A Laboratory Investigation of Temperature-Induced Sand Consolidation
- Cynthia M. Ross (Stanford University) | Edgar Rangel-German (Ministry of Energy-Mexico) | Louis M. Castanier (Stanford University) | Philip S. Hara (Tidelands Oil Production Company) | Anthony R. Kovscek (Stanford University)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- June 2006
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 206 - 215
- 2006. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 3 Production and Well Operations, 5.2 Reservoir Fluid Dynamics, 4.2.3 Materials and Corrosion, 5.4.6 Thermal Methods, 1.6.9 Coring, Fishing, 2 Well Completion, 5.3.2 Multiphase Flow, 4.3.4 Scale, 3.2.5 Produced Sand / Solids Management and Control, 1.14.3 Cement Formulation (Chemistry, Properties), 5.6.4 Drillstem/Well Testing, 5.5.2 Core Analysis, 5.2.1 Phase Behavior and PVT Measurements, 2.4.3 Sand/Solids Control, 4.3.1 Hydrates, 2.4.5 Gravel pack design & evaluation, 6.5.3 Waste Management, 1.8 Formation Damage, 1.14 Casing and Cementing, 4.6 Natural Gas, 2.2.2 Perforating, 6.5.2 Water use, produced water discharge and disposal, 1.2.3 Rock properties
- 0 in the last 30 days
- 440 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Current gravel-packed, slotted-liner completion techniques for wells in unconsolidated and weakly consolidated sandstone are relatively expensive and result in greatly reduced operational flexibility. On the other hand, empirical field evidence (Wilmington, California) demonstrates that sand grains surrounding the wellbore are cemented and consolidated following injection of high-pressure (1,600-psi) steam. Effective sand control results without adverse changes to formation permeability and producibility. Here, sand consolidation mechanisms are exposed by duplicating, in the laboratory, the governing geochemical processes. Sandpacks contain typical per-volume concentrations of concrete resulting from perforating a cased and cemented well. The evolution of sandpack pore and grain struture is determined using scanning electron microscope imaging and compositional analyses. Results show that hot alkaline water injected at rates comparable to field rates indeed results in grain-cementing precipitates. Casing cement plays a crucial role in that it is the source of calcium silicates appearing in various pore-lining precipitates. Conditions for effective sand consolidation are not necessarily formation-specific, and the process can be altered to improve cost-effectiveness, flexibility, and longevity of the completion technique.
In poorly consolidated and unconsolidated sandstone reservoirs, solids are sometimes carried from the formation to the wellbore as oil and water flow toward producers. It is referred to as "sand production." This term is usually detrimental and should be avoided. Operational problems result, including extra wear of the pumping units, shorter pipe lifetime, frequent workovers, loss of well productivity, and waste-disposal issues. Several remedies are available to the engineer. They include production-rate reduction (Penberthy and Shaughnessy 1992), physical barriers (Penberthy and Shaughnessy 1992), in-situ consolidation (Prats and Hamby 1965; Davies et al. 1983; Davies et al. 1997; Davies et al. 2003), and hybrid methods (Penberthy and Shaughnessy 1992; Kruger 1986). No sand-control method is, as of yet, generally applicable.
We use laboratory experiments to develop a mechanistic understanding of a novel hot alkaline/steam sand-consolidation technique. This technique has proved effective empirically (Davies et al. 1997). The mechanisms of mineral and grain dissolution, precipitation, and consolidation using Wilmington (Los Angeles basin, California) field cores and quartz sandpacks are described. Field sands are drawn from the productive, heavy-oil intervals (T and D sands) of the Tar II-A zone (Hara 2003).
The tools employed are core-scale and beaker-scale experiments, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and elemental analyses. Additionally, tubing-tail samples recovered from the field are reexamined in light of the new laboratory results. Before proceeding to the experimental details and results, a brief review of the hot alkaline/steam sand-consolidation process is given. This background is foundational, because it underpins the experimental program and interpretation of results. The experimental objectives, apparatus, and procedures follow. Results, discussion, and implications finish the paper.
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||10|
Bensted, J. 1988. Special Cements. In Lea's Chemistry of Cement andConcrete. ed. P.C. Hewlett, 779-836. Fourth edition. London: Arnold.
Davies, D.R., Zwolle, S., and Meijs, F.H. 1983. Silicalock—A Novel Sand-ControlProcess for Gas Wells. JPT 35 (11): 2087-2094. SPE-9423-PA.
Davies, D.K., Mondragon, J.J., and Hara, P.S. 1997. A Novel, Low-Cost Well-CompletionTechnique Using Steam for Formations With Unconsolidated Sands, WilmingtonField, California. Paper SPE 38793 presented at the SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, Dallas, 5-8 October.
Davies, D.K., Mondragon, J.J. III, and Hara, P.S. 2003. Well CompletionProcess for Formations with Unconsolidated Sands. U.S. Patent No. 6,554,067 B1,granted 29 April, 2003.
Diabira, I., Castanier, L.M., and Kovscek, A.R. 2001. Porosity and PermeabilityEvolution Accompanying Hot Fluid Injection Into Diatomite. PetroleumScience and Technology 19 (9/10): 1167-1185.
Gani, M.S.J. 1997. Cement and Concrete. Chapman & Hall: New York City.212.
Garbev, K.L., Black, L., Beuchle, G., and Stemmermann, P. 2002. InorganicPolymers in Cement Based Materials. Wasser- und Geotechnologie (Nachrichten ausdem Institut fur Technische Chemie). 1 (2): 19-30.
Haga, K., Shibata, M., Hironaga, M., Tanaka, S., and Nagasaki, S. 2002.Silicate Anion Structural Change in Calcium Silicate Hydrate Gel on Dissolutionof Hydrated Cement. J. Nuclear Science and Technology 39 (5): 540--547.
Hara, P.S. and Project Team Partners. 2003. Increasing Heavy Oil Reserves inthe Wilmington Oil Field Through Advanced Reservoir Characterization andThermal Production Technologies. DOE Annual Report DE-FC22-95BC14939, 100.
Hara, P.S., Mondragon, J.J., and Davies, D.K. 1999. A Well CompletionTechnique for Controlling Unconsolidated Sand Formations by Using Steam. Paperpresented at DOE Oil and Gas Conference, Dallas, 28-30 June(DE-FC22-95BC14939).
Kruger, R.F. 1986. An Overviewof Formation Damage and Well Productivity in Oilfield Operations . JPT 38(2): 131-152. SPE-10029-PA.
Mamora, D.D., Nilsen, K.A., Moreno, F.E., and Guillemette, R. 2000. Sand Consolidation UsingHigh-Temperature Alkaline Solution. Paper SPE 62943 presented at the SPEAnnual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, 1-4 October.
Moreno, F.E. and Mamora, D.D. 2001. Sand Consolidation UsingHigh-Temperature Alkaline Solution—Analysis of Reaction Parameters. PaperSPE 68847 presented at the SPE Western Regional Meeting, Bakersfield,California, 26-30 March.
Penberthy, W.L. Jr. and Shaughnessy, C.M. 1992. Sand Control: SPE Series onSpecial Topics. Society of Petroleum Engineers: Richardson, Texas.98.
Prats, M. and Hamby, T.W. Jr. 1965. Consolidation by Silica Coalescence:U.S. Patent No. 3,205,946.
Reed, M.G. 1980. Gravel Pack andFormation Sandstone Dissolution During Steam Injection. JPT 32 (6):941-949. SPE-8224-PA.
Taylor, H.F.W. 1997. Cement Chemistry. Second edition. Thomas Telford:London. 459.