On Subcool Control in the SAGD Producers—Part III: Efficiency of Subcool Trapping in the Nsolv Process
- Mazda Irani (Ashaw Energy) | Ian Gates (University of Calgary)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Journal
- Publication Date
- October 2018
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 1,957 - 1,976
- 2018.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- NSolv process, solvent recovery process, liquid pool, subcool control
- 14 in the last 30 days
- 150 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 10.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 30.00|
Steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) is currently the preferred thermal-recovery method used to produce bitumen from Athabasca deposits in Alberta, Canada. SAGD is, however, an energy-intensive process with large amounts of greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions and required water treatment. One option to reduce emissions and water usage is with solvent-based techniques, such as the NsolvTM process. Suncor and Nsolv have been working together on a bitumen-extraction solvent-technology (BEST) field demonstration at Suncor’s Dover test site. The solvent-injection–produced-oil ratio (SvOR) is among the key performance indicators (KPIs) of the BEST facility. Solvent breakthrough caused by inefficiency of thermodynamic trapping, such as subcool trapping, contributes to SvOR and affects the facility’s economic and artificial-lift efficiencies. Subcool is the temperature difference between the injected butane (at saturated condition) and produced fluids (mixture of butane condensate, upgraded bitumen, and formation water). One of the unknowns in this process is the efficiency of thermodynamic trapping. On the basis of field results, it is shown that, like the SAGD process, liquid-pool depletion presents a critical control on the performance of the recovery process. Although the produced fluids are depleted from the liquid pool at the base of the chamber, because liquid-butane viscosity dependency on temperature is not strong and its viscosity changes slightly with temperature, thermodynamic trapping (or subcool trapping) is not efficient. Stability analysis of BEST data suggests that vapor breakthrough is part of the process but can be minimized by operating at temperatures greater than the second subcool limit. The second subcool limit (or Nsolv optimal reservoir subcool) will vary over time, and it is shown to occur at slightly less than 4°C after liquid-pool development.
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||20|
Butler, R. M. 1997. Process and Apparatus for the Recovery of Hydrocarbons From a Reservoir of Hydrocarbons, US Patent No. 5607016A.
Butler, R. M. and Mokrys, I. J. 1989. Solvent Analogue Model of Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage. AOSTRA Journal of Research 5 (1): 17–32.
Butler, R. M. and Mokrys, I. J. 1993, Recovery of Heavy Oils Using Vapourized Hydrocarbon Solvents: Further Development of the VAPEX Process. J Can Pet Technol 32 (6): 56–62. PETSOC-SS-92-7. https://doi.org/10.2118/SS-92-7.
Computer Modeling Group (CMG) 2012. STARS Manual, Version 2012.
Irani, M., 2018. On Subcool Control in the SAGD Producers. Part I: Stability Envelopes. SPE J. 23 (3): 841–867. SPE-187956-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/187956-PA.
Kariznovi, M. 2013. Phase-Behaviour Study and Physical Properties Measurement for Athabasca Bitumen/Solvent Systems Applicable for Thermal and Hybrid Solvent Recovery Processes. PhD thesis, Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Krawchuk, P. 2016. Development andOperation of the Nsolv BEST Demonstration Facility. Presented at the World Heavy Oil Congress Conference, Calgary.
Nenniger, J. and Dunn, S. 2008. How Fast Is Solvent-Based Gravity Drainage? Presented at the Canadian International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, 17–19 June. PETSOC-2008-139. https://doi.org/10.2118/2008-139.
Nenniger, J. and Gunnewiek, L. 2009. Dew Point vs. Bubble Point: A Misunderstood Constraint on Gravity Drainage Processes. Presented at the Canadian International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, 16–18 June. PETSOC-2009-065. https://doi.org/10.2118/2009-065.
Nenniger, J. and Nenniger, E. 2000. Method and Apparatus for Stimulating Heavy Oil Production. Canada Patent No. 2299790C.
Nenniger, J. and Nenniger, E. 2001. Method and Apparatus for Stimulating Heavy Oil Production. Canada Patent No. 2351148C.
Younglove, B. A. and Ely, J. F. 1987. Thermophysical Properties of Fluids. II. Methane, Ethane, Propane, Isobutane, and Normal Butane. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 16 (4): 577–798. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.555785.
Yuan, J. Y. and Nugent, D. 2013, Subcool, Fluid Productivity, and Liquid Level Above a SAGD Producer. J Can Pet Technol 52 (5): 360–367. SPE-157899-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/157899-PA.