Evaluation of Software-Based Early Leak-Warning System in Gulf of Mexico Subsea Flowlines
- Caitlyn J. Thiberville (Louisiana State University) | Yanfang Wang (Louisiana State University) | Paulo J. Waltrich (Louisiana State University) | Wesley C. Williams (Louisiana State University) | Seung I. Kam (Louisiana State University)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Production & Operations
- Publication Date
- November 2018
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 802 - 828
- 2018.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- offshore pipelines, leak detection modeling, pipeline leak, pipeline leak detection
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 102 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Early detection of subsea pipeline leaks is a very serious and ongoing issue for the oil and gas industry with limited successful cases reported. For example, aerial surveillance of pipelines can be applied only for relatively shallow and concentrated areas, and an advanced technology such as fiber-optic cable can be considered at the significant expense of time and cost for installation and equipment. The objective of this study is to evaluate a software-based leak-detection technique through complex multiphase flow mechanics. More specifically, this study investigates (i) how leak-detection problems can be formulated from a fluid-mechanics viewpoint and (ii) how reliable such a technique can be under conditions resembling the deepwater Gulf of Mexico (GOM). In examining a wide range of scenarios, this study proves that software-based techniques have a potential for playing a key role in the future.
First, this study defines a base case selected from the literature review of deepwater GOM flowlines in terms of pressure and temperature conditions, fluid properties, reservoir properties, and flowline characteristics that allows a steady-state flow in pipeline to be determined with no leak present. Next, leaks with certain opening sizes (dleak) at different longitudinal locations (xD = x/L) are positioned, and new steady states in the presence of leaks are calculated. By comparing the two steady-state responses (with and without leak), finally, the changes in two leak-detection indicators [i.e., change in upstream pressure (ΔPin) and change in downstream total flow rate (Δqt out)] can be calculated in a wide range of input parameters. This study presents the results in the form of contour plots for pressure and flow responses.
The major finding of this study is that, theoretically, it is possible to estimate both size and longitudinal location of the leak with the two leak-detection indicators in the software-based leak-detection method. The results from various subsea flowline conditions [such as different gas/oil ratios (GORs) and fluid types, water depths, pressures at the receiving facilities, inclination angles, pipe diameters, water cuts, and so on] show that the reliability of this technique is improved when the sink term (i.e., amount of leaking fluid) is more dominant, which, in turn, means that leaks positioned farther upstream, with larger opening size, and occurring at higher pressure inside pipe are relatively easier to detect. In many of the scenarios considered, Δqt out as a leak-detection indicator shows more than a 10% change in the presence of a leak with dleak > 1 in., allowing relatively easier activation of a leak-warning system, which demonstrates the robustness of this technique. Other scenarios in which the indicators are less than a few percent changes, however, may be challenging—in those cases, additional responses from other methods (hardware-based or transient simulation) will be helpful.
|File Size||4 MB||Number of Pages||27|
49 CFR Part 195, Transportation of Hazardous Liquids by Pipeline, Vol. 3. 2017. Washington, DC: United States Federal Register.
Aamo, O. M., Salvesen, J., and Foss, B. A. 2006. Observer Design Using Boundary Injections for Pipeline Monitoring and Leak Detection. International Symposium on Advanced Control of Chemical Processes. Vol. 6, Part 1. https://doi.org/10.3182/20060402-4-BR-2902.00053.
Anadarko. 2015. Heidelberg: First Oil. www.anadarko.com/News/Flash-Feed/Heidelberg-First-Oil/.
API 1130: Computational Pipeline Monitoring for Liquid Pipelines: Pipeline Segment, second edition (49 CFR 195.444). 2002. Washington, DC: American Petroleum Institute.
API 1149, Pipeline Variable Uncertainties and Their Effects on Leak Detectability, second edition. 2015. Washington, DC: American Petroleum Institute.
API RP 14B, Design, Installation, Operation, Test, and Redress of Subsurface Safety Valve Systems, sixth edition. 2015. Washington, DC: American Petroleum Institute.
API RP 1155: Evaluation Methodology for Software-Based Leak Detection Systems. 1995. Washington, DC: American Petroleum Institute.
API RP 1175: Pipeline Leak Detection-Program Management. 2015. Washington, DC: American Petroleum Institute.
Ashford, F. E. and Pierce, P. E. 1975. Determining Multiphase Pressure Drops and Flow Capacities in Down-Hole Safety Valves. J Pet Technol 27 (9): 1145–1152. SPE-5161-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/5161-PA.
Bai, Y. and Bai, Q. 2005. Subsea Pipelines and Risers. Elsevier.
Beggs, D. H. and Brill, J. P. 1973. A Study of Two-Phase Flow in Inclined Pipes. J Pet Technol 25 (5): 607–617. SPE-4007-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/4007-PA.
Beggs, H. D. 1972. An Experimental Study of Two-Phase Flow in Inclined Pipes. PhD dissertation, University of Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Bird, D. E., Burke, K., Hall, S. A. et al. 2005. Gulf of Mexico Tectonic History: Hotspot Tracks, Crustal Boundaries, and Early Salt Distribution. AAPG Bull. 89 (3): 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1306/10280404026.
Bowditch, N. 2002. The American Practical Navigator: An Epitome of Navigation. US National Imagery and Mapping Agency.
Brill, J. P. and Beggs, H. D. 1991. Two-Phase Flow in Pipes. University of Tulsa.
Brill, J. P. and Mukherjee, H. 1999. Multiphase Flow in Wells. SPE Monograph Series Vol. 17. Richardson, Texas: SPE.
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM). 2012 Assessment of Technically Recoverable Hydrocarbon Resources of the Gulf of Mexico Outer Continental Shelf as of January 1, 2009. US Department of Interior.
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM). 2017. Gulf of Mexico OCS Region. US Department of Interior.
Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE). 2016. Annual Report 2016. US Department of Interior.
Burgess, G. L., Kazanis, E. G., and Shepard, N. K. 2016. Estimated Oil and Gas Reserves Gulf of Mexico OCS Region December 31, 2015. US Department of Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Gulf of Mexico OCS.
Bustnes, E. T., Rousselet, M., and Berland, S. 2011. Leak Detection Performance of a Commercial Real-Time Transient Model for Troll Oil Pipeline. Pipeline Simulation Interest Group. Paper No. PSIG 1114.
Carney, B. 2002. Currents in a Cul-de-sac. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Close, F., McCavitt, R. D., and Smith, B. 2008. Deepwater Gulf of Mexico Development Challenges Overview. Presented at the SPE North Africa Technical Conference and Exhibition, Marrakech, Morocco, 12–14 March. SPE-113011-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/113011-MS.
Cranswick, D. and Regg, J. 1997. Deepwater in the Gulf of Mexico: America’s New Frontier. US Department of the Interior, Minerals Management Service, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region.
Cranswick, D. 2001. Brief Overview of Gulf of Mexico OCS Oil and Gas Pipelines: Installation, Potential Impacts, and Mitigation Measures. US Department of Interior, Minerals Management Service, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region.
Dribus, J. R., Jackson, M., and Smith, J. 2008. The Prize Beneath the Salt. Oilfield Review 20 (3): 4–17.
Electronic Code of Federal Regulations. 2017. Federal Register, US Office of the Federal Register and the US Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC.
Enbridge. 2017. Heidelberg Oil Pipeline.
Fielder, R., Grant, J., and Zagrzecki, P. 2017. First-Quarter Operations Report. Anadarko Petroleum Corporation.
Gallagher, J. E. 2006. Natural Gas Measurement Handbook. Gulf Publishing Company.
Gajbhiye, R. N. and Kam, S. I. 2008. Leak Detection in Subsea Pipeline: A Mechanistic Modeling Approach With Fixed Pressure Boundaries. SPE Proj Fac & Const 3 (4): 1–10. SPE-123130-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/123130-PA.
Griffith, P. 1984. Multiphase Flow in Pipes. J Pet Technol 36 (3): 361–367. SPE-12895-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/12895-PA.
Hauge, E., Aamo, O. M., and Godhavn, J. M. 2009. Model-Based Monitoring and Leak Detection in Oil and Gas Pipelines. SPE Proj Fac & Const 4 (3): 53–60. SPE-114218-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/114218-PA.
Hillegeist, P., Shafer, S., Brousseau, C. et al. 2011. United States Gulf of Mexico Oil and Natural Gas Industry Economic Impact Analysis: The Economic Impacts of GOM Oil and Natural Gas Development on the US Economy. Sugarland, Texas: Quest Offshore Resources, Inc.
Hillegeist, P., Shafer, S., Gross, M. et al. 2014. The Economic Benefits of Increasing US Access to Offshore Oil and Natural Gas Resources in the Eastern Gulf of Mexico. Sugarland, Texas: Quest Offshore Resources, Inc.
ICF International. 2014. North American Midstream Infrastructure Through 2035: Capitalizing on Our Energy Abundance. Washington, DC: The INGAA Foundation, Inc.
Igland, R. T., Sævik, S., Bai, Y. et al. 2000. Deepwater Pipelines and Flowlines. Presented at the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, 1–4 May. OTC-12187-MS. https://doi.org/10.4043/12187-MS.
Kam, S. I. 2009. Mechanistic Modeling of Pipeline Leak Detection at Fixed Inlet Rate. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 70 (3–4): 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2009.09.008.
Kulkarni, G. M., Buitrago, J., Arslan, H. et al. 2012. Offshore Pipeline Leak Detection System Concepts and Feasibility Study. International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers (ISOPE).
Lee, A. L., Gonzales, M. H., and Eakin, B. E. 1966. The Viscosity of Natural Gases. J Pet Technol 18 (8): 997–1000. SPE-1340-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/1340-PA.
Ling, K., Han, G., Ni, X. et al. 2015. A New Method for Leak Detection in Gas Pipelines. Oil and Gas Fac 4 (2): 97–106. SPE-2014-1891568-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/2014-1891568-PA.
Lopez, R. J. 2011. Failure Investigation Report—Whitecap (Chevron), 18” Offshore Failure. US Department of Transportation.
McAllister, E. W. 2005. Pipeline Rules of Thumb Handbook—A Manual of Quick, Accurate Solutions to Everyday Pipeline Engineering Problems, sixth edition. Elsevier.
McCain, W. D., Jr. 1990. Properties of Petroleum Fluids. Tulsa: PennWell Books.
Nations, J. F. and Speice, C. B. 1982. The Field Development of Cognac (Mississippi Canyon 194) Field: A Case History. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 26–29 September. SPE-10955-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/10955-MS.
Nixon, L., Kazanis, E., and Alonso, S. 2016. Deepwater Gulf of Mexico, December 21, 2014. Washington, DC: US Department of Interior, Bureau of Ocean and Energy Management.
Payne, G. A., Palmer, C. M., Brill, J. P. et al. 1979. Evaluation of Inclined-Pipe, Two-Phase Liquid Holdup and Pressure-Loss Correlation Using Experimental Data (includes associated paper 8782). J Pet Technol 31 (9): 1198–1208. SPE-6874-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/6874-PA.
Petrosky, G. E. and Farshad, F. F. 1995. Viscosity Correlations for Gulf of Mexico Crude Oils. Presented at the SPE Production Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA, 2–4 April. SPE-29468-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/29468-MS.
PHMSA. 2012. Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty, and Job Creation Act of 2011. Public Law 112-90, 125 Stat. 1904.
PHMSA. 2017a. Pipeline Incident 20-Year Trend. US DOT Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.
PHMSA. 2017b. Pipeline Mileage and Facilities 2010+. US DOT Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.
Pipeline Engineering Problems, sixth edition. Elsevier.
PIPESIM. 2013. PIPESIM Multiphase Flow Simulator Manual. Schlumberger.
Roberts, H. H. 2013. A Complex Geologic Framework Prone to Fluid and Gas Leakage: Northern Gulf of Mexico Continental Slope. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Scott, S. L. and Barrufet, M. A. 2003. Worldwide Assessment of Industry Leak Detection Capabilities for Single & Multiphase Pipelines. Offshore Technology Research Center.
Scott, S. L., Lei, L., and Jinghai, Y. 1999. Modeling the Effects of a Deepwater Leak on Behavior of a Multiphase Production Flowline. Paper presented at the SPE/EPA Exploration and Production Environmental Conference, Austin, Texas, USA, 28 February–3 March. SPE-52760-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/52760-MS.
Shoham, O. 2006. Mechanistic Modeling of Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flow in Pipes. Richardson, Texas: SPE.
Shoup, G. J. and Shoham, O. 1990. Pipeline Design for Deepwater Gulf of Mexico Developments. Presented at the 22nd Annual Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, 7–10 May. Paper no. 6411.
Smith, J. R. and Griffin, J. M. 2001. Investigation of Hybrid Deepwater Production. Minerals Management Service.
Standing, M. B. 1947. A Pressure-Volume-Temperature Correlation for Mixtures of California Oils and Gases. In Drilling and Production Practice, New York City, 1 January, API-47-275. American Petroleum Institute.
Teale, R. A. 1986. Deepwater Pipeline Welding Specifications. Presented at the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, 5–8 May. OTC-5349-MS. https://doi.org/10.4043/5349-MS.
Trench, C. J. and Miesner, T. O. 2006. The Role of Energy Pipelines and Research in the United States. Pipeline Research Council International, Inc.
US Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2015. Annual Energy Outlook 2015 With Projections to 2040. United States Energy Information Administration, Office of Integrated and International Energy Analysis.
US Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2017a. Gulf of Mexico Fact Sheet. United States Energy Information Administration, Office of Independent Statistics and Analysis. www.eia.gov/special/gulf_of_mexico/.
US Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2017b. EIA-914: Monthly Crude Oil, Lease Condensate, and Natural Gas Production Report: Crude Oil and Lease Condensate Production by API Gravity. United States Energy Information Administration, Office of Independent Statistics & Analysis.
US Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2017c. Short-Term Energy Outlook (STEO). United States Energy Information Administration, Office of Independent Statistics & Analysis.
Wasson, T. 1948. Creole Field, Gulf of Mexico, Coast of Louisiana. American Association of Petroleum Geologists.
Weimer, P. and Slatt, R. M. 2004. Petroleum Systems of Deepwater Settings. Distinguished Instructor Series: No. 7. Tulsa: Society of Exploration Geophysicists.