Real-Time Formation Evaluation and Contamination Prediction Through Inversion of Downhole Fluid-Sampling Measurements
- Morten Kristensen (Schlumberger) | Nikita Chugunov (Schlumberger) | Adriaan Gisolf (Schlumberger) | Mario Biagi (ENI) | Francois Dubost (Schlumberger)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- May 2019
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 531 - 547
- 2019.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- downhole fluid analysis, downhole fluid sampling, real-time contamination monitoring, multisensor inversion, wireline formation testing
- 9 in the last 30 days
- 110 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Acquisition of fluid samples using wireline-formation testers (WFTs) is an integral part of reservoir evaluation and fluid characterization. Recent developments in formation-tester hardware have enabled wireline-based fluid sampling in a wide range of downhole conditions. However, accurate quantification of oil-based-mud (OBM) filtrate contamination using data from downhole-fluid-analysis (DFA) sensors alone remains challenging, especially in difficult sampling environments and for advanced sampling tools that have complex inflow geometries and active guarding of filtrate flows. Such tools and conditions lead to contamination behaviors that do not follow simple power-law models that are commonly assumed in OBM-contamination-monitoring (OCM) algorithms.
In this paper, we introduce a new OCM algorithm derived from an inversion of DFA data using a full 3D numerical flow model of the contamination-cleanup process. Using formation and fluid properties and operational tool settings, the model predicts the evolution of filtrate contamination as a function of time and pumped volume, and can thus be used to forward model the DFA sensor responses. Sensor data are then inverted in real time to provide contamination predictions. Real-time computation is enabled through fast, high-fidelity proxy models for the cleanup process. The proxy models are trained on and thoroughly vetted against a large number of full-scale numerical simulations. Compared with existing algorithms, the new OCM method is now applicable for all types of sampling hardware and a wider set of operating conditions. By directly relying on a model of the cleanup process, the physical properties of the formation and fluids (such as porosity, permeability, viscosity, and depth of filtrate invasion) are estimated during the inversion, thus providing additional valuable information for formation evaluation.
The new method is demonstrated by practical application in both synthetic and field examples of oil sampling in OBM. The synthetic examples demonstrate the robustness of the algorithm and show that the true formation and fluid properties can be recovered from noise-corrupted sensor data. The field example presented demonstrates that contamination predictions are in good agreement with results from laboratory analysis, and the inverted formation properties are consistent with estimates derived from openhole logs and pressure measurements.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||17|
Akram, A. H., Halford, F. R., and Fitzpatrick, A. J. 1999. A Model To Predict Wireline Formation Tester Sample Contamination. SPE Res Eval & Eng 2 (6): 499–505. SPE-59559-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/59559-PA.
Alpak, F., Elshahawi, H., and Mullins, O. 2008. Compositional Modeling of Oil-Based-Mud-Filtrate Cleanup During Wireline Formation Tester Sampling. SPE Res Eval & Eng 11 (2): 219–232. SPE-100393-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/100393-PA.
Angeles, R., Torres-Verdín, C., Sepehrnoori, K. et al. 2009. Prediction of Formation-Tester Fluid-Sample Quality in Highly-Deviated Wells. Petrophysics 50 (1): 32–48. SPWLA-2009-v50n1a2.
Chin, W. C. and Proett, M. A. 2005. Formation Tester Immiscible and Miscible Flow Modeling for Job Planning Applications. Presented at the SPWLA 46th Annual Logging Symposium, New Orleans, 26–29 June. SPWLA-2005-L.
Dong, C., Hegeman, P. S., Elshahawi, H. et al. 2003. Advances in Downhole Contamination Monitoring and GOR Measurement of Formation Fluid Samples. Presented at the SPWLA 44th Annual Logging Symposium, Galveston, Texas, 22–25 June. SPWLA-2003-FF.
Gisolf, A., Zuo, J., Achourov, V. et al. 2016. Accurate New Solutions for Fluid Sample Contamination Quantification, With Special Focus on Water Sampling in Water-Base Mud. Presented at the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, 2–5 May. OTC-27291-MS. https://doi.org/10.4043/ 27291-MS.
Hammond, P. S. 1991. One- and Two-Phase Flow During Fluid Sampling by a Wireline Tool. Transport Porous Med. 6 (3): 299–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00208955.
Hsu, K., Hegeman, P. S., Dong, C. et al. 2008. Multichannel Oil-Base Mud Contamination Monitoring Using Downhole Optical Spectrometer. Presented at the SPWLA 49th Annual Logging Symposium, Edinburgh, Scotland, 25–28 May. Paper QQQQ.
Kristensen, M., Ayan, C., Chang, Y. et al. 2014. Flow Modeling and Comparative Analysis for a New Generation of Wireline Formation Tester Modules. Presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Doha, 19–22 January. IPTC-17385-MS. https://doi.org/10.2523/IPTC-17385-MS.
Kristensen, M. R., Ayan, C., Lee, R. et al. 2016a. Cleanup Model Parameterization, Approximation, and Sensitivity. Filed patent application: https://patents.google.com/patent/US20160216404A1/en?q=kristensen&inventor=chugunov&oq=kristensen+chugunov.
Kristensen, M. R., Chugunov, N., Ayan, C. et al. 2016b. Fast Proxy Models for Probabilistic Evaluation of Downhole Fluid Sampling Operations. Presented at the ECMOR XV–European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery, Amsterdam, 29 August–1 September. https://doi.org/10.3997/ 2214-4609.201601861.
Lee, R., Chen, L., Gisolf, A. et al. 2016. Real-Time Formation Testing Focused-Sampling Contamination Estimation. Presented at the SPWLA 57th Annual Logging Symposium, Reykjavik, Iceland, 25–29 June. SPWLA-2016-LLLL.
Lophaven, S. N., Nielsen, H. B., and Søndergaard, J. 2002. DACE: A MATLAB Kriging Toolbox, Version 2.0, Technical Report IMM-TR-2002-12, Informatics and Mathematical Modeling, Technical University of Denmark, http://www2.imm.dtu.dk/projects/dace/dace.pdf (accessed 16 June 2017).
Malik, M., Torres-Verdin, C., Sepehrnoori, K. et al. 2007. History Matching and Sensitivity Analysis of Probe-Type Formation-Tester Measurements Acquired in the Presence of Oil-Base Mud-Filtrate Invasion. Petrophysics 48 (6): 454–472. SPWLA-2007-v48n6a2.
McCalmont, S., Onu, C. O., Wu, J. et al. 2005. Predicting Pump-Out Volume and Time Based on Sensitivity Analysis for an Efficient Sampling Operation: Prejob Modeling Through a Near-Wellbore Simulator. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, 9–12 October. SPE-95885-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/95885-MS.
McKay, M. D., Beckman, R. J., and Conover, W. J. 1979. A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code. Technometrics 21 (2): 239–245. https://doi.org/10.2307/1268522.
Mullins, O. C. and Schroer, J. 2000. Real-Time Determination of Filtrate Contamination During Openhole Wireline Sampling by Optical Spectroscopy. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, 1–4 October. SPE-63071-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/63071-MS.
Ramakrishnan, T. S. 2007. Single Probe Downhole Sampling Apparatus and Method. US Patent No. 7,263,881.
Sacks, J., Mitchell, T. J., and Wynn, H. P. 1989. Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments. Stat. Sci. 4 (4): 409–423. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177012413.
Saltelli, A., Ratto, M., Andres, T. et al. 2008. Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Interscience.
Schlumberger. 2017. ECLIPSE Technical Description, V. 2017.1. Reservoir simulator software manual. Schlumberger.
Sherwood, J. D. 2005. Optimal Probes for Withdrawal of Uncontaminated Fluid Samples. Phys. Fluids 17 (8): 083102. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2006128.
Skibin, A. and Zazovsky, A. 2010. Self-Similarity in Contamination Transport to a Formation Fluid Tester During Cleanup Production. Transport Porous Med. 83 (1): 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-009-9466-2.
Sudret, B. 2008. Global Sensitivity Analysis Using Polynomial Chaos Expansions. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe. 7 (93): 964–979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2007.04.002.
Todd, M. and Longstaff, W. 1972. The Development, Testing, and Application of a Numerical Simulator for Predicting Miscible Flood Performance. J Pet Technol 24 (7): 874–882. SPE-3484-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/3484-PA.
Zazovsky, A. 2008. Monitoring and Prediction of Cleanup Production During Sampling. Presented at the SPE International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Lafayette, Louisiana, 13–15 February. SPE-112409-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/112409-MS.
Zuo, J. Y., Gisolf, A., Dumont, H. et al. 2015. A Breakthrough in Accurate Downhole Fluid Sample Contamination Prediction in Real Time. Petrophysics 56 (3): 251–265. SPWLA-2015-v56n3a2.