Systematic Approach To Reduce Uncertainties When Quantitatively Assimilating 4D Seismic and Well Data
- Forlan La Rosa Almeida (University of Campinas) | Alessandra Davolio (University of Campinas) | Denis José Schiozer (University of Campinas)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- February 2020
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 13 - 30
- 2020.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- 4D seismic assimilation, uncertainty reduction, multi-objective functions
- 24 in the last 30 days
- 55 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
History matching (HM) is a complex process that aims to increase the reliability of reservoir-simulation models. HM is an inverse problem with multiple solutions that call for probabilistic approaches. When observed data are integrated with sampling methods, uncertainty can be reduced by updating the uncertainty distribution of the reservoir properties. This work presents a practical methodology to systematically reduce uncertainties in a multiobjective assisted HM while dealing with multiple scenarios and assimilating well and 4D-seismic (4DS) data quantitatively. The frequency-distribution update goes through an iterative process. The distribution of the current iteration is combined with the histogram generated using the best-matched simulation scenarios from the current iteration to generate the updated distribution. To evaluate the matching quality, multiple local objective functions (LOFs) are independently evaluated, enabling the identification of LOFs that expose the need for reparameterization. This quantitative process was applied in two phases: Phase 1, in which only well data were used to constrain the scenarios, and Phase 2, when 4DS data were added. The methodology was successfully validated against a synthetic benchmark case of medium complexity, with the production-history data generated at a fine scale (reference model). Each iteration increased the number of matched scenarios, demonstrating good convergence. Most of the reservoir properties had uncertainty reduced gradually while avoiding the premature reduction of the uncertainty range (minimizing convergence to an incorrect solution). Local probabilistic perturbations were conducted on the petrophysical realizations in the regions around the wells that manifested LOFs, which hindered the match. The method efficiently achieved multiple matched simulation scenarios, with all (87) LOFs evaluated within the defined tolerance range. The 4DS data were included regionally with an acceptable increase in computation time. In both phases, the matched simulation scenarios presented production forecasts similar to the reference model. The quantitative assimilation of 4DS data generated scenarios that forecast production with less variability than did scenarios generated without 4DS data. This was expected for this study because the 4DS data provided do not present noise or artifacts.
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||18|
Almeida, F. 2016. Metodologia de Ajuste de Histórico Probabilístico e Multiobjetivo Integrando dados de Produção e Sísmica 4D (in Portuguese). Master’s thesis, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil (August 2016).
Almeida, F. L. R., Davolio, A., and Schiozer, D. J. 2014. A New Approach To Perform a Probabilistic and Multi-Objective History Matching. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, 27–29 October. SPE-170623-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/170623-MS.
Assunção, G. S. C., Davolio, A., and Schozer, D. J. 2017. Application of a Methodology To Incorporate Probabilistic Data From Two Technologies: Reservoir Simulation Models and 4D Seismic. Presented at OTC Brasil, Rio de Janeiro, 24–26 October. OTC-28153-MS. https://doi.org/10.4043/28153-MS.
Avansi, G. D., Maschio, C., and Schiozer, D. J. 2016. Simultaneous History-Matching Approach by Use of Reservoir-Characterization and Reservoir-Simulation Studies. SPE Res Eval & Eng 19 (4): 694–712. SPE-179740-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/179740-PA.
Becerra, G. G., Maschio, C., and Schiozer, D. J. 2011. Petroleum Reservoir Uncertainty Mitigation Through the Integration With Production History Matching J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. & Eng. 33 (2): 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-58782011000200005.
Cancelliere, M., Verga, F., and Viberti, D. 2011. Benefits and Limitations of Assisted History Matching. Presented at Offshore Europe, Aberdeen, 6–8 September. SPE-146278-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/146278-MS.
Correia, G. G., Davolio, A., and Schiozer, D. J. 2016. Multi-Scale Integration of 4D Seismic and Simulation Data To Improve Saturation Estimations. Presented at SPE Europec at the 78th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Vienna, Austria, 30 May–2 June. SPE-180116-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/180116-MS.
dos Santos Silva, L. and Schiozer, D. J. 2012. Integration of Uncertainty Analysis and History Matching: Application in a Complex Case. Presented at the SPE Latin America and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Mexico City, 16–18 April. SPE-153604-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/153604-MS.
Dujardin, B. O., Matringe, S. F., and Collins, J. R. 2011. Practical Assisted History Matching and Probabilistic Forecasting Procedure: A West Africa Case Study. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, 30 October–2 November. SPE-146292-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/146292-MS.
Kashib, T. and Srinivasan, S. 2006. A Probabilistic Approach To Integrating Dynamic Data in Reservoir Models. J Pet Sci Eng 50 (3–4): 241–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2005.11.002.
Maschio, C. and Schiozer, D. J. 2014. A Method for Reduction of Uncertainties in Reservoir Model Using Observed Data: Application to a Complex Case. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. & Eng. 36 (4): 901–918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-013-0126-7.
Maschio, C. and Schiozer, D. J. 2016. Probabilistic History Matching Using Discrete Latin Hypercube Sampling and Nonparametric Density Estimation. J Pet Sci Eng 147 (November): 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2016.05.011.
Maucec, M., Singh, A. P., Carvajal, G. A. et al. 2013. Engineering Workflow for Probabilistic Assisted History Matching and Production Forecasting: Application to a Middle East Carbonate Reservoir. Presented at the SPE Reservoir Characterization and Simulation Conference and Exhibition, Abu Dhabi, 16–18 September. SPE-165980-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/165980-MS.
Morosov, A. L. and Schiozer, D. J. 2017. Field-Development Process Revealing Uncertainty-Assessment Pitfalls. SPE Res Eval & Eng 20 (3): 765–778. SPE-180094-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/180094-PA.
Oliveira, G. S., Schiozer, D. J., and Maschio, C. 2017. History Matching by Integrating Regional Multi-Property Image Perturbation Methods With a Multivariate Sensitivity Analysis. J Pet Sci Eng 153 (May): 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.03.031.
Roggero, F. and Hu, L. Y. 1998. Gradual Deformation of Continuous Geostatistical Models for History Matching. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 27–30 September. SPE-49004-MS. https://doi.org/10.2523/49004-MS.
Schiozer, D. J., de Souza dos Santos, A. A., de Grac¸a Santos, S. M. et al. 2019. Model-Based Decision Analysis Applied to Petroleum Field Development and Management. Oil Gas Sci Techn—Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles 74 (46): 20. https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2019019.
Schiozer, D. J., Avansi, G. D., and de Souza dos Santos, A. A. 2016. Risk Quantification Combining Geostatistical Realizations and Discretized Latin Hypercube. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. & Eng. 39 (2): 575–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-016-0576-9.
Yadav, S., Srinivasan, S., Bryant, S. L. et al. 2005. History Matching Using Probabilistic Approach in a Distributed Computing Environment. Presented at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, The Woodlands, Texas, 31 January–2 February. SPE-93399-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/93399-MS.