Shale Swelling, Osmosis, and Acoustic Changes Measured Under Simulated Downhole Conditions
- Russell T. Ewy (Chevron Energy Technology) | R.J. Stankovic (RSTD)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Drilling & Completion
- Publication Date
- June 2010
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 177 - 186
- 2010. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 1.2.2 Geomechanics, 1.11 Drilling Fluids and Materials, 5.3.4 Integration of geomechanics in models, 1.6.9 Coring, Fishing, 2 Well Completion, 4.1.5 Processing Equipment, 1.6 Drilling Operations, 4.2 Pipelines, Flowlines and Risers, 4.3.1 Hydrates, 2.7.1 Completion Fluids, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating
- stability, acoustic, swelling, osmotic, shale
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 1,122 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Preserved shale samples from four different shale cores were exposed to various aqueous fluids while under simulated downhole stress conditions. Before fluid exposure, the samples were not contacted by any aqueous fluid, including simulated pore fluid. Time-dependent measurements of pore pressure, swelling, and acoustic velocities were made. Pore pressures both less than and greater than the applied fluid pressure were observed, and apparent osmotic membrane efficiencies were calculated. Swelling was found to depend not only on the shale type and the fluid but also on the level of confining stress; sufficient confining stress can prevent swelling. Swelling anisotropy was observed. Acoustic velocities were found to change as a result of fluid exposure, but significant velocity decrease occurred only in the presence of chemically induced swelling. S-wave velocities were found to be more sensitive than P-wave velocities. Because swelling is expected to occur mostly in the radial direction around a wellbore and only very close to the wellbore, the best detection method would be either (1) well-parallel S-velocities processed to yield the high-frequency (near-wellbore) slowness or (2) S-velocities measured in the radial direction instead of the well-parallel direction.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||10|
Chenevert, M.E. 1970. ShaleAlteration by Water Adsorption. J. Pet Tech 22 (9):1141-1148. SPE-2401-PA. doi: 10.2118/2401-PA.
Chenevert, M.E. and Osisanya, S.O. 1992. Shale swelling at elevatedtemperature and pressure. In Rock Mechanics: Proceedings of the 33rd USSymposium, ed. J.R. Tillerson and W.R. Wawersik (eds.), 869-878. London:Taylor & Francis.
Ewy, R.T. and Stankovich, R.J. 2000. Pore pressure change due to shale-fluidinteraction: Measurements under simulated wellbore conditions. Proc.,Pacific Rocks 2000, 4th North American Rock Mechanics Symposium, Seattle,Washington, USA, 31 July-3 August, 147-154.
Ewy, R.T., Bovberg, C.A., and Stankovich, R.J. 2008. Shale triaxial strengthalteration due to brine exposure. Paper ARMA 08-304 presented at San Francisco2008, 42nd U.S. Rock Mechanics Symposium, 2nd U.S.-Canada Rock MechanicsSymposium, San Francisco, California, USA, 29 June-2 July.
Ewy, R.T., Daniels, E.J., and Stankovich, R.J. 2001. Behavior of a reactiveshale from 12000 feet depth. In Rock Mechanics in the National Interest:Proceedings of the 38th US Rock Mechanics Symposium, 77-84. Rotterdam, TheNetherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Fonseca, C.F. and Chenevert, M.E. 1998. The effect of totalstress and temperature on the water activity of shales. Int. J. RockMech. Min. Sci. 35 (4-5): 546-547.doi:10.1016/S0148-9062(98)00113-2.
Holt, R.M., Sønstebø, E.F., Horsrud, P., and Skaflestad, R. 1996. Fluideffects on acoustic wave propagation in shales. Proc., Eurock'96--Prediction and performance in rock mechanics and rock engineering, Turin,Italy, September, Vol. 1, 83-90.
Mody, F.K. and Hale, A.H. 1993. Borehole-Stability Model To Couplethe Mechanics and Chemistry of Drilling-Fluid/Shale Interactions. J. PetTech 45 (11): 1093-1101. SPE-25728-PA. doi:10.2118/25728-PA.
Onaisi, A., Durand, C., and Audibert, A. 1994. Role of hydration state of shales inborehole stability studies. Paper SPE 28062 presented at Rock Mechanics inPetroleum Engineering, Delft, The Netherlands, 29-31 August. doi:10.2118/28062-MS.
Sønstebø, E.F. and Horsrud, P. 1996. Effects of brines on mechanicalproperties of shales under different test conditions. Proc., Eurock'96--Prediction and performance in rock mechanics and rock engineering, Turin,Italy, September, Vol. 1, 91-98.
Srodon, J., Drits, V.A., McCarty, D.K., Hsieh, J.C.C., and Eberl, D.D. 2001.Quantitative X-rayDiffraction Analysis of Clay-Bearing Rocks From Random Preparations.Clays and Clay Minerals 49 (6): 514-528.doi:10.1346/CCMN.2001.0490604.
Steiger, R.P. 1982. Fundamentals and Use ofPotassium/Polymer Drilling Fluids To Minimize Drilling and Completion ProblemsAssociated with Hydratable Clays. J. Pet Tech 34 (8):1661-1670. SPE-10100-PA. doi: 10.2118/10100-PA.
Steiger, R.P. and Leung, P.K. 1991. Consolidated undrained triaxial testprocedure for shales. Proc., 32nd US Rock Mechanics Symposium-RockMechanics as a Multidisciplinary Science, Norman, Oklahoma, USA, 10-12 July,637-646.
Tan, C.P., Zeynaly-Andabily, E.M., and Rahman, S.S. 1995. The Effects ofDrilling Fluid-Shale Interactions on Wellbore Stability. APEA Journal 35: 678-691.
Tare, U.A., Mese, A.I., and Mody F.K. 2001. Time dependent impact ofwater-based drilling fluids on shale properties. In Rock Mechanics in theNational Interest, Proceedings of the 38th US Rock Mechanics Symposium,Washington DC, July 5-7, 2001, ed. D. Elsworth, J.P. Tinucci, and K.A.Heasley, 107-112. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
van Oort, E., Hale, A.H. Mody, F.K., and Roy, S. 1996. Transport in Shales and the Design ofImproved Water Based Shale Drilling Fluids. SPE Drill & Compl 11 (3): 137-146. SPE-28309-PA. doi: 10.2118/28309-PA.
van Oort, E., Hale, A.H., and Mody, F.K. 1995. Manipulation of Coupled Osmotic Flowsfor Stabilisation of Shales Exposed to Water-Based Drilling Fluids. PaperSPE 30499 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,Dallas, 22-25 October. doi: 10.2118/30499-MS.