Apparent Toughness Anisotropy Induced by “Roughness” of In-Situ Stress: A Mechanism That Hinders Vertical Growth of Hydraulic Fractures and Its Simplified Modeling
- Pengcheng Fu (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) | Jixiang Huang (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) | Randolph R. Settgast (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) | Joseph P. Morris (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) | Frederick J. Ryerson (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- October 2019
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 2,148 - 2,162
- 2019.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- in situ stress roughness, fracture height growth, anisotropy, hydraulic fracturing, toughness
- 4 in the last 30 days
- 182 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
The height growth of a hydraulic fracture is known to be affected by many factors that are related to the layered structure of sedimentary rocks. Although these factors are often used to qualitatively explain why hydraulic fractures usually have well-bounded height growth, most of them cannot be directly and quantitatively characterized for a given reservoir to enable a priori prediction of fracture-height growth. In this work, we study the role of the “roughness” of in-situ-stress profiles, in particular alternating low and high stress among rock layers, in determining the tendency of a hydraulic fracture to propagate horizontally vs. vertically. We found that a hydraulic fracture propagates horizontally in low-stress layers ahead of neighboring high-stress layers. Under such a configuration, a fracture-mechanics principle dictates that the net pressure required for horizontal growth of high-stress layers within the current fracture height is significantly lower than that required for additional vertical growth across rock layers. Without explicit consideration of the stress-roughness profile, the system behaves as if the rock is tougher against vertical propagation than it is against horizontal fracture propagation. We developed a simple relationship between the apparent differential rock toughness and characteristics of the stress roughness that induce equivalent overall fracture shapes. This relationship enables existing hydraulic-fracture models to represent the effects of rough in-situ stress on fracture growth without directly representing the fine-resolution rough-stress profiles.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||15|
Abbas, S., Gordeliy, E., Peirce, A. et al. 2014. Limited Height Growth and Reduced Opening of Hydraulic Fractures Due to Fracture Offsets: An XFEM Application. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 4–6 February. SPE-168622-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/168622-MS.
Adachi, J. I., Detournay, E., and Peirce, A. P. 2010 Analysis of the Classical Pseudo-3D Model for Hydraulic Fracture With Equilibrium Height Growth Across Stress Barriers. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47 (4): 625–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2010.03.008.
AlTammar, M. J. and Sharma, M. M. 2017. Effect of Geological Layer Properties on Hydraulic Fracture Initiation and Propagation: An Experimental Study. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition, The Woodlands, Texas, 24–26 January. SPE-184871-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/184871-MS.
Barree, R. D., Conway, M. W., Gilbert, J. V. et al. 2010. Evidence of Strong Fracture Height Containment Based on Complex Shear Failure and Formation Anisotropy. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Florence, Italy, 19–22 September. SPE-134142-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/134142-MS.
Burghardt, J., Desroches, J., Lecampion, B. et al. 2015. Laboratory Study of the Effect of Well Orientation, Completion Design, and Rock Fabric on Near-Wellbore Hydraulic Fracture Geometry in Shales. Presented at the 13th ISRM International Congress of Rock Mechanics, Montreal, Canada, 10–13 May. ISRM-13CONGRESS-2015-357.
Chandler, M. R., Meredith, P. G., Brantut, N. et al. 2016. Fracture Toughness Anisotropy in Shale. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 121 (3): 1706–1729. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JB012756.
Cherian, B. V., Higgins-Borchardt, S., Bordakov, G. A. et al. 2014. The Impact of Laminated Rock on Hydraulic Fracture Propagation in Unconventional Resources. Presented at the SPE Energy Resources Conference, Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago, 9–11 June. SPE-169960-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/169960-MS.
Chuprakov, D. A. and Prioul, R. 2015. Hydraulic Fracture Height Containment by Weak Horizontal Interfaces. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 3–5 February. SPE-173337-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/173337-MS.
Cooke, M. L. and Underwood, C. A. 2001. Fracture Termination and Step-Over at Bedding Interfaces Due to Frictional Slip and Interface Opening. J Struct Geol 23 (2–3): 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8141(00)00092-4.
Daneshy, A. A. 1978. Hydraulic Fracture Propagation in Layered Formations. SPE J. 18 (1): 33–41. SPE-6088-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/6088-PA.
Detournay, E. 2004. Propagation Regimes of Fluid-Driven Fractures in Impermeable Rocks. Int J Geomech 4 (1): 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2004)4:1(35).
Diaz, H. G., Desroches, J., Williams, R. et al. 2018. Rock Fabric Analysis Based on Borehole Image Logs: Applications to Modeling Fracture Height Growth. Presented at the SPE International Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition, Muscat, Oman, 16–18 October. SPE-191389-18IHFT-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/191389-18IHFT-MS.
Dontsov, E. 2019. Scaling Laws for Hydraulic Fractures Driven by a Power-Law Fluid in Homogeneous Anisotropic Rocks. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 43 (2): 519–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2874.
Fisher, M. K. and Warpinski, N. R. 2012. Hydraulic-Fracture-Height Growth: Real Data. SPE Prod & Oper 27 (1): 8–19. SPE-145949-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/145949-PA.
Fu, P., Johnson, S. M., and Carrigan, C. R. 2013. An Explicitly Coupled Hydro-Geomechanical Model for Simulating Hydraulic Fracturing in Complex Discrete Fracture Networks. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 34 (14): 2278–2300. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2135.
Fung, R. L., Vijayakumar, S., and Cormack, D. 1987. Calculation of Vertical Fracture Containment in Layered Formations. SPE Form Eval 2 (4): 518–522. SPE-14707-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/14707-PA.
Gu, H. and Siebrits, E. 2008. Effect of Formation Modulus Contrast on Hydraulic Fracture Height Containment. SPE Prod & Oper 23 (2): 170–176. SPE-103822-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/103822-PA.
Gu, H., Siebrits, E., and Sabourov, A. 2008. Hydraulic Fracture Modeling With Bedding Plane Interfacial Slip. Presented at the SPE Eastern Regional/AAPG Eastern Section Joint Meeting, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 11–15 October. SPE-117445-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/117445-MS.
Hoek, E. 1964. Fracture of Anisotropic Rock. J South Afr Inst Min Metall 64 (10): 501–518.
Huang, J., Fu, P., Settgast, R. R. et al. 2018. Evaluating a Simple Fracturing Criterion for a Hydraulic Fracture Crossing Stress and Stiffness Contrasts. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52 (6): 1657–1670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-018-1679-7.
Huang, J., Morris, J., Fu, P. et al. 2019. Hydraulic-Fracture-Height Growth Under the Combined Influence of Stress Barriers and Natural Fractures. SPE J. 24 (1): 302–318. SPE-189861-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/189861-PA.
Hubbert, K. M. and Willis, D. G. 1957. Mechanics of Hydraulic Fracturing. SPE-686-G.
Kruger, R. 2004. Virtual Crack Closure Technique: History, Approach, and Applications. Appl. Mech. Rev. 57 (2): 109–143. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1595677.
Lam, K. Y. and Cleary, M. P. 1984. Slippage and Re-Initiation of (Hydraulic) Fractures at Frictional Interfaces. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 8 (6): 589–604. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.1610080607.
Lee, H. P., Olson, J. E., Holder, J. et al. 2015. The Interaction of Propagating Opening Mode Fractures With Preexisting Discontinuities in Shale. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 120 (1): 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JB011358.
Mader, D. 1989. Hydraulic Proppant Fracturing and Gravel Packing, first edition. Burlington, Massachusetts: Developments in Petroleum Science Series, Elsevier.
Maxwell, S. C. 2011. Hydraulic Fracture Height Growth. CSEG Recorder 36 (9): 19–22.
McClure, M. W. and Kang, C. A. 2017. A Three-Dimensional Reservoir, Wellbore, and Hydraulic Fracturing Simulator That is Compositional and Thermal, Tracks Proppant and Water Solute Transport, Includes Non-Darcy and Non-Newtonian Flow, and Handles Fracture Closure. Presented at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Conference, Montgomery, Texas, 20–22 February. SPE-182593-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/182593-MS.
Rahman, M. K., Hossain, M. M., and Rahman, S. S. 2002. A Shear-Dilation-Based Model for Evaluation of Hydraulically Stimulated Naturally Fractured Reservoirs. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 26 (5): 469–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.208.
Settgast, R. R., Fu, P., Walsh, S. D. C. et al. 2017. A Fully Coupled Method for Massively Parallel Simulation of Hydraulically Driven Fractures in 3-Dimensions. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 41 (5): 627–653. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2557.
Simonson, E. R., Abou-Sayed, A. S., and Clifton, R. J. 1978. Containment of Massive Hydraulic Fractures. SPE J. 18 (1): 27–32. SPE-6089-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/6089-PA.
Smith, M. B., Bale, A. B., Britt, L. K. et al. 2001 Layered Modulus Effects on Fracture Propagation, Proppant Placement, and Fracture Modeling. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 30 September–3 October. SPE-71654-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/71654-MS.
Teufel, L. W. and Clark, J. A. 1984. Hydraulic Fracture Propagation in Layered Rock: Experimental Studies of Fracture Containment. SPE J. 24 (1): 19–32. SPE-9878-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/9878-PA.
van Eekelen, H. A. M. 1982. Hydraulic Fracture Geometry: Fracture Containment in Layered Formations. SPE J. 22 (3): 341–349. SPE-9261-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/9261-PA.
Voegele, M. D., Abou-Sayed, A. S., and Jones, A. H. 1983. Optimization of Stimulation Design Through the Use of In-Situ Stress Determination. J Pet Technol 35 (6): 1071–1081. SPE-10308-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/10308-PA.
Warpinski, N. R., Schmidt, R. A., and Northrop, D. A. 1982a. In-Situ Stresses: The Predominant Influence on Hydraulic Fracture Containment. J Pet Technol 34 (3): 653–664. SPE-8932-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/8932-PA.
Warpinski, N. R., Clark, J. A., Schmidt, R. A. et al. 1982b. Laboratory Investigation on the Effect of In-Situ Stresses on Hydraulic Fracture Containment. SPE J. 22 (3): 333–340. SPE-9834-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/9834-PA.
Weng, X., Kresse, O., Cohen, C.-E. et al. 2011. Modeling of Hydraulic-Fracture-Network Propagation in a Naturally Fractured Formation. SPE Prod & Oper 26 (4): 368–380. SPE-140253-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/140253-PA.
Yamada, Y. and Shibanuma, J. 2015. Small-Scale Stress Fluctuations in Borehole Breakouts and Their Implication in Identifying Potential Active Faults Around the Seismogenic Megasplay Fault, Nankai Trough, SW Japan. Earth Planets Space 67: 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-014-0176-9.
Zhang, X. and Jeffrey R. G. 2008. Reinitiation and Termination of Fluid-Driven Fractures at Frictional Bedding Interfaces. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 113 (B8): B08416. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JB005327.
Zhang, X., Wu, B., Jeffrey, R. G. et al. 2017. A Pseudo-3D Model for Hydraulic Fracture Growth in a Layered Rock. Int J Solids Struct 115–116 (1 June): 208–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.03.022.
Zhou, J., Huang, H., Deo, M. et al. 2015. A New Physics-Based Modeling of Multiple Non-Planar Hydraulic Fractures Propagation. Presented at the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, San Antonio, Texas, 20–22 July. URTEC-2170875-MS. https://doi.org/10.15530/URTEC-2015-2170875.
Zia, H., Lecampion, B., and Zhang, W. 2018. Impact of the Anisotropy of Fracture Toughness on the Propagation of Planar 3D Hydraulic Fracture. Int J Fract 211 (1–2): 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-018-0278-7.
Zoback, M. D. 2007. Reservoir Geomechanics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.