A Laboratory Study of the Impact of Reinjecting Flowback Fluids on Formation Damage in the Marcellus Shale
- Lifu Zhang (Texas A&M University) | Michael Tice (Texas A&M University) | Berna Hascakir (Texas A&M University)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- April 2020
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 788 - 799
- 2020.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Marcellus Shale, reuse of flowback water, formation damage, water/rock interaction
- 8 in the last 30 days
- 102 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Reuse of flowback water in hydraulic fracturing is usually used by industry to reduce consumption, transportation, and disposal cost of water. However, because of complex interactions between injected water and reservoir rocks, induced fractures may be blocked by impurities carried by flowback and mineral precipitation by water/rock interactions, which causes formation damage. Therefore, knowledge of flowback water/rock interactions is important to understand the changes within the formation and effects on hydraulic fracturing performance.
This study focuses on investigating flowback water/rock interactions during hydraulic fracturing in Marcellus Shale. Simple deionized water (DI)/rock interactions and complicated flowback water/rock interactions were studied under static and dynamic conditions. In static experiments, crushed reservoir rock samples were exposed to water for 3 weeks at room condition. In the dynamic experiment, continuous water flow interacted with rock samples through the coreflooding experimental system for 3 hours at reservoir condition. Before and after experiments, rock samples were characterized to determine the change on the rock surfaces. Water samples were analyzed to estimate the particle precipitation tendency and potential to modify flow pathway.
Surface elemental concentrations, mineralogy, and scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of rock samples were characterized. Ion contents, particle size, total dissolved solids (TDS), and zeta-potential in the water samples were analyzed. After flowback water/rock interaction, the surface of the rock sample shows changes in the compositions and more particle attachment. In produced water, Na, Sr, and Cl concentrations are extremely high because of flowback water contamination. Water parameters show that produced water has the highest precipitation tendency relative to all water samples. Therefore, if flowback water without any treatment is reused in hydraulic fracturing, formation damage is more likely to occur from blockage of pores.
Flowback water management is becoming very important due to volumes produced in every hydraulic fracturing operation. Deep well injection is no longer a favorable option because it results in disposal of high volumes of water that cannot be used for other purposes. A second option is the reuse of waste water for fracturing purposes, which reduces freshwater use significantly. However, the impurities present in flowback water may deteriorate the fracturing job and reduce or block the hydraulic fracturing apertures. This study shows that a simple filtration process applied to the flowback water allows for reinjection of the flowback water without further complication to the water/rock interaction, and does not cause significant formation damage in the fractures.
|File Size||7 MB||Number of Pages||12|
40 CFR Part 435, Oil and Gas Extraction Point Source Category. 1979. Washington, DC, USA: US Government Publishing Office.
Abdulsattar, Z. 2015. Physicochemical Interactions of Source-Rocks with Injected Water-Based Fluids. Master of Science thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA (May 2015).
Abrams, A. 1977. Mud Design to Minimize Rock Impairment due to Particle Invasion. J Pet Technol 29 (5): 586–592. SPE-5713-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/5713-PA.
Abualfaraj, N., Gurian, P., and Olson, M. 2014. Characterization of Marcellus Shale Flowback Water. Environ Eng Sci 31: 514–524. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2014.0001.
Ali, M. and Hascakir, B., 2017. Water-Rock Interaction for Eagle Ford, Marcellus, Green River, and Barnett Shale Samples and Implications for Hydraulic Fracturing Fluid Engineering. SPE J. 22 (1): 162–171. SPE-177304-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/177304-PA.
ASTM D2791-13, Standard Test Method for On-Line Determination of Sodium in Water. 2013. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA: ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/D2791-13.
ASTM D7126-15, Standard Test Method for On-Line Colorimetric Measurement of Silica. 2015. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA: ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/D7126-15.
Avary, K. L. and Lewis, J. E. 2008. New Interest in Cores Taken Thirty Years Ago: The Devonian Marcellus Shale in Northern West Virginia. http://www.papgrocks.org/avary_pp.pdf (accessed September 2016).
Benjamin, M. M. 2002. Water Chemistry. New York, New York, USA: McGraw-Hill.
Birkeland, P. W. 1999. Soils and Geomorphology, third edition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Boyce, M. and Carr, T. 2009. Lithostratigraphy and Petrophysics of the Devonian Marcellus Interval in West Virginia and Southwestern Pennsylvania. In Unconventional Energy Resources: Making the Unconventional Conventional, T. Carr et al., Vol. 29. Houston, Texas, USA: GCSSEPM Foundation. https://doi.org/10.5724/gcs.09.29.0254.
Brady, N. C. and Weil, R. R. 2008. The Nature and Properties of Soils, 14th edition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA: Pearson.
Burger, J., Sourieau, P., Combarnous, M. et al. 1985. Thermal Methods of Oil Recovery. Houston, Texas, USA: EditionsTechnip, Gulf Publishing Company.
Carroll, D. 1959. Cation Exchange in Clays and Other Minerals. GSA Bulletin 70 (6): 749–779. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1959)70[749:IEICAO]2.0.CO;2.
Civan, F. 2015. Reservoir Formation Damage, third edition. Waltham, Massachusetts, USA: Gulf Professional Publishing.
El-Jallad, I. S., Abouzeid, A. Z. M., and El-Sinbawy, H. A. 1980. Calcination of Phosphates: Reactivity of Calcined Phosphate. Powder Technol 26 (2): 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-5910(80)85061-3.
Eslinger, E. and Pevear, D. 1988. Clay Minerals for Petroleum Geologists and Engineers. Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA: Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Short Course Notes No. 22.
Ettensohn, F. and Barron, L. 1981. Tectono-Climatic Model for Origin of Devonian-Mississippian Black Gas Shales of East-Central United States. AAPG Bull 65 (5): 923.
Gabriel, G. A. and Inamdar, G. R. 1983. An Experimental Investigation of Fines Migration in Porous Media. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Francisco, California, USA, 5–8 October. SPE-12168-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/12168-MS.
Gandossi, L., and Von Estorff, U. 2015. An Overview of Hydraulic Fracturing and Other Formation Stimulation Technologies for Shale Gas Production. JRC Technical Reports, EUR 26347 EN, European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Petten, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.2790/99937.
Gibson, R. E. 1938. On the Effect of Pressure on the Solubility of Solids in Liquids. Am J Sci 235-A: 49–69.
Gillespie, L. J. 1920. Reduction Potential of Bacterial Cultures and of Waterlogged Soils. Soil Sci 9 (4): 199–216.
Goldstein, J., Newbury, D. E., Joy, D. C. et al. 2003. Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis, third edition. New York, New York, USA: Springer Science+Business Media.
Gregory, K. B., Vidic, R. D., and Dzombak, D. A. 2011. Water Management Challenges Associated With the Production of Shale Gas by Hydraulic Fracturing. Elements 7 (3): 181–186. https://doi.org/10.2113/gselements.7.3.181.
Gros, N. 2013. Ion Chromatographic Analyses of Sea Waters, Brines and Related Samples. Water 5 (2): 659–676. https://doi.org/10.3390/w5020659.
Guerra, K. and Drewes, J. 2008. Produced Water in the Western United States: Geographical Distribution, Occurrence, and Composition. Environmental Engineering Science. Environ Eng Sci 25: 239–246. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2007.0026.
Hagemeier, P. and Hutt, J. 2009. Hydraulic Fracturing, Water Use Issues Under Congressional, Public Scrutiny. Oil Gas J 107 (25): 18–23.
Haluszczak, L. O., Rose, A. W., and Kump, L. R. 2013. Geochemical Evaluation of Flowback Brine From Marcellus Gas Wells in Pennsylvania, USA. Appl Geochem 28: 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2012.10.002.
Hammer, R., VanBriesen, J., and Levine, L. 2012. In Fracking’s Wake: New Rules are Needed to Protect Our Health and Environment From Contaminated Wastewater. NRDC Document, D:12-05-A, National Resources Defense Council, Washington, DC, USA (May 2012).
Harper, J. A. 1999. Devonian. In The Geology of Pennsylvania, ed. C. H. Shultz, 108–127. Pennsylvania Bureau of Topographic and Geologic Survey and Pittsburgh Geological Society.
Hayes, T. D. 2009. Sampling and Analysis of Water Streams Associated with the Development of Marcellus Shale Gas. Final Report, Gas Technology Institute, Des Plaines, Illinois, USA (31 December 2009).
Hildebrand, J. H. 1924. Solubility. New York, New York, USA: Chemical Catalog Co.
Holditch, S. A. 1979. Factors Affecting Water Blocking and Gas Flow from Hydraulically Fractured Gas Wells. J Pet Technol 31 (12): 1515–1524. SPE-7561-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/7561-PA.
Hosterman, J. W. and Whitlow, S. I. 1983. Clay Mineralogy of Devonian Shales in the Appalachian Basin. USGS Professional Paper 1298, US Department of the Interior, Washington, DC, USA. https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/1298/report.pdf.
Jarvie, D. M., Hill, R. J., Ruble, T. R. et al. 2007. Unconventional Shale-Gas Systems: The Mississippian Barnett Shale of North-Central Texas as One Model for Thermogenic Shale-Gas Assessment. AAPG Bull 91 (4): 475–499. https://doi.org/10.1306/12190606068.
Jones, F. O. Jr. 1964. Influence of Chemical Composition of Water on Clay Blocking of Permeability. J Pet Technol 16 (4): 441–446. SPE-631-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/631-PA.
Kar, T. and Hascakir, B. 2017. In-Situ Kerogen Extraction via Combustion and Pyrolysis. J Pet Sci Eng 154: 502–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.01.051.
King, G. E. 2012. Hydraulic Fracturing 101: What Every Representative, Environmentalist, Regulator, Reporter, Investor, University Researcher, Neighbor and Engineer Should Know About Estimating Frac Risk and Improving Frac Performance in Unconventional Gas and Oil Wells. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 6–8 February. SPE-152596-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/152596-MS.
Kirkwood, J. G., Baldwin, R. L., Dunlop, P. J. et al. 1960. Flow Equations and Frames of Reference for Isothermal Diffusion in Liquids. J Chem Phys 33 (5): 1505–1513. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1731433.
Lester, Y., Ferrer, I., Thurman, E. M. et al. 2015. Characterization of Hydraulic Fracturing Flowback Water in Colorado: Implications for Water Treatment. Sci Tot Environ 512: 637–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.043.
Long, D. T. and Angino, E. E. 1982. The Mobilization of Selected Trace Metals From Shales by Aqueous Solutions: Effects of Temperature and Ionic Strength. Econ Geol 77 (3): 646–652. https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.77.3.646.
Losev, E. S., Netrebko, N. V., and Orlova, I. V. 1989. Gravitational Sedimentation of Aggregating Particles in a Shear Flow. Fluid Dyn 24: 242. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01075154.
Mantell, E. M. 2011. Produced Water Reuse and Recycling Challenges and Opportunities Across Major Shale Plays. Presented at the EPA Hydraulic Fracturing Study Technical Workshop #4: Water Resources Management, Arlington, Virginia, USA, 29–30 March. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/documents/09_Mantell_-_Reuse_508.pdf (last accessed 3 January 2020).
Moses, C. O., Nordstrom, D. K., Herman, J. S. et al. 1987. Aqueous Pyrite Oxidation by Dissolved Oxygen and by Ferric Iron. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 51 (6): 1561–1571. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(87)90337-1.
Moulder, J. F., Stickle, W. F., Sobol, P. E. et al. 1995. Handbook of X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy: A Reference Book of Standard Spectra for Identification and Interpretation of XPS Data. Eden Prairie, Minnesota, USA: Perkin-Elmer Corporation.
O’Melia, R. C. 1998. Coagulation and Sedimentation in Lakes, Reservoirs and Water Treatment Plants. Water Sci Technol 37 (2): 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1223(98)00018-3.
Paronish, T. J., Bhattacharya, S., and Carr, T. 2016. Integrated Geologic Analysis from Two Marcellus Shale Science Wells in Northeastern West Virginia. Poster presentation at the AAPG 2016 Annual Convention and Exhibition, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 19–22 June.
Riddick, T. M. 1968. Control of Colloid Stability through Zeta Potential: With a Closing Chapter on Its Relationship to Cardiovascular Disease. Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, USA: Livingston.
Salimen, R., Plant, J., Reeder, S. (eds.) 2006. Geochemical Atlas of Europe. Part 1, Background Information, Methodology and Maps, 526. Espoo, Finland: Geological Survey of Finland. http://weppi.gtk.fi/publ/foregsatlas/text/Sr.pdf.
Sarsfield, B., Davidovich, M., and Desikan, S. 2006. Powder X-Ray Diffraction Detection of Crystalline Phase in Amorphous Pharmaceuticals. JCPDS-ICDD 49: 322–327.
Shao, H. B., Ray, J. R., and Jun, Y. 2010. Dissolution and Precipitation of Clay Minerals Under Geologic CO2 Sequestration Conditions: CO2-Brine-Phlogopite Interactions. Environ Sci Technol 44 (15): 5999–6005. https://doi.org/10.1021/es1010169.
Stephen, D. J., Shockey, R. E., Kurz, B. A. et al. 2010. Bakken Water Opportunities Assessment—Phase 1. Report, 2010-EERC-04-03, Energy & Environmental Research Center, Grand Forks, North Dakota, USA (April 2010).
Sugiyama, N. and Tanoshima, M. 2007. New! Agilent High Matrix Introduction Accessory Expands the Capabilities of ICP-MS. Agilent ICP-MS J October (32): 2–3.
Thompson, K. C. and Nathanail, C. P. 2003. Chemical Analysis of Contaminated Land (Sheffield Analytical Chemistry), first edition. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
United State Environmental Protection Agency [USEPA]. 1999. Total Dissolved Solids (TDS): EPA Method 160.1 (Gravimetric, Dried at 180 deg. C). Washington, DC, USA: USEPA.
US Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2013. Annual Energy Outlook 2013 with Projections to 2040. DOE/EIA-0383(2013), US EIA, Washington, DC, USA (April 2013). https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/0383(2013).pdf.
US Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2014. Annual Energy Outlook 2014 with Projections to 2040. DOE/EIA-0383(2014), US EIA, Washington, DC, USA (April 2014). https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/0383(2014).pdf.
US Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2016. Annual Energy Outlook 2016 with Projections to 2040. DOE/EIA-0383(2016), US EIA, Washington, DC, USA (August 2016). https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/0383(2016).pdf.
USEPA. 2012. Study of Potential Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing on Drinking Water Resources: Progress Report. Washington, DC, USA: USEPA.
Vidic, R. D., Brantley, S. L., Vandenbossche, J. M. et al. 2013. Impact of Shale Gas Development on Regional Water Quality. Science 340 (6134): 1235009. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1235009.
Weber, W. J. 1972. Physicochemical Processes for Water Quality Control. New York, New York, USA: Wiley Interscience.
Yue, W. 2012. Interaction of Fracture Fluid with Formation Rock and Proppant on Fracture Fluid Cleanup and Long Term Gas Recovery in Marcellus Shale Reservoirs. MSc thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA (November 2012).
Zhang, C., Gamage, R. P., Perera, M. S. A. et al. 2017. Characteristics of Clay-Abundant Shale Formations: Use of CO2 for Production Enhancement. Energies 10 (11): 1887. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10111887.
Zielinski, R. E. and McIver, R. D. 1982. Resource and Exploration Assessment of the Oil and Gas Potential in the Devonian Gas Shales of the Appalachian Basin. Technical Report MLM-MU-82-61-0002, DOE/DP/0053-1125, Monsanto Research Corp., Miamisburg, Ohio, USA, 326 p.
Ziemkiewicz, P. F. and Thomas, H. Y. 2015. Evolution of Water Chemistry During Marcellus Shale Gas Development: A Case Study in West Virginia. Chemosphere 134: 224–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.04.040.