A Review of Field Oil-Production Response of Injection-Well Gel Treatments
- Munqith Aldhaheri (Missan Oil Company and University of Misan) | Mingzhen Wei (Missouri University of Science and Technology) | Na Zhang (Missouri University of Science and Technology) | Baojun Bai (Missouri University of Science and Technology)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- May 2019
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 597 - 611
- 2019.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Conformance control gel treatments, Oil production response, Project review and data analysis, Polymer bulk gels
- 14 in the last 30 days
- 114 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
As life-span extenders, bulk gels have been widely applied to rejuvenate oil production from uneconomic producers in mature oil fields by improving the sweep efficiency of improved-oil-recovery (IOR)/enhanced-oil-recovery (EOR) floods. This paper presents a comprehensive review of the responses of injection-well gel treatments implemented between 1985 and 2014. The survey includes 61 field projects compiled from SPE papers and US Department of Energy reports. Seven parameters related to the oil-production response were evaluated according to the reservoir lithology, formation type, and recovery process, using univariate analysis and stacked histograms. The interquartile-range (IQR) method was used to detect the underperforming and overperforming gel projects. Scatterplots were used to identify the effects of the injected-gel volume and the treatment timing on the treatment response. Pretreatment water cut, recovery factor, and flood life were used as indicators for the treatment timing.
Results indicated that gel treatments have very wide ranges of response for injection and production wells and for oil and water rates and profiles. When successfully applied, they, on average, respond after 3.5 months, increase the oil-production rate by 32%, and additionally recover 116,000 STBO per treatment, 15 STBO per gel barrel, or 10 STBO per polymer pound. We identified that gel treatments perform more efficiently in carbonate (CB) than in sandstone (SS) reservoirs and in naturally fractured (NF) formations than in other formation types. In addition, the incremental oil production considerably increases with the channeling strength and the injected-gel volume for all formation types, not just for the matrix-rock (MR) reservoirs. Moreover, gel treatments applied in NF formations have lower productivities in SS than in CB reservoirs using normalized performance parameters.
Declining trends were identified for all parameters of the oil-production response with the treatment-timing indicators. The sooner the gel treatment is applied, the faster the response, and the larger the incremental oil production and its rate. It is recommended to allow longer evaluation times for gel treatments applied in MR formations because their response times might extend to several months. Gel treatments will perform more efficiently if they are conducted at water cuts of less than 70%, flood lives of fewer than 20 years, or recovery factors of less than 35%. For different application environments, the present review provides reservoir engineers with updated ideas regarding the low, typical, and high performances of gel treatments when successfully applied, as well as how other treatment aspects affect performance.
|File Size||708 KB||Number of Pages||15|
Aldhaheri, M., Wei, M., Bai, B. et al. 2017. Development of Machine Learning Methodology for Polymer Gels Screening for Injection Wells. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 151 (March): 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2016.12.038.
Aldhaheri, M., Wei, M., Alhuraishawy, A. et al. 2018. A Review of Responses of Bulk Gel Treatments in Injection Wells—Part II: Water Responses and Economic Assessments. Presented at the SPE Western Regional Meeting, Garden Grove, California, 22–26 April. SPE-190147-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/190147-MS.
Borling, D. C. 1994. Injection Conformance Control Case Histories Using Gels at the Wertz Field CO2 Tertiary Flood in Wyoming. Presented at the SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 17–20 April. SPE-27825-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/27825-MS.
Hild, G. P. and Wackowski, R. K. 1998. Results of the Injection Well Polymer Gel Treatment Program at the Rangely Weber. Presented at the SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 19–22 April. SPE-39612-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/39612-MS.
Hinds, C., Sayarpour, M., and Hameed, A. 2015. A New Perspective on Applying a Conformance Lookback Analysis for the Central Permian Basin Fields. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 28–30 September. SPE-175049-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/175049-MS.
Kshirsagar, A. 2014. Waterflood Evaluation Using Communication Analysis Tool. Presented at the DEVEX 2014 Conference, Aberdeen, Scotland. http://www.devex-conference.org/perch/resources/0955-1020-waterflood-evaluation-using-communication-analysis-tool.pdf (accessed 25 Febraury 2019).
Lantz, M. and North, W. 2014. Polymer Flooding in the Minnelusa. Presented at the 2014 Minnelusa Workshop, University of Wyoming, Gillette, Wyoming, 4 June.
Mack, J. C. and Lantz, M. 2013. Historic IOR/EOR Practices in the Minnelusa. Presented at the EORI Minnelusa Workshop, University of Wyoming, Gillette, Wyoming, 6–7 May.
Maya, G., Castro, R., Sandoval, J. et al. 2014. Successful Polymer Gels Application in a Highly Channeled Peripheral Injection Well: Tello Field Pilot. Presented at the SPE Latin America and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Maracaibo, Venezuela, 21–23 May. SPE-169478-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/169478-MS.
Mishra, A., Abbas, S., Braden, J. et al. 2016. Comprehensive Review of Fracture Control for Conformance Improvement in the Kuparuk River Unit–Alaska. Presented at the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference, Tulsa, 11–13 April. SPE-179649-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/179649-MS.
Norman, C., Turner, B. O., Romero, J. L. et al. 2006. A Review of Over 100 Polymer Gel Injection Well Conformance Treatments in Argentina and Venezuela: Design, Field Implementation and Evaluation. Presented at the International Oil Conference and Exhibition in Mexico, Cancun, Mexico, 31 August–2 September. SPE-101781-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/101781-MS.
Smith, J. E. 1999. Practical Issues With Field Injection Well Gel Treatments. Presented at the SPE Rocky Mountain Regional Meeting, Gillette, Wyoming, 15–18 May. SPE-55631-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/55631-MS.
Soliman, M. Y., Rester, S., Sigal, R. et al. 2000. Integration of Technology Supports Preventive Conformance Reservoir Techniques. Presented at the SPE/AAPG Western Regional Meeting, Long Beach, California, 19–22 June. SPE-62553-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/62553-MS.
Southwell, G. P. and Posey, S. M. 1994. Applications and Results of Acrylamide-Polymer/Chromium(III) Carboxylate Gels. Presented at the SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 17–20 April. SPE-27779-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/27779-MS.
Sydansk, R. D. and Moore, P. E. 1990. Production Responses in Wyoming’s Big Horn Basin Resulting From Application of Acrylamide-Polymer/CrIIICarboxylate Gels. SPE-21894-MS, eLibrary, unsolicited.
Sydansk, R. D. and Romero-Zeron, L. 2011. Reservoir Conformance Improvement. Richardson, Texas: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Sydansk, R. D. and Smith, T. B. 1988. Field Testing of a New Conformance-Improvement-Treatment Chromium(III) Gel Technology. Presented at the SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 16–21 April. SPE-17383-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/17383-MS.
Sydansk, R. D. and Southwell, G. P. 2000. More Than 12 Years’ Experience With a Successful Conformance-Control Polymer-Gel Technology. SPE Prod & Fac 15 (4): 270–278. SPE-66558-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/66558-PA.
Thyne, G. D., Alvarado, V., and Murrell, G. 2009. Evaluation of Chemical Flooding in the Minnelusa Formation, Powder River Basin, Wyoming. Presented at the AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition, Denver, 7–10 June.