Quantification of Wellbore-Collision Probability by Novel Analytic Methods
- Jon Bang (Gyrodata)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Drilling & Completion
- Publication Date
- December 2017
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 255 - 276
- 2017.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Collision probability, Collision avoidance, Collision risk
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 227 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Unintentional collision between two wellbores may have serious economic and health, safety, and environmental consequences. It is therefore important to evaluate the probability of such an event in the well-planning phase and at critical stages during the drilling phase.
A commonly used approach is to analyze the collision probability between two points, one in each wellbore, which are determined from geometric criteria only. This procedure may ignore point pairs with higher collision probabilities, and thereby lead to overoptimistic conclusions. Typically, the results from such methods will be accurate only for simple wellbore geometries, such as straight sections, and for position uncertainties that are highly symmetrical with respect to the wellbores. More advanced methods that overcome such limitations are impractical for general application because of high conceptual or computational complexity.
This paper proposes novel analytic methods that may potentially overcome these problems. Formulae are derived for two important situations: the direct-hit (DH) and the unintentional-crossing (UC) scenarios. In both cases, the spatial region of interest is divided into carefully designed segments, such that the collision probability can be accurately evaluated for each segment. The total collision probability is then found by summing the results over all segments. The main advantage of this approach is that it gives accurate results for arbitrary well geometries and uncertainty-ellipsoid orientations.
The algorithms can easily be integrated in existing software for wellbore-anticollision analysis. The paper shows examples of results that are all in good agreement with control calculations. Compared with existing methods, the proposed methods are therefore believed to represent an improvement to quantitative collision-probability analysis for both the wellbore-planning and the drilling phases.
|File Size||1 MB||Number of Pages||22|
Brooks, A. G. 2010. A New Look at Wellbore-Collision Probability. SPE Drill & Compl 25 (2): 223–229. SPE-116155-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/116155-PA.
Davis, J. C. 1986. Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology, second edition, Chapter 6, 527–531. New York City: Wiley & Sons.
de Wardt, J. P., Mullin, S., Thorogood, J. L. et al. 2013. Well Bore Collision Avoidance and Interceptions – State of the Art. Presented at the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Amsterdam, 5–7 March. SPE-163411-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/163411-MS.
Ekseth, R., Torkildsen, T., Brooks, A. G. et al. 2010. High-Integrity Wellbore Surveying. SPE Drill & Compl 25 (4): 438–447. SPE-133417-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/133417-PA.
Gradshteyn, I. S. and Ryzhik, I. M. 1980. Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, fourth edition, Section 2.27. San Diego, California: Academic Press.
Greenberg, M. D. 1978. Foundations of Applied Mathematics, Chapter 7. London: Prentice-Hall International.
Industry Steering Committee on Wellbore Survey Accuracy (ISCWSA). 2013. Collision Avoidance Calculations – Current Common Practice (October 2013 revision), http://www.iscwsa.net/files/1713/8248/6822/Current_Common_Practice_in_Collision_Avoidance_Calculations_Oct_2013.pdf (accessed 28 October 2016).
McGregor, A. 2016. Update Error Model Group. Minutes of ISCWSA/SPE-WPTS 44th General Meeting, 22 September, Glasgow, Scotland, UK, http://www.iscwsa.net/download/0c2ee1dc-acd6–11e6-a174-53c54bf2e654/ (accessed 22 April 2017).
McNair, G. A., Lance, S. J., Codling, J. et al. 2005. Implementation of a New Risk Based Well Collision Avoidance Method. Presented at the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Amsterdam, 23–25 February. SPE-92554-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/92554-MS.
Papoulis, A. 1984. Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes, second edition, Chapter 6. Singapore: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Poedjono, B., Burgos, E. C., Gonzalez, L. F. et al. 2013. Advanced Surveying Techniques Help Increase Hydrocarbon Production While Preventing Well Collisions and HSE Risks. Presented at the SPE Latin American and Caribbean Health, Safety, Social Responsibility, and Environment Conference, Lima, Peru, 26–27 June. SPE-165636-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/165636-MS.
Poedjono, B., Lombardo, G. J., and Phillips, W. 2009. Anti-Collision Risk Management Standard for Well Placement. Presented at the SPE Americas E&P Environmental & Safety Conference, San Antonio, Texas, 23–25 March. SPE-121040-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/121040-MS.
Sawaryn, S. J. 2017. Well Collision Avoidance Management and Principles. Presented at the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference and Exhibition, The Hague, 14–16 March. SPE/IADC-184730-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/184730-MS.
Sawaryn, S. J. and Thorogood, J. L. 2005. A Compendium of Directional Calculations Based on the Minimum Curvature Method. SPE Drill & Compl 20 (1): 24–36. SPE-84246-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/84246-PA.
Thorogood J. L. and Sawaryn, S. J. 1991. The Traveling-Cylinder Diagram: A Practical Tool for Collision Avoidance. SPE Drill Eng 6 (1): 31–36. SPE-19989-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/19989-PA.
Torkildsen, T., Havardstein, S. T., Weston, J. L. et al. 2008. Prediction of Wellbore Position Accuracy When Surveyed With Gyroscopic Tools. SPE Drill & Compl 23 (1): 5–12. SPE-90408-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/90408-PA.
Williamson, H. S. 1998. Towards Risk-Based Well Separation Rules. SPE Drill & Compl 13 (1): 47–51. SPE-36484-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/36484-PA.
Williamson, H. S. 2000. Accuracy Prediction for Directional Measurement While Drilling. SPE Drill & Compl 15 (4): 221–233. SPE-67616-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/67616-PA.