservoir Initialization. SPERE 9 (4):530-542. SPE-66365-PA. DOI: 10.2118/66365-PA.
Nath, D.K., Sugianto, R., and Finley, D. 2007. Fiber-OpticDistributed-Temperature-Sensing Technology Used for Reservoir Monitoring in anIndonesia Steamflood. SPEDE 22 (2): 149-156. SPE-97912-PA.DOI: 10.2118/97912-PA.
Nowak, T.J. 1953. The Estimation of Water Injection Profiles FromTemperature Surveys. Trans., AIME 198: 203-212.
Oliver, D.S. 1996. OnConditional Simulation to Inaccurate Data. Math. Geology 28(6): 811-817. DOI: 10.1007/BF02066348.
Ouyang, L.-B. and Belanger, D. 2006. Flow Profiling by DistributedTemperature Sensor (DTS) System—Expectation and Reality. SPEPO21 (2): 269-281. SPE-90541-PA. DOI: 10.2118/90541-PA.
Ozkaya, S.I. and Richard, P.D. 2006. Fractured Reservoir CharacterizationUsing Dynamic Data in a Carnonate Field, Oman. SPERE 9 (3):227-238. SPE-93312-PA. DOI: 10.2118/93312-PA.
Ozkaya, S.I. et al. 2007. Devising Knowledge-Based DecisionTree for Detection of Fracture Corridors From Dynamic Data in a CarbonateReservoir in Oman. Paper SPE 105015 presented at the SPE Middle East Oiland Gas Show and Conference, Bahrain, 11-14 March. DOI: 10.2118/105015-MS.
Platenkamp, R.J. 1985. Temperature Distribution Around WaterInjectors: Effects on Injection Performance. Paper SPE 13746 presented atthe SPE Middle East Technical Conference and Exhibition, Bahrain, 11-14 March.DOI: 10.2118/13746-MS.
Ramey, H.J. Jr. 1962. WellboreHeat Transmission. JPT 14 (4): 427-435; Trans., AIME,225. SPE-96-PA. DOI: 10.2118/96-PA.
Reynolds, A.C. et al. 2004. Simultaneous Estimation of Absolute and RelativePermeability by Automatic History Matching of Three-Phase Flow Production Data.J. Canadian Pet. Tech. 43 (3): 37-46.
Romero, A., Zhu, D., and Hill A.D. 2005. Temperature Behavior in MultilateralWells: Application to Intelligent Wells. Paper SPE 94982 presented at theSPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Rio deJaneiro, 20-23 June. DOI: 10.2118/94982-MS.
Roux, B. et al. 1980. AnImproved Approach to Estimating True Reservoir Temperature From TransientTemperature Data. Paper SPE 8888 presented at the SPE Annual CaliforniaRegional Meeting, Los Angeles, 9-11 April. DOI: 10.2118/8888-MS.
Sumnu-Dindoruk, D. and Dindoruk, B. 2006. Analytical and Numerical Solution ofNonisothermal Buckley-Leverett Flow Including Tracers. Paper SPE 102266presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio,Texas, 24-27 September. DOI: 10.2118/102266-MS.
Tarantola, A. 2004. Inverse Problem Theory and Methods for ModelParameter Estimation. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: SIAM Press.
Tarantola, A. and Valette, B. 1982. Inverse Problem = Quest for Information.Journal of Geophysics 50: 159-170.
Wang, D.Y. et al. 2006. Fracture Analysis for CarbonateReservoirs Using 3D Seismic P-Wave Data: Middle East Case Study. Paper SPE101596 presented at the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition andConference, Abu Dhabi, U.A.E., 5-8 November. DOI: 10.2118/101596-MS.
Wen, X.-H. and Chen, W.H. 2006. Real-Time Reservoir Model UpdatingUsing Ensemble Kalman Filter With Confirming Option. SPEJ 11(4): 431-442. SPE-92991-PA. DOI: 10.2118/92991-PA.
Yoshioka, K., Zhu, D., Hill, A.D., and Lake, L.W. 2005a. Interpretation of Temperature andPressure Profiles Measured in Multilateral Wells Equipped With IntelligentCompletions. Paper SPE 94097 presented at the SPE Europec/EAGE AnnualConference, Madrid, Spain, 13-16 June. DOI: 10.2118/94097-MS.
Yoshioka, K., Zhu, D., Hill, A.D., Dawkrajai, P., and Lake, L.W. 2005b. A Comprehensive Model of TemperatureBehavior in a Horizontal Well. Paper SPE 95656 presented at the SPE AnnualTechnical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, 9-12 October. DOI:10.2118/95656-MS.
Zafari, M. and Reynolds, A.C. 2007. Assessing the Uncertainty inReservoir Description and Performance Predictions With the Ensemble KalmanFilter. SPEJ 12 (3): 382-391. SPE-95750-PA. DOI:10.2118/95750-PA.
Zhang, F. 2002. Automatic History Matching of Production Data for LargeScale Problems. PhD dissertation, Tulsa: University of Tulsa.