An Integrated Carbon-Dioxide-Foam Enhanced-Oil-Recovery Pilot Program With Combined Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage in an Onshore Texas Heterogeneous Carbonate Field
- Zachary P. Alcorn (University of Bergen) | Sunniva B. Fredriksen (University of Bergen) | Mohan Sharma (University of Stavanger) | Arthur U. Rognmo (University of Bergen) | Tore L. Føyen (University of Bergen and SINTEF Industry) | Martin A. Fernø (University of Bergen) | Arne Graue (University of Bergen)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- November 2019
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 1,449 - 1,466
- 2019.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- CO2 foam, Enhanced oil recovery, Pilot test, Mobility Control
- 7 in the last 30 days
- 288 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
A carbon-dioxide (CO2) -foam enhanced-oil-recovery (EOR) field pilot research program has been started to advance the technology of CO2 foam for mobility control in a heterogeneous carbonate reservoir. Increased oil recovery with associated anthropogenic-CO2 storage is a promising technology for mitigating global warming as part of carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS). Previous field tests with CO2 foam report various results because of injectivity problems and the difficulty of attributing fluid displacement specifically to CO2 foam. Thus, a comprehensive integrated multiscale methodology is required for project design to better link laboratory- and field-scale displacement mechanisms. This study presents an integrated upscaling approach for designing a miscible CO2-foam field trial, including pilot-well-selection criteria and laboratory corefloods combined with reservoir-scale simulation to offer recommendations for the injection of alternating slugs of surfactant solution and CO2, or surfactant-alternating-gas (SAG) injection, while assessing CO2-storage potential.
Laboratory investigations include dynamic aging, foam-stability scans, CO2-foam EOR corefloods with associated CO2 storage, and unsteady-state CO2/water endpoint relative permeability measurements. Tertiary CO2-foam EOR corefloods at oil-wet conditions result in a total recovery factor of 80% of original oil in place (OOIP), with an incremental recovery of 30% of OOIP by CO2 foam after waterflooding. Stable CO2 foam, using aqueous surfactants with a gas fraction of 0.70, provided mobility-reduction factors (MRFs) up to 340 compared with pure-CO2 injection at reservoir conditions. Oil recovery, gas-mobility reduction, producing-gas/oil ratio (GOR), and CO2 utilization at field pilot scale were investigated with a validated numerical model. Simulation studies show the effectiveness of foam to reduce gas mobility, improve CO2 utilization, and decrease GOR.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||18|
Al-Menhali, A. S. and Krevor, S. 2016. Capillary Trapping of CO2 in Oil Reservoirs: Observations in a Mixed-Wet Carbonate Rock. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50 (5): 2727–2734. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b05925.
Anderson, W. G. 1986. Wettability Literature Survey—Part I: Rock/Oil/Brine Interactions and the Effects of Core Handling on Wettability. J Pet Technol 38 (10): 1125–1144. SPE-13932-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/13932-PA.
Aspenes, E., Graue, A., Baldwin, B. A. et al. 2002. Fluid Flow in Fractures Visualized by MRI During Waterfloods at Various Wettability Conditions–Emphasis on Fracture Width and Flow Rate. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 29 September–2 October. SPE-77338-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/77338-MS.
Bernard, G. G., Holm, L. W., and Harvey, C. P. 1980. Use of Surfactant to Reduce CO2 Mobility in Oil Displacement. SPE J. 20 (4): 281–292. SPE-8370-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/8370-PA.
Chalbaud, C., Robin, M., Bekri, S. et al. 2007. Wettability Impact on CO2 Storage in Aquifers: Visualization and Quantification Using Micromodel Tests, Pore Network Model and Reservoir Simulations. Presented at the International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts, Calgary, 10–12 September. SCA2007-09.
Chou, S. I., Vasicek, S. L., Pisio, D. L. et al. 1992. CO2 Foam Field Trial at North Ward-Estes. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Washington, DC, 4–7 October. SPE-24643-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/24643-MS.
Dykstra, H. and Parsons, R. L. 1950. The Prediction of Oil Recovery by Waterflooding. In Secondary Recovery of Oil in the United States, second edition, 160–174. Washington, DC: API.
Fernø, M. A., Ersland, G., Haugen, A. et al. 2007. Impacts From Fractures on Oil Recovery Mechanisms in Carbonate Rocks at Oil-Wet and Water-Wet Conditions—Visualizing Fluid Flow Across Fractures With MRI. Presented at the International Oil Conference and Exhibition in Mexico, Veracruz, Mexico, 27–30 June. SPE-108699-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/108699-MS.
Fernø, M. A., Gauteplass, J., Pancharoen, M. et al. 2014. Experimental Study of Foam Generation, Sweep Efficiency, and Flow in a Fracture Network. SPE J. 21 (4): 1140–1150. SPE-170840-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/170840-PA.
Fernø, M. A., Haugen, A., and Graue, A. 2012. Surfactant Prefloods for Integrated EOR in Fractured, Oil-Wet Carbonate Reservoirs. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 8–10 October. SPE-159213-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/159213-MS.
Fernø, M. A., Steinsbø, M., Eide, Ø. et al. 2015. Parametric Study of Oil Recovery During CO2 Injections in Fractured Chalk: Influence of Fracture Permeability, Diffusion Length and Water Saturation. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 27 (November): 1063–1073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2015.09.052.
Fernø, M. A., Torsvik, M., Haugland, S. et al. 2010. Dynamic Laboratory Wettability Alteration. Energy Fuels 24 (7): 3950–3958. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef1001716.
Fredriksen, S. B., Alcorn, Z. P., Frøland, A. et al. 2018. Surfactant Pre-Floods During CO2 Foam for Integrated Enhanced Oil Recovery in Fractured Oil-Wet Carbonates. Presented at the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference, Tulsa, 14–18 April. SPE-190168-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/190168-MS.
Graue, A., Tonheim, E., and Baldwin, B. 1994. Control and Alteration of Wettability in Low-Permeability Chalk. Presented at the 3rd International Symposium on Evaluation of Reservoir Wettability and Its Effect on Oil Recovery, Laramie, Wyoming, 21–23 September.
Graue, A., Viksund, B. G., Eilertsen, T. et al. 1999a. Systematic Wettability Alteration by Aging Sandstone and Carbonate Rock in Crude Oil. J Pet Sci Eng 24 (2–4): 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-4105(99)00033-9.
Graue, A., Viksund, B. G., and Baldwin, B. A. 1999b. Reproducible Wettability Alteration of Low-Permeable Outcrop Chalk. SPE Res Eval & Eng 2 (2): 134–140. SPE-55904-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/55904-PA.
Graue, A., Aspenes, E., Bognø, T. et al. 2002. Alteration of Wettability and Wettability Heterogeneity. J Pet Sci Eng 33 (1–3): 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-4105(01)00171-1.
Graue, A., Aspenes, E., Moe, R. W. et al. 2001a. MRI Tomography of Saturation Development in Fractures During Waterfloods at Various Wettability Conditions. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 30 September–3 October. SPE-71506-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/71506-MS.
Graue, A., Bognø, T., Baldwin, B. A. et al. 2001b. Wettability Effects on Oil-Recovery Mechanisms in Fractured Reservoirs. SPE Res Eval & Eng 4 (6): 455–466. SPE-74335-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/74335-PA.
Gray, T. J. 1989. Development Study, East Seminole San Andres Field, Gaines County, Texas. Internal report, Mobil Exploration and Producing US Inc., Midland Division, Midland, Texas, March 1989.
Hanssen, J. E., Holt, T., and Surguchev, L. M. 1994. Foam Processes: An Assessment of Their Potential in North Sea Reservoirs Based on a Critical Evaluation of Current Field Experience. Presented at the SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Conference, Tulsa, 17–20 April. SPE-27768-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/27768-MS.
Haugen, Å., Mani, N., Svenningsen, S. et al. 2014. Miscible and Immiscible Foam Injection for Mobility Control and EOR in Fractured Oil-Wet Carbonate Rocks. Transp Porous Media 104 (1): 109–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-014-0323-6.
Harpole, K. J., Siemers, W. T., and Gerard, M. G. 1994. CO2 Foam Field Verification Test at EVGSAU: Phase IIIC–Reservoir Characterization and Response to Foam Injection. Presented at the SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 17–20 April. SPE-27798-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/27798-MS.
Heller, J. P. 1966. Onset of Instability Patterns Between Miscible Fluids in Porous Media. J Appl Phys 37 (4): 1566–1579. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1708569.
Heller, J. P., Boone, D. A., and Watts, R. J. 1985. Field Test of CO2 Mobility Control at Rock Creek. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Las Vegas, Nevada, 22–26 September. SPE-14395-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/14395-MS.
Hirasaki, G. J. and Lawson, J. B. 1985. Mechanisms of Foam Flow in Porous Media: Apparent Viscosity in Smooth Capillaries. SPE J. 25 (2): 176–190. SPE-12129-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/12129-PA.
Hoefner, M. L. and Evans, E. M. 1995. CO2 Foam: Results From Four Developmental Field Trials. SPE Res Eng 10 (4): 273–281. SPE-27787-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/27787-PA.
Honarpour, M. M., Nagarajan, N. R., Grijalba Cuenca, A. et al. 2010. Rock-Fluid Characterization for Miscible CO2 Injection: Residual Oil Zone, Seminole Field, Permian Basin. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Florence, Italy, 19–22 September. SPE-133089-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/133089-MS.
Iglaur, S. 2017. CO2–Water–Rock Wettability: Variability, Influencing Factors, and Implications for CO2 Geostorage. Acc. Chem. Res. 50 (5): 1134–1142. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00602.
Jian, G., Puerto, M. C., Wehowsky, A. et al. 2016. Static Adsorption of an Ethoxylated Nonionic Surfactant on Carbonate Minerals. Langmuir 32 (40): 10244–10252. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b01975.
Jones, S. A., Laskaris, G., Vincent-Bonnieu, S. et al. 2016. Surfactant Effect on Foam: From Core Flood Experiments to Implicit-Texture Foam-Model Parameters. Presented at the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference, Tulsa, 11–13 April. SPE-179637-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/179637-MS.
Kloet, M., Renkema, W. J., and Rossen, W. R. 2009. Optimal Design Criteria for SAG Foam Processes in Heterogeneous Reservoirs. Presented at the EUROPEC/EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, 8–11 June. SPE-121581-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/121581-MS.
Lake, L. W., Johns, R., Rossen, B. et al. 2014. Fundamentals of Enhanced Oil Recovery. Richardson, Texas: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Lee, H. O., Heller, J. P., and Hoefer, A. M. W. 1991. Change in Apparent Viscosity of CO2 Foam With Rock Permeability. SPE Res Eng 6 (4): 421–428. SPE-20194-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/20194-PA.
Martin, F. D., Heller, J. P., Weiss, W. W. et al. 1992. CO2-Foam Field Verification Pilot Test at EVGSAU Injection Project Phase I: Project Planning and Initial Results. Presented at the SPE/DOE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 22–24 April. SPE-24176-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/24176-MS.
Martin, F. D., Stevens, J. E., and Harpole, K. J. 1995. CO2-Foam Field Test at the East Vacuum Grayburg/San Andres Unit. SPE Res Eng 10 (4): 266–272. SPE-27786-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/27786-PA.
Matthews, C. S. 1989. Carbon Dioxide Flooding. In Enhanced Oil Recovery, II: Processes and Operations, Vol. 17B, first edition, ed. E. C. Donaldson, G. V. Chilingarian, and T. F. Yen, Chap. 6. New York City: Elsevier.
Melzer, L. S., Kuuskraa, V. A., and Koperna, G. J. 2006. The Origin and Resource Potential of Residual Oil Zones. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 24–27 September. SPE-102964-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/102964-MS.
Rossen, W. R. 1996. Foams in Enhanced Oil Recovery. In Foams Theory, Measurements, and Applications, Vol. 57, ed. R. K. Prud’homme and S. A. Khan, Chap. 11, 414–464. New York City: Marcel Dekker.
Salathiel, R. A. 1973. Oil Recovery by Surface Film Drainage in Mixed-Wettability Rocks. J Pet Technol 25 (10): 1216–1224. SPE-4104-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/4104-PA.
Schlumberger. 2015. ECLIPSE Reservoir Simulation Software, Technical Description. Houston: Schlumberger.
Schmalz, J. P. and Rahme, H. D. 1950. The Variation of Waterflood Performance With Variation in Permeability Profile. Production Monthly 15 (9): 9–12.
Sharma, M., Alcorn, Z. P., Fredriksen, S. B. et al. 2017. Numerical Modeling Study for Designing CO2-Foam Field Pilot. Proc., IOR 2017–19th European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Stavanger, Norway, 24 April. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201700339.
Stephenson, D. J., Graham, A. G., and Luhning, R. W. 1993. Mobility Control Experience in the Joffre Viking Miscible CO2 Flood. SPE Res Eng 8 (3): 183–188. SPE-23598-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/23598-PA.
Stiles, W. E. 1949. Use of Permeability Distribution in Water Flood Calculations. J Pet Technol 1 (1): 9–13. SPE-949009-G. https://doi.org/10.2118/949009-G.
Taylor, P. 1998. Ostwald Ripening in Emulsions. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 75 (2): 107–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8686(98)00035-9.
Wang, F. P., Lucia, F. J., and Kerans, C. 1994. Critical Scales, Upscaling, and Modeling of Shallow-Water Carbonate Reservoirs. Presented at the Permian Basin Oil and Gas Recovery Conference, Midland, Texas, 16–18 March. SPE-27715-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/27715-MS.
Wang, F. P., Lucia, J. F., and Kerans, C. 1998. Integrated Reservoir Characterization Study of a Carbonate Ramp Reservoir: Seminole San Andres Unit, Gaines County, Texas. SPE Res Eval & Eng 1 (2): 105–113. SPE-36515-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/36515-PA.
Xu, Q. and Rossen,W. R. 2004. Experimental Study of Gas Injection in a Surfactant-Alternating-Gas. SPE Res Eval & Eng 7 (6): 438–448. SPE-84183-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/84183-PA.
Zhou, Z. H. and Rossen, W. R. 1995. Applying Fractional-Flow Theory to Foam Processes at the “Limiting Capillary Pressure”. SPE Advanced Technology Series 3 (1): 154–162. SPE-24180-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/24180-PA.