Modeling the Conformance Improvement Using Flow Control Devices in Infill Wells Adjacent to SAGD Well Pairs: No Flashing
- Mazda Irani (Ashaw Energy) | Sahar Ghannadi (Ashaw Energy)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- April 2020
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 800 - 819
- 2020.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- wedge well, conformance improvement, infill well, steam-assisted gravity drainage, flow control device, SAGD
- 5 in the last 30 days
- 83 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Late in the life of the steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) process, drilling a single, horizontal infill well (called a wedge well by some) has become a common practice in the oil bank located between two mature SAGD well pairs to produce bitumen that has been heated and mobilized but could not be effectively drained by gravity because of the large lateral location relative to that of the SAGD producers. Because this oil bank is surrounded by a large, depleted steam chamber created by the existing well pairs, little heat is required to mobilize bitumen. Consequently, the incremental steam/oil ratio (SOR) to produce this bitumen can be reduced using these infill wells. One of the challenges, however, in producing such wells is that nonuniform drainage and local hot spots can be readily created in the first year of their operation that in many cases require steam stimulations and completion retrofits, such as with flow control devices (FCDs), to improve the drainage profile. This work is a continuation of three previous parts (presented in Irani 2018, 2019, and Irani and Gates 2018) on SAGD near-wellbore drainage behavior, control, and some of the modeling challenges. In previous parts, productivity index (PI) models were formulated specifically for an SAGD well producing emulsion from the liquid pool under changing operational subcool conditions. Given the conformance challenges, many infill wells have greater risk of developing hot spots than SAGD producers, suggesting that the wellbore modeling, which includes the response of the FCDs, should be coupled with a PI model appropriately for such wells.
Currently, there is no suitable PI model to predict drainage rates in these SAGD infill wells. The production rate in these wells is highly pressure driven in contrast to the SAGD reservoir drainage process that is dominantly gravity driven. In this study, a time variable PI model is analytically developed for infill wells considering a developed pressure-driven formulation. The model accurately shows fluctuations in the production rate because of flowing bottomhole pressure (FBHP) variations and can be used for both oil rate prediction and forecasting and wellbore hydraulic design for infill wells. This novel approach is the first of its kind to incorporate temperature variation, pressure dependency, and steam interface velocity within a PI model for infill wells. To achieve higher efficiencies, the location and characteristics of the FCDs along the infill wells should be optimized. In this study, the mathematical PI model of infill wells is coupled with an FCD model, and the analysis of different configurations of FCDs is evaluated. The results of this work show an uplift in a well completed with liner-deployed FCDs, but because flashing is not incorporated in the PI model, the pressure drop predicted within these FCDs for produced fluids with free steam vapor is found to be less than reality. Ignoring flashing through the FCD provides higher density of the fluid passing through the venturi. Therefore, the FCD creates less choking with reduced conformance control than would be expected if flashing was considered.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||20|
Arthur, J. E., Gittins, S. D., and Chhina, H. S. 2009. Recovery Process. Patent No. US7556099B2, CA2591498A1, CA2591498C, US20070295499, WO2007143845A1, Filing date: June 14, 2006, Original Assignee: Encana Corporation.
Babu, D. K. and Odeh, A. S. 1989. Productivity of a Horizontal Well. SPE Res Eval & Eng 4 (4): 417–421. SPE-18298-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/18298-PA.
Bennion, D. B., Gupta, S., Gittins, S. et al. 2009. Protocols for Slotted Liner Design for Optimum SAGD Operation. J Can Pet Technol 48 (11): 21–26. SPE-130441-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/130441-PA.
Butler, R. M. 1991. Thermal Recovery of Oil and Bitumen. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall.
Butler, R. M. and Stephens, D. J. 1981. The Gravity Drainage of Steam-Heated Heavy Oil to Parallel Horizontal Wells. J Can Pet Technol 20 (2): 90–96. PETSOC-81-02-07. https://doi.org/10.2118/81-02-07.
Butler, R. M. 1985. A New Approach to the Modelling of Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage. J Can Pet Technol 24 (3): 42–51. PETSOC-85-03-01. https://doi.org/10.2118/85-03-01.
Chase, R. W., Marietta, C., and Anthony, T. M. 1988. A Simplified Method for Determining Gas-Well Deliverability. SPE Res Eval & Eng 3 (3): 1090–1096. SPE-14507-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/14507-PA.
Chan, R. and Ghannadi, S. 2019. Infill Well Methods for Hydrocarbon Recovery, Patent No. CA 2980009, Filing date: September 25, 2017, Original Assignee: Suncor Energy Inc.
Fetkovich, M. J. 1973. The Isochronal Testing of Oil Wells. Paper Presented at the SPE Annual Meeting (AIME), Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, 30 September–3 October. SPE-4529-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/4529-MS.
Gallice, F. and Wiggins, M. L. 2004. A Comparison of Two-Phase Inflow Performance Relationships. SPE Prod & Oper 19 (2): 100–104. SPE-88445-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/88445-PA.
Ghannadi S., Irani M., and Chalaturnyk R. 2016. Overview of Performance and Analytical Modeling Techniques for Electromagnetic Heating and Applications to Steam-Assisted-Gravity-Drainage Process Startup. SPE J. 21 (2): 311–333. SPE-178427-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/178427-PA.
Irani, M. and Gates, I. 2018. On Subcool Control in Steam-Assisted-Gravity-Drainage Producers—Part III: Efficiency of Subcool Trapping in Nsolv Process. SPE J. 23 (5): 1957–1976. SPE-191355-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/191355-PA.
Irani, M. and Ghannadi, S. 2013. Understanding the Heat-Transfer Mechanism in the Steam-Assisted Gravity-Drainage (SAGD) Process and Comparing the Conduction and Convection Flux in Bitumen Reservoirs. SPE J. 18 (1): 134–145. SPE-163079-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/163079-PA.
Irani, M. 2013. Understanding the Steam-Hammer Mechanism in Steam-Assisted-Gravity-Drainage Wells. SPE J. 18 (6): 1181–1201. SPE-165456-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/165456-PA.
Irani, M. 2018. On Subcool Control in Steam-Assisted-Gravity-Drainage Producers—Part I: Stability Envelopes. SPE J. 23 (3): 841–867. SPE-187956-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/187956-PA.
Irani, M. 2019. On Subcool Control in SAGD Producers—Part II: Localized-Hot-Spots Effects and Optimization of Flow-Control Devices. SPE J. 24 (4): 1613–1629. SPE-193369-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/193369-PA.
Jones, L. G., Blount, E. M., and Glaze, O. H. 1976. Use of Short-Term Multiple Rate Flow Tests to Predict Performance of Wells Having Turbulence. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Fall Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 3–6 October. SPE-6133-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/6133-MS.
Joshi, S. D. 1988. Augmentation of Well Productivity with Slant and Horizontal Wells. J Pet Technol 40 (6): 729–739. SPE-15375-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/15375-PA.
Klins, M. A. and Majcher, M. W. 1992. Inflow Performance Relationships for Damaged or Improved Wells Producing Under Solution Gas Drive. J Pet Technol 44 (12): 1357–1363. SPE-19852-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/19852-PA.
Lastiwka, M., Bailey, C., James, B. et al. 2017. A Practical Approach to the Use and Design of Flow Control Devices in SAGD. Paper presented at the SPE Canada Heavy Oil Technical Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 15–16 February. SPE-185005-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/185005-MS.
NETool™ is a trademark of Landmark Graphics Corporation, 3000 N. Sam Houston Pkwy. E., Houston Texas, USA 77032.
Peaceman, D. W. 1978. Interpretation of Well-Block Pressures in Numerical Reservoir Simulation. SPE J. 18 (3): 183–194. SPE-6893-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/6893-PA.
Peaceman, D. W. 1983. Interpretation of Well-Block Pressures in Numerical Reservoir Simulation with Nonsquare Grid Blocks and Anisotropic Permeability. SPE J. 23 (3): 531–543. SPE-10528-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/10528-PA.
Standing, M. B. 1970. Inflow Performance Relationships for Damaged Wells Producing by Solution-Gas Drive J Pet Technol 22 (11): 1399–1400. SPE-3237-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/3237-PA.
Su, Y. and Gates, I. 2015. Impact of Flow Control Devices on SAGD Performance from Less Heterogeneous to Strongly Heterogeneous Reservoirs. Paper presented at the SPE Canada Heavy Oil Technical Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 9–11 June. SPE-174501-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/174501-MS.
Sukarno, P. and Wisnogroho, A. 1995. Generalized Two-Phase IPR Curve Equation Under Influence of Non-linear Flow Efficiency. Proc., Soc. of Indonesian Petroleum Engineers Production Optimization Intl. Symposium, Bandung, Indonesia, 31–43.
Vachon, G. P., Klaczek, W., Erickson, P. J. et al. 2015. Use of Flow Control Devices (FCDs) to Enforce Conformance in Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) Completions. Paper presented at the SPE Canada Heavy Oil Technical Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 9–11 June. SPE-174416-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/174416-MS.
Vogel, J. V. 1968. Inflow Performance Relationships for Solution-Gas Drive Wells. J Pet Technol 20 (1): 83–92. SPE-1476-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/1476-PA.
Wiggins, M. L. 1994. Generalized Inflow Performance Relationships for Three-Phase Flow. SPE Res Eng 9 (3): 181-182. SPE-25458PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/25458-PA.