A Hybrid Approach for the Prediction of Relative Permeability Using Machine Learning of Experimental and Numerical Proxy SCAL Data
- Bochao Zhao (The University of Texas at Austin) | Ram Ratnakar (Shell International Exploration & Production) | Birol Dindoruk (Shell International Exploration & Production and University of Houston) | Kishore Mohanty (The University of Texas at Austin)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- October 2020
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 2,749 - 2,764
- 2020.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- random forest regression, machine learning, relative permeability, Euler characteristic, phase connectivity
- 35 in the last 30 days
- 180 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Accurate estimation of relative permeability is one of the key parameters for decision making in upstream applications from project appraisal to field development and evaluation of various field development options. In this study, we identify Euler number (Arns et al. 2001) (a quantitative measure of fluid connectivity/distribution) and saturation as being the first-order predictors of relative permeability and develop a reliable correlation between them using machine learning of experimental special core analysis (SCAL) data and pore network simulation results.
In order to achieve our objective, first, we developed a machine-learning model based on the random forest algorithm (Breiman 2001) to analyze specific SCAL data that indicates a key missing feature in the traditional saturation-based relative permeability prediction. We identified this missing feature and proposed the Euler characteristic as a potential first-order predictor of relative permeability in combination with in-situ fluid saturations. We generated “artificial” relative permeability data using pore network simulation (Valvatne and Blunt 2004) by systematically varying a set of key parameters such as pore geometry, wettability, and saturation history. Subsequently, we used machine learning to rank the importance of each parameter and identify possible correlative responses to those selected variables.
At a fixed saturation (zero-dimensional volumetric abundance) and Euler number coordinates, the relative permeability is very consistent and varies insignificantly across different cases, suggesting these two parameters as first-order predictors. Euler number characterizes the fluid connectivity/distribution, while saturation represents the net volumetric fluid quantity. We believe that Euler number could be the missing first-order predictor in traditional saturation-based predictive relative permeability models, especially for connected pathway dominated flow regime. Finally, we identified the quantitative relationship between relative permeability and Euler characteristic, and present a reliable correlation to determine the relative permeability on the basis of Euler number and saturation.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||16|
Alpak, F. O., Lake, L. W., and Embid, S. M. 1999. Validation of a Modified Carman-Kozeny Equation to Model Two-Phase Relative Permeabilities. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, USA, 3–6 October. SPE-56479-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/56479-MS.
Alpaydin, E. 2010. Introduction to Machine Learning, second edition. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: The MIT Press.
Armstrong, R. T., McClure, J. E., Berrill, M. A. et al. 2016. Beyond Darcy’s Law: The Role of Phase Topology and Ganglion Dynamics for Two-Fluid Flow. Phys Rev E 94: 043113. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.94.043113.
Arns, C. H., Knackstedt, M. A., and Mecke, K. R. 2002. Characterising the Morphology of Disordered Materials, In Morphology of Condensed Matter: Physics and Geometry of Spatially Complex Systems, Lecture Notes in Physics, ed. K. Mecke and D. Stoyan, 37–74. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Arns, C. H., Knackstedt, M. A., Pinczewski, W. V. et al. 2001. Euler-Poincaré Characteristics of Classes of Disordered Media. Phys Rev E 63: 031112. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.63.031112.
Behrenbruch, P. and Goda, H. M. 2006. Two-Phase Relative Permeability Prediction: A Comparison of the Modified Brooks-Corey Methodology with a New Carman-Kozeny Based Flow Formulation. Paper presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition, Adelaide, Australia, 11–13 September. SPE-101150-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/101150-MS.
Boek, E. S. and Venturoli, M. 2010. Lattice-Boltzmann Studies of Fluid Flow in Porous Media with Realistic Rock Geometries. Comput Math Appl Mesoscopic Methods Eng Sci 59: 2305–2314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2009.08.063.
Breaux, H. J. 1968. A Modification of Efroymson’s Technique for Stepwise Regression Analysis. Commun ACM 11: 556–558. https://doi.org/10.1145/363567.363580.
Breiman, L. 2001. Random Forests. Mach Learn 45: 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324.
Brooks, R. H. and Corey, A. T. 1964. Hydraulic Properties of Porous Media. Fort Collins, Colorado, USA: Colorado State University.
Burdine, N. T. 1953. Relative Permeability Calculations from Pore Size Distribution Data. J Pet Technol 5 (3): 71–78. SPE-225-G. https://doi.org/10.2118/225-G.
Calzavarini, E., Kerscher, M., Lohse, D. et al. 2008. Dimensionality and Morphology of Particle and Bubble Clusters in Turbulent Flow. J Fluid Mech 607: 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112008001936.
Carlson, F. M. 1981. Simulation of Relative Permeability Hysteresis to the Nonwetting Phase. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 4–7 October. SPE-10157-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/10157-MS.
Cinar, Y., Marquez, S., and Orr, F. M. 2007. Effect of IFT Variation and Wettability on Three-Phase Relative Permeability. SPE Res Eval & Eng 10 (3): 211–220. SPE-90572-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/90572-PA.
Clarke, R., Ressom, H. W., Wang, A. et al. 2008. The Properties of High-Dimensional Data Spaces: Implications for Exploring Gene and Protein Expression Data. Nat Rev Cancer 8: 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc2294.
Fattahi, E., Waluga, C., Wohlmuth, B. et al. 2016. Lattice Boltzmann Methods in Porous Media Simulations: From Laminar to Turbulent Flow. Comput Fluids 140: 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.10.007.
Golparvar, A., Zhou, Y., Wu, K. et al. 2018. A Comprehensive Review of Pore Scale Modeling Methodologies for Multiphase Flow in Porous Media. Adv Geo-Energy Res 2: 418–440. https://doi.org/10.26804/ager.2018.04.07.
Hamouda, A. A., Karoussi, O., and Chukwudeme, E. A. 2008. Relative Permeability as a Function of Temperature, Initial Water Saturation and Flooding Fluid Compositions for Modified Oil-Wet Chalk. J Pet Sci Eng 63: 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2008.10.002.
Herring, A. L., Andersson, L., Schlüter, S. et al. 2015. Efficiently Engineering Pore-Scale Processes: The Role of Force Dominance and Topology during Nonwetting Phase Trapping in Porous Media. Adv Water Resour 79: 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.02.005.
Herring, A. L., Harper, E. J., Andersson, L. et al. 2013. Effect of Fluid Topology on Residual Nonwetting Phase Trapping: Implications for Geologic CO2 Sequestration. Adv Water Resour 62: 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2013.09.015.
Honarpour, M., Koederitz, L. F., and Harvey, A. H. 1982. Empirical Equations for Estimating Two-Phase Relative Permeability in Consolidated Rock. J Pet Technol 34 (12): 2905–2908. SPE-9966-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/9966-PA.
Ibrahim, M. N. M. and Koederitz, L. F. 2000. Two-Phase Relative Permeability Prediction Using a Linear Regression Model. Paper presented at the SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA, 17–19 October. SPE-65631-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/65631-MS.
Ibrahim, M. N. M. and Koederitz, L. F. 2001. Two-Phase Steady-State and Unsteady-State Relative Permeability Prediction Models. Paper presented at the SPE Middle East Oil Show, Manama, Bahrain, 17–20 March. SPE-68065-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/68065-MS.
Joekar-Niasar, V., Hassanizadeh, S. M., and Leijnse, A. 2008. Insights into the Relationships among Capillary Pressure, Saturation, Interfacial Area and Relative Permeability Using Pore-Network Modeling. Transp Porous Media 74: 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-007-9191-7.
Kerscher, M., Schmalzing, J., Buchert, T. et al. 1998. Fluctuations in the IRAS 1.2 Jy Catalogue. Astron, Astrophys 333: 1–12. arXiv:astro-ph/9704028.
Khorsandi, S., Li, L., and Johns, R. T. 2017. Equation of State for Relative Permeability, Including Hysteresis and Wettability Alteration. SPE J. 22 (6): 1915–1928. SPE-182655-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/182655-PA.
Land, C. S. 1968. Calculation of Imbibition Relative Permeability for Two- and Three-Phase Flow From Rock Properties. SPE J. 8 (2): 149–156. SPE-1942-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/1942-PA.
Li, J., Jiang, H., Wang, C. et al. 2017. Pore-Scale Investigation of Microscopic Remaining Oil Variation Characteristics in Water-Wet Sandstone Using CT Scanning. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 48: 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2017.04.003.
Lin, Q., Alhammadi, A. M., Gao, Y. et al. 2019. iSCAL for Complete Rock Characterization: Using Pore-Scale Imaging to Determine Relative Permeability and Capillary Pressure. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 30 September–2 October. SPE-196082-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/196082-MS.
Liu, Z., Herring, A., Arns, C. et al. 2017. Pore-Scale Characterization of Two-Phase Flow Using Integral Geometry. Transp Porous Media 118: 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-017-0849-5.
Liu, Z., McClure, J. E., and Armstrong, R. T. 2018. Influence of Wettability on Phase Connectivity and Electrical Resistivity. Phys Rev E 98: 043102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.98.043102.
Mecke, K. R. 2000. Additivity, Convexity, and Beyond: Applications of Minkowski Functionals in Statistical Physics, In Statistical Physics and Spatial Statistics, Lecture Notes in Physics, ed. K. R. Mecke and D. Stoyan, 111–184. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Mecke, K. R., Buchert, T., and Wagner, H. 1994. Robust Morphological Measures for Large-Scale Structure in the Universe. Astron. Astrophys. 288: 697–704. arXiv:astro-ph/9312028.
Miller, M. A. and Ramey, H. J. J. 1985. Effect of Temperature on Oil/Water Relative Permeabilities of Unconsolidated and Consolidated Sands. SPE J. 25 (6): 945–953. SPE-12116-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/12116-PA.
Morgan, J. T. and Gordon, D. T. 1970. Influence of Pore Geometry on Water-Oil Relative Permeability. J Pet Technol 22 (10): 1199–1208. SPE-2588-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/2588-PA.
Murphy, K. P. 2012. Machine Learning: A Probabilistic Perspective. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: The MIT Press.
Naar, J. and Henderson, J. H. 1961. An Imbibition Model—Its Application to Flow Behavior and the Prediction of Oil Recovery. SPE J. 1 (2): 61–70. SPE-1550-G https://doi.org/10.2118/1550-G.
Osoba, J. S., Richardson, J. G., Kerver, J. K. et al. 1951. Laboratory Measurements of Relative Permeability. J Pet Technol 3 (2): 47–56. SPE-951047-G. https://doi.org/10.2118/951047-G.
Owens, W. W. and Archer, D. L. 1971. The Effect of Rock Wettability on Oil-Water Relative Permeability Relationships. J Pet Technol 23 (7): 873–878. SPE-3034-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/3034-PA.
Pan, C., Luo, L.-S., and Miller, C. T. 2006. An Evaluation of Lattice Boltzmann Schemes for Porous Medium Flow Simulation. Comput Fluids 35: 898–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2005.03.008.
Peters, E. J. and Khataniar, S. 1987. The Effect of Instability on Relative Permeability Curves Obtained by the Dynamic-Displacement Method. SPE Form Eval 2 (4): 469–474. SPE-14713-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/14713-PA.
Purcell, W. R. 1949. Capillary Pressures—Their Measurement Using Mercury and the Calculation of Permeability Therefrom. J Pet Technol 1 (2): 39–48. SPE-949039-G. https://doi.org/10.2118/949039-G.
Purswani, P., Tawfik, M. S., Karpyn, Z. et al. 2018. On the Development of a Relative Permeability Equation of State. Paper presented at the 16th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery, ECMOR, European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers, EAGE.
Raoof, A., Nick, H. M., Hassanizadeh, S. M. et al. 2013. PoreFlow: A Complex Pore-Network Model for Simulation of Reactive Transport in Variably Saturated Porous Media. Comput Geosci 61: 160–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2013.08.005.
Rapoport, L. A. and Leas, W. J. 1951. Relative Permeability to Liquid in Liquid-Gas Systems. J Pet Technol 3 (3): 83–98. SPE-951083-G. https://doi.org/10.2118/951083-G.
Ratnakar, R. R. and Balakotaiah, V. 2014. Coarse-Graining of Diffusion–Reaction Models with Catalyst Archipelagos. Chem Eng Sci 110: 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2013.08.011.
Rose, W. 1949. Theoretical Generalizations Leading to the Evaluation of Relative Permeability. J Pet Technol 1 (5): 111–126. SPE-949111-G. https://doi.org/10.2118/949111-G.
Schlüter, S., Berg, S., Rücker, M. et al. 2016. Pore-Scale Displacement Mechanisms as a Source of Hysteresis for Two-Phase Flow in Porous Media. Water Resour Res 52: 2194–2205. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018254.
Scholz, C., Wirner, F., Götz, J. et al. 2012. Permeability of Porous Materials Determined from the Euler Characteristic. Phys Rev Lett 109: 264504. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.264504.
Sedaee Sola, B., Rashidi, F., and Babadagli, T. 2007. Temperature Effects on the Heavy Oil/Water Relative Permeabilities of Carbonate Rocks. J Pet Sci Eng 59: 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2007.02.005.
Silin, D. B. and Patzek, T. W. 2009. Predicting Relative-Permeability Curves Directly From Rock Images. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 4–7 October. SPE-124974-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/124974-MS.
Sorbie, K. S. and Skauge, A. 2012. Can Network Modeling Predict Two-Phase Flow Functions? Petrophysics 53 (6): 401–409. SPWLA-2012-v53n6a2.
Valvatne, P. H. and Blunt, M. J. 2004. Predictive Pore-Scale Modeling of Two-Phase Flow in Mixed Wet Media. Water Resour Res 40 (2): W07406. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002627.
Xiong, Q., Baychev, T. G., and Jivkov, A. P. 2016. Review of Pore Network Modelling of Porous Media: Experimental Characterisations, Network Constructions and Applications to Reactive Transport. J Contam Hydrol 192: 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2016.07.002.
Yeganeh, M., Hegner, J., Lewandowski, E. et al. 2016. Capillary Desaturation Curve Fundamentals. Paper presented at the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA, 11–13 April. SPE-179574-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/179574-MS.
Zou, S., Armstrong, R. T., Arns, J.-Y. et al. 2018. Experimental and Theoretical Evidence for Increased Ganglion Dynamics During Fractional Flow in Mixed-Wet Porous Media. Water Resour. Res. 54 (5): 3277–3289. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017WR022433.
Zou, J., Han, Y., and So, S.-S. 2008. Overview of Artificial Neural Networks. Methods Mol Biol 458: 15–23. https://10.1007/978-1-60327-101-1_2.