Unlocking the Potential of the Monterey Shale Resource: An Analysis of Geological Characteristics, Completion Techniques, and Production Behaviors
- Dayanand Saini (California State University, Bakersfield) | Jacob Wright (California State University, Bakersfield) | Megan Mantas (California State University, Bakersfield) | Charles Gomes (California State University, Bakersfield)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- February 2019
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 219 - 237
- 2019.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- hydraulic fracturing, boundary dominated flow (BDF), horizontal wells, diagnostic production analysis, Monterey shale
- 34 in the last 30 days
- 911 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
A critical analysis of the key geological characteristics, completion techniques, and production behaviors of the Monterey Shale wells and their comparisons with analogous major US shale plays—namely, the Bakken and the Eagle Ford—may provide insights that could eventually help the petroleum industry unlock its full potential. The present study reports on such efforts.
The Monterey Shale is very young and geologically heterogeneous compared with the Eagle Ford and the Bakken. Oil viscosity in the Monterey Shale is significantly higher, and one can also notice that Monterey oil production has declined over the years. The Monterey Shale has a field-dependent completion strategy (pattern spacing and fracturing stage), while a horizontal, uncemented wellbore completion is common in the Bakken and the Eagle Ford. In the Monterey, nonhydraulically fractured zones of horizontal and hydraulically fractured wells appear to be making approximately equal contributions to the well’s cumulative production. The ongoing water-disposal operations in overlying injection zones, up to a certain extent, have affected the productivity of both types (long and short production histories) of wells. The geology also appears to have an effect on the production behaviors of horizontal and hydraulically fractured wells.
A preliminary economic analysis suggests that exploitation of the Monterey Shale is still a profitable venture. However, for sustainable development in a current price regime of USD 50/bbl of crude oil, it is necessary that production costs be reduced further. Also, compared with the Bakken and the Eagle Ford, the Monterey sits in regions of extremely high water stress (i.e., frequent occurrences of drought or drought-like conditions). However, oilfield-produced water associated with current steamflooding-based oil- and gas-production operations in the region as a base fluid suggests that it can potentially meet most of the water demand for future fracturing jobs. Also, combined use of a centralized water-management system; a less-costly, more energy-efficient, and high-capacity solar-powered desalination system; and a final sludge-management and/or residual-brine-disposal mechanism might assist the petroleum industry in managing flowback and produced waters while keeping water-handling costs low.
A combination of new enhanced-oil-recovery (EOR) methods for releasing the remaining oil from both nonfractured and fractured zones of horizontal wells and the use of oilfield-produced and recycled water for completing hydraulically fractured horizontal wells might prove to be a significant change for the future exploitation of California’s Monterey Shale resource, which is subject to the toughest hydraulic-fracturing regulations in the nation and is in a region of extremely high water stress.
|File Size||688 KB||Number of Pages||19|
Agiddi, D., Davenport, B., Hernandez, H. et al. 2004. New Fluid Technology Improves Well Productivity in the Western 31S Stevens Oil Zone in the Elk Hills Field. Presented at the SPE International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium and Western Regional Meeting, Bakersfield, California, 16–18 March. SPE-86994-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/86994-MS.
Arguijo, A. L., Morford, L., Baihly, J. et al. 2012. Streamlined Completions Process: An Eagle Ford Shale Case History. Presented at the SPE Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, 30 October–1 November. SPE-162658-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/162658-MS.
Beckwith, R. 2011. The Trend Toward Shale Oil. J Pet Technol 63 (7): 42–43. SPE-0711-0042-JPT. https://doi.org/10.2118/0711-0042-JPT.
Beckwith, R. 2013. California’s Monterey Formation Zeroing in on a New Shale Oil Play? J Pet Technol 65 (5): 44–58. SPE-0513-0044-JPT. https://doi.org/10.2118/0513-0044-JPT.
Behl, R. J. 2012. Depositional and Sedimentologic Framework for the Miocene Monterey Formation, California. Proc., Monterey Formation Seminar and Core Workshop, AAPG Annual Convention, Long Beach, California, 22 April, ed. J. Schwalbach and R. J. Behl, 3–10.
Borstmayer, R., Stegent, N., Wagner, A. et al. 2011. Approach Optimizes Completion Design, Halliburton, http://www.halliburton.com/public/pe/contents/Papers_and_Articles/web/A_through_P/Eagle%20Ford%20%20Approach%20Optimizes%20Completion%20Design.pdf (accessed April 2015).
Brown, D. 2012. The Monterey Shale: Big Deal, or Big Bust? Looking at Its Resource Play Potential. AAPG Explorer, November 2012, http://www.aapg.org/Publications/News/Explorer/Details/ArticleID/2052/The-Monterey-Shale-Big-Deal-or-Big-Bust (accessed January 2016).
Burzlaff, A. A. and Brewster, D. P. 2014. Unconventional Oil From California’s Monterey Formation-Exploitation Results. Presented at the SPE Western North American and Rocky Mountain Joint Meeting, Denver, 17–18 April. SPE-169508-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/169508-MS.
Bybee, K. 2003. Tilt Mapping Shows Complex Fracture Growth in Laterals With Uncemented Liners. J Pet Technol 55 (7): 47–48. SPE-0703-0047-JPT. https://doi.org/10.2118/0703-0047-JPT.
California Council on Science and Technology (CCST). 2014. Advanced Well Stimulation Technologies in California: An Independent Review of Scientific and Technical Information, http://ccst.us/BLMreport (accessed January 2016).
Carroll, R. 2015. Exclusive: California Used 70 million Gallons of Water in Fracking in 2014. Reuters 2 April 2015, http://www.reuters.com/article/uscalifornia-drought-fracking-exclusive-idUSKBN0MU01M20150403 (accessed January 2016).
Carrero-Parreño, A., Onishi, V. C., Salcedo-Díaz, R. et al. 2017. Optimal Pretreatment System of Flowback Water From Shale Gas Production. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 56 (15): 4386–4398. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.6b04016.
Chen, S., Miller, D., Li, L. et al. 2013. Qualitative and Quantitative Information NMR Logging Delivers for Characterization of Unconventional Shale Plays: Case Studies. Presented at the SPWLA 54th Annual Logging Symposium, New Orleans, 22–26 June. SPWLA-2013-Z.
Denney, D. 2012. Fracturing-Fluid Effects on Shale and Proppant Embedment. J Pet Technol 64 (3): 59–61. SPE-0312-0059-JPT. https://doi.org/10.2118/0312-0059-JPT.
Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR). 2015a. Annual Reports of the State Oil & Gas Supervisor, http://www.conservation.ca.gov/dog/pubs_stats/annual_reports/Pages/annual_reports.aspx (accessed January through December 2015).
Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR). 2015b. Brine Chemistry Reports, ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/oil/Chemical_Analysis/District%204/ (accessed 12 July 2018).
Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR). 2016. Online database, http://opi.consrv.ca.gov/opi/opi.dll (accessed March 2015 through April 2016).
Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR). 2017. Online database. https://secure.conservation.ca.gov/WellSearch/ (accessed October through December 2017).
Dong, Z., Holditch, S., McVay, D. et al. 2015. Probabilistic Assessment of World Recoverable Shale-Gas Resources. SPE Econ & Mgmt 7 (2): 72–82. https://doi.org/10.2118/167768-PA.
Duong, A. N. 2010. An Unconventional Rate Decline Approach for Tight and Fracture-Dominated Gas Wells. Presented at the Canadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, 19–21 October. SPE-137748-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/137748-MS.
Easton, J. 2013. Fracking Wastewater Management: Is Centralised Treatment the Way Forward? WaterWorld 28 (5), http://www.waterworld.com/articles/wwi/print/volume-28/issue-5/regional-spotlight-us-caribbean/fracking-wastewater-management.html (accessed December 2017).
El Shaari, N. A., Minner, W. A., and LaFollette, R. F. 2011. Is there a “Silver Bullet Technique” to Stimulating California. Presented at the SPE Western North American Region Meeting, Anchorage, 7–11 May. SPE-144526-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/144526-MS.
Esser, B. K., Beller, H. R., Carroll, S. A. et al. 2015. Recommendations on Model Criteria for Groundwater Sampling, Testing, and Monitoring of Oil and Gas Development in California. Final Report No. LLNL-TR-669645, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, June 2015.
Freyman, M. 2014. Hydraulic Fracturing & Water Stress: Water Demand by the Numbers—Shareholder, Lender & Operator Guide to Water Sourcing. A Ceres (http://www.ceres.org) report, Boston, MA.
Garfield, G. 2001. Formation Damage Control Utilizing Composite-Bridge-Plug Technology for Monobore, Multizone Stimulation Operations. Presented at the SPE Permian Basin Oil and Gas Recovery Conference, Midland, Texas, 15–16 May. SPE-70004-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/70004-MS.
Gamadi, T. D., Sheng, J. J., Soliman, M. Y. et al. 2014. An Experimental Study of Cyclic CO2 Injection to Improve Shale Oil Recovery. Presented at the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 12–16 April. SPE-169142-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/169142-MS.
Ganong, B. L., Hansen, C., Connolly, P. et al. 2003. Rose Field: A Mclure Shale Monterey Formation Development Story. Presented at the SPE Western Regional/AAPG Pacific Section Joint Meeting, Long Beach, California, 19–24 May. SPE-83501-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/83501-MS.
Gautier, D. L. and Scheirer, A. H. 2007. Miocene Total Petroleum System—Southeast Stable Shelf Assessment Unit of the San Joaquin Basin Province. In Petroleum Systems and Geologic Assessment of Oil and Gas in the San Joaquin Basin Province, California, ed. A. H. Scheirer, Chap. 13. Reston, Virginia: US Geological Survey.
Grayson, S., Kamerling, M., Pirie, I. et al. 2015. NMR-Enhanced Natural Fracture Evaluation in the Monterey Shale. Presented at the SPWLA 56th Annual Logging Symposium, Long Beach, California, 18–22 July. SPWLA-2015-MMM.
Halldorson, B. 2013. Successful Oilfield Water Management 5 Unique Case Studies. Oral presentation given at the EPA Technical Workshop–Wastewater Treatment and Related Modeling, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 18 April, https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/documents/halldorson.pdf (accessed December 2017).
Harris, S. and Lee, J. W. 2014. A Study of Decline Curve Analysis in the Elm Coulee Field. Presented at the SPE Unconventional Resources Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 1–3 April. SPE-169018-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/169018-MS.
Hartman, T. 2017. Break-Even Price Rising. Reuters, http://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/rngs/USA-OIL-COST/010031V546Z/index.html (accessed November 2017).
Hughes, D. J. 2013. Drilling California: A Reality Check on the Monterey Shale. Report, Post Carbon Institute and Physicians Scientists & Engineers for Healthy Energy, http://www.postcarbon.org/publications/drilling-california/ (accessed July 2014).
Hughes, D. J. 2016. 2016 Tight Oil Reality Check: Revisiting the US Department of Energy Play-by-Play Forecasts Through 2040 From Annual Energy Outlook 2016. Report, Post Carbon Institute, http://www.postcarbon.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Hughes_2016-Tight-Oil-Reality-Check-2016.pdf (accessed December 2017).
Ilk, D., Curie, S. M., Symmons, D. et al. 2010. Hybrid Rate-Decline Models for Analysis of Production Performance in Unconventional Reservoirs. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Florence, Italy, 19–22 September. SPE-135616-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/135616-MS.
Jin, L., Hawthorne, S., Sorensen, J. et al. 2017. Advancing CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery and Storage in Unconventional Oil Play—Experimental Studies on Bakken Shales. Appl. Energ. 208 (15 December): 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.054.
Jordan, P. D. and Gillespie, J. 2016. Produced Water Disposal Injection in the Southern San Joaquin Valley: No Evidence of Groundwater Quality Effects Due to Upward Leakage. Environ. Geosci. 23 (3): 141–177. https://doi.org/10.1306/eg.10131515012.
Kalra, S., Tian, W., and Wu, X. 2017. A Numerical Simulation Study of CO2 Injection for Enhancing Hydrocarbon Recovery and Sequestration in Liquid-Rich Shales. Pet. Sci. 15 (1): 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-017-0199-5.
Kemp, J. 2017. US Shale Breakeven Price Revealed Around $50. Reuters, 9 August, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-shale-kemp/u-s-shale-breakeven-price-revealed-around-50-kemp-idUSKBN1AP25M (accessed November 2017).
Kondash, A. J., Albright, E., and Vengosh, A. 2017. Quantity of Flowback and Produced Waters From Unconventional Oil and Gas Exploration. Sci. Total Environ. 574 (1 January): 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.069.
LeFever, J. A. 1992. Horizontal Drilling in the Williston Basin, United States, and Canada. In Geological Studies Relevant to Horizontal Drilling: Examples From Western North America: Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists Guidebook, ed. J. W. Schmoker, E. B. Coalson, and C. A. Brown, 177–198. Denver: Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists.
LeFever, J. A. 2008. Isopach of the Bakken Formation. North Dakota Geological Survey Geologic Investigations No. 59, Bakken Map Series: Sheet 1–5.
Leichman, A. K. 2016. Solar-Powered Desalination Cuts Energy Costs by 90%. Israel21c, 17 November, https://www.israel21c.org/solar-powereddesalination-cuts-energy-costs-by-90/ (accessed December 2017).
Li, X., Feng, Z., Han, G. et al. 2016. Breakdown Pressure and Fracture Surface Morphology of Hydraulic Fracturing in Shale With H2O, CO2 and N2. Geomech. Geophys. Geo-Energ. Geo-resour. 2 (2): 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-016-0022-6.
Long, J. C. S., Feinstein, L. C., Birkholzer, J. et al. 2015. An Independent Scientic Assessment of Well Stimulation in California Volume 1 Well Stimulation Technologies and their Past, Present, and Potential Future Use in California. Report, California Council on Science and Technology, Sacramento, California.
Lyons, B. and Tintera, J. J. 2014. Sustainable Water Management in the Texas Oil and Gas Industry. Atlantic Council Energy & Environment Program, http://texasalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Texas-White-Paper-on-sustainable-Water-Management-by-the-Oil-and-Gas-Industry-July-29-2014.pdf (accessed December 2017).
Magoon, L. B., Lillis, P. G., and Peters, K. E. 2007. Total Petroleum Systems Used to Determine Assessment Units in the San Joaquin Basin Province for the 2003 National Oil and Gas Assessment. In US Geologic Survey Professional Paper 1713: Petroleum Systems and Geologic Assessment of Oil and Gas in San Joaquin Basin Province, California, ed. A. H. Scheirer, Chap. 8. Reston, Virginia: US Geological Survey.
Mangha, V. O., Ilk, D., Blasingame, T. A. et al. 2012. Practical Consideration for Decline Curve Analysis in Unconventional Reservoirs—Application of Recently Developed Time-Rate Relationship. Presented at the SPE Hydrocarbon Economics and Evaluation Symposium, Calgary, 24–25 September. SPE-162910-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/162910-MS.
McJannet, G. S. 1996. General Overview of the Elk Hills Field. Presented at the SPE Western Regional Meeting, Anchorage, 22–24 May. SPE-35670-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/35670-MS.
Minner, W. A., Du, J., Ganong, B. L. et al. 2003. Rose Field: Surface Tilt Mapping Shows Complex Fracture Growth in 25000 Laterals Completed With Uncemented Liners. Presented at the SPE Western Regional/AAPG Pacific Section Joint Meeting, Long Beach, California, 19–24 May. SPE-83503-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/83503-MS.
Mistré, M., Crénes, M., and Hafner, M. 2017. Shale Gas Production Costs: Historical Developments and Outlook. Insight Energy, Rapid Response Energy Brief, January 2017, http://www.insightenergy.org/system/publication_files/files/000/000/067/original/RREB_Shale_Gas_final_20170315_
published.pdf?1494419889 (accessed November 2017).
Morea, M. F. 2000. Advanced Reservoir Characterization in the Antelope Shale to Establish the Viability of CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery in California’s Monterey Formation Siliceous Shales. Annual Report DOE/BC/14938-16, US Department of Energy.
Murphy, E. E., Praznik, G., Quirein, J. et al. 2013. A Workflow to Evaluate Mineralogy, Porosity, TOC, and Hydrocarbon Volume in the Eagle Ford Shale. Presented at the SPE Unconventional Resources Conference and Exhibition-Asia Pacific, Brisbane, Australia, 11–13 November. SPE-167012-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/167012-MS.
Nejad, A. M., Sheludko, S., Shelley, R. F. et al. 2015. A Case History: Evaluating Well Completions in Eagle Ford Shale Using a Data-Driven Approach. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 3–5 February. SPE-173336-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/173336-MS.
Peters, K. E., Magoon, L. B., Lampe, C. et al. 2007. A Four Dimensional Petroleum Systems Model for the San Joaquin Basin Province, California. In US Geologic Survey Professional Paper 1713: Petroleum Systems and Geologic Assessment of Oil and Gas in San Joaquin Basin Province, California, ed. A. H. Scheirer, Chap. 12. Reston, Virginia: US Geological Survey.
Pitman, J. K., Price, L. C., and LeFever, J. A. 2001. Diagenesis and Fracture Development in the Bakken Formation, Williston Basin: Implications for Reservoir Quality in the Middle Member. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 1653, Denver, November 2001.
Pope, C. D., Palisch, T., and Saldungaray, P. 2012. Improving Completion and Stimulation Effectiveness in Unconventional Reservoirs—Field Results in The Eagle Ford Shale of North America. Presented at the SPE/EAGE European Unconventional Resources Conference and Exhibition, Vienna, Austria, 20–22 March. SPE-152839-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/152839-MS.
Rowe, G., Hurkmans, R., and Jones, N. 2004. Unlocking the Monterey Shale Potential at Elk Hills: A Case Study. Presented at the SPE International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium and Western Regional Meeting, Bakersfield, California, 16–18 March. SPE-86993-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/86993-MS.
Saini, D. and Mezei, T. 2016. Potential Use of Water Associated With Conventional Oil Production and Sea Water as Base Fluids for Hydraulic Fracturing Operations: Effect of Water Chemistry on Crosslinking and Breaking Behaviors of Guar Gum-Based Fracturing Fluid Formulations. Energ. Environ. Res. 6 (1): 31–43. https://doi.org/10.5539/eer.v6n1p31.
Schamel, S. and Deo, M. 2000. Strategies for Optimal Enhanced Recovery of Heavy Oil by Thermal Methods, Midway-Sunset Field, Southern San Joaquin Basin, California. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, 1–4 October. SPE-63295-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/63295-MS.
Sonnenberg, S. A. 2014. The Upper Bakken Shale Resource Play, Williston Basin. Presented at the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Denver, 25–27 August. URTEC-1918895-MS. https://doi.org/10.15530/URTEC-2014-1918895.
Sieminski, A. 2014. Outlook for US Oil and Gas. Oral presentation given at the IAEE/AEA Meeting, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 4 January, https://www.eia.gov/pressroom/presentations/sieminski_01042014.pdf/ (accessed December 2015).
Tran, T., Sinurat, P. D., and Wattenbarger, B. A. 2011. Production Characteristics of the Bakken Shale Oil. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, 30 October–2 November. SPE-145684-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/145684-MS.
University of North Dakota Energy and Environmental Research Center (UND EERC). 2015. Online Database on Bakken Shale Play: Depositional Environments, http://www.undeerc.org/bakken/depositionalenvironments.aspx (accessed March through May 2015).
University of North Dakota Energy and Environmental Research Center (UND EERC). 2017. NDIC-NDPC Water Factsheet, https://www.undeerc.org/bakken/pdfs/NDIC-NDPC-Water-Fact-Sheet.pdf (accessed December 2017).
US Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2011. Review of Emerging Resources: US Shale Gas and Shale Oil Plays, July 2011, http://www.eia.gov/analysis/studies/usshalegas/pdf/usshaleplays.pdf. (accessed January 2016).
US Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2014a. Tight Oil Production Pushes US Crude Supply to Over 10% of World Total, 26 March 2014, http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=15571 (accessed January 2016).
US Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2014b. Assumptions to the Annual Energy Outlook 2014. US Department of Energy, Washington, DC, June 2014.
US Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2017. Domestic Crude Oil First Purchase Prices for Selected Crude Streams, https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/PET_PRI_DFP2_K_M.htm (accessed December 2017).
US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2015. Analysis of Hydraulic Fracturing Fluid Data From the FracFocus Chemical Disclosure Registry 1. Report No. EPA/601/R-14/003, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, March 2015.
Valko, P. P. and Lee, J. W. (2010). A Better Way to Forecast Production From Unconventional Gas Wells. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Florence, Italy, 19–22 September. SPE-134231-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/134231-MS.
Wanniarachchi, W. A. M., Ranjith, P. G., Perera, M. S. A. et al. 2015. Current Opinions on Foam-Based Hydro-Fracturing in Deep Geological Reservoirs. Geomech. Geophys. Geo-Energ. Geo-Resour. 1 (3): 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-015-0015-x.
Webster, R. L. 1984. Petroleum Source Rocks and Stratigraphy of the Bakken Formation in North Dakota. In Hydrocarbon Source Rocks of the Greater Rocky Mountain Region, ed. J. Woodward, F. F. Meissner, and J. C. Clayton, 57–81. Denver: Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists.
WSPA. 2017. Setting the Record Straight: Water and Hydraulic Fracturing in California, https://www.wspa.org/resources/setting-the-record-straightwater-and-hydraulic-fracturing-in-california/ (accessed 12 July 2018).
Zander, D. M., Czehura, M. P., and, Seale, R. A. 2010. Horizontal Drilling and Completion Optimization in a North Dakota Bakken Oilfield. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Florence, Italy, 19–22 September. SPE-135195-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/1351950-MS.