A New Generation Chemical Flooding Simulator
- Abraham John (U. of Texas at Austin) | Choongyong Han (U. of Texas at Austin) | Mojdeh Delshad (U. of Texas at Austin) | Gary A. Pope (U. of Texas at Austin) | Kamy Sepehrnoori (The University of Texas at Austin)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- June 2005
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 206 - 216
- 2005. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 2.5.2 Fracturing Materials (Fluids, Proppant), 1.2.3 Rock properties, 1.8 Formation Damage, 2.2.2 Perforating, 4.1.5 Processing Equipment, 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 5.2.2 Fluid Modeling, Equations of State, 5.1 Reservoir Characterisation, 5.4.7 Chemical Flooding Methods (e.g., Polymer, Solvent, Nitrogen, Immiscible CO2, Surfactant, Vapex), 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 5.1.5 Geologic Modeling, 5.6.5 Tracers, 5.4.1 Waterflooding, 4.3.4 Scale, 5.4.2 Gas Injection Methods, 5.3.2 Multiphase Flow, 5.2.1 Phase Behavior and PVT Measurements
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 1,380 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Compositional reservoir simulators that are based on equation-of-state (EOS)formulations typically do not handle the modeling of aqueous phase behavior,and those that are designed for modeling chemical processes typically assumesimplified hydrocarbon phase behavior. There is a need to have a singlereservoir simulator capable of combining both approaches to benefit from theadvantages of both aqueous and hydrocarbons models. Developing and implementingfully implicit procedures for modeling both hydrocarbon and aqueous phasebehavior simultaneously is a complex process. An approach to integrate asurfactant phase behavior model into an existing fully implicit, parallel, EOScompositional simulator is presented in this paper. Physical property modelsdescribing the flow and transport of surfactant and polymer species have beenimplemented. These properties include surfactant phase behavior, interfacialtension, capillary desaturation, viscosity, adsorption, and relativepermeability as a function of trapping number. Polymer properties includeviscosity, permeability reduction, inaccessible pore volume, and adsorption.The simulation results were validated by comparison with the explicitchemical-flooding simulator UTCHEM and are shown in this paper. Test runs wereperformed with high-resolution models in a parallel environment, with resultsindicating a good scalability of the simulator.
Increased oil production using improved oil recovery processes requiresnumerical modeling of such processes to minimize the risk involved indevelopment decisions. The oil industry is requiring much more detailedanalyses with a greater demand for reservoir simulation with geological,physical, and chemical models of much more detail than the past. Reservoirsimulation has become an increasingly widespread and important tool foranalyzing and optimizing oil recovery projects.
Numerical simulation of large petroleum reservoirs with complex recoveryprocesses is computationally challenging because of the problem size anddetailed property calculations involved. This problem is compounded by thefiner resolution needed to model such processes accurately. Traditionally, suchsimulations have been performed on workstations or high-end desktop computers.These computers restrict the problem size because of their address- able memorylimit, and simulation studies of the entire project life become time-consuming.Parallel reservoir simulation, especially on low-cost, high-performancecomputing clusters, has alleviated these issues to a certain extent. Recentpublications describe the development of such approaches and emphasize thenecessity and advantages of using parallel processing. 1--4
Compositional reservoir simulators that are based on EOS formulations do nothandle the modeling of aqueous phase behavior and those that are designed forchemical-flood modeling typically assume simplified hydrocarbon phase behavior.There is need to have a single reservoir simulator capable of combining bothapproaches to benefit from the advantages of both models. The overall objectiveof this research is to develop such technology using a computational frameworkthat also allows parallel processing. The initial stage of development involvedthe formulation of a fully implicit, parallel, EOS compositional simulator. 5The description of the framework approach used for modular code development andthe application to gas injection is in Wang et al. 6
In this paper, we focus on the implementation of the chemical module to theexisting EOS simulator, its validation, and its application to large-scalechemical-flooding simulations. The formulation of the compositional model isbriefly described. The assumptions for the chemical model and its formulationare described next. We use Hand's rule 7 to describe surfactant/oil/brine TypeII(--) phase behavior. The trapping number model for relative permeability isimplemented to capture the changes in residual saturations caused by thelowered interfacial tension. The validation of the implementation against theexplicit chemical flooding simulator UTCHEM is shown. Application tolarge-scale problems and tests showing the parallel performance of thesimulator are described. The approach we used to couple the models is easy toimplement, computationally efficient, and extendable to many other interestingreservoir problems involving aqueous chemistry. With the capability of parallelprocessing, the general purpose adaptive simulator (GPAS) can now be used tosimulate chemical flooding on a larger scale than before.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||11|
1. Dogru, A.H. et al.: "AParallel Reservoir Simulator for Large-Scale Reservoir Simulation," SPEREE(February 2002) 11.
2. Habiballah, W.A. et al.: "Parallel Reservoir SimulationUtilizing PC-Clusters in Massive Reservoir Simulation Models," paper SPE84065 presented at the 2003 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,Denver, 5-8 October.
3. Gai X. et al.: "CoupledGeomechanical and Reservoir Modeling on Parallel Computers," paper SPE79700 presented at the 2003 SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Houston, 3-5February.
4. Zhang, K. et al.: "ParallelComputing Techniques for Large-Scale Reservoir Simulation of Multicomponent andMultiphase Fluid Flow," paper SPE 66343 presented at the 2001 SPE ReservoirSimulation Symposium, Houston, 11-14 February.
5. Wang, P. et al.: "A NewGeneration EOS Compositional Reservoir Simulator: Part I—Formulation andDiscretization," paper SPE 37979 presented at the 1997 SPE ReservoirSimulation Symposium, Dallas, 8-11 June.
6. Wang, P. et al.: "A FullyImplicit Parallel EOS Compositional Simulator for Large-Scale ReservoirSimulation," paper SPE 51885 presented at the 1999 SPE Reservoir SimulationSymposium, Houston, 14-17 February.
7. Hand, D.B.: "Dineric Distribution: I. The Distribution of a ConsoluteLiquid between Two Immiscible Liquids," Journal of Physics and Chemistry (1939)34.
8. Parashar M. et al.: "A NewGeneration EOS Compositional Reservoir Simulator: Part II—Framework andMultiprocessing," paper SPE 37977 presented at the 1997 SPE ReservoirSimulation Symposium, Dallas, 8-11 June.
9. Gropp, W., Lusk, E., and Skjellum, A.: Using MPI: Portable ParallelProgramming With the Message Passing Interface, MIT Press, Cambridge,Massachusettes (1994).
10. Balay, S. et al.: "Efficient Management of Parallelism in ObjectOriented Numerical Software Libraries," Modern Software Tools in ScientificComputing. Arge et al. (eds.), Birkhauser Press, New York City (1997).
11. Lake, L.W.: Enhanced Oil Recovery, Prentice Hall, New Jersey (1989).
12. Hirasaki, G.J. and Pope, G.A.: "Analysis of Factors InfluencingMobility and Adsorption in the Flow of Polymer Solution Through PorousMedia," SPEJ (August 1974) 337.
13. Winsor, P.A.: Solvent Properties of Amphiphilic Compounds, Butterworths,London (1954).
14. Nelson, R.C. and Pope,G.A.: "Phase Relationships in ChemicalFlooding," SPEJ (October 1978) 325; Trans., AIME, 265.
15. Reed, R.L. and Healy, R.N.: "Some Physico-Chemical Aspects ofMicroemulsion Flooding: A Review," Improved Oil Recovery by Surfactant andPolymer Flooding, D.O. Shah and R.S. Schechter (eds.), Academic Press, New YorkCity (1977).
16. Prouvost, L., Pope, G.A., and Rouse, B.: "Microemulsion Phase Behavior: AThermodynamic Modeling of the Phase Partitioning of Amphiphilic Species,"SPEJ (October 1985) 693.
17. Camilleri, D. et al.: "Comparison of an ImprovedCompositional Micellar/Polymer Simulator With Laboratory Corefloods," SPERE(November 1987) 441.
18. Huh, C.: "Interfacial Tension and Solubilization Ability of aMicroemulsion Phase that Coexists with Oil and Brine," Journal of ColloidInterface Science (1979) 71.
19. Hirasaki, G.J.: "Applicationof the Theory of Multicomponent, Multiphase Displacement to Three-Component,Two-Phase Surfactant Flooding," SPEJ (April 1981) 191.
20. Flory, P.J.: Principles of Polymer Chemistry, Cornell U. Press, Ithaca,New York (1953).
21. Jin, M.: "A Study of Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid Characterization andSurfactant Remediation," PhD dissertation, U. of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas(1995).
22. Pope, G.A. et al.: "Modeling Relative PermeabilityEffects in Gas-Condensate Reservoirs With a New Trapping Model," SPEREE(April 2000) 171.
23. Delshad, M.: "Trapping of Micellar Fluids in Berea Sandstone," PhDdissertation, U. of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas (1990).
24. Chatzis, I. and Morrow, N.R.: "Correlation of Capillary NumberRelationships for Sandstone," SPEJ (October 1984) 555.
25. Morrow, N.R., Chatzis, I. and Lim, H.: "Relative Permeabilities atReduced Residual Saturation," J. Cdn. Pet. Tech. (July-August 1985) 62.
26. Delshad, M. et al.: "Effectof Capillary Number of the Residual Saturation of a Three-Phase MicellarSolution," paper SPE 14911 presented at the 1986 SPE Enhanced Oil RecoverySymposium , Tulsa, 20-23 April.
27. Nalla, G.: "Implementation of the Chemical Flooding Module in GPAS," MSthesis, U. of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas (2002).
28. John, A.K.: "Development of a Hybrid Approach to Couple Chemical andCompositional Models in an Implicit, Parallel Simulator," MS thesis, U. ofTexas at Austin, Austin, Texas (2003).
29. Saad, N., Pope, G.A., and Sepehrnoori, K.: "Simulation of Big Muddy SurfactantPilot," SPERE (February 1989) 24; Trans., AIME, 287.
30. Delshad, M. et al.: "Simulations of Chemical and MicrobialEnhanced Oil Recovery Methods," paper SPE 75237 presented at the 2002SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 13-17 April.
31. Wu, W. et al.: "Design andOptimization of Low-Cost Chemical Flooding," paper SPE/DOE 35355 presentedat the 1996 SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 21-24 April.
32. Abate, J.M., Wang, P., and Sepehrnoori, K.: "Parallel CompositionalReservoir Simulation on a Cluster of PCs," International Journal of HighPerformance Computing Applications (Spring 2001).
33. Uetani T., Guler, B., and Sepehrnoori, K.: "Reservoir Simulation on HighPerformance Clusters," paper presented at the 2002 World Multiconference onSystematics, Cybernetics, and Informatics, Orlando, Florida, 14-18 July.