Integrated Interpretation of Microseismic and Petroleum-Engineering Data for Comparison of Gas Production in Two Interfering Adjacent Wellpads in the Horn River Basin, Canada
- Abdolnaser Yousefzadeh (University of Calgary) | Qi Li (University of Calgary) | Roberto Aguilera (University of Calgary) | Claudio Virués (Nexen Energy ULC)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Production & Operations
- Publication Date
- May 2020
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 255 - 271
- 2020.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- microseismic monitoring, Horn River Basin, well interference, stimulated reservoir volume, shale gas
- 19 in the last 30 days
- 106 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
We present an integrated interpretation of microseismic, treatment, and production data from hydraulic-fracturing jobs carried out in two adjacent wellpads in the Horn River Basin, northeast British Columbia, Canada.
We conclude that poor correlation coefficients (R2) in crossplots of normalized production rate vs. the product of stimulated reservoir volume (SRV) and porosity and total organic carbon (TOC) (SRV × φ × TOC) indicate pressure interference between wells or wellpads. Good correlation coefficients in the same crossplots indicate lack of interference.
The SRV × φ × TOC product reflects the hydrocarbon pore SRV because there is a relationship between TOC and hydrocarbon saturation in shales (Lopez and Aguilera 2018). Our results suggest that natural-fracture networks have an important effect on well connectivity and on the spatial distribution of microseismic data. Connectivity between wellpads occurs through a network of pre-existing natural fractures, which are approximately perpendicular to the least principal compressive stress in the area.
This conclusion is supported by data analysis from Wellpads I and II in the Horn River Basin. Wellpad I includes eight wells that were drilled and fractured in the Muskwa and Otter Park formations (four wells in each formation) in 2010. Wellpad II includes three wells drilled and fractured in 2011 in each of the three shale formations, Muskwa, Otter Park, and Evie. There is a 1-year interval between fracturing on the first and second wellpads.
The data analysis includes evaluation of magnitudes, b-values, moment-tensor inversion (MTI), and the spatial and temporal distributions of three-component microseismic events recorded during more than 200 stages of fracturing by multiwell downhole arrays. We analyzed Gutenberg-Richter frequency/magnitude graphs for each fracturing stage, and with proper integration of b-values, fracture-complexity index (FCI), MTI information, and treatment data, we distinguished hydraulic-fracturing-related events and events associated with slip along the surface of natural fractures. The results are compared with 5- and 4-year gas-production data in Wellpads I and II, respectively.
Identification of natural fractures and information about interactions between hydraulically fractured wells are both essential for optimal well placement and completion, reservoir characterization, SRV calculation, and reservoir simulation. This study presents a distinctive insight into the integrated interpretation of microseismic events and production data to identify the activation of natural fractures and interference between the hydraulically fractured wells. The methodology developed in this study is thus related to production engineering, but examines it from the point of view of microseismic data.
|File Size||5 MB||Number of Pages||17|
BC Oil & Gas Commission. 2005. Report on Gas Shale Potential of Devonian Strata NE BC. Victoria, British Columbia, Canada: British Columbia Oil & Gas Commission. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/farming-natural-resources-and-industry/natural-gas-oil/petroleum-geoscience/oil-gas-reports/og_report2005-1.pdf.
BC Oil & Gas Commission. 2014. Report on Horn River Basin Unconventional Shale Gas Play Atlas. Victoria, British Columbia, Canada: British Columbia Oil & Gas Commission. https://www.bcogc.ca/node/11238.
Cipolla, C. L. and Wallace, J. 2014. Stimulated Reservoir Volume: A Misapplied Concept? Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 4–6 February. SPE-168596-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/168596-MS.
Cipolla, C. L., Warpinski, N. R., Mayerhofer, M. J. et al. 2008. The Relationship Between Fracture Complexity, Reservoir Properties, and Fracture Treatment Design. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, 21–24 September. SPE-115769-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/115769-PA.
Eagle Ford Training. 2015. What are Frac Hits? https://www.eagleford.training/2015/08/what-are-frac-hits/ (accessed 4 October 2018).
Eaton, D. W., Davidsen, J., Pedersen, P. K. et al. 2014. Breakdown of the Gutenberg-Richter Relation for Microearthquakes Induced by Hydraulic Fracturing: Influence of Stratabound Fractures. Geophys Prospecting 62 (4): 806–818. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12128.
Fisher, M. K., Heinze, J. R., Harris, C. D. et al. 2004. Optimizing Horizontal Completion Techniques in the Barnett Shale Using Microseismic Fracture Mapping. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, 26–29 September. SPE-90051-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/90051-MS.
Gutenberg, B. and Richter, C.F. 1944. Frequency of Earthquakes in California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 34 (4): 185–188.
Hanks, T. C. and Kanamori, H. 1979. A Moment Magnitude Scale. J Geophys Res 84 (B5): 2348–2350. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB084iB05p02348.
Ishimoto, M. and Iida, K. 1939. Observations sur les seismes enregistres par le microsismographe construit dernierement: Bull Earthq Res Inst Univ Tokyo 17: 443–478.
Kanamori, H. 1978. Quantification of Earthquakes. Nature 271: 411–414. https://doi.org/10.1038/271411a0.
Kijko, A. and Smit, A. 2012. Extension of the Aki-Utsu b-Value Estimator for Incomplete Catalogs: Bull Seismol Soc Am 102 (3): 1283–1287.
Li, Q. and Aguilera, R. 2018. A New Simple Analytic Equation for Estimating Asymmetric Growth of Stimulated Reservoir Volume in Anisotropic Shales. Presented at the SPE Canada Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 13–14 March. SPE-189812-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/189812-MS.
Li, Q., Yousefzadeh, A., and Aguilera, R. 2015. New Seismic Based Reservoir Characterization (SBRC) Geomechanical Model Based on Mogi Empirical Rock Failure Relationship. Presented at the SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Quito, Ecuador, 18–20 November. SPE-177265-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/177265-MS.
Lopez, B. and Aguilera, R. 2018. Petrophysical Quantification of Multiple Porosities in Shale Petroleum Reservoirs With the Use of Modified Pickett Plots. SPE Res Eval & Eng 21 (1): 187–201. SPE-171638-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/171638-PA.
Maxwell, S. C. 2014. Microseismic Imaging of Hydraulic Fracturing: Improved Engineering of Unconventional Shale Reservoirs, first edition. Distinguished Instructor Short Course, Distinguished Instructor Series, No. 17. Tulsa, Oklahoma: SEG.
Mayerhofer, M. J., Lolon, E. P., Warpinski, N. R. et al. 2008. What is Stimulated Reservoir Volume? SPE Prod & Oper 25 (1): 89–98. SPE-119890-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/119890-PA.
Sardinha, C., Petr, C., Lehmann, J. et al. 2014. Determining Interwell Connectivity and Reservoir Complexity Through Frac Pressure Hits and Production Interface Analysis. Presented at the SPE/CSUR Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 30 September–2 October. SPE-171628-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/171628-MS.
Segall, P. and Lu, S. 2015. Injection-Induced Seismicity: Poroelastic and Earthquake Nucleation Effects. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 120: 5082–5103. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jb012060.
Shapiro, S. A., Huenges, E., and Borm, G. 1997. Estimating the Crust Permeability From Fluid-Injection-Induced Seismic Emission at the KTB Site. Geophys J Int 131 (2): F15–F18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1997.tb01215.x.
Warpinski, N. R. and Wolhart, S. 2016. A Validation Assessment of Microseismic Monitoring. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 9–11 February. SPE-179150-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/179150-MS.
Warpinski, N. R., Mayerhofer, M. J., Agarwal, J. et al. 2013. Hydraulic-Fracture Geomechanics and Microseismic-Source Mechanisms. SPE J. 188 (4): 766–780. SPE-158935-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/158935-PA.
Yousefzadeh, A., Li, Q., and Aguilera, R. 2015. Microseismic 101: Monitoring and Evaluating Hydraulic Fracturing To Improve the Efficiency of Oil and Gas Recovery From Unconventional Reservoirs. Presented at the SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Quito, Ecuador, 18–20 November. SPE-177277-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/177277-MS.
Yousefzadeh, A., Li, Q., Virués, C. et al. 2016. Toward Interpretation of Intermediate Microseismic b-Values. Geoconvention Extended Abstract. Presented at the Geoconvention Annual Meeting, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 7–11 March.
Yousefzadeh, A., Li, Q., Virués, C. et al. 2018. An Interpretation of Microseismic Spatial Anomalies, b-values, and Magnitude Analyses To Identify Activated Fracture Networks in Horn River Basin. SPE Prod & Oper 33 (4): 679–696. https://doi.org/10.2118/179153-PA.
Yu, G. and Aguilera, R. 2012. 3D Analytical Modeling of Hydraulic Fracturing Stimulated Reservoir Volume. Presented at the SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Mexico City, Mexico, 16–18 April. SPE-153486-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/153486-MS.
Zimmer, U. 2011. Calculating Stimulated Reservoir Volume (SRV) With Consideration of Uncertainties in Microseismic Event Locations. Presented at the Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 15–17 November. SPE-148610-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/148610-MS.