Effect of Scaleup and Aggregation on the Use of Well Tests To Identify Geological Properties
- Olubusola O. Thomas (Stanford U.) | Rajagopal S. Raghavan (ConocoPhillips Co.) | Thomas N. Dixon (ConocoPhillips Co.)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- June 2005
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 248 - 254
- 2005. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.1.5 Geologic Modeling, 2.4.3 Sand/Solids Control, 5.1 Reservoir Characterisation, 5.5.3 Scaling Methods, 5.1.1 Exploration, Development, Structural Geology, 5.6.3 Pressure Transient Testing, 5.6.4 Drillstem/Well Testing, 4.1.5 Processing Equipment, 5.2 Reservoir Fluid Dynamics, 5.5.8 History Matching, 4.3.4 Scale, 5.5 Reservoir Simulation
- 0 in the last 30 days
- 364 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
This paper discusses specific issues encountered when pressure tests areanalyzed in reservoirs with complex geological properties. These issues relateto questions concerning the methodology of scaleup, the degree of aggregation,and the reliability of conventional methods of analysis. The paper shows thatif we desire to use pressure-transient analysis to determine more complexgeological features such as connectivity and widths of channels, we need amodel that incorporates reservoir heterogeneity. This complexity can lead tosignificantly more computational effort in the analysis of the pressuretransient.
The paper demonstrates that scaleup criteria, based on steady-stateprocedures, are inadequate to capture transient pressure responses.Furthermore, the number of layers needed to match the transient response may besignificantly greater than the number of layers needed for areservoir-simulation study. The use of models without a sufficient number oflayers may lead to interpretations that are in significant error.
The paper compares various vertical aggregation methods to coarsen thefine-grid model. The pressure-derivative curve is used as a measure ofevaluating the adequacy of the scaleup procedure. Neither the use ofpermeability at a wellbore nor the average layer permeability as criteria forthe aggregation was adequate to reduce the number of layers significantly.
The objectives of this paper are to demonstrate the impact of the detailedand small-scale heterogeneities of a formation on the flow characteristics thatare obtained from a pressure test and how those heterogeneities affect theanalysis of the pressure test. The literature recognizes that special scaleupprocedures are required in the vicinity of wells located in heterogeneousfields. Our work demonstrates that these procedures apply only to rather smallchanges in pressure over time and are usually inadequate to meet objectives forhistory-matching well tests. Using a fine-scale geological model derived bygeological and geophysical techniques, this work systematically examines theinterpretations obtained by various aggregation and scaleup techniques. We willdemonstrate that unless care is taken, the consequences of too much aggregationmay lead to significant errors on decisions concerning the value of areservoir. Current scaleup techniques presume that spatial (location ofboundaries, location of faults, etc.) variables are maintained. In analyzing awell test, however, one of our principal objectives is to determine therelationship between the well response and geometrical variables. We show thata limited amount of aggregation will preserve the spatial and petrophysicalrelationships we wish to determine. At this time, there appears to be no methodavailable to determine the degree of scaleup a priori. Because the objective ofwell testing is to estimate reservoir properties, the scaleup process needs tobe made a part of the history-matching procedure.
By assuming a truth case, we show that too much vertical aggregation maylead to significant errors. Comparisons with traditional analyses based onanalytical techniques are made. Whenever an analytical model is used in theanalysis, unless otherwise stated, we use a single-layer-reservoirsolution.
|File Size||602 KB||Number of Pages||7|
1. Herweijer, J.C. and Dubrule, O.R.F.: "Screening of Geostatistical ReservoirModels With Pressure Transients," JPT (November 1995) 973.
2. Christie, M.A. and Blunt, M.J.: "Tenth SPE Comparative SolutionProject: A Comparison of Upscaling Techniques," SPEREE (August 2001)308.
3. Durlofsky, L.J. et al.: "Scale Up of Heterogeneous ThreeDimensional Reservoir Descriptions," SPEJ (September 1996) 313.
4. Li, D., Cullick, A.S., and Lake, L.W.: "Global Scale-up ofReservoir Model Permeability with Local Grid Refinement," J. Pet. Sci.& Eng. (December 1995) 14, No. 1, 1.
5. Ding, Y.: "Scaling-up in theVicinity of Wells in Heterogeneous Fields," paper SPE 29137 presented atthe 1995 SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, San Antonio, Texas, 12-15February.
6. Durlofsky, L.J., Milliken, W.J., and Bernath, A.: "Scale Up in the Near-WellRegion," paper SPE 51940 presented at the 1999 SPE Reservoir SimulationSymposium, Houston, 14-17 February.
7. Peaceman, D.W.: "EffectiveTransmissibilities of a Gridblock by Upscaling—Comparizon of Direct MethodsWith Renormalization," SPEJ (September 1997) 338.
8. Sagar, R.K., Kelkar, M.G., and Thompson, L.G.: "Reservoir Description by IntegratingWell-Test Data and Spatial Statistics," SPEFE (December 1995) 201.
9. Corbett, P.W.M., Mesmari, A., and Stewart, G.: "A Method for Using theNaturally-Occurring Negative Geoskin in the Description of FluvialReservoirs," paper SPE 36882 presented at the 1996 SPE European PetroleumConference, Milan, Italy, 22-24 October.
10. Raghavan, R., Roesler, R.R., and Tureyen, O.I.: "Effect of Scaleup and Aggregation onthe Analysis of Interference Tests," SPEREE (December 2004) 392.
11. Raghavan, R. et al.: "Integration of Geology, Geophysics,and Numerical Simulation in the Interpretation of a Well Test in a FluvialReservoir," SPEREE (June 2001) 201.
12. Landa, J.L.: "Technique ToIntegrate Production and Static Data in a Self-Consistent Way," paper SPE71597 presented at the 2001 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, NewOrleans, 30 September-3 October.
13. Mezghani, M. and Roggero, F.: "Combining Gradual Deformation andUpscaling Techniques for Direct Conditioning of Fine-Scale Reservoir Models toInterference Test Data," SPEJ (March 2004) 79.
14. Durlofsky, L.J., Jones, R.C., and Milliken, W.J.: "A NonuniformCoarsening Approach for Scale-Up of Displacement Processes in Porous Media,"Adv. in Water Resour. (October-December 1997) 20, No. 5-6, 335.
15. Raghavan, R.: "A Review of Applications to Constrain Pumping-TestResponses to Improve on Geological Description and Uncertainty," Rev. Geophy.(November 2004) 42, RG4001; DOI: 10.10292003RG000142.