Shut-In Effect in Removing Water Blockage in Shale-Oil Reservoirs With Stress-Dependent Permeability Considered
- Nur Wijaya (Texas Tech University) | James J Sheng (Texas Tech University)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- February 2020
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 81 - 94
- 2020.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- flowback, stress-dependent permeability
- 20 in the last 30 days
- 194 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
It is widely known that only a small fraction of the water injected during hydraulic fracturing is recovered during the flowback period. The water that remains in the reservoir is believed to imbibe into the matrix. Because of the capillary discontinuity between the matrix and the fracture, water blockage is formed near the matrix/fracture interface and reduces the hydrocarbon relative permeability. Therefore, shut-in is often performed just after hydraulic fracturing to alleviate water blockage by redistributing the water deeper into the reservoir through capillary imbibition.
However, field data show mixed observations on shut-in performance: some report shut-in as beneficial, while others suggest that it is detrimental. On the basis of laboratory experiments, shut-in is shown to increase the hydrocarbon relative permeability upon flowback. However, most of the laboratory-scale experiments might not simulate the stress-dependent permeability (SDP) observed in hydraulically fractured reservoirs. SDP is a behavior of a porous medium in which its permeability changes depending on the pressure/ stress change which, in turn, affects the grain compaction/dilation or fracture aperture and hence permeability. As reported in many experiments, SDP inevitably occurs because the pore pressure changes significantly during both the fracturing and the production stage in hydraulically fractured reservoirs. Therefore, there have been questions concerning the applicability of such laboratory-scale experiments to explain the field-scale phenomena. Because reservoir simulation allows the inclusion of SDP, several papers used the simulation approach to investigate shut-in benefits while including the SDP. However, most of the previous simulation studies used an unrealistic input for the matrix SDP and an asymmetric model segmentation, or even did not validate their numerical model with field-data history matching. This paper will show that such unrealistic input, and such an improper modeling approach, can yield misleading conclusions on shut-in benefits. Therefore, the first objective of our study is to demonstrate an improved modeling workflow to simulate flowback upon water fracturing. Afterward, we aim to evaluate shut-in benefits in terms of hydrocarbon recovery and net present value (NPV). The NPV allows a more realistic economic evaluation of shut-in benefits, because it discounts the higher initial production rate because of shut-in that happens in the future. A parametric study on the injection volume, matrix absolute permeability, and economic parameters is also presented.
Given the more realistic modeling approach, our model is successfully history matched with field production data from the Middle Bakken Shale reservoir. This model quantitatively shows that shut-in does not significantly affect the ultimate oil recovery in shale-oil reservoirs. In fact, the model shows that longer shut-in tends to decrease the NPV because the higher initial production rate upon shut-in cannot be maintained for long enough to compensate for the production loss during the shut-in period. Our model suggests that such higher initial production rates are unsustainable because even after shut-in, water will reaccumulate toward the fractures and create water blockage. In addition, the high pressure buildup during fracturing only marginally increases the average reservoir pressure and will be expended quickly once flowback starts. In other words, shut-in seems to only delay the water-blockage issue, although it allows the early-time flowback to start in a milder water-blockage situation. As a result, in this study we propose immediate flowback as a more profitable flowback strategy.
|File Size||1010 KB||Number of Pages||14|
Agrawal, S. and Sharma, M. 2013. Impact of Liquid Loading in Hydraulic Fractures on Well Productivity. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 4–6 February. SPE-163837-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/163837-MS.
Alramahi, B. and Sundberg, M. I. 2012. Proppant Embedment and Conductivity of Hydraulic Fractures in Shales. Presented at the 46th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Chicago, Illinois, 24–27 June. ARMA-2012-291.
Assiri, W. and Miskimins, J. L. 2014. The Water Blockage Effect on Desiccated Tight Gas Reservoir. Presented at the SPE International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Lafayette, Louisiana, 26–28 February. SPE-168160-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/168160-MS.
Bailey, B., Crabtree, M., Tyrie, J. et al. 2000. Water Control. Oilfield Rev 12 (1): 30–51. https://www.slb.com/resources/publications/industry_articles/oilfield_review/2000/or2000spr03_watercontrol.aspx.
Barree, R. D., Cox, S. A., Barree, V. L. et al. 2003. Realistic Assessment of Proppant Pack Conductivity for Material Selection. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, 5–8 October. SPE-84306-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/84306-MS.
Bennion, D. B., Thomas, F. B., Bietz, R. F. et al. 1996. Water and Hydrocarbon Phase Trapping in Porous Media—Diagnosis, Prevention and Treatment. J Can Pet Technol 35 (10): 29–36. PETSOC-96-10-02. https://doi.org/10.2118/96-10-02.
Bertoncello, A., Wallace, J., Blyton, C. et al. 2014. Imbibition and Water Blockage in Unconventional Reservoirs: Well Management Implications During Flowback and Early Production. Presented at the SPE/EAGE European Unconventional Resources Conference and Exhibition, Vienna, Austria, 25–27 February. SPE-167698-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/167698-MS.
Cheng, Y. 2010. Impact of Water Dynamics in Fractures on the Performance of Hydraulically Fractured Wells in Gas Shale Reservoirs. Presented at the SPE International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Lafayette, Louisiana, 10–12 February. SPE-127863-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/127863-MS.
Cho, Y., Ozkan, E., and Apaydin, O. G. 2013. Pressure-Dependent Natural-Fracture Permeability in Shale and Its Effect on Shale-Gas Well Production. SPE Res Eval & Eng 16 (2): 216–228. SPE-159801-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/159801-PA.
Christiansen, R., Mayoral, C., and Pereira, C. 2005. Capillary End Effects and Gas Production From Low Permeability Formations. Presented at the International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts, Toronto, Canada, 21–15 August. SCA2005-26.
Cipolla, C. L., Lolon, E. P., Erdle, J. C. et al. 2009. Modeling Well Performance in Shale-Gas Reservoirs. Presented at the SPE/EAGE Reservoir Characterization & Simulation Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 19–21 October. SPE-125532-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/125532-MS.
Dehghanpour, H., Lan, Q., Saeed, Y. et al. 2013. Spontaneous Imbibition of Brine and Oil in Gas Shales: Effect of Water Adsorption and Resulting Microfractures. Energy Fuel 27 (6): 3039–3049.
Duenckel, R. J., Barree, R. D., Drylie, S. et al. 2017. Proppants—What 30 Years of Study Has Taught Us. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 9–11 October. SPE-187451-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/187451-MS.
Edwards, R. W. and Celia, M. A. 2018. Shale Gas Well, Hydraulic Fracturing, and Formation Data To Support Modeling of Gas and Water Flow in Shale Formations. Water Resour Res 54 (4): 3196–3206. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR022130.
Fredd, C. N., McConnell, S. B., Boney, C. L. et al. 2001. Experimental Study of Fracture Conductivity for Water-Fracturing and Conventional Fracturing Applications. SPE J. 6 (3): 288–298. SPE-74138-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/74138-PA.
Ganpule, S., Cherian, B., Gonzales, V. et al. 2013. Impact of Well Completion on the Uncertainty in Technically Recoverable Resource Estimation in Bakken and Three Forks. Presented at the SPE Unconventional Resources Conference Canada, Calgary, Alberta, 5–7 November. SPE-167131-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/167131-MS.
Gonzalez, L., Nasreldin, G., Rivero, J. A. et al. 2014. 3D Modeling of Multistage Hydraulic Fractures and Two-Way-Coupling Geomechanics/Fluid-Flow Simulation of a Horizontal Well in the Nikanassin Tight Gas Formation, Western Canada Sedimentary Basin. SPE Res Eval & Eng 17 (2): 257–270. SPE-159765-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/159765-PA.
Jurus, W. J., Whitson, C. H., and Golan, M. 2013. Modeling Water Flow in Hydraulically-Fractured Shale Wells. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 30 September–2 October. SPE-166439-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/166439-MS.
Kam, P., Nadeem, M., Novlesky, A. et al. 2015. Reservoir Characterization and History Matching of the Horn River Shale: An Integrated Geoscience and Reservoir-Simulation Approach. J Can Pet Technol 54 (6): 475–488. SPE-171611-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/171611-PA.
Kurtoglu, B. and Kazemi, H. 2012. Evaluation of Bakken Performance Using Coreflooding, Well Testing, and Reservoir Simulation. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 8–10 October. SPE-155655-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/155655-MS.
Liang, T., Luo, X., Nguyen, Q. et al. 2017. Computed-Tomography Measurements of Water Block in Low-Permeability Rocks: Scaling and Remedying Production Impairment. SPE J. 23 (3): 762–771. SPE-189445-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/189445-PA.
Liu, Y., Leung, J. Y., and Chalaturnyk, R. 2018. Geomechanical Simulation of Partially Propped Fracture Closure and Its Implication for Water Flow-back and Gas Production. SPE Res Eval & Eng 21 (2): 273–290. SPE-189454-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/189454-PA.
Lopez, B. A., Piedrahita, J., and Aguilera, R. 2017. Estimates of Stress-Dependent Properties in Tight Reservoirs: Their Use With Core and Drill-Cuttings Data. SPE Res Eval & Eng 20 (3): 572–588. SPE-177189-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/177189-PA.
Makhanov, K., Habibi, A., Dehghanpour, H. et al. 2014. Liquid Uptake of Gas Shales: A Workflow To Estimate Water Loss During Shut-In Periods After Fracturing Operations. J Unconv Oil Gas Resour 7: 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juogr.2014.04.001.
Odumabo, S. M. and Karpyn, Z. T. 2014. Investigation of Gas Flow Hindrance due to Fracturing Fluid Leakoff in Low Permeability Sandstones. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 17: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2013.12.002.
Pettersen, O. 2010. Compaction, Permeability, and Fluid Flow in Brent-Type Reservoirs Under Depletion and Pressure Blowdown. The Open Petroleum Engineering Journal 3 (1). https://doi.org/10.2174/1874834101003010001.
Piedrahita, J., Lopez, B., and Aguilera, R., 2018. Generalized Methodology for Estimating Stress-Dependent Properties in a Tight Gas Reservoir and Extension to Drill-Cuttings Data. SPE Res Eval & Eng 22 (1): 173–189. SPE-189972-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/189972-PA.
Quintero, H., Hawkes, R., Mattucci, M. et al. 2018. Application of Multi-Functionalized Surfactant To Enhance Hydrocarbon Production in Tight Oil & Gas Formations Yields Successful Results. Presented at the SPE Argentina Exploration and Production of Unconventional Resources Symposium, Neuquen, Argentina, 14–16 August. SPE-191845-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/191845-MS.
Raghavan, R. and Chin, L. Y. 2002. Productivity Changes in Reservoirs With Stress-Dependent Permeability. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 29 September–2 October. SPE-77535-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/77535-MS.
Rahim, Z., Al-Anazi, H., Al-Kanaan, A. et al. 2015. Impact of Remaining Water in Hydraulic Fractures on Well Productivity—Field Examples From Saudi Arabian Sandstone Reservoirs. Presented at the SPE Western Regional Meeting, Garden Grove, California, 27–30 April. SPE-174026-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/174026-MS.
Rubin, B. 2010. Accurate Simulation of Non Darcy Flow in Stimulated Fractured Shale Reservoirs. Presented at the SPE Western Regional Meeting, Anaheim, California, 27–29 May. SPE-132093-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/132093-MS.
Shen, W., Xu, Y., Li, X. et al. 2016. Numerical Simulation of Gas and Water Flow Mechanism in Hydraulically Fractured Shale Gas Reservoirs. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 35: 726–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.08.078.
Suarez-Rivera, R., Burghardt, J., Edelman, E. et al. 2013. Geomechanics Considerations for Hydraulic Fracture Productivity. Presented at the 47th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, San Francisco, California, 23–26 June. ARMA-2013-666.
Tinni, A., Fathi, E., Agarwal, R. et al. 2012. Shale Permeability Measurements on Plugs and Crushed Samples. Presented at the SPE Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, Alberta, 30 October–1 November. SPE-162235-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/162235-MS.
Vidic, R. D., Brantley, S. L., Vandenbossche, J. M. et al. 2013. Impact of Shale Gas Development on Regional Water Quality. Science 340 (6134): 1235009. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1235009.
Wang, M. and Leung, J. Y. 2015. Numerical Investigation of Coupling Multiphase Flow and Geomechanical Effects on Water Loss During Hydraulic Fracturing Flow Back Operation. Presented at the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, San Antonio, Texas, 20–22 July. URTEC-2154838-MS. https://doi.org/10.15530/URTEC-2015-2154838.
Wijaya, N. and Sheng, J. J. 2019. Effect of Desiccation on Shut-In Benefits in Removing Water Blockage in Tight Water-Wet Cores. Fuel 244: 314–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.01.180.
Yaich, E., Williams, S., Goddard, P. et al. 2015. A Case Study: The Impact of Soaking on Well Performance in the Marcellus. Presented at the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, San Antonio, Texas, 20–22 July. URTEC-2154766-MS. https://doi.org/10.15530/URTEC-2015-2154766.
Yan, Q., Lemanski, C., Karpyn, Z. T. et al. 2015. Experimental Investigation of Shale Gas Production Impairment due to Fracturing Fluid Migration During Shut-In Time. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 24: 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2015.03.017.
Yang, S., Harris, N. B., Dong, T. et al. 2018. Natural Fractures and Mechanical Properties in a Horn River Shale Core From Well Logs and Hardness Measurements. SPE Res Eval & Eng 21 (3): 671–682. SPE-174287-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/174287-PA.
Zhang, T., Li, X., Li, J. et al. 2017. Numerical Investigation of the Well Shut-In and Fracture Uncertainty on Fluid-Loss and Production Performance in Gas-Shale Reservoirs. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 46: 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2017.08.024.
Zhu, S. Y., Du, Z. M., Li, C. L. et al. 2018. A Semi-Analytical Model for Pressure-Dependent Permeability of Tight Sandstone Reservoirs. Transp Porous Med 122 (2): 235–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-018-1001-x.