Unified Model of Heat Transfer in Gas-Liquid Pipe Flow
- Hong-Quan Zhang (U. of Tulsa) | Qian Wang (U. of Tulsa) | Cem Sarica (U. of Tulsa) | James P. Brill (U. of Tulsa)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Production & Operations
- Publication Date
- February 2006
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 114 - 122
- 2006. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 4.3.1 Hydrates, 4.6 Natural Gas, 1.6.9 Coring, Fishing, 5.3.2 Multiphase Flow, 4.1.4 Gas Processing, 4.3 Flow Assurance
- 3 in the last 30 days
- 1,289 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
A unified model of multiphase heat transfer is developed for different flow patterns of gas/liquid pipe flow at all inclinations -90° to +90° from horizontal. The required local flow parameters are predicted by use of the unified hydrodynamic model for gas/liquid pipe flow recently developed by Zhang et al. (2003a, 2003b). The model prediction of the pipe inside convective-heat-transfer coefficients are compared with experimental measurements for a crude-oil/natural-gas system in horizontal and upward-vertical flows, and good agreement is observed.
As oil and gas production moves to deep and ultradeep waters, flow-assurance issues such as wax deposition, hydrate formation, and heavy-oil flow become very crucial in transportation of gas, oil, and water to processing facilities. These flow-assurance problems are strongly related to both the hydraulic and thermal behaviors (such as liquid holdups, local fluid velocities, pressure gradient, slug characteristics, and convective-heat-transfer coefficients corresponding to different phases and flow patterns) of the multiphase flow. Therefore, multiphase hydrodynamics and heat transfer need to be modeled properly to optimize the design and operation of the flow system.
Compared to experimental and modeling studies of multiphase hydrodynamics, very limited research results can be found in the open literature for multiphase heat transfer. Davis et al. (1979) presented a method for predicting local Nusselt numbers for stratified gas/liquid flow under turbulent-liquid/turbulent-gas conditions. A mathematical model based on the analogy between momentum transfer and heat transfer was developed and tested using heat-transfer and flow-characteristics data taken for air/water flow in a 63.5-mm-inside-diameter (ID) tube.
Shoham et al. (1982) measured heat-transfer characteristics for slug flow in a horizontal pipe. The time variations of temperature, heat-transfer coefficients, and heat flux were reported for the different zones of slug flow. Substantial difference in heat-transfer coefficient was found to exist between the bottom and top of the slug.
Most previous modeling studies were aimed at developing heat-transfer correlations for different flow patterns (Knott et al. 1959; Kudirka et al. 1965; Aggour 1978; Shah 1981; Ravipudi and Godbold 1978; Rezkallah and Sims 1987). Kim et al. (1997) evaluated 20 heat-transfer correlations against experimental data collected from the open literature and made recommendations for different flow patterns and inclination angles. However, these recommended correlations did not give satisfactory predictions when compared with experimental results by Matzain (1999).
Manabe (2001) developed a comprehensive mechanistic model for heat transfer in gas/liquid pipe flow. The overall performance was better than previous correlations in comparison with experimental data; however, some inconsistencies in the hydrodynamic model and the heat-transfer formulations for stratified (annular) and slug flows need to be improved.
A unified hydrodynamic model has been developed for gas/liquid pipe flow at the Tulsa U. Fluid Flow Projects (TUFFP) (Zhang et al. 2003a, 2003b). The major advantage of this model compared with previous mechanistic models is that the predictions for both flow-pattern transition and flow behavior are incorporated into a single unified model based on slug dynamics. Multiphase heat transfer depends on the hydrodynamic behavior of the flow. The objective of this study is to develop a unified heat-transfer model for gas/liquid pipe flow that is consistent with the unified hydrodynamic model.
|File Size||437 KB||Number of Pages||9|
Aggour, M.A.: "Hydrodynamics and Heat Transfer in Two-Phase Two-ComponentFlow," PhD dissertation, U. Manitoba, Canada (1978).
Davis, E.J., Cheremisinoff, N.P., and Guzy, C.J.: "Heat Transfer with StratifiedGas-Liquid Flow," AIChE J. (1979) 25, No. 6, 958.
Dittus, F.W. and Boelter, L.M.K.: "Heat Transfer in Automobile Radiators ofthe Tubular Type," U. California (Berkeley) Pub. Eng. (1930) 2, 443.
Kim, D. et al.:"An Evaluation of Several Heat Transfer Correlationsfor Two-Phase Flow with Different Flow Patterns in Vertical and HorizontalTubes," Proc. Natl. Heat Transfer Conference, Baltimore, Maryland (August1997).
Knott, R.F. et al.:"An Experimental Study of HeatTransfer to Nitrogen-Oil Mixtures," Ind. Eng. Chem. (1959) 51, No.11, 1,369.
Kudirka, A.A., Grosh, R.J., and Mcfaddden, P.W.: "Heat Transfer in Two-PhaseFlow of Gas-Liquid Mixtures," Ind. Eng. Chem. (1965) 4, No. 3, 339.
Manabe, R.: "A Comprehensive Mechanistic Heat Transfer Model for Two-PhaseFlow with High-Pressure Flow Pattern Validation," PhD dissertation, U. Tulsa,Tulsa (2001).
Matzain, A.B.: "Multiphase Flow Paraffin Deposition Modeling," PhDdissertation, U. Tulsa, Tulsa (1999).
Petukhov, B.S.: "Heat Transfer and Friction in Turbulent Pipe Flow withVariable Physical Properties," Advances in Heat Transfer, J.P. Hartnetand T.V. Irvine (eds.) Academic Press, New York City (1970) 6,505-564.
Ravipudi, S.R. and Godbold, T.M.: "The Effect of Mass Transfer on Heat Transfer Rates for Two-Phase Flow in aVertical Pipe," Proc. 6th Intl. Heat Transfer Conference, Toronto (1978)1, 505.
Rezkallah, K.S. and Sims, G.E.: "An Examination of Correlations of Mean HeatTransfer Coefficients in Two-Phase and Two-Component Flow in Vertical Tubes,"AIChE Symposium (1987) Series 83, 109.
Shah, M.M.: "Generalized Prediction of Heat Transfer during Two ComponentGas-Liquid Flow in Tubes and Other Channels," AIChE Symposium (1981) Series 77,140.
Shah, R.K. and London, A.L.: Laminar Flow: Forced Convection inDucts, Academic Press, New York City (1978) 77.
Shoham, O., Dukler, A.E., and Taitel, Y.: "Heat Transfer DuringIntermittent/Slug Flow in Horizontal Tubes," Ind. Eng. Chem.Fundamentals (1982) 21, No. 3, 312.
Zhang, H.-Q. et al.: "UnifiedModel for Gas-Liquid Pipe Flow via Slug Dynamics--Part 1: ModelDevelopment," J. Energy Res. Technol. (2003a) 125, No. 4,266.
Zhang, H.-Q. et al.: "UnifiedModel for Gas-Liquid Pipe Flow via Slug Dynamics?Part 2: Model Validation,"J. Energy Res. Technol . (2003b) 125, No. 4, 274.