Modeling the Interaction Between Natural and Hydraulic Fractures Using 3D Finite-Element Analysis
- Aditya Nikam (University of Alaska, Fairbanks) | Obadare O. Awoleke (University of Alaska, Fairbanks) | Mohabbat Ahmadi (University of Alaska, Fairbanks)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Production & Operations
- Publication Date
- November 2019
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 703 - 724
- 2019.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- natural fracture, finite element analysis, hydraulic fracture
- 6 in the last 30 days
- 180 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
We built a 3D geomechanical model using commercially available finite-element-analysis (FEA) software to simulate a propagating hydraulic fracture (HF) and its interaction with a vertical natural fracture (NF) in a tight medium. These newly introduced elements have the ability to model the fluid continuity at an HF/NF intersection, the main area of concern.
We observed that, for a high-stress-contrast scenario, the NF cohesive elements showed less damage when compared with the low-stress- contrast case. Also, for the scenario of high stress contrast with principal horizontal stresses reversed, the HF intersected, activated, and opened the NF. Increasing the injection rate resulted in a longer and wider HF but did not significantly affect the NF-activated length. Injection-fluid viscosity displayed an inverse relationship with the HF length and a proportional relationship with the HF opening or width. We observed that a weak NF plane temporarily restricts the HF propagation. On the other hand, a tougher NF, or an NF with properties similar to its surroundings, does not show this type of restriction. The NF activated length was found at its maximum in the case of a weaker NF and at nearly zero in the case of a stronger NF and an NF that has strength similar to its surroundings.
In this study we present the results for a three-layered 3D geomechanical model with a single HF and NF orthogonally intersecting each other, using newly introduced cohesive elements for the first time in technical literature. We also conducted a detailed sensitivity analysis considering the effect of stress contrast, injection rate, injection-fluid viscosity, and NF properties on this HF/NF interaction. These results provide an idea of how the idealized resultant fracture geometry will change when several fracture/fracture treatment properties are varied.
|File Size||3 MB||Number of Pages||22|
Abbas, S., Gordeliy, E., Peirce, A. et al. 2014. Limited Height Growth and Reduced Opening of Hydraulic Fractures Due to Fracture Offsets: An XFEM Application. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 4–6 February. SPE-168622-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/168622-MS.
Aimene, Y. E. and Nairn, J. A. 2014. Modeling Multiple Hydraulic Fractures Interacting With Natural Fractures Using the Material Point Method. Presented at the SPE/EAGE European Unconventional Resources Conference and Exhibition, Vienna, Austria, 25–27 February. SPE-167801-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/167801-MS.
Barree, R. D. and Mukherjee, H. 1996. Determination of Pressure Dependent Leakoff and Its Effect on Fracture Geometry. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, 6–9 October. SPE-36424-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/36424-MS.
Ben, Y., Miao, Q., Wang, Y. et al. 2012. Effect of Natural Fractures on Hydraulic Fracturing. Presented at the ISRM Regional Symposium–7th Asian Rock Mechanics Symposium, Seoul, Korea, 15–19 October. ISRM-ARMS7-2012-087.
Benzeggah, M. L. and Kennane, M. 1996. Measurement of Mixed-Mode Delamination Fracture Toughness of Unidirectional Glass/Epoxy Composites With Mixed-Mode Bending Apparatus. Compos Sci Technol 56: 439–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-3538(96)00005-X.
Blanton, T. L. 1982. An Experimental Study of Interaction Between Hydraulically Induced and Pre-Existing Fractures. Presented at the SPE Unconventional Gas Recovery Symposium, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 16–18 May. SPE-10847-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/10847-MS.
Chuprakov, D. A., Akulich, A. V., Siebrits, E. et al. 2011. Hydraulic-Fracture Propagation in a Naturally Fractured Reservoir. SPE Prod & Oper 26 (1): 88–97. SPE-128715-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/128715-PA.
Chuprakov, D., Melchaeva, O., and Prioul, R. 2013. Hydraulic Fracture Propagation Across a Weak Discontinuity Controlled by Fluid Injection. Presented at the ISRM International Conference for Effective and Sustainable Hydraulic Fracturing, Brisbane, Australia, 20–22 May. ISRM-ICHF-2013-008.
COMSOL Multiphysics is a registered trademark of Comsol AB, Tegnergatan 23 SE-111 40, Stockholm, Sweden. https://www.comsol.com/release/5.4.
Dahi Taleghani, A.. 2009. Analysis of Hydraulic Fracture Propagation in Fractured Reservoirs: An Improved Model for Interaction Between Induced and Natural Fractures. PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin, Texas (May 2009).
Dahi Taleghani, A. and Olson, J. E. 2014. How Natural Fractures Could Affect Hydraulic-Fracture Geometry. SPE J. 19 (1): 161–171. SPE-167608-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/167608-PA.
Fisher, M. K., Wright, C. A., Davidson, B. M. et al. 2002. Integrating Fracture Mapping Technologies To Optimize Stimulations in the Barnett Shale. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 29 September–2 October 2002. SPE-77441-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/77441-MS.
Fu, P., Cruz, L., Moos, D. et al. 2015. Numerical Investigation of a Hydraulic Fracture Bypassing a Natural Fracture in 3D. Presented at the 49th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geotechnics Symposium, San Francisco, 28 June–1 July. ARMA-2015-671.
Fu, P., Johnson, S. M., and Carrigan, C. R. 2011. Simulating Complex Fracture Systems in Geothermal Reservoirs Using an Explicitly Coupled Hydro Geomechanical Model. Presented at the 45th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, San Francisco, 26–29 June. ARMA-11-244.
Gong, B., Qin, G., Towler, B. F. et al. 2011. Discrete Modeling of Natural and Hydraulic Fractures in Shale-Gas Reservoirs. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, 30 October–2 November. SPE-146842-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/146842-MS.
Gonzalez-Chavez, M., Puyang, P., and Dahi Taleghani, A. 2015. From Semi-Circular Bending Test to Micro Seismic Maps: An Integrated Modeling Approach To Incorporate Natural Fracture Effects on Hydraulic Fracturing. Presented at the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, San Antonio, Texas, 20–22 July. SPE-178544-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/178544-MS.
Gu, H., Weng, X., Lund, J. B. et al. 2011. Hydraulic Fracture Crossing Natural Fracture at Non-Orthogonal Angles, a Criterion, Its Validation and Applications. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 24–26 January. SPE-139984-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/139984-MS.
Haddad, M. and Sepehrnoori, K. 2014. Simulation of Multiple-Stage Fracturing in Quasibrittle Shale Formations Using Pore Pressure Cohesive Zone Model. Presented at the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Denver, 25–27 August. URTEC-1922219-MS. https://doi.org/10.15530/
Haddad, M. and Sepehrnoori, K. 2015. XFEM-Based CZM for the Simulation of 3D Multiple-Stage Hydraulic Fracturing in Quasi-Brittle Shale Formations. Presented at the AADE National Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 8–9 April 2015. AADE-15-NTCE-28.
He, M. Y. and Hutchinson, J. W. 1989. Crack Deflection at an Interface Between Dissimilar Elastic Materials. Int J Solids Struct 25 (9): 1053–1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(89)90021-8.
Jeffrey, R. G., Zhang, X., and Thiercelin, M. J. 2009. Hydraulic Fracture Offsetting in Naturally Fractures Reservoirs: Quantifying a Long-Recognized Process. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 19–21 January. SPE-119351-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/119351-MS.
Koshelev, V. and Ghassemi, A. 2003. Numerical Modeling of Stress Distribution and Crack Trajectory Near a Fault or a Natural Fracture. Proc., Soil and Rock America, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 22–26 June, H0129C, 931–935.
Kresse, O. and Weng, X. 2013. Hydraulic Fracturing in Formations With Permeable Natural Fractures. Presented at the ISRM International Conference for Effective and Sustainable Hydraulic Fracturing, Brisbane, Australia, 20–22 May. ISRM-ICHF-2013-028.
Lancaster, D. E., McKetta, S. F., Hill, R. E. et al. 1992. Reservoir Evaluation, Completion Techniques, and Recent Results From Barnett Shale Development in the Fort Worth Basin. Presented at the Offshore Technology Conference–Asia, Kuala Lumpur, 25–28 March. SPE-24884-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/24884-MS.
Lu, C., Li, M., Guo, J.-C. et al. 2015. Engineering Geological Characteristics and the Hydraulic Fracture Propagation Mechanism of the Sand-Shale Interbedded Formation in the Xu5 Reservoir. J Geophys Eng 12 (3): 321–339. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2132/12/3/321.
Meng, C. and De Pater, H. J. 2011. Hydraulic Fracture Propagation in Pre-Fractured Natural Rocks. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 24–26 January. SPE-140429-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/140429-MS.
Moës, N., Dolbow, J., and Belytschko, T. 1999. A Finite Element Method for Crack Growth Without Remeshing. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng 46 (1): 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990910)46:1<131::AID-NME726>3.0.CO;2-J.
Mukherjee, H., Larkin, S., and Kordziel, W. 1991. Extension of Fracture Pressure Decline Curve Analysis to Fissured Formations. Presented at the Low Permeability Reservoirs Symposium, Denver, 15–17 April. SPE-21872-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/21872-MS.
Nagel, N. B., Gil, I., Sanchez-Nagel, M. et al. 2011. Simulating Hydraulic Fracturing in Real Fractured Rocks—Overcoming the Limits of Pseudo3D Models. Presented at SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 24–26 January. SPE-140480-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/140480-MS.
Nagel, N. B., Sanchez-Nagel, M., Lee, B. et al. 2012. Hydraulic Fracturing Optimization for Unconventional Reservoirs—The Critical Role of the Mechanical Properties of the Natural Fracture Network. Presented at SPE Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, 30 October–1 November. SPE-161934-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/161934-MS.
Nolte, K. G. 1991. Fracturing-Pressure Analysis for Nonideal Behavior. J Pet Technol 43 (2): 210–218. SPE-20704-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/20704-PA.
Offenberger, R., Ball, N., Kanneganti, K. et al. 2013. Integration of Natural and Hydraulic Fracture Network Modeling With Reservoir Simulation for an Eagle Ford Well. Presented at the SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Denver, 12–14 August. URTEC-1563066-MS. https://doi.org/10.1190/URTEC2013-049.
Oussoltsev, D., Offenberger, R. M., Kanneganti, K. T. et al. 2013. Application of Reservoir-Centric Stimulation Design Tool in Completion Optimization for Eagle Ford Shale. Presented at the SPE Unconventional Resources Conference-USA, The Woodlands, Texas, 10–12 April. SPE-164526-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/164526-MS.
Searles, K. H., Zielonka, M. G., Ning, J. et al. 2016. Fully Coupled 3D Hydraulic Fracture Models: Development, Validation, and Application to O&G Problems. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 9–11 February. SPE-179121-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/179121-MS.
Sesetty, V. and Ghassemi, A. 2012. Simulation of Hydraulic Fractures and Their Interactions With Natural Fractures. Presented at the 46th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Chicago, Illinois, 24–27 June. ARMA-2012-331.
Shin, D. H. and Sharma, M. M. 2014. Factors Controlling the Simultaneous Propagation of Multiple Competing Fractures in a Horizontal Well. Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 4–6 February. SPE-168599-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/168599-MS.
Suarez-Rivera, R., Burghardt, J., Edelman, E. et al. 2013. Geomechanics Considerations for Hydraulic Fracture Productivity. Presented at the 47th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, San Francisco, 23–26 June. ARMA-2013-666.
Walsh, J. B. 1981. Effect of Pore Pressure and Confining Pressure on Fracture Permeability. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 18 (5): 429–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(81)90006-1.
Warpinski, N. R. 1991. Hydraulic Fracturing in Tight, Fissured Media. J Pet Technol 43 (2): 146–209. SPE-20154-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/20154-PA.
Warpinski, N. R. and Teufel, L. W. 1987. Influence of Geologic Discontinuities on Hydraulic Fracture Propagation. J Pet Technol 39 (2): 209–220. SPE-13224-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/13224-PA.
Weng, X., Kresse, O., Cohen, C.-E. et al. 2011. Modeling of Hydraulic-Fracture-Network Propagation in a Naturally Fractured Formation. SPE Prod & Oper 26 (1): 368–380. SPE-140253-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/140253-PA.
Yadav, H. 2011. Hydraulic Fracturing in Naturally Fractured Reservoirs and the Impact of Geomechanics on Micro Seismicity. MS thesis, University of Texas, Austin, Texas (December 2011).
Zhang, X. and Jeffrey, R. G. 2006. The Role of Friction and Secondary Flaws on Deflection and Re-Initiation of Hydraulic Fractures at Orthogonal Pre-Existing Fractures. Geophys J Int 166 (3): 1454–1465. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03062.x.
Zielonka, M. G., Searles, K. H., Ning, J. et al. 2014. Development and Validation of Fully Coupled Hydraulic Fracturing Simulation Capabilities. Presented at the SIMULIA Community Conference, Providence, Rhode Island, 20 May.