Pioneer Field Pilot of Optimal Reservoir Management in Campos Basin
- Diego Felipe Barbosa de Oliveira (Petrobras S.A.) | Diogo Ferreira Alves Pereira (Petrobras S.A.) | Gustavo E. Silveira (Petrobras S.A.) | Pedro Andrade Lima Sá de Melo (Petrobras S.A.)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- May 2020
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 578 - 590
- 2020.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- optimal well control, field pilot, decision under uncertainty, reservoir management
- 26 in the last 30 days
- 76 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Reservoir management in offshore fields is a challenging task, particularly for mature fields because of a typical excessive production of water and/or gas. Because of several constraints on facilities capacity, an assisted reservoir management process can deliver solutions to optimally operate offshore fields, seeking to increase oil production with better assessment of water and gas production and injection. Optimal reservoir management (ORM) can be applied aiming at maximizing reservoir performance and to deliver well controls applicable to field operations. In this work, we implemented an assisted optimization procedure to maximize overall oil production for a field offshore Brazil in Campos Basin.
We applied our ORM technique in an important field offshore Brazil, where cumulative oil production is maximized by optimally controlling water rates through injection wells. Injection rates can vary with time, honoring operational requirements of smoothness. Geomechanical limits on injection pressures are considered to avoid loss of rock integrity, and platform constraints on overall production and injection are imposed at all times. Our approach deals with reservoir uncertainties described within a large set of calibrated simulation models to decide on optimal injection rates, taking into account possible risks.
The model-based ORM under uncertainty that we developed showed gains in total oil production over 20 years of operation up to 7.2% with respect to the base strategy currently applied. On average, results show an increase of near 4% in oil production, with concomitant reduction in total water production and in overall water injection.
To guarantee that the gains forecast by our study are feasible, a pilot test in the actual field has been implemented to verify the consistency between modeling and reality (data observation). We have chosen an area in the field to proceed with the optimal injection control pilot, aiming to check the quality of the uncertain models in comparison to the observed data in practice. The pilot area has been selected on the basis of aspects related to geological description, connectivity expected in the reservoir, and operational constraints. The results of 8 months of the pilot show clear coherence between models and reality that is well within the uncertainty range accepted at the reservoir of interest.
To the best of our knowledge, it is the first time that an offshore field is actually operated on the basis of a set of controls obtained through an assisted ORM procedure, although it was performed at a pilot scale. Results suggest robust benefits under reservoir-uncertainties consideration, and large-scale application will take place soon, but that is outside the scope of this work. The pilot provided more confidence in field applications, leading to a broader perspective for full-field implementations.
|File Size||6 MB||Number of Pages||13|
Alhuthali, A. H., Datta-Gupta, A., Yuen, B. et al. 2010. Field Applications of Waterflood Optimization via Optimal Rate Control with Smart Wells. SPE Res Eval & Eng 13 (3): 406–422. SPE-118948-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/118948-PA.
Armstrong, M., Ndiaye, A., Razanatsimba, R. et al. 2013. Scenario Reduction Applied to Geostatistical Simulations. Math Geosci 45 (2): 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-012-9420-7.
Asheim, H. 1988. Maximization of Water Sweep Efficiency by Controlling Production and Injection Rates. Paper presented at the SPE European Petroleum Conference, London, United Kingdom, 16–19 October. SPE-18365-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/18365-MS.
Barros, E., Chitu, A., and Leeuwenburgh, O. 2018. Ensemble-Based Optimization of Well Trajectory Design in the Olympus Field. Presented at the EAGE/TNO Workshop on OLYMPUS Field Development Optimization, Barcelona, Spain, 7 September. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201802294.
Brouwer, D. R., Nævdal, G., Jansen, J. D. et al. 2004. Improved Reservoir Management Through Optimal Control and Continuous Model Updating. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, USA, 26–29 September. SPE-90149-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/90149-MS.
Chang, Y., Lorentzen, R., Naevdal, G. et al. 2018. Olympus Optimization Under Geological Uncertainty. Presented at the EAGE/TNO Workshop on OLYMPUS Field Development Optimization, Barcelona, Spain, 7 September. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201802285.
Chen, Y., Oliver, D. S., and Zhang, D. 2009. Efficient Ensemble-Based Closed-Loop Production Optimization. SPE J. 14 (4): 634–645. SPE-112873-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/112873-PA.
Chen, B. and Reynolds, A. C. 2018. CO2 Water-Alternating-Gas Injection for Enhanced Oil Recovery: Optimal Well Controls and Half-Cycle Lengths. Comput Chem Eng 113: 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2018.03.006.
Emerick, A. A. and Reynolds, A. C. 2013. Ensemble Smoother with Multiple Data Assimilation. Comput Geosci 55: 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.03.011.
Fonseca, R.-M., Chen, B., Jansen, J. D. et al. 2017. A Stochastic Simplex Approximate Gradient (StoSAG) for Optimization under Uncertainty. Int J Numer Methods Eng 109 (13): 1756–1776. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.5342.
Fonseca, R., Della Rossa, E., Emerick, A. et al. 2018. Overview of the Olympus Field Development Optimization Challenge. Paper presented at the 16th European Conference on the Mathematical Oil Recovery, Barcelona, Spain, 3–6 September. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201802246.
Fonseca, R., Leeuwenburgh, O., Rossa, E. D. et al. 2015. Ensemble-Based Multiobjective Optimization of On/Off Control Devices under Geological Uncertainty. SPE Res Eval & Eng 18 (4): 554–563. SPE-173268-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/173268-PA.
Forouzanfar, F., Rossa, E. D., Russo, R. et al. 2013. Life-Cycle Production Optimization of an Oil Field with an Adjoint-Based Gradient Approach. J Pet Sci Eng 112: 351–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2013.11.024.
Fu, J. and Wen, X.-H. 2018. A Regularized Production-Optimization Method for Improved Reservoir Management. SPE J. 23 (2): 467–481. SPE-189457-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/189457-PA.
Gao, G. and Reynolds, A. C. 2006. An Improved Implementation of the LBFGS Algorithm for Automatic History Matching. SPE J. 11 (1): 5–17. SPE-90058-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/90058-PA.
Guo, Z. and Reynolds, A. C. 2018. Robust Life-Cycle Production Optimization with a Support-Vector-Regression Proxy. SPE J. 23 (6): 2409–2427. SPE-191378-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/191378-PA.
Hanea, R., Casanova, P., Hustoft, L. et al. 2018. Drill and Learn: A Decision-Making Work Flow To Quantify Value of Learning. SPE Res Eval & Eng 22 (3): 1131–1143. SPE-182719-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/182719-PA.
Heitsch, H. and Ro¨misch, W. 2003. Scenario Reduction Algorithms in Stochastic Programming. Comput Optim Appl 24 (2–3): 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021805924152.
Khrulenko, A. and Zolotukhin, A. 2018. Ensemble-Based Optimization with Localized Temporal Contributions to Update Direction. Presented at the EAGE/TNO Workshop on OLYMPUS Field Development Optimization, Barcelona, Spain, 7 September. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201802300.
Lu, R., Forouzanfar, F., and Reynolds, A. C. 2017. An Efficient Adaptive Algorithm for Robust Control Optimization Using StoSAG. J Pet Sci Eng 159: 314–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.09.002.
Mattax, C. and Dalton, R. 1990. Reservoir Simulation. Richardson, Texas, USA: Monograph Series, Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Mohagheghian, E., James, L. A., and Haynes, R. D. 2018. Optimization of Hydrocarbon Water Alternating Gas in the Norne Field: Application of Evolutionary Algorithms. Fuel 223: 86–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.01.138.
Nwaozo, J. 2006. Dynamic Optimization of a Water Flood Reservoir. Master’s thesis, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA.
Oliveira, D. F. and Reynolds, A. C. 2015. Hierarchical Multiscale Methods for Life-Cycle Production Optimization: A Field Case Study. SPE J. 20 (5): 896–907. SPE-173273-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/173273-PA.
Oliveira, D. F., Reynolds, A. C., and Jansen, J. D. 2015. An Improved Multiscale Method for Life-Cycle Production Optimization. Comput Geosci 19: 1139–1157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-015-9530-7.
Oliver, D. S., Reynolds, A. C., and Liu, N. 2008. Inverse Theory for Petroleum Reservoir Characterization and History Matching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Pinto, J., Tueros, J., Horowitz, B. et al. 2018. Gradient-Free Strategies to Robust Well Control Optimization. Presented at the EAGE/TNO Workshop on OLYMPUS Field Development Optimization, Barcelona, Spain, 7 September. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201802299.
Saetrom, J. 2018. Drainage Strategy Analytics on the Olympus Field. Presented at the EAGE/TNO Workshop on OLYMPUS Field Development Optimization, Barcelona, Spain, 7 September. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201802296.
Silva, V., Cardoso, M., Oliveira, D. et al. 2018. Stochastic Optimization Strategies Applied to Olympus Benchmark. Presented at the EAGE/TNO Workshop on OLYMPUS Field Development Optimization, Barcelona, Spain, 7 September. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201802289.
Silva, V. L. S., Cardoso, M. A., Oliveira, D. F. B. et al. 2019. Stochastic Optimization Strategies Applied to the Olympus Benchmark. Comput Geosci (online first; posted 21 October). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-019-09854-3.
Silva, V. L. S., Emerick, A. A., Couto, P. et al. 2017. History Matching and Production Optimization Under Uncertainties—Application of Closed-Loop Reservoir Management. J Pet Sci Eng 157: 860–874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.07.037.
Tueros, J. A. R., Horowitz, B., Willmersdorf, R. B. et al. 2019. Refined Ensemble-Based Waterflooding Optimization Subject to Field-Wide Constraints. Comput Geosci, 17 pages (in press). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-019-09866-z.
van Essen, G. M., den Hof, P. M. J. V., and Jansen, J. D. 2011. Hierarchical Long-Term and Short-Term Production Optimization. SPE J. 16 (1): 191–199. SPE-124332-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/124332-PA.
Wang, C., Li, G., and Reynolds, A. C. 2009. Production Optimization in Closed-Loop Reservoir Management. SPE J. 14 (3): 506–523. SPE-109805-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/109805-PA.
Zhao, H., Chen, C., Do, S. et al. 2013. Maximization of a Dynamic Quadratic Interpolation Model for Production Optimization. SPE J. 18 (6): 1012–1025. SPE-141317-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/141317-PA.