A Decline Curve Analysis Model Based on Fluid Flow Mechanisms
- Kewen Li (Stanford U.) | Roland N. Horne (Stanford U.)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- June 2005
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 197 - 204
- 2005. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.8.7 Carbonate Reservoir, 5.1.2 Faults and Fracture Characterisation, 1.6.9 Coring, Fishing, 5.4.1 Waterflooding, 5.6.4 Drillstem/Well Testing, 5.7.2 Recovery Factors, 5.9.2 Geothermal Resources, 5.5.8 History Matching, 6.5.2 Water use, produced water discharge and disposal, 1.2.3 Rock properties, 5.3.1 Flow in Porous Media, 5.5.2 Core Analysis, 5.6.5 Tracers, 4.6 Natural Gas, 5.8.6 Naturally Fractured Reservoir, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 5.3.2 Multiphase Flow, 5.7 Reserves Evaluation
- 5 in the last 30 days
- 2,058 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Decline-curve-analysis models are used frequently but still have manylimitations. Approaches of decline-curve analysis used for naturally fracturedreservoirs developed by waterflooding have been few. To this end, adecline-analysis model derived on the basis of fluid-flow mechanisms wasproposed and used to analyze the oil-production data from naturally fracturedreservoirs developed by waterflooding. Relative permeability and capillarypressure were included in this model. The model reveals a linear relationshipbetween the oil-production rate and the reciprocal of the oil recovery or theaccumulated oil production. We applied the model to the oil-production datafrom different types of reservoirs and found a linear relationship between theproduction rate and the reciprocal of the oil recovery as foreseen by themodel, especially at the late period of production. The values of maximum oilrecovery for the example reservoirs were evaluated with the parametersdetermined from the linear relationship. An analytical oil-recovery model wasalso proposed. The results showed that the analytical model could match theoil-production data satisfactorily. We also demonstrated that the frequentlyused nonlinear type curves could be transformed to linear relationships in alog-log plot. This may facilitate the production-decline analysis. Finally, theanalytical model was compared with conventional models.
Estimating reserves and predicting production in reservoirs has been achallenge for many years. Many methods have been developed in the last severaldecades. One frequently used technique is the decline-curve-analysis approach.There have been a great number of papers on this subject.
Most of the existing decline-curve-analysis techniques are based on theempirical Arps equations: exponential, hyperbolic, and harmonic. It isdifficult to foresee which equation the reservoir will follow. On the otherhand, each approach has some disadvantages. For example, the exponentialdecline curve tends to underestimate reserves and production rates; theharmonic decline curve has a tendency to overpredict the reservoir performance.In some cases, production-decline data do not follow any model but cross overthe entire set of curves.
Fetkovich combined the transient rate and the pseudosteady-state declinecurves in a single graph. He also related the empirical equations of Arps tothe single-phase-flow solutions and attempted to provide a theoretical basisfor the Arps equations. This was realized by developing the connection betweenthe material balance and the flow-rate equations on the basis of his previouspapers.
Many derivations were based on the assumption of single-phase oil flow inclosed-boundary systems. These solutions were suitable only for undersaturated(single-phase) oil flow. However, many oil fields are developed bywaterflooding. Therefore, two-phase fluid flow (rather than single-phase flow)occurs. In this case, Lefkovits and Matthews derived the exponential declineform for gravity-drainage reservoirs with a free surface by neglectingcapillary pressure. Fetkovich et al. included gas/oil relative permeabilityeffects on oil production for solution-gas drive through the pressure-ratioterm. This assumes that the oil relative permeability is a function ofpressure. It is known that gas/oil relative permeability is a function of fluidsaturation, which depends on fluid/rock properties.
|File Size||591 KB||Number of Pages||8|
1. Agarwal, R.G. et al.: "Analyzing Well Production Data UsingCombined-Type-Curve and Decline-Curve Analysis Concepts," SPEREE (October1999) 478.
2. Agbi, B. and Ng, M.C.: "ANumerical Solution to Two-Parameter Representation of Production Decline CurveAnalysis," paper SPE 16505 presented at the 1987 SPE Petroleum IndustryApplications of Microcomputers, Montgomery, Texas, 23-26 June.
3. Araya, A. and Ozkan, E.: "AnAccount of Decline-Type-Curve Analysis of Vertical, Fractured, and HorizontalWell Production Data," paper SPE 77690 presented at the 2002 SPE AnnualTechnical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 29 September-2October.
4. Arps, J.J.: "Analysis of Decline Curves," Trans., AIME (1945) 160,228.
5. Arps, J.J.: "Estimation of Primary Oil Reserves," Trans., AIME (1956)207, 182.
6. Baker, R.O. et al.: "Usingan Analytical Decline Model to Characterize Naturally FracturedReservoirs," paper SPE 39623 presented at the 1998 SPE/DOE Improved OilRecovery Symposium, Tulsa, 19-22 April.
7. Callard, J.G.: ‘‘ReservoirPerformance History Matching Using Rate/Cumulative Type-Curves,'' paper SPE30793 presented at the 1995 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,Dallas, 22-25 October.
8. Camacho-V., R. and Raghavan, R.: "Boundary-Dominated Flow inSolution-Gas-Drive Reservoirs," SPERE (November 1989) 503.
9. Chen, H.Y. and Poston, S.W.: "Application of a Pseudotime Functionto Permit Better Decline-Curve Analysis," SPEFE (September 1989) 421.
10. Cutler, W.W. Jr.: "Estimation of Underground Reserves by Well ProductionCurves," Bull., USBM (1924) 228.
11. Da Prat, G., Cinco-Ley, H., and Ramey, H.J. Jr.: "Decline Curve Analysis Using TypeCurves for Two-Porosity Systems," SPEJ (June 1981) 354.
12. Duong, A.N.: "A NewApproach for Decline-Curve Analysis," paper SPE 18859 presented at the 1989SPE Production Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 13-14 March.
13. Ehlig-Economides, C.A. and Ramey, H.J. Jr.: "Transient Rate Decline Analysis forWells Produced at Constant Pressure," SPEJ (February 1981) 98.
14. Faulder, D.D.: "AdvancedDecline Curve Analysis in Vapor-Dominated Geothermal Reservoirs," paper SPE38763 presented at the 1997 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, SanAntonio, Texas, 5-8 October.
15. Fetkovich, M.J.: "DeclineCurve Analysis Using Type Curves," JPT (June 1980) 1065.
16. Fetkovich, M.J. et al.: "Decline-Curve Analysis Using TypeCurves—Case Histories," SPEFE (December 1987) 637; Trans., AIME, 283.
17. Fetkovich, M.J., Fetkovich, E.J., and Fetkovich, M.D.: "Useful Concepts for Decline-CurveForecasting, Reserve Estimation, and Analysis," SPERE (February 1996)13.
18. Fetkovich, M.D. et al.: "Oil and Gas Relative PermeabilitiesDetermined from Rate-Time Performance Data," paper SPE 15431 presented atthe 1986 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 5-8October.
19. Lefkovits, H.C. and Matthews, C.S.: "Application of Decline Curves toGravity-Drainage Reservoirs in the Stripper Stage," Trans., AIME (1958) 213,275.
20. Marhaendrajana, T. and Blasingame, T.A.: ‘‘Decline Curve Analysis Using TypeCurves—Evaluation of Well Performance Behavior in a Multiwell ReservoirSystem,'' paper SPE 71517 presented at the 2001 SPE Annual TechnicalConference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 30 September-3 October.
21. Masoner, L.O.: "DeclineAnalysis' Relationship to Relative Permeability in Secondary and TertiaryRecovery," paper SPE 39928 presented at the 1998 SPE Rocky MountainRegional/Low-Permeability Reservoirs Symposium, Denver, 5-8 April.
22. Palacio, J.C. and Blasingame, T.A.: "Decline Curve Analysis Using TypeCurves: Analysis of Gas Well Production Data," paper SPE 25909 presented at the1993 SPE Rocky Mountain Regional/Low-Permeability Reservoirs Symposium, Denver,12-14 April.
23. Rodriguez, F. and Cinco-Ley, H.: "A New Model for ProductionDecline," paper SPE 25480 presented at the 1993 SPE Production OperationsSymposium, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 21-23 March.
24. Fetkovich, M.J.: "TheIsochronal Testing of Oil Wells," paper SPE 4529 presented at the 1973 SPEAnnual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada, 30 September-3 October.
25. Fetkovich, M.J.: "ASimplified Approach to Water Influx Calculations—Finite Aquifer Systems,"JPT (July 1971) 814.
26. Raghavan, R.: Well Test Analysis, PTR Prentice Hall, New Jersey(1993).
27. Aronofsky, J.S., Massé, L., and Natanson, S.G.: "A Model for theMechanism of Oil Recovery from the Porous Matrix Due to Water Invasion inFractured Reservoirs," Trans., AIME (1958) 213, 17.
28. Li, K. and Horne, R.N.: "Characterization of Spontaneous WaterImbibition into Gas-Saturated Rocks," SPEJ (December 2001) 375.
29. Li, K. and Horne, R.N.: "AnAnalytical Scaling Method for Spontaneous Imbibition in Gas/Water/RockSystems," SPEJ (September 2004) 322.
30.Li, K. and Horne, R.N.: "A General Scaling Method forSpontaneous Imbibition," paper SPE 77544 presented at the 2002 SPE AnnualTechnical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 29 September-2October.
31. Li, K., Chow, K., and Horne, R.N.: "Effects of Initial Water Saturationon Spontaneous Water Imbibition," paper SPE 76727 presented at the 2002 SPEWestern Regional/AAPG Pacific Section Joint Meeting, Anchorage, 20-22 May.
32. Li, K. and Horne, R.N.: "Extracting Capillary Pressure andGlobal Mobility From Spontaneous Imbibition Data in Oil-Water-RockSystems," paper SPE 80553 presented at the 2003 SPE Asia Pacific Oil andGas Conference and Exhibition, Jakarta, 15-17 April.
33. Schechter, D.S. and Guo, B.: "An Integrated Investigation forDesign of a CO2 Pilot in the Naturally Fractured Spraberry Trend Area, WestTexas," paper SPE 39881 presented at the 1998 SPE International PetroleumConference and Exhibition of Mexico, Villahermosa, Mexico, 3-5 March.
34. Ma, S., Morrow, N.R., and Zhang, X.: "Generalized Scaling of SpontaneousImbibition Data for Strongly Water-Wet Systems," paper 95-138 presented at the6th Petroleum Conference of the South Saskatchewan Section, the Petroleum Soc.of CIM, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada, 16-18 October 1995.
35. Handy, L.L.: "Determination of Effective Capillary Pressures for PorousMedia From Imbibition Data," Trans., AIME (1960) 219, 75.
36. Allan, J. and Sun, S.Q.: "Controls on Recovery Factor inFractured Reservoirs: Lessons Learned from 100 Fractured Fields," paper SPE84590 presented at the 2003 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,Denver, 5-8 October.
37. Dake, L.P.: The Practice of Reservoir Engineering, Elsevier, Amsterdam(2001).
38. Schechter, D.S., Zhou, D., and Orr, F.M. Jr.: "Low IFT Drainage andImbibition," J. Pet. Sci. & Eng. (1994) 11, 283.