Measuring Simplified Pore-Throat Angularity Using Automated Mathematical Morphology
- Aurelien G. Meyer (Natural History Museum of Denmark)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- February 2019
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 243 - 253
- 2019.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- pore throat, Image analysis, geometry, mathematical morphology, angularity
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 60 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
Fluid flow in sedimentary rocks is controlled mainly by the morphology of pore-connecting throats. Pore throats (PTs) typically exhibit diverse converging/diverging morphologies such as biconic, parabolic, or hyperbolic geometries. These different geometries are defined by variable opening angle, or angularity, between the throat walls from the narrowest point of the throat toward the pore body. Importantly, each of these geometries imposes different constraints on fluid flow. However, current pore-level flow models usually favor simple cylindrical or biconic throat morphologies, in part because of the difficulty to extract the throat angularity from pore-space imagery. An image-analysis technique called mathematical morphology has been used to characterize porosity in laterally continuous pore networks (e.g., in sandstones) from thin-section microphotographs. This method allows the extraction of petrophysical parameters such as pore and throat diameters through successive image alterations—namely, erosion/dilation cycles using an expanding structuring element (SE). This study proposes a novel application of this technique and quantifies PT angularity. Angularity can be measured from the throat toward the pore body so that the true geometry—biconic, parabolic, or hyperbolic—can be recognized. The technique is tested on simple geometries to demonstrate the correctness of the mathematic equations involved. Because all equations assume perfect, nonpixelated geometries while images are composed of square pixels, the accuracy of measurements depends strongly on image resolution. Pixelation causes significant fluctuations of ±2 to 10° around the correct angularity values that decrease in amplitude as image resolution increases. Finally, potential implications of this parameter on fluid-flow modeling are discussed.
|File Size||856 KB||Number of Pages||11|
Acharya, R. C., van der Zee, S. E. A. T. M., and Leijnse, A. 2004. Porosity-Permeability Properties Generated With a New 2-Parameter 3D Hydraulic Pore-Network Model for Consolidated and Unconsolidated Porous Media. Advances in Water Resources 27 (7): 707723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2004.05.002.
Al-Kharusi, A. S. and Blunt, M. J. 2007. Network Extraction From Sandstone and Carbonate Pore Space Images. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 56 (4): 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2006.09.003.
Alizadeh, A. H. and Piri, M. 2014. Three-Phase Flow in Porous Media: A Review of Experimental Studies on Relative Permeability. Reviews of Geophysics 52 (3): 468–521. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013RG000433.
Bakke, S. and Øren, P.-E. 1997. 3D Pore-Scale Modelling of Sandstones and Flow Simulations in the Pore Networks. SPE J. 2: 136–149. SPE-35479-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/35479-PA.
Beckingham, L. E., Peters, C. A., Um, W. et al. 2013. 2D and 3D Imaging Resolution Trade-Offs in Quantifying Pore Throats for Prediction of Permeability. Advances in Water Resources 62: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2013.08.010.
Berg, C. F. 2014. Permeability Description by Characteristic Length, Tortuosity, Constriction, and Porosity. Transport in Porous Media 103 (3): 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-014-0307-6.
Bjørlykke, K. 1994. Pore-Water Flow and Mass Transfer of Solids in Solution in Sedimentary Basins. In Quantitative Diagenesis: Recent Developments and Applications to Reservoir Geology, ed. A. Parker and B. Sellwood. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 189–221.
Blunt, M. J. 2001. Flow in Porous Media—Pore-Network Models and Multiphase Flow. Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science 6 (3): 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-0294(01)00084-X.
Blunt, M. J. 2017. Multiphase Flow in Permeable Media: A Pore-Scale Perspective. Cambridge, UK: University Press.
Blunt, M. J., Jackson, M. D., Piri, M. et al. 2002. Detailed Physics, Predictive Capabilities, and Macroscopic Consequences for Pore-Network Models of Multiphase Flow. Advances in Water Resources 25 (8–12): 1069–1089. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(02)00049-0.
Brice, J. G., Lowe, R. D., and Dowsett, D. J. 1964. Haemodynamic Effects of Carotid Artery Stenosis. British Medical Journal 2 (5421): 1363–1366. https://10.1136/bmj.2.5421.1363.
Celia, M. A., Reeves, P. C., and Ferrand, L. A. 1995. Recent Advances in Pore Scale Models for Multiphase Flow in Porous Media. Reviews of Geophysics 33 (52): 1049–1057. https://doi.org/10.1029/95RG00248.
Chapman, R. E. 1987. Fluid Flow in Sedimentary Basins: A Geologist’s Perspective. In Fluid Flow in Sedimentary Basins and Aquifers, ed. C. Goff and B. P. J. Williams. Geological Society Special Publication No. 34, pp. 3–18.
Chaudhary, K., Cardenas, M. B., Deng, W. et al. 2013. Pore Geometry Effects on Intrapore Viscous to Inertial Flows and on Effective Hydraulic Parameters. Water Resources Research 49 (2): 1149–1162. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20099.
Ciftcioglu, M., Smith, D. M., and Ross, S. B. 1988. Mercury Porosimetry of Ordered Sphere Compacts—Investigation of Intrusion and Extrusion Pore-Size Distributions. Powder Technology 55 (3): 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-5910(88)80103-7.
Crandell, L. E., Peters, C. A., Um, W. et al. 2012. Changes in the Pore Network Structure of Hanford Sediment After Reaction With Caustic Tank Wastes. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 131 (1–4): 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2012.02.002.
Doyen, P. M. 1988. Permeability, Conductivity, and Pore Geometry of Sandstone. Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth and Planets 93 (B7): 7729–7740. https://doi.org/10.1029/jB093iB07p07729.
Ehrlich, R., Crabtree, S. J., Horkowitz, K. O. et al. 1991. Petrography and Reservoir Physics. I. Objective Classification of Reservoir Porosity. AAPG Bull. 75 (10): 1547–1562.
Ehrlich, R., Kennedy, S. K., Crabtree, S. J. et al. 1984. Petrographic Image-Analysis. 1. Analysis of Reservoir Pore Complexes. Journal of Sedimentary Research 54 (4): 1365–1378. https://doi.org/10.1306/212F85DF-2B24-11D7-8648000102C1865D.
Fenwick, D. H. and Blunt, M. J. 1998. Three-Dimensional Modeling of Three-Phase Imbibition and Drainage. Advances in Water Resources 21 (2): 121–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(96)00037-1.
Guzman, A. M. and Amon, C. H. 1994. Transition to Chaos in Converging Diverging Channel Flows—Ruelle-Takens-Newhouse Scenario. Physics of Fluids 6 (6): 1994–2002. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.868206.
Ioannidis, M. A. and Chatzis, I. 2000. On the Geometry and Topology of 3D Stochastic Porous Media. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 229 (2): 323–334. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.2000.7055.
Jerauld, G. R. and Salter, S. J. 1990. The Effect of Pore-Structure on Hysteresis in Relative Permeability and Capillary Pressure—Pore-Level Modeling. Transport in Porous Media 5 (2): 103–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0014460.
Khishvand, M., Alizadeh, A. H., and Piri, M. 2016. In-Situ Characterization of Wettability and Pore-Scale Displacements During Two- and Three-Phase Flow in Natural Porous Media. Advances in Water Resources 97: 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.10.009.
Lee, T. S. 2002. Numerical Study of Fluid Flow Through Double Bell-Shaped Constrictions in a Tube. International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow 12 (2): 258–289. https://doi.org/10.1108/09615530210422947.
Lenormand, R., Zarcone, C., and Sarr, A. 1983. Mechanisms of the Displacement of One Fluid by Another in a Network of Capillary Ducts. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 135 (1): 337–353. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112083003110.
Li, Y. and Wardlaw, N. C. 1986. The Influence of Wettability and Critical Pore Throat Size Ratio on Snap-Off. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 109 (2): 461–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(86)90324-3.
Liang, Z., Ioannidis, M. A., and Chatzis, I. 2000. Geometric and Topological Analysis of Three-Dimensional Porous Media: Pore Space Partitioning Based on Morphological Skeletonization. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 221 (1): 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.1999.6559.
Lindquist, W. B., Venkatarangan, A., Dunsmuir, J. et al. 2000. Pore and Throat Size Distributions Measured From Synchrotron X-Ray Tomographic Images of Fontainebleau Sandstones. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 105 (B9): 21509–21527. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jB900208.
Mahmud, S., Islam, A. K. M. S., and Feroz, C. M. 2003. Flow and Heat Transfer Characteristics Inside a Wavy Tube. Heat and Mass Transfer 39 (5): 387–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-002-0369-9.
Mohanty, K. K., Davis, H. T., and Scriven, L. E. 1987. Physics of Oil Entrapment in Water-Wet Rock. SPE Res Eng 2: 113–128. SPE-9406-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/9406-PA.
Payatakes, A. C., Tien, C., and Turian, R. M. 1973. A New Model for Granular Porous Media: Part I. Model Formulation. AICHE J. 19 (1): 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690190110.
Rabbani, H. S., Joekar-Niasar, V., and Shokri, N. 2016. Effects of Intermediate Wettability on Entry Capillary Pressure in Angular Pores. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 473: 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2016.03.053.
Raeini, A. Q., Blunt, M. J., and Bijeljic, B. 2014. Direct Simulations of Two-Phase Flow on Micro-CT Images of Porous Media and Upscaling of Pore-Scale Forces. Advances in Water Resources 74: 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2014.08.012.
Raoof, A. and Hassanizadeh, S. M. 2012. A New Formulation for Pore-Network Modeling of Two-Phase Flow. Water Resources Research 48 (1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR010180.
Reeves, P. C. and Celia, M. A. 1996. A Functional Relationship Between Capillary Pressure, Saturation, and Interfacial Area as Revealed by a Pore-Scale Network Model. Water Resources Research 32 (8): 2345–2358. https://doi.org/10.1029/96WR01105.
Rink, M. 1976. A Computerized Quantitative Image Analysis Procedure for Investigating Features and an Adapted Image Process. Journal of Microscopy 107 (3): 267–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.1976.tb02448.
RStudio is a registred trademark of RStudio, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts.
Serra, J. 1982. Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology. London: Academic Press.
Silin, D. and Patzek, T. 2006. Pore Space Morphology Analysis Using Maximal Inscribed Spheres. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 371 (2): 336–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2006.04.048.
Singh, K., Menke, H., Andrew, M. et al. 2017. Dynamics of Snap-Off and Pore-Filling Events During Two-Phase Fluid Flow in Permeable Media. Scientific Reports 7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05204-4.
Sochi, T. 2015. Navier–Stokes Flow in Converging–Diverging Distensible Tubes. Alexandria Engineering Journal 54 (3): 713–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2015.03.028.
Toledo, P. G., Scriven, L. E., and Davis, H. T. 1994. Equilibrium and Stability of Static Interfaces in Biconical Pore Segments. SPE Form Eval 9 (1): 61–65. SPE-27410-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/27410-PA.
Tu, C., Deville, M., Dheur, L. et al. 1992. Finite-Element Simulation of Pulsatile Flow Through Arterial-Stenosis. Journal of Biomechanics 25 (10): 1141–1152. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(92)90070-H.
Valvatne, P. H., Piri, M., Lopez, X. et al. 2005. Predictive Pore-Scale Modeling of Single and Multiphase Flow. Transport in Porous Media 58 (1–2): 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-004-5468-2.
Vogel, H. J. 1997. Morphological Determination of Pore Connectivity as a Function of Pore Size Using Serial Sections. European Journal of Soil Science 48 (3): 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1997.tb00203.x.
Wardlaw, N. C. 1982. The Effects of Geometry, Wettability, Viscosity, and Interfacial Tension on Trapping in Single Pore-Throat Pairs. J Can Pet Technol 21 (3): 21–27. PETSOC-82-03-01. https://doi.org/10.2118/82-03-01.
Wardlaw, N. C. 1990. Quantitative-Determination of Pore Structure and Application to Fluid Displacement in Reservoir Rocks. In North Sea Oil and Gas Reservoirs, ed. A. T. Buller, E. Berg, O. Hjelmeland, J. Kleppe, O. Torsaeter, and J. O. Aasen, 229–243. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Wardlaw, N. C., McKellar, M., and Yu, L. 1988. Pore and Throat Size Distributions Determined by Mercury Porosimetry and by Direct Observation. Carbonates and Evaporites 3 (1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0317440.
Wildenschild, D. and Sheppard, A. P. 2013. X-Ray Imaging and Analysis Techniques for Quantifying Pore-Scale Structure and Processes in Subsurface Porous Medium Systems. Advances in Water Resources 51: 217–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.07.018.
Xiong, Q. R., Baychev, T. G., and Jivkov, A. P. 2016. Review of Pore Network Modeling of Porous Media: Experimental Characterizations, Network Constructions and Applications to Reactive Transport. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 192: 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2016.07.002.
Yang, F. F., Hingerl, F. F., Xiao, X. H. et al. 2015. Extraction of Pore-Morphology and Capillary Pressure Curves of Porous Media From Synchrotron-Based Tomography Data. Scientific Reports 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10635.