Practical Solutions for Rate-Transient Analysis of Tight/Shale Reservoirs with Interfracture Induced Heterogeneity
- Mohammadhossein Heidari Sureshjani (Amirkabir University of Technology) | Mohammad Ahmadi (Amirkabir University of Technology) | Jalal Fahimpour (Amirkabir University of Technology)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- May 2020
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 648 - 663
- 2020.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- heterogeneous reservoirs, rate transient analysis, tight/shale reservoirs
- 31 in the last 30 days
- 106 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Production from previously uneconomic tight/shale formations has become feasible by constructing multifractured horizontal wells. Rate-transient analysis of these wells is commonly performed with the assumption of homogeneous-reservoir models, which might not be valid in reality. During hydraulic fracturing, secondary fractures might be formed in the reservoir. Because of the limited energy of hydraulic fracturing, the quality of secondary fractures decreases with the distance from the main fracture. This would negate the assumption of a homogeneous reservoir.
In this paper, we present practical solutions that include reservoir heterogeneity in rate-transient analysis of multifractured wells. The solutions are developed for transient linear flow, which is a dominant-flow regime in many tight/shale reservoirs. In addition to forward solutions, inverse solutions are also developed that would ease the analysis procedure and reduce the uncertainty of estimation. The solutions are presented in simple formats and can be easily applied. We first developed the solutions such that they can be applied for any arbitrary permeability profile. We further considered special formats for the permeability/distance relationship and developed the relevant models. For a homogeneous system, the well-known square-root-of-time (time to the power of 0.5) plot is used. For the case of heterogeneity, however, the power of time should be greater than 0.5 and less than unity to produce a straight-line plot. We mathematically demonstrate this for a recognized format of the permeability/distance relationship.
The presented solutions are verified with the numerical simulation of synthetic examples. Comparison of the results reveals the accuracy of the analytical solutions. Two field examples are also analyzed to indicate the practical applicability of the analytical solutions. The permeability/distance profiles for these field examples are derived using the inverse solutions.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||16|
Al-Hussainy, R., Ramey, H. J. Jr., and Crawford, P. B. 1966. The Flow of Real Gases through Porous Media. J Pet Technol 18 (5): 624–636. SPE-1243-A-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/1243-A-PA.
Anderson, D. M. and Mattar, L. 2007. An Improved Pseudo-Time for Gas Reservoirs with Significant Transient Flow. J Can Pet Technol 46 (7): 49–54. PETSOC-07-07-05. https://doi.org/10.2118/07-07-05.
Behmanesh, H., Clarkson, C. R., Tabatabaie, S. H. et al. 2015. Impact of Distance-of-Investigation Calculations on Rate-Transient Analysis of Unconventional Gas and Light-Oil Reservoirs: New Formulations for Linear Flow. J Can Pet Technol 54 (6): 509–519. SPE-178928-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/178928-PA.
Duong, A. N. 2010. An Unconventional Rate Decline Approach for Tight and Fracture-Dominated Gas Wells. Paper presented at the Canadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 19–21 October. SPE-137748-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/137748-MS.
El-Banbi, A. H. and Wattenbarger, R. A. 1998. Analysis of Linear Flow in Gas Well Production. Paper presented at the SPE Gas Technology Symposium, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 15–18 March. SPE-39972-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/39972-MS.
Feitosa, G. S., Chu, L., Thompson, L. G. et al. 1994. Determination of Permeability Distribution from Well-Test Pressure Data. J Pet Technol 46 (7): 607–615. SPE-26047-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/26047-PA.
Fuentes-Cruz, G., Gildin, E., and Valko, P. P. 2014. Analyzing Production Data from Hydraulically Fractured Wells: The Concept of Induced Permeability Field. SPE Res Eval & Eng 17 (2): 220–232. SPE-163843-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/163843-PA.
Hamdi, H. 2014. Well-Test Response in Stochastic Permeable Media. J Pet Sci Eng 119: 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2014.05.005.
Heidari Sureshjani, M. and Clarkson, C. R. 2015. An Analytical Model for Analyzing and Forecasting Production from Multifractured Horizontal Wells with Complex Branched-Fracture Geometry. SPE Res Eval & Eng 18 (3): 356–374. SPE-176025-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/176025-PA.
Heidari Sureshjani, M. and Clarkson, C. R. 2016. A Direct Method for Property Estimation from Analysis of Infinite Acting Production in Shale/Tight Gas Reservoirs. J Pet Sci Eng 143: 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2016.02.007.
Levitan, M. M. and Crawford, G. E. 2002. General Heterogeneous Radial and Linear Models for Well-Test Analysis. SPE J. 7 (2): 131–138. SPE-78598-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/78598-PA.
Nobakht, M. and Clarkson, C. R. 2012a. A New Analytical Method for Analyzing Linear Flow in Tight/Shale Gas Reservoirs: Constant-Flowing-Pressure Boundary Condition. SPE Res Eval & Eng 15 (3): 370–384. SPE-143989-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/143989-PA.
Nobakht, M. and Clarkson, C. R. 2012b. A New Analytical Method for Analyzing Linear Flow in Tight/Shale Gas Reservoirs: Constant-Rate Boundary Condition. SPE Res Eval & Eng 15 (1): 51–59. SPE-143990-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/143990-PA.
Oliver, D. S. 1990. The Averaging Process in Permeability Estimation from Well-Test Data. SPE Form Eval 5 (3): 319–324. SPE-19845-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/19845-PA.
Oliver, D. S. 1992. Estimation of Radial Permeability Distribution from Well-Test Data. SPE Form Eval 7 (4): 290–296. SPE-20555-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/20555-PA.
Pedrosa, O. A. 1986. Pressure Transient Response in Stress-Sensitive Formations. Paper presented at the 56th California Regional Meeting of SPE, Oakland, California, USA, 2–4 April. SPE-15115-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/15115-MS.
Sagar, R. K., Kelkar, M. G., and Thompson, L. G. 1995. Reservoir Description by Integration of Well Test Data and Spatial Statistics. SPE Form Eval 10 (4): 267–274. SPE-26462-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/26462-PA.
Shahamat, M. S., Hamdi, H., and Clarkson, C. R. 2018. Analytical Modeling of Linear Flow with Variable Permeability Distribution in Tight and Shale Reservoirs. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 50: 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2017.12.020.
Stalgorova, E. and Mattar, L. 2013. Analytical Model for Unconventional Multifractured Composite Systems. SPE Res Eval & Eng 16 (3): 246–256. SPE-162516-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/162516-PA.
Wattenbarger, R. A., El-Banbi, A. H., Villegas, M. E. et al. 1998. Production Analysis of Linear Flow into Fractured Tight Gas Wells. Paper presented at the SPE Rocky Mountain Regional/Low-Permeability Reservoirs Symposium, Denver, Colorado, USA, 5–8 April. SPE-39931-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/39931-MS.
Yeh, N. S. and Agarwal, R. G. 1989. Pressure Transient Analysis of Injection Wells in Reservoirs with Multiple Fluid Banks. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 8–11 October. SPE-19775-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/19775-MS.
Yuan, B., Zhang, Z., Hamdi, H. et al. 2018. Improved Rate-Transient Analysis for Heterogeneous Fractured Liquid-Rich Tight Reservoirs with Non-Static Properties. Paper presented at the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, USA, 23–25 July. URTEC-2901799-MS. https://doi.org/10.15530/URTEC-2018-2901799.