A Methodology for Screening Surfactants for Foam Enhanced Oil Recovery in an Oil-Wet Reservoir
- Christian S. Boeije (Delft University of Technology) | Martin V. Bennetzen (Maersk Oil) | William R. Rossen (Delft University of Technology)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- November 2017
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 795 - 808
- 2017.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Foam, oil-wet media, Surfactant screening, foam enhanced oil recovery
- 0 in the last 30 days
- 414 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
A surfactant-screening methodology for foam enhanced oil recovery (EOR) is proposed that comprises both bulk-foam tests and foam flooding in model porous media. The initial foam screening (bulk-foam stability in test tubes) is aimed at quickly providing a qualitative indication of a surfactant’s foaming potential as well as salinity and oil tolerance at reservoir temperature. Surfactant formulations passing these tests are tested further in a series of foam-flooding experiments in model porous media (bead packs) under reservoir conditions (100-bar backpressure, at 55°C) at 95% gas fraction, with and without crude oil (32°API) present. The mobility-reduction factor (MRF) (i.e., ratio of pressure drop across the pack with foam compared with that for water) is a direct measure of foam strength in porous media. To investigate the effect of wettability, tests are performed in both strongly water-wet (glass beads) and oil-wet (polypropylene beads) porous media.
The bulk-foam tests screened out most of the considered surfactants. Out of 31 surfactants tested, 26 precipitated in the highest-salinity brine (200,000 ppm). Also, the presence of crude oil resulted in foam collapse for most surfactants in the bulk tests. Surfactants that retained some foam stability in the presence of oil were carried forward to the porous-media tests. In our study, qualitative foam stability inferred from the bulk-foam-stability tests correlated well with the MRF in the water-wet bead packs. We found large variations in MRF comparing different surfactants; some have MRFs on the order of 10 and others are as high as 1,000. For all investigated surfactants, the presence of crude oil reduced MRF, but for some mobility reduction was still significant. The bulk-foam tests showed similar results, with foam retaining some stability even in the presence of oil for the surfactants that were analyzed in both bulk form and in porous media. Oil-wetness was found to have a detrimental effect on foam strength: Values of MRF were approximately one order of magnitude lower than those measured in the water-wet porous media. However, the decrease in MRF was not the same for all surfactants. The best-performing surfactant in the oil-wet pack was not the same as the best performer in the water-wet pack, proving the value of these additional tests.
The goal of the protocol is to obtain a method for rapid testing the foaming performance and stability of a range of surfactants under conditions that are as realistic as possible. The most-promising surfactant(s) identified by use of this protocol are then selected to be evaluated further in long consolidated cores.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||14|
Andrianov, A., Farajzadeh, R., Mahmoodi Nick, M. et al. 2011. Immiscible Foam for Enhancing Oil Recovery: Bulk and Porous Media Experiments. Presented at the SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Conference, Kuala Lampur, 19–21 July. SPE-143578-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/143578-MS.
Bird, R. B., Stewart, W. E., and Lightfoot, E. N. 2006. Transport Phenomena, second edition. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Boeije, C. S. 2016. Experimental and Modelling Studies of Foam Enhanced Oil Recovery. PhD dissertation, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands (April 2016).
Chabert, M., Morvan, M., and Nabzar, L. 2012. Advanced Screening Technologies for the Selection of Dense CO2 Foaming Surfactants. Presented at the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 14–18 April. SPE-154147-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/154147-MS.
Chen, P. and Mohanty, K. K. 2014. Wettability Alteration in High Temperature Carbonate Reservoirs. Presented at the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 12–16 April. SPE-169125-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/169125-MS.
Duerksen, J. H. 1986. Laboratory Study of Foaming Surfactants as Steam-Diverting Additives. SPE Res Eval & Eng 1 (1): 44–52. SPE-12785-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/12785-PA.
Farajzadeh, R., Andrianov, A., Krastev, R. et al. 2012. Foam-Oil Interaction in Porous Media: Implications for Foam Assisted Enhanced Oil Recovery. Adv. Colloid Interfac. 183–184 (15 November): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2012.07.002.
Gupta, R., Mohan, K., and Mohanty, K. K. 2009. Surfactant Screening for Wettability Alteration in Oil-Wet Fractured Carbonates. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 4–7 October. SPE-124822-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/124822-MS.
Kam, S. I. and Rossen, W. R. 2003. A Model for Foam Generation in Homogeneous Porous Media. SPE J. 8 (4): 417–425. SPE-87334-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/87334-PA.
Kristiansen, T. S. and Holt, T. 1992. Properties of Flowing Foam in Porous Media Containing Oil. Presented at the SPE/DOE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 22–24 April. SPE-24182-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/24182-MS.
Kuehne, D. L., Frazier, R. H., Cantor, J. et al. 1992. Evaluation of Surfactants for CO2 Mobility Control in Dolomite Reservoirs. Presented at the SPE/DOE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 22–24 April. SPE-24177-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/24177-MS.
Kumar, K., Dao, E. K., and Mohanty, K. K. 2008. Atomic Force Microscopy Study of Wettability Alteration by Surfactants. SPE J. 13 (2): 137–145. SPE-93009-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/93009-PA.
Lau, H. C. and O’Brien, S. M. 1988. Effects of Spreading and Nonspreading Oils on Foam Propagation Through Porous Media. SPE Res Eval & Eng 3 (3): 893–896. SPE-15668-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/15668-PA.
Lescure, B. M. and Claridge, E. L. 1986. CO2 Foam Flooding Performance vs. Rock Wettability. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 5–8 October. SPE-15445-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/15445-MS.
Mannhardt, K., Novosad, J. J., and Schramm, L. L. 1998. Foam/Oil Interactions at Reservoir Conditions. Presented at the SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 19–22 April. SPE-39681-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/39681-MS.
Moradi-Araghi, A., Johnston, E. L., Zornes, D. R. et al. 1997. Laboratory Evaluation of Surfactants for CO2-Foam Applications at the South Cowden Unit. Presented at the International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, Houston, 18–21 February. SPE-37218-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/37218-MS.
Rossen, W. R. 1996. Foams in Enhanced Oil Recovery. New York City: Marcel Dekker.
Sanchez, J. M. and Hazlett, R. D. 1992. Foam Flow Through an Oil-Wet Porous Medium: A Laboratory Study. SPE Res Eval & Eng 7 (1): 91–97. SPE-19687-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/19687-PA.
Schramm, L. L. 1994. Foams: Fundamentals and Applications in the Petroleum Industry. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.
Seethepalli, A., Adibhatla, B., and Mohanty, K. K. 2004. Wettability Alteration During Surfactant Flooding of Carbonate Reservoirs. Presented at the SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Tulsa, 17–21 April. SPE-89423-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/89423-MS.
Singh, R. and Mohanty, K. K. 2014. Foams Stabilize by In-Situ Surface Activated Nanoparticles in Bulk and Porous Media. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, 27–29 October. SPE-170942-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/170942-MS.
Suffridge, F. E., Raterman, K. T., and Russell, G. C. 1989. Foam Performance Under Reservoir Conditions. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 8–11 October. SPE-19691-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/19691-MS.
Tsau, J.-S. and Grigg, R. B. 1997. Assessment of Foam Properties and Effective in Mobility Reduction for CO2-Foam Floods. Presented at the International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, Houston, 18–21 February. SPE-37221-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/37221-MS.
Vikingstad, A. K., Skauge, A., Høiland, H. et al. 2005. Foam-Oil Interaction Analyzed by Static Foam Tests. Colloid. Surface. A 260 (1–3): 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.02.034.
Wang, L. and Mohanty, K. K. 2013. Improving Oil Recovery in Gas-Flooded, Oil-Wet Carbonate Reservoirs by Wettability Altering Surfactants. Presented at the SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, The Woodlands, Texas, 8–10 April. SPE-164126-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/164126-MS.
Yang, S. H. and Reed, R. L. 1989. Mobility Control Using CO2 Forms. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 8–11 October. SPE-19689-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/19689-MS.