A Novel Approach for Estimating Formation Permeability and Revisiting After-Closure Analysis of Diagnostic Fracture-Injection Tests
- HanYi Wang (University of Texas at Austin) | Mukul M. Sharma (University of Texas at Austin)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- August 2019
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 1,809 - 1,829
- 2019.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Normalized Stiffness Plot (NS Plot), Pressure Transient Analysis, Permeability Estimation, Diagnostic Fracture Injection Test (DFIT), After-Closure Analysis
- 32 in the last 30 days
- 99 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Estimating reservoir-flow capacity is crucial for production estimation, hydraulic-fracturing design, and field development. Laboratory experiments can be used to measure the permeability of rock samples, but the results might not be representative at a field scale because of reservoir heterogeneity and pre-existing natural-fracture systems. Diagnostic fracture-injection tests (DFITs) have now become standard practice to estimate formation pore pressure and formation permeability. However, in low-permeability reservoirs, after-closure radial flow is often absent and this can result in significant uncertainties in interpreting DFIT data. In addition, the established methods for analyzing DFIT data make two oversimplified assumptions: Carter leakoff and constant fracture compliance (or stiffness) during fracture closure. However, both assumptions are violated during fracture closure; therefore, G-function-based models and subsequent related work can lead to an incorrect interpretation and are not capable of consistently fitting both before- and after-closure data coherently. Moreover, current after-closure analysis relies on classic well-test solutions with a constant injection rate. In reality, a “constant injection rate” does not equal “constant leakoff rate into the formation,” because more than 90% of the injected fluid stays inside the fracture at the end of pumping instead of leaking into the formation. The variable leakoff rate clearly violates the constant-rate boundary condition used in existing well-test solutions.
In this study, we extend our previous work and derive time-convolution solutions to pressure-transient behavior of a closing fracture with infinite and finite fracture conductivity. We show that the G-function and the square-root-of-time models are only special cases of our general solutions. In addition, we found that after-closure linear-flow and bilinear-flow analysis can be used to infer pore pressure reliably but fail to estimate other parameters correctly. Most importantly, we present a new approach to history match the entire duration of DFIT data to estimate formation-flow capacity, even without knowing closure stress and the roughness properties of the fracture surface. Our approach adds significant value to DFIT interpretation and uncertainty analysis, especially in unconventional reservoirs where the absence of after-closure radial flow is the norm. Two representative field cases are also presented and discussed.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||21|
Abrams, M. E., Churcher, P. L., Piland, J. et al. 2015. From the Laboratory to the Field: Successful Multistage Horizontal Fracturing Design and Implementation in Tight Sandstones in the Anadarko Basin. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 3–5 February. SPE-173379-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/173379-MS.
Barree, R. D., Barree, V. L., and Craig, D. 2009. Holistic Fracture Diagnostics: Consistent Interpretation of Prefrac Injection Tests Using Multiple Analysis Methods. SPE Prod & Oper 24 (3): 396–406. SPE-107877-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/107877-PA.
Benelkadi, S. and Tiab, D. 2004. Reservoir Permeability Determination Using After-Closure Period Analysis of Calibration Tests. SPE Res Eval & Eng 7 (3): 230–237. SPE-88640-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/88640-PA.
Busetti, S. and Flottmann, T. 2018. Modeling Hydraulic Fracturing in Transitional Stress Regimes, Surat Basin, Australia. Presented at the 2nd International Discrete Fracture Network Engineering Conference, Seattle, Washington, 20–22 June. ARMA-DFNE-18-0625.
Castillo, J. L. 1987. Modified Fracture Pressure Decline Analysis Including Pressure-Dependent Leakoff. Presented at the Low Permeability Reservoir Symposium, Denver, 18–19 May. SPE-16417-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/16417-MS.
Chipperfield, S. T. 2006. After-Closure Analysis to Identify Naturally Fractured Reservoirs. SPE Res Eval & Eng 9 (1): 50–60. SPE-90002-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/90002-PA.
Craig, D. P. 2017. Determining Fracture Geometry in a Multifractured Horizontal Well Using DFIT Interpretation, Intra-Well Fracture-to-Fracture Interference, and Production History Matching. Presented at the SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Austin, Texas, 24–26 July. URTEC-2695331-MS. https://doi.org/10.15530/URTEC-2017-2695331.
de Pater, C. J., Desroches, J., Groenenboom, J. et al. 1996. Physical and Numerical Modeling of Hydraulic Fracture Closure. SPE Prod & Fac 11 (2): 122–128. SPE-28561-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/28561-PA.
Fu, Y., Dehghanpour, H., Ezulike, D. O. et al. 2017. Estimating Effective Fracture Pore Volume From Flowback Data and Evaluating Its Relationship to Design Parameters of Multistage-Fracture Completion. SPE Prod & Oper 32 (4): 423–439. SPE-175892-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/175892-PA.
Gibson, M., Mazumder, S., Probst, P. et al. 2013. Application of Open-Hole Diagnostic Fracture Injection Test Results to Regional Stress Interpretation in Bowen Basin Coals. Presented at the SPE Unconventional Resources Conference and Exhibition-Asia Pacific, Brisbane, Australia, 11–13 November. SPE-167074-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/167074-MS.
Gu, H., Elbel, J. L., Nolte, K. G. et al. 1993. Formation Permeability Determination Using Impulse-Fracture Injection. Presented at the SPE Production Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 21–23 March. SPE-25425-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/25425-MS.
Guo, J., Luo, B., Lu, C. et al. 2017. Numerical Investigation of Hydraulic Fracture Propagation in a Layered Reservoir Using the Cohesive Zone Method. Eng Fract Mech 186 (December): 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.10.013.
Guppy, K. H., Kumar, S., and Kagawan, V. D. 1988. Pressure-Transient Analysis for Fractured Wells Producing at Constant Pressure. SPE Form Eval 3 (1): 169–178. SPE-13629-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/13629-PA.
Liu, G., Ehlig-Economides, C., and Sun, J. 2016. Comprehensive Global Fracture Calibration Model. Presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Hydraulic Fracturing Conference, Beijing, 24–26 August. SPE-181856-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/181856-MS.
Loughry, D., Epps, D., and Forrest, J. 2015. Using Pad ISIP, DFIT, and ESP Data to Generate a Pore Pressure Model for the Midland Basin. Presented at the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, San Antonio, Texas, 20–22 July. URTEC-2162973-MS. https://doi.org/10.15530/URTEC-2015-2162973.
Marongiu-Porcu, M., Retnanto, A., Economides, M. J. et al. 2014. Comprehensive Fracture Calibration Test Design. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 4–6 February. SPE-168634-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/168634-MS.
Mayerhofer, M. J., Ehlig-Economides, C. A., and Economides, M. J. 1995. Pressure Transient Analysis of Fracture Calibration Tests. J Pet Technol 47 (3): 229–234. SPE-26527-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/26527-PA.
McClure, M. W. 2017. The Spurious Deflection on Log-Log Superposition Time Derivative Plots of Diagnostic Fracture. SPE Res Eval & Eng 20 (4): 1045–1055. SPE-186098-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/186098-PA.
McClure, M. W., Jung, H., Cramer, D. D. et al. 2016. The Fracture Compliance Method for Picking Closure Pressure From Diagnostic Fracture-Injection Tests. SPE J. 21 (4): 1321–1339. SPE-179725-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/179725-PA.
Mear, M. E., Sevostianov, I., and Kachanov, M. 2007. Elastic Compliances of Non-Flat Cracks. Int J Solids Struct 44 (20): 6412–6427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.02.034.
Mirani, A., Marongiu-Porcu, M., Wang, H. et al. 2018. Production-Pressure-Drawdown Management for Fractured Horizontal Wells in Shale-Gas Formations. SPE Res Eval & Eng 21 (3): 550–565. SPE-181365-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/181365-PA.
Nolte, K. G. 1979. Determination of Fracture Parameters From Fracturing Pressure Decline. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Las Vegas, Nevada, 23–26 September. SPE-8341-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/8341-MS.
Nolte, K. G. 1986. A General Analysis of Fracturing Pressure Decline With Application to Three Models. SPE Form Eval 1 (6): 571–583. SPE-12941-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/12941-PA.
Nolte, K. G., Maniere, J. L., and Owens, K. A. 1997. After-Closure Analysis of Fracture Calibration Tests. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 5–8 October. SPE-38676-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/38676-MS.
Parotidis, M., Hummel, N., Graham, J. et al. 2016. Unconventional Plays, Various Lithologies–Constant Stress Gradients. Presented at SPE Europec featured at the 78th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Vienna, Austria, 30 May–2 June. SPE-180075-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/180075-MS.
Potocki, D. J. 2012. Understanding Induced Fracture Complexity in Different Geological Settings Using DFIT Net Fracture Pressure. Presented at the SPE Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, 30 October–1 November. SPE-162814-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/162814-MS.
Ramurthy, M., Barree, R. D., Kundert, D. P. et al. 2011. Surface-Area vs. Conductivity-Type Fracture Treatments in Shale Reservoirs. SPE Prod & Oper 26 (4): 357–367. SPE-140169-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/140169-PA.
Rittenhouse, S., Currie, J., and Blumstein, R. 2016. Using Mud Weights, DST, and DFIT Data to Generate a Regional Pore Pressure Model for the Delaware Basin, New Mexico and Texas. Presented at the SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, San Antonio, Texas, 1–3 August. URTEC-2450423-MS. https://doi.org/10.15530/URTEC-2016-2450423.
Sevostianov, I. and Kachanov, M. 2002. On Elastic Compliances of Irregularly Shaped Cracks. Int J Fract 114 (3): 245–257. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015534127172.
Shrivastava, K. and Sharma, M. M. 2018. Proppant Transport in Complex Fracture Networks. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition, The Woodlands, Texas, 23–25 January. SPE-189895-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/189895-MS.
Soliman, M. Y. and Kabir, C. S. 2012. Testing Unconventional Formations. J Pet Sci Eng 92–93 (August): 102–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2012.04.027.
Soliman, M. Y., Craig, D. P., Bartko, K. M. et al. 2005. Post-Closure Analysis to Determine Formation Permeability, Reservoir Pressure, Residual Fracture Properties. Presented at the SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, Bahrain, 12–15 March. SPE-93419-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/93419-MS.
Soliman, M. Y., Miranda, C., and Wang, H. M. 2010. Application of After-Closure Analysis to a Dual-Porosity Formation, to CBM, and to a Fractured Horizontal Well. SPE Prod & Oper 25 (4): 472–483. SPE-124135-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/124135-PA.
Taco, G., Kamenar, A., and Edgoose, J. 2012. Comparison of DFIT, DST and IFT Permeability in Coal Seam Reservoirs Subject to Stress. Presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Perth, Australia, 22–24 October. SPE-158297-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/158297-MS.
Valkó, P. P. and Economides, M. J. 1999. Fluid-Leakoff Delineation in High-Permeability Fracturing. SPE Prod & Fac 14 (2):110–116. SPE-56135-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/56135-PA.
van Dam, D. B., de Pater, C. J., and Romijn, R. 2000. Analysis of Hydraulic Fracture Closure in Laboratory Experiments. SPE Prod & Fac 15 (3): 151–158. SPE-65066-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/65066-PA.
van den Hoek, P. 2017. A Simple Unified Pressure-Transient-Analysis Method for Fractured Waterflood Injectors and Minifractures in Hydraulic-Fracture Stimulation. SPE Prod & Oper 33 (1): 32–48. SPE-181593-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/181593-PA.
van den Hoek, P. J. 2005. Dimensions and Degree of Containment of Waterflood-Induced Fractures From Pressure Transient Analysis. SPE Res Eval & Eng 8 (5): 377–387. SPE-84289-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/84289-PA.
Wang, H. 2017. What Factors Control Shale-Gas Production and Production-Decline Trend in Fractured Systems: A Comprehensive Analysis and Investigation. SPE J. 22 (2): 562–581. SPE-179967-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/179967-PA.
Wang, H. 2018. Discrete Fracture Networks Modeling of Shale Gas Production and Revisit Rate Transient Analysis in Heterogeneous Fractured Reservoirs. J Pet Sci Eng 169: 796–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.05.029.
Wang, H. and Sharma, M. M. 2017a. A Non-Local Model for Fracture Closure on Rough Fracture Faces and Asperities. J Pet Sci Eng 154 (June): 425–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.04.024.
Wang, H. and Sharma, M. M. 2017b. New Variable Compliance Method for Estimating Closure Stress and Fracture Compliance From DFIT Data. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 9–11 October. SPE-187348-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/187348-MS.
Wang, H. and Sharma, M. M. 2018a. Estimating Unpropped-Fracture Conductivity and Fracture Compliance From Diagnostic Fracture-Injection Tests. SPE J. 23 (5): 1648–1668. SPE-189844-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/189844-PA.
Wang, H. and Sharma, M. M. 2018b. Modelling of Hydraulic Fracture Closure on Proppants With Proppant Settling. J Pet Sci Eng 171 (December): 636–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.07.067.
Wang, H. and Sharma, M. M. 2019. Determine In-Situ Stress and Characterize Complex Fractures in Naturally Fractured Reservoirs From Diagnostic Fracture Injection Tests. Rock Mech Rock Eng (in press; published online 28 March 2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-01793-w.
Wang, H., Marongiu-Porcu, M., and Economides, M. J. 2016. Poroelastic and Poroplastic Modeling of Hydraulic Fracturing in Brittle and Ductile Formations. SPE Prod & Oper 31 (1): 47–59. SPE-168600-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/168600-PA.
Wang, H., Yi, S., and Sharma, M. M. 2018. A Computationally Efficient Approach to Modeling Contact Problems and Fracture Closure Using Superposition Method. Theor Appl Fract Mec 93 (February): 276–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2017.09.009.
Warpinski, N. R., Branagan, P. T., Engler, B. P. et al. 2002. Evaluation of a Downhole Tiltmeter Array for Monitoring Hydraulic Fractures. Int J Rock Mech Min 34 (3–4): 329.e1–329.e13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(97)00074-9.
Witherspoon, P. A., Wang, J. S., Iwai, K. et al. 1980. Validity of Cubic Law for Fluid Flow in a Deformable Rock Fracture. Water Resources Research 16 (6): 1016–1024. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR016i006p01016.
Zheng, S., Manchanda, R., Wang, H. et al. 2019. Fully 3D Simulation of Diagnostic Fracture Injection Tests With Application in Depleted Reservoirs. Paper prepared for presentation at the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Denver, Colorado, 22–24 July.