Design and Analysis of a New Profile Control Tool: Swirling Autonomous Inflow-Control Device
- Mingjun Yang (Sichuan University of Science and Engineering) | Xinyuan Wu (Sichuan University of Science and Engineering) | Yingchun Yue (Sichuan University of Science and Engineering) | Ying Zhang (Sichuan University of Science and Engineering) | Ye Chen (Chongqing University) | Yufeng Tang (Sichuan University of Science and Engineering)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Production & Operations
- Publication Date
- May 2020
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 351 - 361
- 2020.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- swirling AICD, pressure drop calculation model, CFD analysis, experimental verification, profile control principle
- 25 in the last 30 days
- 43 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Edge/bottomwater cresting or even breaking into the wellbore has been a major factor affecting crude-oil production and has not been overcome so far. Aiming at this problem, this paper designs a new autonomous inflow-control device (AICD) profile control tool— swirling AICD—on the basis of the research of profile control tools used in the past. The AICD is mainly based on the principle of automatic phase separation, the splitting of three-way pipes, and the principle of vortex depressurization. Combined with the special flow path, the production of edge/bottomwater can be effectively restrained. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) numerical simulation and indoor flow experiments are used to prove the water-control function of the swirling AICD, to obtain the pressure and velocity distribution of fluid flow in the AICD, and to obtain the influencing factors and their influence rules. Based on these analyses, we established the swirling AICD mathematical model, which has laid a theoretical foundation for the application of swirling AICDs in wells.
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||11|
Andrade, A., Chango, M., Atahualpa, G. et al. 2018. Production Performance of Multiple Completion Designs: Openhole, Slotted Liner, ICD, and AICD: A Case Study for Water Control in Villano Field, Ecuador. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, USA, 24–26 September. SPE-191635-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/191635-MS.
Corona, G., Fripp, M., and Yin, W. 2017. Fluidic Diode Autonomous ICD Multiphase Performance in Light-Oil Reservoirs. Paper presented at the SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, Manama, Bahrain, 6–9 March. SPE-183863-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/183863-MS.
Crow, S. L., Coronado, M. P., and Mody, R. K. 2006. Means for Passive Inflow Control Device Upon Gas Breakthrough. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 24–27 September. SPE-102208-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/102208-MS.
Elverhøy, A. B., Aakre, H., and Mathiesen, V. 2018. Autonomous Inflow Control for Reduced Water Cut and/or Gas Oil Ratio. Paper presented at the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, USA, 30 April–3 May. OTC-28860-MS. https://doi.org/10.4043/28860-MS.
Freyer, R., Fejerskov, M., and Huse, A. 2002. An Oil Selective Inflow Control System. Paper presented at the European Petroleum Conference, Aberdeen, UK, 29–31 October. SPE-78272-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/78272-MS.
Hartge, E. U., Ratschow, L., Wischnewski, R. et al. 2009. CFD-Simulation of a Circulating Fluidized Bed Riser. Particuology 7 (4): 283–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2009.04.005.
Ismail, I. M., Sidik, N. A. C., Wahi, F. S. et al. 2018. Increased Oil Production in Super Thin Oil Rim Using the Application of Autonomous Inflow Control Devices. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, USA, 24–26 September. SPE-191590-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/191590-MS.
James, E. J. and Hossain, M. M. 2017. Evaluation of Factors Influencing the Effectiveness of Passive and Autonomous Inflow Control Devices. Paper presented at the SPE/IATMI Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Jakarta, Indonesia, 17–19 October. SPE-186926-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/186926-MS.
Joubran, J. 2018. Intelligent Completions: Design and Reliability of Interval Control Valves in the Past, Present, and Future. Paper presented at the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, USA, 30 April–3 May. OTC-28917-MS. https://doi.org/10.4043/28917-MS.
Kaur, A., Stalker, R., and Graham, G. M. 2018. Simulating Squeeze Treatments in Wells Completed with Inflow Control Devices. Paper presented at the SPE International Oilfield Scale Conference and Exhibition, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK, 20–21 June. SPE-190740-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/190740-MS.
Kuvakina, M., Makarov, Y., and Zhuravlev, O. 2015. Well Completion Selection to Increase the Efficiency of Contact Reserves Development on Example of Van-Yoganskoye Field. Paper presented at the SPE Russian Petroleum Technology Conference, Moscow, Russia, 26–28 October. SPE-176525-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/176525-MS.
Li, H., Jiang, B., Wang, Y. et al. 2014. A Semianalytical Model for Horizontal Wells with Improved Stinger Completion in Heterogeneous Bottomwater Reservoirs. J Can Pet Technol 53 (3): 151–160. SPE-170251-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/170251-PA.
Volkov, V. Y., Skibin, A. P., Zhuravlev, O. N. et al. 2014. Adaptive Inflow Control System. Physics 2 (8): 3–36. https://arxiv.org/abs/1408.5251.
Wang, X. Q., Wang, Z. M., and Zeng, Q. S. 2014. A Novel Autonomous Inflow Control Device: Design, Structure Optimization and Fluid Sensitivity Analysis. Paper presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 10–12 December. IPTC-17758-MS. https://doi.org/10.2523/IPTC-17758-MS.
Wei, J. G., Lin, X. S., Liu, X. M. et al. 2017. The Experimental and Model Study on Variable Mass Flow for Horizontal Wells with Perforated Completion. J Energy Res Technol 139 (6): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4037026.
Yang, M., Li, H., Xie, J. et al. 2016. The Theory of the Automatic Phase Selection Controller and Its Performance Analysis. J Pet Sci Eng 144: 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2016.03.001.
Yoshioka, N. and Hotta, Y. 2010. Liquid Cyclone as a Hydraulic Classifier. Chem Eng 19 (12): 632–641. https://doi.org/10.1252/kakoronbunshu1953.19.632.
Yue, P., Chen, X., Liu, H. et al. 2015. The Critical Parameters of a Horizontal Well Influenced by a Semi-Permeable Barrier Considering Thickness in a Bottom Water Reservoir. J Pet Sci Eng 129: 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2015.02.029.
Zhang, N., Li, H., Liu, Y. et al. 2019a. A New Autonomous Inflow Control Device Designed for a Loose Sand Oil Reservoir with Bottom Water. J Pet Sci Eng 178: 344–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2019.03.034.
Zhang, N., Li, H., Zhang, Y. et al. 2019b. A Numerical Simulation for the Determination of the Shunt Ratio at a T-Junction with Different Branch Angles, Viscosities, and Flow Rates. J Energy Res Technol 141 (10): 102906. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4043635.
Zhao, L., Zeng, Q., and Wang, Z. 2017. Design and Performance of a Novel Autonomous Inflow Control Device. Energy Fuels 32 (1): 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b02673.
Zitterell, D. B., Frizzone, J. A., and Neto, J. A. 2014. Dimensional Analysis Approach to Estimate Local Head Losses in Microirrigation Connectors. Irrig Sci 32 (3): 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-013-0424-y.