A Case Study of Greenhouse-Gas-Emissions Measurements and Reduction-Potential Evaluation During Oil and Gas Production in China
- Yibin Weng (State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Pollution Control, CNPC Research Institute of Safety and Environmental Technology) | Ming Xue (State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Pollution Control, CNPC Research Institute of Safety and Environmental Technology) | Xiangyu Cui (State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Pollution Control, CNPC Research Institute of Safety and Environmental Technology)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Production & Operations
- Publication Date
- November 2019
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 799 - 804
- 2019.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- methane, oil and gas production, emission and reduction, greenhouse gas
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 81 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Reducing greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions in oil and gas production could provide several benefits, including energy conservation, cost reduction, and economic returns. The direct-emissions measurements and reduction-potential evaluation are the prerequisites to achieve an effective reduction goal in GHG emissions. On the basis of the survey of production processes and related parameters, we identified and measured a series of GHG-emissions sources. The emissions sources were measured, including production processes and leakage-prone facilities such as dehydrators, boilers, heaters, associated gas-treatment plants, light-hydrocarbon-recovery units, storage tanks, and gas flaring. A series of leakage-detection/measurement instruments was applied as well, such as flow samplers, impeller flowmeter, gas detectors, and gas-flow probes. On the basis of the measured emissions data, we then used a simulation model to evaluate the specific forms, sources, and reduction potentials of the GHGs. The measured GHG emissions showed that evaporation and flashing losses from storage tanks were the largest source, accounting for 86% of the total methane (CH4) emissions and 42% of the total GHG emissions. The contribution of CH4 emissions from heaters and boilers during incomplete combustions was less than 1% of the total CH4 emissions and approximately 16% of the total GHG emissions. When controlling technology on storage-tank losses was applied, CH4 emissions could be reduced by 81.7% and the GHG emissions could be reduced by 39.9%. Furthermore, such controlling technologies also presented substantial economic benefits through the recovery of fuel gas. In this study, the recovery potentials of various GHG-emissions sources were analyzed. In addition, a preliminary cost/benefit analysis was performed per the emissions categories, reduction potentials, and the feasibility of reduction technologies. Finally, the probability of the application of such reduction technologies was evaluated.
|File Size||258 KB||Number of Pages||6|
AP-42. Compilation of Air Emissions Factors. 2000. Washington, DC: US EPA. https://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-factors-and-quantification/ap-42-compilation-air-emissions-factors (accessed 14 June 2019).
API RP 521, Guide for Pressure-Relieving and Depressuring Systems, third edition. 1990. Washington, DC: API.
Brandt, A. R., Sun, Y., and Vafi, K. 2015. Uncertainty in Regional-Average Petroleum GHG Intensities: Countering Information Gaps With Targeted Data Gathering. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49 (1): 679–686. https://doi.org/10.1021/es505376t.
Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP). 2003. Calculating Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Global Climate Change, Voluntary Challenge Guide, Publication No. 2003-0003. Calgary: CAPP.
Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP). 2004. A National Inventory of Greenhouse Gas (GHG), Criteria Air Contaminant (CAC) and Hydrogen Sulphide (H2S) Emissions by the Upstream Oil and Gas Industry. Vol. 4: Methodology for CAC and H2S Emissions. Calgary: CAPP.
Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME). 1993. Environmental Code of Practice for the Measurement and Control of Fugitive VOC Emissions From Equipment Leaks. Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada: CCME Secretariat.
Comyns, B. and Figge, F. 2015. Greenhouse Gas Reporting Quality in the Oil and Gas Industry: A Longitudinal Study Using the Typology of “Search,” “Experience” and “Credence” Information. Account Audit Accoun 28 (3): 403–443. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-10-2013-1498.
GRI-GLYCalc is a trademark of Gas Research Institute, 1700 South Mount Prospect Road, Des Plaines, IL 60018.
Hase, F., Frey, M., Kiel, M. et al. 2016. Addition of a Channel for XCO Observations to a Portable FTIR Spectrometer for Greenhouse Gas Measurements. Atmos Meas Tech 9 (5): 2303–2313. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2303-2016.
Howard, T., Siverson, R., Wenzlick, A. et al. 1994. A High Flow Rate Sampling System for Measuring Emissions From Leaking Process Components. Presented at the International Workshop on Environmental Impacts of Natural Gas Losses, Prague, Czech Republic, 22–23 March.
ISO 50001:2011 Energy Management Systems—Requirements With Guidance for Use. 2011. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
Subramanian, R., Williams, L. L., Vaughn, T. L. et al. 2015. Methane Emissions From Natural Gas Compressor Stations in the Transmission and Storage Sector: Measurements and Comparisons With the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program Protocol. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49 (5): 3252–3261. https://doi.org/10.1021/es5060258.
Thompson, P. A., Espenscheid, A. P., Berry, C. A. et al. 1994. Technical Reference Manual for GRI-GLYCalc: A Program for Estimating Emissions From Glycol Dehydration of Natural Gas, second edition. Chicago: Gas Research Institute.
US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1995a. Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates. Publication No. EPA-453/R-95-017, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, November 1995.
US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1995b. Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors. Vol. I: Stationary Point and Area Sources, fifth edition. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina: US EPA.
US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1997. Method 21—Determination of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks, https://www.epa.gov/emc/method-21-volatile-organic-compound-leaks (accessed 14 June 2019).
Uwasu, M., Jiang, Y., and Saijo, T. 2010. On the Chinese Carbon Reduction Target. Sustainability 2 (6): 1553–1557. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2061553.
Zevenhoven, R. 2015. Understanding Greenhouse Gases: Mission Being Accomplished. GGST 5 (6): 695–696. https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.1580.
Zhang, Y.-J. 2011. The Impact of Financial Development on Carbon Emissions: An Empirical Analysis in China. Energy Policy 39 (4): 2197–2203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.02.026.