Reservoir Simulation (includes associated papers 21606 and 21620 )
- Calvin C. Mattax (Exxon Production Research Co.) | Robert L. Dalton (Exxon Production Research Co.)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Journal of Petroleum Technology
- Publication Date
- June 1990
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 692 - 695
- 1990. Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 5.5.8 History Matching, 2.4.3 Sand/Solids Control, 2.2.2 Perforating, 5.5 Reservoir Simulation, 5.2 Reservoir Fluid Dynamics, 5.3 Reservoir Fluid Dynamics, 5.4.1 Waterflooding, 5.1 Reservoir Characterisation, 3 Production and Well Operations
- 4 in the last 30 days
- 1,324 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
"... the precision with which variations In reservoir properties can be modeled Is determined by the number of blocks In the model."
In the past 30 years, reservoir simulation has evolved from a research area into one of the most flexible and widely used tools in reservoir engineering. Use of reservoir simulation has grown because of its ability to predict the future performance of oil and gas reservoirs over a wide range of operating conditions. Reservoir simulators use numerical methods and high-speed computers to model multidimensional fluid flow in reservoir rock. Reliable simulators and adequate computing capacity are available to most reservoir engineers, so simulation is usually practical for all reservoir sizes and all types of reservoir performance studies. Although the use of simulation frequently is optional, it may be the only reliable way to predict the performance of a large, complex reservoir, especially if such external considerations as government regulations influence the production schedule. Even for small reservoirs where simple calculations or extrapolations may be adequate, simulation is often faster, cheaper, and more reliable than alternative methods for predicting performance.
A reservoir simulator models a reservoir as if it were divided into a number of individual blocks (gridblocks). Each block corresponds to a designated location in the reservoir and is assigned properties-porosity, permeability, relative permeability, etc. -believed to be representative of the reservoir at that location. In the simulator, fluids can flow between neighboring blocks at a rate determined by pressure differences between blocks and flow properties assigned to the interfaces between blocks. In essence, the mathematical problem is reduced to a calculation of flow between adjacent blocks. For every block-to-block interface, a set of equations must be solved to calculate the flow of all mobile phases. The equations generally incorporate Darcy's law and the concept of material balance and contain terms describing the permeability " between" blocks, fluid mobilities (relative permeability and viscosity), and rock and fluid compressibilities. Fig. 1 illustrates the most common types of models used in simulation. Models range in complexity from a single block, useful only for classical material-balance calculations, to fully 3D models capable of modeling all major factors that influence reservoir performance. Each gridblock in a model has only one set of properties; there is no variation in any property within a block. For example, phase saturations in a model block will be volumetric averages of the saturations in that part of the reservoir represented by the block. In this respect, a model block can be visualized as a well-stiffed tank (i.e., its contents are homogeneous)connected to adjacent tanks with pipes whose flow capacities are determined by reservoir flow properties. This visualization, although simplistic, demonstrates that the precision with which variations in reservoir properties can be modeled is determined by the number of blocks in the model. A simulator also divides the life of a reservoir into discrete increments. Changes in a reservoir (pressure, saturation, etc.) are computed over each of many time increments, or timesteps. Conditions are defined only at the beginning and end of each timestep; nothing is defined at any intermediate time within a time interval. The accuracy with which reservoir behavior can be calculated generally will be influenced by the length of the timesteps as well as the number of gridblocks. The preceding discussion implies that for any size gridblock and any length of timestep, there will always be abrupt changes in reservoir conditions from one block to the next and from one timestep to the next. Fig. 2 illustrates this point. At the top of Fig. 2 are plan views of a hypothetical two-well reservoir being waterflooded and a four-gridblock simulator model of the reservoir. The two plots show-water-saturation distribution at a given time in both the reservoir and the model.
|File Size||4 MB||Number of Pages||6|