Effect of an Invaded Zone on Pressure-Transient Data From Multiprobe and Packer-Probe Wireline Formation Testers
- Ihsan M. Gok (Schlumberger) | M. Onur (Istanbul Technical U.) | Peter S. Hegeman (Schlumberger) | Fikri J. Kuchuk (Schlumberger)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- February 2006
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 39 - 49
- 2006. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 4.3.4 Scale, 5.6.1 Open hole/cased hole log analysis, 1.11 Drilling Fluids and Materials, 5.5.8 History Matching, 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 5.5.11 Formation Testing (e.g., Wireline, LWD), 5.3.2 Multiphase Flow, 4.6 Natural Gas, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 5.6.4 Drillstem/Well Testing, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 5.1 Reservoir Characterisation, 4.2 Pipelines, Flowlines and Risers, 5.5.1 Simulator Development, 5.6.3 Pressure Transient Testing, 1.11.2 Drilling Fluid Selection and Formulation (Chemistry, Properties)
- 0 in the last 30 days
- 715 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
This paper examines the effect of a mud-filtrate-invaded zone on pressure transients from multiprobe/packer-probe wireline formation testers (WFTs). Invasion zones are modeled as composite zones concentric with the wellbore that have different rock and fluid properties (permeability, porosity, viscosity, and compressibility) from those of the native uninvaded formation.
The results show that for multiprobe wireline testers, the sink- (production) and horizontal-probe pressure responses are highly affected by the invaded-region properties, while the vertical-probe pressures are influenced mainly by the properties of the uninvaded zones. For the packer-probe configuration, similar results are obtained (i.e., the vertical-probe pressures are influenced mainly by the properties of the uninvaded zones, while the packer-interval pressures at early times are influenced by the invaded-zone properties). It is shown that if the invaded zones are incorporated into the interpretation process with a 3D r-???-z single-phase, finite-difference model like the one developed in this work, simultaneous matching of spatially available WFT pressure-data sets using nonlinear regression can provide estimates of both invaded- and uninvaded-zone parameters. A synthetic example of a multiprobe test is presented to confirm the theory and procedures developed in this work.
The multiprobe and packer-probe WFTs are used to conduct controlled local production and buildup tests as well as horizontal- and vertical-interference tests (interval pressure transient tests, or IPTT). These tools provide formation-fluid samples and estimates of horizontal and vertical permeabilities and wellbore damage. Further details about WFTs, equipped with packers and multiple probes, can be found in Zimmerman et al. (1990), Goode et al. (1991), Goode and Thambynayagam (1992), Head and Bettis (1993), Pop et al. (1993), Kuchuk et al. (1994), and Onur et al. (2004).
It has always been a concern how the pressure transients from these formation testers are affected by the presence of invaded regions around the wellbore. When an oil/gas well is drilled, some of the borehole fluid (mud filtrate) can leak into the formation, displacing the native formation fluid and creating an invaded zone around the wellbore. The invading fluid usually has a viscosity and compressibility that differ from those of the formation fluid. All WFT drawdown and buildup tests and IPTTs are conducted in an openhole environment, in which formation invasion takes place until the mudcake buildups, after which invasion becomes negligible. The invasion depth may vary from a few inches to a few feet, depending on formation and mud properties, as well as drilling parameters. Therefore, one must know how the invaded zone affects parameter estimates from WFT drawdown and buildup tests and IPTTs. Second, can we estimate some of the parameters of invaded zones? For instance, if we can obtain the permeabilities of both invaded and uninvaded zones, this can give us the endpoint effective permeabilities for both water and oil on a much larger scale than that from cores.
In general, the process of drilling-fluid invasion is quite complicated because it involves solid and solute (and solvent, in the case of oil-based mud) transport and precipitation as well as multiphase flow, capillary pressure hysteresis, wettability alterations, chemical adsorption, and gravity effects (Ferguson and Klotz 1954; Bailey et al. 2000; Civan 2002). One of the main difficulties is how to model the initial condition set by the invasion process before sampling and pressure transients from WFTs. In addition, modeling the effects of invasion zone(s) on fluid sampling during production and on pressure-transient data from WFTs during pumpout and buildup periods is challenging, where we are faced by two distinct problems. However, if one assumes that capillary and gravity effects are negligible and that permeability and porosity impairments caused by solid and solute invasion and precipitation are minimal, then one may tackle the invasion problem by modeling it as miscible or two-phase immiscible flow.
Several researchers (Phelps et al. 1984; Hammond 1991; Akram et al. 1999; Zeybek et al. 2001; Wu et al. 2002) have taken this approach to include the effect of invasion on fluid sampling and pressure-transient data from WFTs. However, all work given in Phelps et al. (1984), Hammond (1991), Akram et al. (1999), Zeybek et al. (2001), and Wu et al. (2002) is limited to a single-layer system. In addition, these references do not address the parameter-estimation problem (mainly permeability) in the presence of invasion. For instance, Akram et al. (1999) numerically simulated the invaded zone by injecting water to create a sharp interface (or shock front) between filtrate and oil in the simulator and then studied the effect of invasion on sampling quality (water cut) vs. time during the pumpout (production) period, which is production from the formation into the wellbore by means of a pump. In the presence of water-based-mud invasion, Zeybek et al. (2001) presented an inversion methodology using a numerical simulator to refine oil/water relative permeabilities by integrating dual-packer pressure and water-cut measurements with openhole array resistivity measurements. During their inversion process, they also updated the absolute horizontal and vertical permeability in the simulator. However, they did not consider vertical-observation probe pressure data in their inversion methodology. Wu et al. (2002) presented miscible and immiscible multiphase sampling modeling for oil- and water-based muds for a dual-probe configuration. Assuming that the capillary pressure and relative permeability curves (and the mud-filtrate characteristics) are known, they presented an inversion methodology of horizontal and vertical permeabilities by matching sampling quality and pressure measurements acquired in the presence of oil- and water-based invaded zones. Their inversion method is based on a neural-network approach coupled with a numerical simulator.
|File Size||794 KB||Number of Pages||11|
Akram, A.H., Halford, F.R., and Fitzpatrick, A.J.: "A Model To Predict Wireline FormationTester Sample Contamination," SPEREE (December 1999) 6, No.2, 499.
Anterion, F., Eymard, R., and Karcher, B.: "Use of Parameter Gradients forReservoir History Matching," paper SPE 18433 presented at the 1989 SPESymposium on Reservoir Simulation, Houston, 6-8 February.
Bailey, L., Boek, E.S., Jacques, S.D.M., Boassen, T., Selle, O.M.,Argillier, J.F., and Longeron, D.G.: "Particulate Invasion From DrillingFluids," SPEJ (December 2000) 5, No. 4, 412.
Civan, F.: "A Multiphase Modelfor Evaluation of Filtration During Drilling and Fracturing of Wells,"paper SPE 77599 presented at the 2002 SPE Annual Technical Conference andExhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 29 September-2 October.
Culham, W.E.: "Pressure BuildupEquations for Spherical Flow Regime Problems," SPEJ (December 1974)14, No. 6, 545.
Dogru, A.H., Dixon, T.N., and Edgar, T.F.: "Confidence Limits on the Parametersand Predictions of Slightly Compressible, Single-Phase Reservoirs,"SPEJ (February 1977) 17, No. 1, 42; Trans., AIME,263.
Ferguson, C.K. and Klotz, J.A.: "Filtration From Mud During Drilling,"Trans., AIME (1954) 201, 29.
Gök, I.M.: "Modeling of Vertical Interference Tests and ParameterEstimation," PhD dissertation, Istanbul Technical U., Istanbul, Turkey (June2004).
Gök, I.M., Onur, M., Hegeman, P.S., and Kuchuk, F.J.: "Effect of an Invaded Zone on PressureTransient Data From Multi-Probe and Packer-Probe Wireline Formation Testers inSingle and Multilayer Systems," paper SPE 84093 presented at the 2003 SPEAnnual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, 5-8 October.
Goode, P.A., Pop, J.J., and Murphy, W.F. III: "Multiple-Probe Formation Testing andVertical Reservoir Continuity," paper SPE 22738 presented at the 1991 SPEAnnual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, 6-9 October.
Goode, P.A. and Thambynayagam, R.K.M.: "Influence of an Invaded Zone on aMultiprobe Formation Tester," SPEFE (March 1996) 11, No. 1,31.
Goode, P.A. and Thambynayagam, R.K.M.: "Permeability Determination With aMultiprobe Formation Tester," SPEFE (December 1992) 7, No. 4,297; Trans., AIME, 293.
Hammond, P.S.: "One- andTwo-Phase Flow During Fluid Sampling by a Wireline Tool," Transport inPorous Media (1991) 6, 299.
Hawkins, M.F. Jr.: "A Note on the Skin Effect," Trans., AIME (1956)207, 356.
Head, E.L. and Bettis, F.E.: "Reservoir Anisotropy DeterminationWith Multiple Probe Pressures," JPT (December 1993) 45, No.12, 1177.
Kuchuk, F.J., Ramakrishnan, T.S., and Dave, Y.: "Interpretation of Wireline FormationTester Packer and Probe Pressures," paper SPE 28404 presented at the 1994SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 25-28September.
Li, R., Reynolds, A.C., and Oliver, D.S.: "Sensitivity Coefficients forThree-Phase Flow History Matching," J. Cdn. Pet. Tech. (April 2003)42, No. 4, 70.
Nacul, E.C., and Aziz, K.: "Useof Irregular Grid in Reservoir Simulation," paper SPE 22886 presented atthe 1991 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, 6-9October.
Odeh, A.S.: "Pseudosteady-StateFlow Capacity of Oil Wells With Limited Entry and an Altered Zone Around theWellbore," SPEJ (August 1977) 17, No. 4, 271; Trans.,AIME, 263.
Onur, M.: "New Well Testing Applications of the Pressure Derivative," PhDdissertation, U. of Tulsa, Tulsa, Oklahoma (May 1989).
Onur, M., Hegeman, P.S., and Kuchuk, F.J.: "Pressure/Pressure ConvolutionAnalysis of Multiprobe and Packer-Probe Wireline Formation Tester Data,"SPEREE (October 2004) 7, No. 5, 351.
Onur, M. and Kuchuk, F.J.: "Nonlinear Regression Analysis ofWell-Test Pressure Data With Uncertain Variance," paper SPE 62918 presentedat the 2000 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, 1-4October.
Phelps, G.D., Stewart, G., and Peden, J.M.: "The Analysis of the Invaded ZoneCharacteristics and Their Influence on Wireline Log and Well-TestInterpretation," paper SPE 13287 presented at the 1984 SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, Houston, 16-19 September.
Pop, J.J., Badry, R.A., Morris, C.W., Wilkinson, D.J., Tottrup, P., andJonas, J.K.: "VerticalInterference Testing With a Wireline-Conveyed Straddle-Packer Tool ," paperSPE 26481 presented at the 1993 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,Houston, 3-6 October.
Ramakrishnan, T.S. and Wilkinson, D.J.: "Water-Cut and Fractional-Flow LogsFrom Array-Induction Measurements," SPEREE (February 1999) 2,No. 1, 85.
Settari, A., and Aziz, K.: "Useof Irregular Grid in Reservoir Simulation," SPEJ (April 1972)12, No. 2, 103.
Schlumberger GeoQuest: Eclipse 100 Reference Manual, Version 2002, Houston(2002).
Wu, J., Torres-Verdin, C., Proett, M.A., Sepehrnoori, K., and Belanger, D.:"Inversion of MultiphasePetrophysical Properties Using Pumpout Sampling Data Acquired With a WirelineFormation Tester," paper SPE 77345 presented at the 2002 SPE AnnualTechnical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 29 September-2October.
Yeh, N.: "Well Test Analysis for Restricted-Entry Wells in LayeredReservoirs," PhD dissertation, U. of Tulsa, Tulsa, Oklahoma (March 1986).
Zeybek, M., Ramakrishnan, T.S., Al-Otaibi, S.S., Salamy, S.P., and Kuchuk,F.J.: "Estimating Multiphase FlowProperties Using Pressure and Flowline Water-Cut Data From Dual PackerFormation Tester Interval Tests and Openhole Array ResistivityMeasurements," paper SPE 71568 presented at the 2001 SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 30 September-3 October.
Zimmerman, T., MacInnis, J., Hoppe, J., Pop, J., and Long, T.: "Applicationof Emerging Wireline Formation Technologies," paper OSEA-90105 presented at theEighth Offshore Southeast Conference, Singapore, 4-7 December 1990.