Well-Test Characterization of Wedge-Shaped, Faulted Reservoirs
- D.D. Charles (Superior Energy Services LLC) | H.H. Rieke (U. of Louisiana at Lafayette) | R. Purushothaman (U. of Louisiana at Lafayette)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- June 2001
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 221 - 230
- 2001. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 2.2.2 Perforating, 3.1 Artificial Lift Systems, 1.8 Formation Damage, 5.1.2 Faults and Fracture Characterisation, 5.6.4 Drillstem/Well Testing, 4.1.2 Separation and Treating, 5.6.3 Pressure Transient Testing, 5.1.3 Sedimentology, 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 5.6.8 Well Performance Monitoring, Inflow Performance, 5.1.1 Exploration, Development, Structural Geology, 2.4.3 Sand/Solids Control, 5.1.5 Geologic Modeling, 4.1.5 Processing Equipment, 5.1 Reservoir Characterisation, 5.5.8 History Matching, 3.3.1 Production Logging, 5.2 Reservoir Fluid Dynamics, 2.4.5 Gravel pack design & evaluation
- 10 in the last 30 days
- 393 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Two offshore, wedge-shaped reservoirs in south Louisiana were interpreted with pressure-buildup responses by comparing the results from simulated finite-element model studies. The importance of knowing the correct reservoir shape, and how it is used to interpret the generated boundary-pressure responses, is briefly discussed. Two different 3D computer models incorporating different wedge-shaped geometries simulated the test pressure-buildup response patterns.
Variations in the two configurations are topologically expressed as a constant thickness and a nonconstant thickness, with smooth-surface, wedged-shaped reservoir models. The variable-thickness models are pinched-out updip at one end and faulted at the other end. Numerical well-test results demonstrated changes in the relationships between the pressure-derivative profile, the wellbore location, and the extent of partial penetration in the reservoir models. The wells were placed along the perpendicular bisector (top view) at distances starting from the apex at 5, 10, 20, 40, 50, 60, 80, and 90% of the reservoir length. Results demonstrate that boundary distance identification (such as distance, number, and type) based solely on the log-log derivative profile in rectangular and triangular wedge-shaped reservoirs should be strongly discouraged. Partial-penetration effects (PPE's) in wedge-shaped reservoirs are highly dependent on the wellbore location relative to the wedge, and the well-test-data analysis becomes more complex.
The interpretation of the effect of reservoir shape on pressure-transient well-test data needs improvement. It is economically imperative to be able to generate an accurate estimate of reserves and producing potential. This is especially critical for independent operators who wish to participate in deepwater opportunities in the Gulf of Mexico. Proper interpretation of data extracted from cost-effective well tests is an integral part of describing, evaluating, and managing such reservoirs. Well-test information such as average reservoir pressure, transmissivity, pore volume, storativity, formation damage, deliverability, distance to the boundary, and completion efficiency are some of the technical inputs into economic and operational decisions. Several key economic decisions that operators have to make are:
Should the reservoir be exploited?
How many wells are needed to develop the reservoir?
Is artificial lift necessary (and if so, when)?
The identification of morphological demarcation components such as impermeable barriers (faults, intersecting faults, facies changes, erosional unconformities, and structural generated depositional pinchouts) and constant-pressure boundaries (aquifer or gas-cap) from well testing help to establish the reservoir boundaries, shape, and volume. One must remember that the geological entrapment structure or sedimentological body does not always define the reservoir's limits.
Our present study provides insight into wedge-shaped reservoirs in the Gulf of Mexico. Seismic exploration can define geological shapes in either two or three dimensions in the subsurface. These shapes are expressions of the preserved structural history and depositional environments and are verified by observations of such structures in outcrops and present-day depositional environments. From a sedimentological viewpoint, the following sedimentary deposits can exhibit wedge-shaped geometries. Preserved barchan sand dunes, reworked transgressive sands, barrier-island sands, offshore bars, alluvial fan deposits, delta-front sheet sands, and lenticular channel sands form the more plausible pinchout, wedge-shaped geological models recognized in the Gulf of Mexico sedimentary sequence.
Reviewing the petroleum engineering literature, we found very few technical papers addressing wedge-shaped reservoir geometries and their effects on reservoir performance. Their detailed analytical results are discussed and applied to the interpretations of our model results. An overview of the conceptual models is presented as a quick orientation to emphasize some model issues.
Horne and Temeng1 were the first to address the problem of recognizing, discriminating, and locating reservoir pinchouts with the Green's functions method proposed by Gringarten and Ramey2 in pressure-transient analysis. The analytical solution considered a dimensionless penetration depth of the well. Their results showed that pinchout boundaries appear similar to constant-pressure boundaries with respect to pressure-drawdown behavior and not as a perpendicular sealing boundary.
Yaxley3 presented a set of simple equations for calculating the stabilized inflow performance of a well in infinite rectangular and wedge-shaped drainage systems. The basis for Yaxley's mathematical model is the application of transient linear flow (as opposed to radial flow conditions assumed for the reservoir) and the mathematical difference between a plane source and a line source in linear-flow drainage systems for various rectangular drainage shapes. The equations were derived from transient linear-flow relationships for a well located between parallel no-flow boundaries. This concept was applied to intersecting no-flow boundaries and an outer circular, no-flow, constant-pressure boundary. His approach involved a constant ßr that is interpreted as an extra pressure drop relative to a well of radius ro (radial distance to the well location), which is a result of the distortion of the radial streamline pattern.
Chen and Raghavan4 developed a solution to compute pressure distributions in wedge-shaped drainage systems using Laplace transforms. Their mathematical approach overcame existing limitations in some of the previous solutions, which were mentioned earlier. By applying the inversion theorem to the Laplace transformation, they verified that the slope of the pressure profile is inversely proportional to the wedge angle of the drainage system. An examination of their results is important to the interpretation of our own simulated pressure-response issues. Generally, their model solutions showed three radial-flow periods in the absence of wellbore-storage effects. The radial-flow periods showed that:
During an initial radial-flow period, neither of the impermeable boundaries registered either singly or jointly.
In the second phase, one or two boundaries became evident on the pressure signature.
A third radial-flow period exhibited a semi logarithmic slope proportional to p/?o, where ?o=the angle of the wedge.
|File Size||759 KB||Number of Pages||10|