Estimation of Mud Losses during the Removal of Drill Cuttings in Oil Drilling
- Asanthi Jinasena (University of South-Eastern Norway) | Roshan Sharma (University of South-Eastern Norway)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- October 2020
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 2,162 - 2,177
- 2020.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- unscented Kalman filter, moving horizon estimation, topside measurements, MPD, fluid loss
- 21 in the last 30 days
- 48 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Quantification of fluid losses at the topside is beneficial for early kick-loss detection and automation of the drilling operation. A model-based estimator is a useful tool for this purpose. The real-time estimation of the amount of fluid losses with the cuttings removal could significantly help in this regard, especially for kick detection and automation. However, to the authors’ knowledge, there is no published literature on such attempts. Therefore, a simple dynamic mathematical model of the complete closed-loop oil-well drilling system is developed in this study for estimation of the fluid losses during the removal of drill cuttings at the topside, as well as for monitoring the flow of return fluid during drilling. Furthermore, this model could provide information about the topside fluid-flow rates and fluid losses to other monitoring systems, such as kick- and loss-detection systems and automation systems. The model is used to estimate both the mud-pit level and the fluid losses during the removal of the drill cuttings through the solids-removal equipment. The model-order reduction of the flowline model using orthogonal collocation allows the model to be used in real-time estimations and/or with control systems. It is simple, easy to implement, and, more importantly, shows the necessary dynamic behavior of both the bottomside and topside of a drilling operation simultaneously. The topside model can be used together with bottomside models of varying complexity to estimate both the bottomhole pressure and the fluid losses through the solids-removal system.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||16|
Aarsnes, U. J. F., Flåtten, T., and Aamo, O. M. 2016. Review of Two-Phase Flow Models for Control and Estimation. Annu Rev Control 42 (July): 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2016.06.001.
Ahmed, M. A., Hegab, O. A., and Sabry, A. 2016. Early Detection Enhancement of the Kick and Near-Balance Drilling Using Mud Logging Warning Sign. Egyptian J Basic Appl Sci 3 (1): 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbas.2015.09.006.
American Association of Drilling Engineers. 1999. Shale Shakers and Drilling Fluid Systems. Houston, Texas, USA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Anfinsen, B. T. and Rommetveit, R. 1992. Sensitivity of Early Kick Detection Parameters in Full-Scale Gas Kick Experiments with Oil and Water Based Drilling Muds. Paper presented at the IADC/SPE Drilling Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 18–21 February. SPE-23934-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/23934-MS.
Basu, S. 2019. Open-Channel Flow Measurement. In Plant Flow Measurement and Control Handbook, ed. S. Basu, Chap. III, 257–331. New York, New York, USA: Academic Press.
Berg, C., Stakvik, J. Å., Lie, B. et al. 2019. Pressure Wave Propagation in Managed Pressure Drilling Model Comparison with Real Life Data. Paper presented at the 60th SIMS Conference on Simulation and Modelling, Våsterås, Sweden, 13–16 August. https://doi.org/10.3384/ecp2017091.
Bernstein, A., Chertock, A., and Kurganov, A. 2016. Central-Upwind Scheme for Shallow Water Equations with Discontinuous Bottom Topography. Bull Brazil Math Soc 47 (1): 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00574-016-0124-3.
Bjorkevoll, K. S., Hovland, S., Barr Aas, I. et al. 2010. Successful Use of Real Time Dynamic Flow Modelling To Control a Very Challenging Managed Pressure Drilling Operation in the North Sea. Paper presented at the SPE/IADC Managed Pressure Drilling and Underbalanced Operations Conference and Exhibition, Kuala Lumpur, 24–25 February. SPE-130311-MS. https://doi.org/10.2523/130311-MS.
Bjorkevoll, K. S., Rommetveit, R., Gjeraldstveit, H. et al. 2003. Field Data Verification of Transient Surge Swab Model for Critical Wells Applications. Paper presented at the Offshore Mediterranean Conference and Exhibition, Ravenna, Italy, 26–28 March. OMC-2003-063.
Bollermann, A., Chen, G., Kurganov, A. et al. 2013. A Well-Balanced Reconstruction of Wet/Dry Fronts for the Shallow Water Equations. J Sci Comput 56 (2): 267–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-012-9677-5.
Cayeux, E. and Daireaux, B. 2013. Precise Gain and Loss Detection Using a Transient Hydraulic Model of the Return Flow to the Pit. Paper presented at the SPE/IADC Middle East Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition, Dubai, UAE, 7–9 October. SPE-166801-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/166801-MS.
Chaudhry, M. H. 2008. Open-Channel Flow, second edition. New York, New York, USA: Springer.
Chow, V. T. 1959. Open-Channel Hydraulics. New York, New York, USA: McGraw-Hill.
Gjerstad, K. and Time, R. 2015. Simplified Explicit Flow Equations for Herschel-Bulkley Fluids in Couette-Poiseuille Flow—For Real-Time Surge and Swab Modeling in Drilling. SPE J. 20 (3): 610–627. SPE-170246-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/170246-PA.
Grace, R. D., Cudd, B., Carden, R. S. et al. 1994. Advanced Blowout and Well Control. Houston, Texas, USA: Gulf Publishing Company.
Guo, B. and Liu, G. 2011. Applied Drilling Circulation Systems: Hydraulics, Calculations, and Models. New York, New York, USA: Elsevier.
Isaacson, E. and Keller, H. B. 1966. Analysis of Numerical Methods, second edition. New York, New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
Jiang, H., Liu, G., Li, J. et al. 2018. An Innovative Diagnosis Method for Lost Circulation with Unscented Kalman Filter. J Pet Sci & Eng 166: 731–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.03.063.
Jiang, H., Liu, G., Li, J. et al. Numerical Simulation of a New Early Gas Kick Detection Method Using UKF Estimation and GLRT. J Pet Sci & Eng 173: 415–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.09.065.
Jinasena, A., Ghaderi, A., and Sharma, R. 2018. Modeling and Analysis of Fluid Flow through a Non-Prismatic Open Channel with Application to Drilling. Model Identif & Control 39 (4): 261–272. https://doi.org/10.4173/mic.2018.4.3.
Jinasena, A., Kaasa, G.-O., and Sharma, R. 2017. Use of Orthogonal Collocation Method for a Dynamic Model of the Flow in a Prismatic Open Channel: For Estimation Purposes. Paper presented at the 58th Conference on Simulation and Modelling (SIMS 58), Reykjavik, Iceland, 25–27 September. https://doi.org/10.3384/ecp1713890.
Jinasena, A., Kaasa, G.-O., and Sharma, R. 2019. Improved Real-Time Estimation of Return Flow Rate of Drilling Fluids by Model Adaptation for Friction Parameter. IEEE Sensors J 19 (20): 9314–9323. https://doi.org/10.1109/jsen.2019.2923854.
Jinasena, A. and Sharma, R. 2018. Model-Based Real-Time Flow Rate Estimation in Open Channels with Application to Conventional Drilling. Paper presented at the 18th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems, Daegwallyeon, South Korea, 17–20 October.
Julier, S. and Uhlmann, J. 2004. Unscented Filtering and Nonlinear Estimation. Proc IEEE 92 (3): 401–422. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2003.823141.
Kaasa, G.-O., Stamnes, Ø. N., Aamo, O. M. et al. 2012. Simplified Hydraulics Model Used for Intelligent Estimation of Downhole Pressure for a Managed-Pressure-Drilling Control System. SPE Drill & Compl 27 (1): 127–138. SPE-143097-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/143097-PA.
Kurganov, A. 2018. Finite-Volume Schemes for Shallow-Water Equations. Acta Numer 27: 289–351. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0962492918000028.
Kurganov, A. and Petrova, G. 2007. A Second-Order Well-Balanced Positivity Preserving Central-Upwind Scheme for the Saint-Venant System. Commun Math Sci 5 (1): 133–160.
Kurganov, A., Prugger, M., and Wu, T. 2017. Second-Order Fully Discrete Central-Upwind Scheme for Two-Dimensional Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws. SIAM J Sci Comput 39 (3): A947–A965. https://doi.org/10.1137/15M1038670.
Lage, C. V. M. A. and Time, R. W. 2000. Mechanistic Model for Upward Two-Phase Flow in Annuli. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, USA, 1–4 October. SPE-63127-MS. https://doi.org/10.2523/63127-MS.
Naeg, M., Pradie, E., Delahaye, T. et al. 1998. Cuttings Flow Meters Monitor Hole Cleaning in Extended Reach Wells. Paper presented at the SPE European Petroleum Conference, The Hague, The Netherlands, 20–22 October. SPE-50677-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/50677-MS.
Nocedal, J. and Wright, S. J. 2006. Numerical Optimization, second edition. New York, New York, USA: Springer.
Ojinnaka, M. A. and Beaman, J. J. 2018. Full-Course Drilling Model for Well Monitoring and Stochastic Estimation of Kick. J Pet Sci & Eng 166: 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.03.012.
Omrani, A. E., Franchek, M. A., Grigoriadis, K. et al. 2016. Model-Based Early Gas Kick and Well Loss Detection. Paper presented at the IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, Banff, Alberta, Canada, 12–15 July. https://doi.org/10.1109/AIM.2016.7576938.
Petersen, J., Rommetveit, R., Bjorkevoll, K. S. et al. 2008. A General Dynamic Model for Single and Multi-Phase Flow Operations during Drilling, Completion, Well Control and Intervention. Paper presented at the IADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition, Jakarta, Indonesia, 25–27 August. SPE-114688-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/114688-MS.
Pirir, I., Jinasena, A., and Sharma, R. 2018. A Dynamic Model for Drain Back to Active Mud Pit Combined with a Well Model during Drilling. J Pet Sci & Eng 167: 803–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.04.057.
Rao, C. V., Rawlings, J. B., and Mayne, D. Q. 2003. Constrained State Estimation for Nonlinear Discrete-Time Systems: Stability and Moving Horizon Approximations. IEEE Trans Auto Control 48 (2): 246–258. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2002.808470.
Rawlings, J. B., Mayne, D. Q., and Diehl, M. M. 2017. Model Predictive Control: Theory, Computation and Design, second edition. Madison, Wisconsin, USA: Nob Hill Publishing.
Reitsma, D. 2010. A Simplified and Highly Effective Method To Identify Influx and Losses during Managed Pressure Drilling without the Use of a Coriolis Flow Meter. Paper presented at the SPE/IADC Managed Pressure Drilling and Underbalanced Operations Conference and Exhibition, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 24–25 February. SPE-130312-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/130312-MS.
Samuel, R. and Lovorn, R. 2016. Swab and Surge Pressures with Reservoir Fluid Influx Condition during MPD. Paper presented at the IADC/SPE Drilling Conference and Exhibition, Fort Worth, Texas, USA, 1–3 March. SPE-178881-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/178881-MS.
Shahri, M., Kutlu, B., Thetford, T. et al. 2018. Adopting Physical Models in Real-Time Drilling Application: Wellbore Hydraulics. Paper presented at the SPE Liquids-Rich Basins Conference–North America, Midland, Texas, USA, 5–6 September. SPE-191797-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/191797-MS.
Simon, D. 2006. Optimal State Estimation: Kalman, H Infinity and Nonlinear Approaches. Hoboken, New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
Stamnes, Ø. N., Zhou, J., Kaasa, G.-O. et al. 2008. Adaptive Observer Design for the Bottomhole Pressure of a Managed Pressure Drilling System. Paper presented at the 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Cancun, Mexico, 9–11 December. https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.2008.4738845.