Experimental Study on the Sliding Friction for Coiled Tubing and High-Pressure Hose in a Cuttings Bed During Microhole-Horizontal-Well Drilling
- Xianzhi Song (State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing) | Zhaoyu Pang (CNOOC Research Institute) | Zhengming Xu (State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing) | Gensheng Li (State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing) | Baojiang Sun (China University of Petroleum, East China) | Zhaopeng Zhu (State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing) | Ruiyue Yang (State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing) | Zehao Lyu (State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- October 2019
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 2,010 - 2,019
- 2019.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Microhole horizontal well, High-pressure hose, Coiled tubing, Cuttings bed, Sliding friction
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 224 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Microhole-horizontal-well-drilling technology is a high-efficiency and low-cost technology that has developed rapidly in recent years. However, during microhole-horizontal-well drilling, cuttings deposit easily at the bottom of the wellbore because of gravity and nonrotation of the pipe. The pipe sliding on the cuttings bed will cause extremely serious friction between the pipe and cuttings bed, which is an important limiting factor on the extended length of the microhole horizontal wellbore. Therefore, it is necessary to study the influencing factors and establish a model for evaluating the friction between the pipe and cuttings bed. In this study, laboratory experiments on the sliding friction between pipe and cuttings bed were conducted. By analyzing the comprehensive sliding-friction coefficient (CSFC) between the pipe and cuttings bed, the effects of dimensionless buried depth (0.2 to 1.0) and average cuttings size (0.249 to 2.667 mm) on the CSFC between the pipe and cuttings bed were obtained. CSFC is a function of dimensionless buried depth and relative roughness in the developed model. The results suggest that the sliding-friction resistance between the pipe and cuttings bed increases as the buried depth of pipe increases or the average cuttings size decreases. We propose a model for estimating the CSFC using experimental data and the least-squares method. The predictions show good agreement with the experimental data within suitable ranges of models. This work is expected to provide the basis for predicting the friction resistance between the pipe and cuttings bed.
|File Size||876 KB||Number of Pages||10|
Albright, J., Dreesen, D., Anderson, D. et al. 2005. Road Map for a 5000-ft Microborehole. Report, Los Alamos National Laboratory. https://edx.netl.doe.gov/dataset/road-map-for-a-5000-ft-microborehole (accessed December 2018).
Ansari, U., Tunio, A. H., Channa, A. A. et al. 2013. Environmental Approach of Micro-Hole Drilling Technique for Hydrocarbon Recovery Using Micro-Instrumentation. Presented at the SPE/PAPG Annual Technical Conference, Islamabad, Pakistan, 26–27 November. SPE-169648-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/169648-MS.
Bizhani, M., Corredor, F. E. R., and Kuru, E. 2016. Quantitative Evaluation of Critical Conditions Required for Effective Hole Cleaning in Coiled-Tubing Drilling of Horizontal Wells. SPE Drill & Compl 31 (3): 188–199. SPE-174404-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/174404-PA.
Chi, H., Li, G., Huang, Z. et al. 2015. Maximum Drillable Length of the Radial Horizontal Micro-Hole Drilled With Multiple High-Pressure Water Jets. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 26 (September): 1042–1049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2015.07.044.
Cho, H., Shah, S. N., and Osisanya, S. O. 2000. A Three-Layer Modeling for Cuttings Transport With Coiled Tubing Horizontal Drilling. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, 1–4 October. SPE-63269-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/63269-MS.
Department of Energy (DOE). 2003. Microdrill Initiative—Initial Market Evaluation. Report, Spears & Associates, Tulsa, April 2003.
Elrashidi, K., Livescu, S., Watkins, T. et al. 2016. Coiled Tubing Technology for Extending the Reach in Sand-Screen-Completed and Openhole Wells. Presented at the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, 7–10 November. SPE-182905-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/182905-MS.
Guo, B., Feng, Y., and Li, J. 2013. How Much Can You Extend the Reach of Coiled Tubing in Horizontal Wells Using Pressure-Hammer/Pulsing Tools. Presented at the SPE Unconventional Resources Conference, Texas, The Woodlands, 10–12 April. SPE-164527-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/164527-MS.
Hou, X., Gao, D., and Shen, Z. 2013. An Analysis of the Flow Resistance in Coiled Tubing Wound Around A Reel, in Microhole Drilling. Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 89 (2): 97–109. https://doi.org/10.3970/cmes.2012.089.097.
Hou, X., Qi, Z., Liang, Q. et al. 2015. Comparative Analysis of the Pressure Loss From the Circulation of Drilling Fluid During Microhole Drilling With the Use of Coiled Tubing. Chem. Technol. Fuel Oils 51 (4): 361–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10553-015-0613-x.
Kamyab, M. and Rasouli, V. 2016. Experimental and Numerical Simulation of Cuttings Transportation in Coiled Tubing Drilling. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 29 (February): 284–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2015.11.022.
Kamyab, M., Rasouli, V., Cavanough, G. et al. 2012. Challenges of Cuttings Transport in Micro-Borehole Coiled Tubing Drilling for Mineral Exploration. Petrol. Min. Resour. 81: 109–120. https://doi.org/10.2495/PMR120101.
Kolle, J. J., Theimer, K., Thimer, T. et al. 2008. Coiled Tubing Jet Drilling With a Downhole Pressure Intensifier. Presented at the SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing and Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition, The Woodlands, Texas, 1–2 April. SPE-113725-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/113725-MS.
Li, G., Ren, W., Meng, Y. et al. 2014. Micro-Flow Kinetics Research on Water Invasion in Tight Sandstone Reservoirs. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 20 (September): 184–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2014.06.024.
Li, J. and Luft, B. H. 2006. Fills Cleanout With Coiled Tubing in the Reverse Circulation Mode. Presented at the IADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition, Bangkok, 13–15 November. SPE-102661-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/102661-MS.
Li, J. and Walker, S. 1999. Sensitivity Analysis of Hole Cleaning Parameters in Directional Wells. Presented at the SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Roundtable, Houston, 25–26 May. SPE-54498-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/54498-MS.
Li, J. and Wilde, G. 2005. Effect of Particle Density and Size on Solids Transport and Hole Cleaning With Coiled Tubing. Presented at the SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Conference and Exhibition, The Woodlands, Texas, 12–13 April. SPE-94187-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/94187-MS.
Li, J., Aitken, W. A. H., Jumawid, F. et al. 2010. Cleaning Horizontal Wellbores Efficiently With Reverse Circulation Combining With Wiper Trip for Coiled-Tubing Annulus Fracturing Application. Presented at the SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing and Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition, The Woodlands, Texas, 23–24 March. SPE-130638-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/130638-MS.
Li, J., Li, G., Huang, Z. et al. 2015. The Self-Propelled Force Model of a Multi-Orifice Nozzle for Radial Jet Drilling. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 24 (May): 441–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2015.04.009.
Livescu, S. and Craig, S. 2015. Increasing Lubricity of Downhole Fluids for Coiled-Tubing Operations. SPE J. 20 (2): 396–404. SPE-168298-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/168298-PA.
Livescu, S. and Craig, S. 2017. A Critical Review of the Coiled Tubing Friction-Reducing Technologies in Extended-Reach Wells. Part 1: Lubricants. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 157 (August): 747–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.07.072.
Livescu, S., Craig, S., and Aitken, B. 2017. Fluid-Hammer Effects on Coiled-Tubing Friction in Extended-Reach Wells. SPE J. 22 (1): 365–373. SPE-179100-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/179100-PA.
Livescu, S., Craig, S. H., and Watkins, T. 2014. Challenging the Industry’s Understanding of the Mechanical Friction Reduction for Coiled Tubing Operations. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, 27–29 October. SPE-170635-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/170635-MS.
Ma, D., Li, G., Huang, Z. et al. 2012. A Model of Calculating the Circulating Pressure Loss in Coiled Tubing Ultra-Short Radius Radial Drilling. Petrol. Explor. Dev. 39 (4): 528–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1876-3804(12)60072-X.
Madarapu, R. R., Holt, B. M., Corson, C. S., et al. 2007. Advances in Coiled-Tubing Re-Entry Access Bypassed Reserves on Alaska’s North Slope. Presented at the Latin American & Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Buenos Aires, 15–18 April. SPE-107665-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/107665-MS.
McCormick, J. E. and Chiu, T. 2011. The Practice and Evolution of Torque and Drag Reduction: Theory and Field Results. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, 30 October–2 November. SPE-147100-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/147100-MS.
Mirhaj, A., Kaarstad, E., and Aadnoy, B. S. 2010. Minimizing Friction in Shallow Horizontal Wells. Presented at the IADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drilling Conference and Exhibition, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, 1–3 November. SPE-135812-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/135812-MS.
Newman, K. R. 2007. Vibration and Rotation Considerations in Extending Coiled-Tubing Reach. Presented at the SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing and Well Intervention Conference Exhibition, The Woodlands, Texas, 20–21 March. SPE-106979-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/106979-MS.
Perry, K. 2009. Microhole Coiled Tubing Drilling: A Low Cost Reservoir Access Technology. J. Energy Resour. Technol. 131 (1): 849–860. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3000100.
Ren, W., Li, G., Tian, S. et al. 2016. Comparison of Capillary Pressure-Saturation Models for Gas-Water Systems in Shale Gas Reservoirs. Presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition, Perth, Australia, 25–27 October. SPE-182461-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/182461-MS.
Rolovic, R., Weng, X., Hill, S. et al. 2004. An Integrated System Approach To Wellbore Cleanouts With Coiled Tubing. Presented at the SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 23–24 March. SPE-89333-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/89333-MS.
Song, X., Li, G., Huang, Z. et al. 2010. Experimental Study on Horizontal Wellbore Cleanout by Rotating Jets. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 75 (1–2): 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2010.10.015.
Song, X., Li, G., Zhang, L. et al. 2014. Mechanism and Characteristics of Horizontal-Wellbore Cleanout by Annular Helical Flow. SPE J. 19 (1): 45–54. SPE-156335-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/156335-PA.
Song, X., Xu, Z., Wang, M. et al. 2017. Experimental Study on the Wellbore-Cleaning Efficiency of Microhole-Horizontal-Well Drilling. SPE J. 22 (4): 1189–1200. SPE-185965-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/185965-PA.
Srinivasan, P. S., Nandapurkar, S. S., and Holland, F. A. 1970. Friction Factors for Coils. Trans. Institut. Chem. Eng. 48 (4–6): T156–T161.
Wang, B., Li, G., Huang, Z. et al. 2016. Hydraulics Calculations and Field Application of Radial Jet Drilling. SPE Drill & Compl 31 (1): 71–81. SPE-179729-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/179729-PA.
Yang, R., Huang, Z., Li, G. et al. 2015. Slotted Liner Sheathing Coiled Tubing—A New Concept for Multilateral Jetting in Coalbed Methane Wells and Laboratory Tests of Tubular Friction Performance. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 26 (September): 1332–1343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2015.08.031.
Yang, R., Huang, Z., Li, G. et al. 2016. Slotted Liner Sheathing Coiled Tubing—A Dual-Pipe Model for Cuttings Transport. J. China Univ. Petrol.-Nat. Sci. 40 (5): 87–95. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-5005.2016.05.010.