Asphaltene-Prevention Work Flow Enhances Oil Production in High-Temperature Fractured Carbonate Reservoirs
- Roger Ortiz (PEMEX) | Carlos Perez (PEMEX) | Obed Sánchez (Schlumberger) | Umut Aybar (Schlumberger) | Fernanda Tellez (Schlumberger) | Luis Mujica (Schlumberger) | Juan Aguilar (Schlumberger) | Antonio Andrade (Schlumberger) | Tadeo Resendiz (Schlumberger) | Luis Camarillo (Schlumberger) | Mario Thompson (PEMEX)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Production & Operations
- Publication Date
- November 2017
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 476 - 490
- 2017.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Fractured, Carbonate, Asphaltene, Prevention Workflow, High Temperature
- 1 in the last 30 days
- 297 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Asphaltene precipitation is a common phenomenon in mature reservoirs that seriously impairs oil production. In high-temperature (HT) fractured carbonate reservoirs, the situation becomes critical when asphaltene precipitates at reservoir conditions, blocking the production channels and starting a cycle of production decline in which additional pressure drop increases the precipitation of the asphaltene fraction. Therefore, it is essential to make an early diagnosis of the problem and deliver an optimal solution to avoid further production decrease.
A proper diagnosis regarding the point of precipitation along the production path requires a complete analysis of the well’s production behavior and reservoir characteristics. To avoid asphaltene precipitation inside the rock matrix, different methods can be applied: maintaining reservoir pressure above the asphaltene-onset pressure, avoiding coproduction of incompatible reservoir fluids, adjusting artificial-lift conditions, or injecting solvents with inhibitors or dispersants. In two mature fields in southern Mexico that have been producing since 1995, an operator needed to determine where the asphaltene precipitation was occurring. An integrated diagnosis work flow was instrumented that included the creation and analysis of the asphaltene-phase envelope plus an asphaltene-onset screening test by use of a solids-detection system (SDS).
After coupling screening results with a pressure/temperature flowing survey, it was identified that asphaltene precipitation occurred inside the reservoir when the bottomhole flowing pressure dropped below a critical level. To address the organic deposits and unstable pressure behavior successfully, asphaltene-precipitation characterization was essential. In some cases, a decrease in oil production after executing unsuccessful matrix-cleanup treatments with solvents results from a misdiagnosis of organic precipitation or a lack of knowledge about flocculation and precipitation causes. To avoid this problem, a new methodology for the inhibition-treatment design was added to the diagnosis work flow; this methodology includes a new adsorption-type asphaltene inhibitor as part of the matrix-cleanup treatment. As a result of this diagnostic-solution work flow, an optimum bullheaded inhibition treatment was determined and applied to the candidate wells. In all study cases, the time lapse between inhibition treatments was extended by 60 days on average, resulting in steadier oil flow rates plus significant reduction in well intervention and deferred production costs. In addition, the post-treatment results showed that, in 50% of the documented interventions, the inhibitor treatment improved overall production performance by at least 10%.
The systematic engineering work flow presented in this paper includes the diagnostic procedure, data from laboratory testing, chemical selection, and treatment application. Subsequent treatment results enhanced the field operator’s understanding of asphaltene precipitation in the formation matrix and provided more insight into maximizing oil production with specialized technology solutions that used a novel adsorption-type asphaltene inhibitor.
|File Size||2 MB||Number of Pages||15|
ASTM D96-88 Standard Test Methods for Water and Sediment in Crude Oil by Centrifuge Method (Field Procedure). 1988. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA: ASTM International.
ASTM D287-92 Standard Test Method for API Gravity of Crude Petroleum and Petroleum Products (Hydrometer Method). 1992. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA: ASTM International.
ASTM D512-04 Standard Test Methods for Chloride Ion in Water. 2004. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA: ASTM International.
ASTM D1429-03 Standard Test Methods for Specific Gravity of Water and Brine. 2003. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA: ASTM International.
ASTM D3279-97 Standard Test Method for n-Heptane Insolubles. 1997. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA: ASTM International.
ASTM UOP46-85 Paraffin Wax Content of Petroleum Oils and Asphaltene. 1985. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA: ASTM International.
Civan, F. 1995. Modeling and Simulation of Formation Damage by Organic Precipitation. Proc., the First International Symposium in Colloid Chemistry in Oil Production: Asphaltenes and Wax Precipitation, JSCOP’95: 26–29.
De Boer, R. B. and Leerlooyer, K. 1995. Screening of Crude Oils for Asphalt Precipitation: Theory, Practice, and Selection of Inhibitors. SPE Prod & Fac 10 (1): 55–61. SPE-24987-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/24987-PA.
Jordan, M. M., Sorbie, K. S., Graham, G. M. et al. 1996. The Correct Selection and Application Methods for Adsorption and Precipitation Scale Inhibitors for Squeeze Treatments in North Sea Oilfields. Presented at the SPE Formation Damage Control Symposium, Lafayette, Louisiana, USA, 14–15 February. SPE-31125-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/31125-MS.
Kokal, S. L. and Sayegh, S. G. 1995. Asphaltenes: The Cholesterol of Petroleum. Presented at the SPE Middle East Oil Show, Bahrain, 11–14 March. SPE-29787-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/29787-MS.
Moreno-Arciniegas, L. and Babadagli, T. 2014. Optimal Application Conditions of Solvent Injection Into Oil Sands to Minimize the Effect of Asphaltene Precipitation: An Experimental Investigation. SPE Res Eval & Eng 17 (4): 530–546. SPE-165531-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/165531-PA.
Nghiem, L. X. and Coombe, D. A. 1997. Modelling Asphaltene Precipitation During Primary Depletion. SPE J. 2 (6): 170–176. SPE-36106-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/36106-PA.
Speight, J. G. and Long, R. B. 1996. The Concept of Asphaltenes Revisited. Fuel Science and Technology International 14 (1–2): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/08843759608947559.
Thomas, D. C., Becker, H. L., and Del Real Soria, R. A. 1995. Controlling Asphaltene Deposition in Oil Wells. SPE Prod & Fac 10 (2): 119–123. SPE-25483-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/25483-PA.