The Key to Predicting Emulsion Stability: Solid Content
- Michael K. Poindexter (Nalco Energy Services) | Shaokun Chuai (Sloan-Kettering Memorial Cancer Center) | Robert A. Marble (Nalco Energy Services) | Samuel Marsh (Nalco Co.)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Production & Operations
- Publication Date
- August 2006
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 357 - 364
- 2006. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 1.8 Formation Damage, 5.1 Reservoir Characterisation, 2.4.3 Sand/Solids Control, 5.8.5 Oil Sand, Oil Shale, Bitumen, 4.1.5 Processing Equipment, 5.3.2 Multiphase Flow, 4.3.3 Aspaltenes, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 4.3 Flow Assurance, 4.3.1 Hydrates, 4.1.3 Dehydration
- 0 in the last 30 days
- 1,029 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Chemical demulsifiers are routinely added in the oil field to effectively resolve water-in-crude-oil emulsions. As used in the common bottle test, demulsifiers, in effect, probe or interrogate emulsion stability strength. Emulsion stability, in turn, is defined by no fewer than three parameters: water drop, oil dryness, and interface quality. All three parameters are direct outputs of the bottle test, and, collectively, all three provide a more complete picture of emulsion stability, as opposed to the use of any singular parameter.
By selecting a wide variety of demulsifiers and by performing a standardized bottle test, emulsion stability from a variety of sites can be quantified and compared. By coupling bottle test results with corresponding crude oil analytical data, fundamental questions concerning factors governing emulsion stability can be quantified. The results show that solid content, not asphaltene content or any other crude oil parameter investigated, is by far the best single predictor for gauging emulsion stability. Furthermore, statistical analysis through partition trees shows that emulsion stability is most aptly described using several crude oil parameters, as opposed to one single factor.
Crude oil characterization remains a challenging proposition. Many crude oil characterizations are based on a separation scheme [e.g., distillation (Speight 1998), chromatography (ASTM D4124 2003; McLean and Kirkpatrick 1997c), and precipitation (Akbarzadeh et al. 2004)], a bulk property of the fluid [e.g., viscosity, American Petroleum Inst. (API) gravity, and surface tension), or a combination of properties. The intent of most characterizations is to relate some property or group of properties back to the fluid's behavior in production or refining. Establishing a valid cause-and-effect relationship can lead to greater confidence when assessing the economic and technical risks associated with new projects or modifications to existing systems.
As related by Hopf (2000), crude oil characterization played a strong role in the development of organic chemistry. For example, the cage hydrocarbon adamantine—a classic in skeletal construct—was first isolated in minute amounts (0.0004%) from petroleum in 1933, 8 years before a synthetic confirmation. The characterization of crude oil has thus developed, both one molecule at a time and by groups of molecules. Fractionation into saturates, aromatics, resins, and asphaltenes (SARA) remains the most common method for classifying crude oils by groups. A variety of techniques exist for classifying crude oils by SARA analysis. Two recent advances in SARA characterization center on the use of high-performance liquid chromatography (Fan et al. 2002) and infrared and near-infrared spectroscopy (Aske et al. 2001). The most studied petroleum group is the asphaltene fraction, which is an ensemble of molecules defined by both solubility and insolubility properties (Pfeiffer and Saal 1940) and certain general features regarding structure and atomic composition (Koots and Speight 1975). Recently, a process for quantifying the overwhelming molecular complexity of crude oil has been illustrated by high-resolution mass spectroscopy (Marshall and Rodgers 2004). Such quantifications are providing a fingerprint with which to compare and contrast crude oils. This technique is quite an advancement that holds unprecedented potential. While certain atomic arrangement information is still not possible with mass spectroscopy, the ability to rapidly amass and store crude oil information for any molecular parameter holds great promise.
Additionally, Buckley (1999) pointed out that the characterization of crude oil and asphaltenes in particular is on the basis of not just the output of laboratory methods, but also by process conditions that influence the solubility parameter and ultimate fate of the asphaltenes (Wang et al. 2004). Such an operational definition clarifies the need to couple crude oil properties (i.e., characterizations) with crude oil behavior in the field. The industrial practice of establishing and managing such critical relationships ultimately falls under the realm of flow assurance. Flow assurance can be divided into the deposition of solids (e.g., hydrates, waxes, asphaltenes, and scales) and disturbed fluid behavior (e.g., foaming and emulsification) (Fu 2000). The latter of these areas is the focus of this study.
|File Size||629 KB||Number of Pages||8|
Akbarzadeh, K., Dhillon, A., Svrcek, W.Y., and Yarranton, H.W. 2004.Methodology for theCharacterization and Modeling of Asphaltene Precipitation from Heavy OilsDiluted with n-Alkanes. Energy Fuels 18 (5):1,434-1,441.
Alfassi, Z.B., Boger, Z., and Ronen, Y. 2005. StatisticalTreatment of Analytical Data. Oxford, England: BlackwellScience.
Aske, N., Kallevik, H., and Sjöblom, J. 2001. Determination of Saturate, Aromatic,Resin, and Asphaltenic (SARA) Components in Crude Oils by Means of Infrared andNear-Infrared Spectroscopy. Energy Fuels 15 (5):1,304-1,312.
Aske, N., Orr, R., and Sjöblom, J. 2002. Dilatational Elasticity Moduliof Water-Crude Oil Interfaces Using the Oscillating Pendant Drop. J.Disp. Sci. Tech. 23 (6): 809-825.
ASTM D4124. 2003. Standard Test Methods for Separation of Asphalt into FourFractions. New York City: Michael Dekkar.
ASTM D4807 1988. Standard Test Method for Sediment in Crude Oil by MembraneFiltration. New York City: Michael Dekkar.
ASTM D664 1988. Standard Test Method for Acid Number of Petroleum Productsby Potentiometric Titration. New York City: Michael Dekkar.
Aveyard, R. and Clint, J.H. 2003. Solid Particles at Liquid Interfaces,Including Their Effects on Emulsion and Foam Stability. In Adsorption andAggregation of Surfactants in Solution, Surfactant Science Series.61-90. New York City: Marcel Dekker.
Barwise, A.J.G. 1990. Roleof Nickel and Vanadium in Petroleum Classification. Energy Fuels4 (6):647-652.
Bowman, R.W., Burton, W.D., and Pryor, J.A. 1977. Statistically Designed Oil DehydrationTests. Paper SPE 6529 presented at the SPE California Regional Meeting,Bakersfield, California, 13-15 April.
Breiman, L., Friedman, J.H., Olshen, R.A., and Stone, C.J. 1998. Classification and Regression Trees. Boca Raton, Florida: Chapmanand Hall/CRC.
Buckley, J.S. 1999. Predicting the Onset of AsphaltenePrecipitation from Refractive Index Measurements. Energy Fuels13 (2): 328-332.
Esbensen, K.H. 2002. Multivariate Data Analysis—InPractice, 5th edition, p. 128. Oslo, Norway: CAMO ProcessAS.
Fan, T., Wang, J., and Buckley, J.S. 2002. Evaluating Crude Oils by SARAAnalysis. Paper SPE 75228 presented at the SPE/DOE Improved Oil RecoverySymposium, Tulsa, 13-17 April.
Fu, B. 2000. Flow Assurance—A Technological Review of Managing FluidBehavior and Solid Deposition to Ensure Optimum Flow. Paper presented at theIIR Ltd. Deeptec 7th Annual Intl. Forum on Deepwater Technologies, Aberdeen,26-28 January.
Gafonova, O.V. and Yarranton, H.W. 2001. The Stabilization ofWater-in-Hydrocarbon Emulsions by Asphaltenes and Resins. J. ColloidInterface Sci. 241 (2): 469-478.
Gramme, P.E. 1999. The Behavior of Crude Oil Fluids in Oil and GasProduction and Processing with Focus on Multiphase Separation and Flow. Paperpresented at the AIChE 2nd Intl. Symposium on the Chemistry and Physics ofPetroleum Oil/Water Emulsions, Houston, 18 March.
Hopf, H. 2000. Adamantane and Other Cage Hydrocarbons. In Classicsin Hydrocarbon Chemistry. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH, WileyPublishing.
Hyne, N.J. 1991. Dictionary ofPetroleum Exploration, Drilling, and Production. Tulsa: PennwellPubishing.
Jones, T.J., Neustadter, E.L., and Whittingham, K.P. 1978. Water-in-CrudeOil Emulsion Stability and Emulsion Destabilization by Chemical Demulsifiers.J. Cdn. Pet. Tech. 17: 100-108.
Kim, Y.H. and Wasan, D.T. 1996. Effect of Demulsifier Partitioningon the Destabilization of Water-in-Oil Emulsions. Ind. Eng. Chem.Res. 35 (4): 1,141-1,149.
Kokal, S. 2005. Crude OilEmulsions: A State-of-the-Art Review. SPEPF 20 (1): 5-13.SPE-77497-PA.
Koots, J.A. and Speight, J.G. 1975. Relation of PetroleumResins to Asphaltenes. Fuel 54 (3): 179-184.
Kotlyar, L.S., Sparks, B.D., Woods, J.R., and Chung, K.H. 1999. Solids Associated with theAsphaltene Fraction of Oil Sands Bitumen. Energy Fuels 13(2): 346-350.
Leopold, G. 1992. Breaking Produced-Fluid and Process-Stream Emulsions. InEmulsions—Fundamentals and Applications in the PetroleumIndustry. ed. L.L. Schramm 341-383. Washington, DC: AmericanChemical Soc.
Manning, F.S. and Thompson, R.E. 1995. Dehydration of Crude Oil. InOilfield Processing Volume 2: Crude Oil. 113-143. Tulsa: PennWellPublishing.
Marshall, A.G. and Rodgers, R.P. 2004. Petroleomics: The Next GrandChallenge for Chemical Analysis. Acc. Chem. Res. 37 (1):53-59.
McLean, J.D. and Kilpatrick, P.K. 1997a. Effects of Asphaltene Solvencyon Stability of Water-in-Crude Oil Emulsions. J. Colloid InterfaceSci. 189 (2): 242-253.
McLean, J.D. and Kilpatrick, P.K. 1997b. Effects of AsphalteneAggregation in Model Heptane-Toluene Mixtures on Stability of Water-in-OilEmulsions. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 196 (1): 23-34.
McLean, J.D. and Kilpatrick, P.K. 1997c. Comparison of Precipitation andExtrography in the Fractionation of Crude Oil Residual. Energy Fuels11 (3): 570-585.
Menon, V.B. and Wasan, D.T. 1988a. A Review of the Factors Affecting theStability of Solids-Stabilized Emulsions. Separation Sci. Tech.23 (12-13): 2,131-2,142.
Menon, V.B. and Wasan, D.T. 1988b. Characterization ofOil-Water Interfaces Containing Finely Divided Solids with Applications to theCoalescence of Water-in-Oil Emulsions: A Review. Colloids Surf.29 (1): 7-27.
Mikula, R.J. and Munoz, V.A. 2000. Characterization of Demulsifiers. In Surfactants:Fundamentals and Applications in the Petroleum Industry. ed. L.L.Schramm. 51-77. Cambridge, England: Cambridge U. Press.
Nalwaya, V., Tangtayakom, V., Piumsomboon, P., and Fogler, S. 1999. Studies on Asphaltenes throughAnalysis of Polar Fractions. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 38(3): 964-972.
Pfeiffer, J.P. and Saal, R.N.J. 1940. Asphaltic Bitumen as ColloidSystem. J. Phys. Chem. 44: 139-149.
Pickering, S.U. 1907. Emulsions. J. Chem. Soc. 91:2001-2021.
Poindexter, M.K. and Lindemuth, P.M. 2004. Applied Statistics: Crude OilEmulsions and Demulsifiers. J. Disp. Sci. Tech. 25 (3):311-320.
Poindexter, M.K., Chuai, S., Marble, R.A., and Marsh, S.C. 2005. Solid Content Dominates EmulsionStability Predictions. Energy Fuels 19 (4): 1,346-1,352.
Poindexter, M.K., Chuai, S., Marble, R.A., Marsh, S.C. 2003. Classifying Crude Oil Emulsions UsingChemical Demulsifiers and Statistical Analyses. Paper SPE 84610 presentedat the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, 5-8 October.
Poindexter, M.K., Zaki, N.N., Kilpatrick, P.K., Marsh, S.C., and Emmons,D.H. 2002. Factors Contributingto Petroleum Foaming. 1. Crude Oil Systems. Energy Fuels 16(3): 700-710.
Schorling, P.-C., Kessel, D.G., and Rahimian, I. 1999. Influence of the CrudeOil Resin/Asphaltene Ratio on the Stability of Oil/Water Emulsions.Colloids Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 152 (1-2):95-102.
Schramm, L.L. 2001. Dictionaryof Colloid and Interface Science. 197. New York City:Wiley-Interscience.
Speight, J.G. 1998. The Chemistry and Technology of Petroleum. 3rd edition. 324.New York City: Marcel Dekker.
Sztukowski, D.M. and Yarranton, H.W. 2004. Characterization and InterfacialBehavior of Oil Sands Solids Implicated in Emulsion Stability. J. Disp.Sci. Tech. 25 (3): 299-310.
Wang, J.X., Buckley, J.S., Burke, N.E., and Creek, J.L. 2004. A Practical Method for AnticipatingAsphaltene Problems. SPEPF 19 (3): 152-160. SPE-87638-PA.