Experimental Study of the Multiphase Flow of Sand, Viscous Oil, and Gas in a Horizontal Pipe
- Panav Hulsurkar (University of Alaska, Fairbanks) | Obadare O. Awoleke (University of Alaska, Fairbanks) | Mohabbat Ahmadi (University of Alaska, Fairbanks)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Production & Operations
- Publication Date
- November 2018
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 837 - 856
- 2018.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- three-phase flow, liquid holdup, slug flow, dilute slurry flow
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 174 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
This study provides horizontal-pipe pressure-drop and liquid-holdup measurements for three-phase flow of sand, viscous oil, and gas with a focus on slug flow (SL). We developed a correlation for predicting the liquid holdup and dimensionless pressure gradient in the presence of solids during SL.
A multiphase-flow-loop facility with 1.5-in. (0.0381m) Schedule 80 polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipes was designed and constructed to flow viscous oils ranging from 150 to 218 cp (0.15 to 0.218 Pa·s). Two-phase (221) and three-phase (88) data points were collected. A progressing cavity pump (PCP) was used to pump the complex mixture from a double-walled steel tank. Compressed air was used as the gas phase and 0 to 1 wt% of 180-µm diameter sand (test-section concentrations) was added to the flow. The facility had a clear test section for flow-pattern visualization and photography. Equipment issues and operational difficulties in the setup were identified during initial tests and rectified. Oil- and gas-flow rates, differential and absolute pressures, liquid holdup (both with and without the presence of solids), and fluid temperatures were measured, and flow-pattern observations were photographed. Gas and viscous-oil superficial velocities ranged from 0.1 to 10 m/s and from 0.1 to 1 m/s, respectively.
We validated the setup by comparing actual single-phase liquid-pressure-drop measurements to an analytical expression for computing the pressure drop during single-phase viscous-oil flow. Sand was introduced into the system thereafter. We found that the presence of sand did not shift the flow-pattern boundaries appreciably and SL was the most commonly encountered flow pattern. As such, we focused on the SL region. Slow-motion photography and videography revealed that the presence of sand disrupted the sharp head and tail profiles in the liquid-slug body. Regression analysis using the observed data revealed that for SL of viscous oil and gas, the most-important dimensionless groups affecting both the holdup and the dimensionless pressure gradient are the fluid-velocity numbers and the Froude number. For three-phase SL of sand, viscous oil, and gas, the most-important dimensionless groups for affecting holdup in the presence of solids are the fluid velocity, Reynolds number, and Froude number in addition to the pipe-diameter number and the sand fraction in the flow stream. For dimensionless pressure gradient, the most-important dimensionless groups are the fluid-velocity numbers, the Reynolds and Froude numbers, and the input-liquid fraction.
Slug-unit length was also measured, and the data were matched with an existing correlation. We also detailed the effect of sand on pattern behavior in each of the commonly observed horizontal-pipe multiphase-flow patterns using videography.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first recorded attempt at measuring pressure drop and liquid holdup in the presence of solids for the horizontal multiphase flow of sand, viscous oil, and gas. This work provides laboratory data/models that can support the characterization of the pressure drop and flow patterns experienced in horizontal wells completed using the process of cold heavy-oil production with sand (CHOPS) and other viscous-oil-producing wells.
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||20|
Al-Safran, E., Gokcal, B., and Sarica, C. 2011. High Viscosity Liquid Effect on Two-Phase Slug Length in Horizontal Pipes. Persented at the 15th International Conference on Multiphase Production Technology, Cannes, France, 15–17 June. BHR-2011-G1.
Al-Safran, E., Kora, C., and Sarica, C. 2013. Prediction of Liquid Volume Fraction in Slugs in Two-Phase Horizontal Pipe Flow With High Viscosity Liquid. Presented at the 16th International Conference on Multiphase Production Technology, Cannes, France, 12–14 June. BHR-2013-H4.
Awoleke, O. O., Zhu, D., and Hill, A. D. 2016. New Propped-Fracture-Conductivity Models for Tight Gas Sands. SPE J. 21 (5): 1508–1517. SPE-179743-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/179743-PA.
Beggs, D. H. and Brill, J. P. 1973. A Study of Two-Phase Flow in Inclined Pipes. SPE J. 25 (5): 607–617. SPE-4007-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/4007-PA.
Brill, J. P. and Mukherjee, H. K. 1999. Multiphase Flow in Wells, first edition. Richardson, Texas: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Brito, R., Pereyra, E., and Sarica, C. 2012. Stratified Flow for Downward Highly Viscous Two-Phase Flow. Presented at the 8th North American Conference on Multiphase Technology, Banff, Alberta, Canada, 20–22 June. BHR-2012-A007.
Buckingham, E. 1914. On Physically Similar Systems: Illustrations of the Use of Dimensional Equations. Phys. Rev. 4 (4): 345–376. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.4.345.
Duns, H. Jr. and Ros, N. C. J. 1963. Vertical Flow of Gas and Liquid Mixtures in Wells. Presented at the 6th World Petroleum Congress, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, 19–26 June. WPC-10132.
Dusseault, M. 2002. CHOPS: Cold Heavy Oil Production With Sand in the Canadian Heavy Oil Industry. Report, Alberta Department of Energy, Canada, March 2002.
Dusseault, M. B. and El-Sayed, S. 2000. Heavy-Oil Production Enhancement by Encouraging Sand Production. Presented at the SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 3–5 April. SPE-59276-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/59276-MS.
Gokcal, B. 2005. Effects of High Oil Viscosity on Two-Phase Oil-Gas Flow Behavior in Horizontal Pipes. Master’s thesis, University of Tulsa.
Gokcal, B., Al-Sarkhi, A., and Sarica, C. 2008. Effects of High Oil Viscosity on Drift Velocity for Upward Inclined Pipes. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, 21–24 September. SPE-115342-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/115342-MS.
Govier, G. W. and Aziz, K. 2008. The Flow of Complex Mixtures in Pipes, second edition. Richardson, Texas: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Mahajan, N. 2016. Class Exercise Submission—Horizontal Pipe Flow, Empirical Models as Part of the Requirements of the Multiphase Flow in Pipes Class. University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska.
Sarica, C., Pereyra, E. J., and Brito, R. 2013. Effect of Medium Oil Viscosity on Two Phase Oil Gas Flow Behavior in Horizontal Pipes. Presented at the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, 6–9 May. OTC-24048-MS. https://doi.org/10.4043/24048-MS.
Shoham, O. 2006. Mechanistic Modeling of Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flow in Pipes. Richardson, Texas: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Taitel, Y. and Barnea, D. 1990. Two Phase Slug Flow. In Advances in Heat Transfer, Vol. 20, ed. J. P. Hartnett and T. F. Irvine, Chap. 2, 83–132. New York City: Academic Press.
Taitel, Y. and Dukler, A. E. 1976. A Model for Predicting Flow Regime Transitions in Horizontal and Near Horizontal Gas-Liquid Flow. AIChE J. 22 (1): 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690220105.
Yang, Z., Hu, B., Langsholt, M. et al. 2015. Experimental Studies on Void Fraction in Slug of Three-Phase Viscous Oil Flows in a Near Horizontal Pipe. Presented at the 17th International Conference on Multiphase Production Technology, Cannes, France, 10–12 June. BHR-2015-F1.
Zhao, Y., Lao, L., and Yeung, H. 2015. Investigation and Prediction of Slug Flow Characteristics in Highly Viscous Liquid and Gas Flows in Horizontal Pipes. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 102 (October): 124–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2015.06.002.