Intelligent Tool To Design Drilling, Spacer, Cement Slurry, and Fracturing Fluids by Use of Machine-Learning Algorithms
- Arash Shadravan (ReservoirFocus) | Mohammadali Tarrahi (Shell) | Mahmood Amani (Texas A&M University at Qatar)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Drilling & Completion
- Publication Date
- June 2017
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 131 - 140
- 2017.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Spacer , Zonal Isolation, Machine Learning , Drilling fluids, Cement Slurry
- 2 in the last 30 days
- 573 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 5.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Design of drilling fluids, spacers, cement slurries, and fracturing fluids is often done by trial and error in the laboratory. In the first step, the required properties of these fluids are categorized and then efforts will be started with a rough idea of the optimal composition. This first guess usually depends on the experience of the laboratory analyst or fluid engineer. Afterward, the trial-and-error testing starts, and it continues until the fluid design moves closer to the desired fluid criteria. There are several test data that would not be used in this method, and it is difficult to digest a large amount of information by the user. Trial and error could be time-consuming, very costly, and misleading. Today, there is a need for an intelligent system that uses all the available data (big data), even if the data sets are not close to the desired goal, and offers insights for fluid designs.
This paper conducted a study on the application of machine-learning-based methodologies, including Gaussian-process regression (GPR) and artificial neural networks (ANNs), to reduce the costs of testing, integrate available experimental data, and eliminate the need for personnel supervision. These practical nonlinear-regression methods empower efficient and fast prediction tools that do not require including complex physics of the underlying system while integrating all available data from different sources. GPR, which is also known as Kriging in geostatistics literature, has exceptional advantages over traditional regression methods because it does not require a known form for regression function and also has the capability of determining the estimation error and the confidence interval. This machine-learning-based tool offers insights for intelligent fluid design and could reduce costs.
|File Size||959 KB||Number of Pages||10|
Amani, M., Al-Jubouri, M., and Shadravan, A. 2012. Comparative Study of Using Oil-Based Mud Versus Water-Based Mud in HPHT Fields. Adv. Petrol. Explor. Develop. 4 (2): 18–27. https://doi.org/10.3968/j.aped.1925543820120402.987.
Bishop, C. M. 2006. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. New York City: Springer.
Bland, R. G., Clapper, D. K., Fleming, N. M. et al. 1993. Biodegradation and Drilling Fluid Chemicals. Presented at the SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Amsterdam, 22–25 February. SPE-25754-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/25754-MS.
Cao, Q., Banerjee, R., Gupta, S. et al. 2016. Data Driven Production Forecasting Using Machine Learning. Presented at the SPE Argentina Exploration and Production of Unconventional Resources Symposium, Buenos Aires, 1–3 June. SPE-180984-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/180984-MS
D’Orangeville, C. and Lasenby, A. N. 2003. Geometric Algebra for Physicists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Deutsch, C. V. and Journel, A. G. 1992. Geostatistical Software Library and User’s Guide. New York City: Oxford University Press.
Diarra, R., Carrasquilla, J., Phelan, D. et al. 2016. New Approach In Lifting Cement In Highly Depleted And Naturally Fractured Formations. Presented at the IADC/SPE Drilling Conference and Exhibition, Fort Worth, Texas, 1–3 March. SPE-178772-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/178772-MS
Duda, R. O., Hart, P. E., and Stork, D. G. 2012. Pattern Classification. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Gidh, Y. K., Purwanto, A., and Ibrahim, H. 2012. Artificial Neural Network Drilling Parameter Optimization System Improves ROP by Predicting/Managing Bit Wear. Presented at the SPE Intelligent Energy International, Ultrecht, The Netherlands, 27–29 March. SPE-149801-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/149801-MS.
Hawkins, D. M. 2004. The Problem of Overfitting. J. Chem. Inf. Comp. Sci. 44 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci0342472.
Journel, A. G. and Huijbregts, C. J. 1978. Mining Geostatistics, London: Academic Press.
Lee, J., Shadravan, A., and Young, S. 2012. Rheological Properties of Invert Emulsion Drilling Fluid Under Extreme HPHT Conditions. Presented at the IADC/SPE Drilling Conference and Exhibition, San Diego, California, 6–8 March. SPE-151413-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/151413-MS.
Mijnarends, R., Frolov, A., Grishko, F. et al. 2015. Advanced Data-Driven Performance Analysis For Mature Waterfloods. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 28–30 September. SPE-174872-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/174872-MS.
Osman, E. A. and Aggour, M. A. 2003. Determination of Drilling Mud Density Change with Pressure and Temperature Made Simple and Accurate by ANN. Presented at the Middle East Oil Show, Bahrain, 9–12 June. SPE-81422-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/81422-MS.
Rafieisakhaei, M., Barazandeh, B., and Tarrahi, M. 2016a. Analysis of Supply and Demand Dynamics to Predict Oil Market Trends: A Case Study of 2015 Price Data. Presented at the SPE/IAEE Hydrocarbon Economics and Evaluation Symposium, Houston, 17–18 May. SPE-179976-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/179976-MS.
Rafieisakhaei, M., Barazandeh, B., Moosavi, A. et al. 2016b. Modeling Dynamics of the Carbon Market: A System Dynamics Approach on the CO2 Emissions and its Connections to the Oil Market. Oral presentation given at the 34rd International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Delft, The Netherlands, 17–21 July.
Rasmussen, C. E. and Williams, C. K. I. 2006. Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Schakel, M. D. and Mesdag, P. R. 2014. Fully Data-Driven Quantitative Reservoir Characterization by Broadband Seismic. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2014: 2502–2506. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2014-0671.1.
Shadravan, A. and Amani, M. 2012. HPHT 101: What Every Engineer or Geoscientist Should Know about High Pressure High Temperature Wells. Presented at the SPE Kuwait International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition, Kuwait City, Kuwait, 10–12 December. SPE-163376-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/163376-MS.
Shadravan, A. and Tarrahi, M. 2016. Machine Learning Leads Cost Effective Intelligent Fluid Design: Fluid Engineering Perspective. Presented at the SPE Bergen One Day Seminar, Bergen, Norway, 20 April. SPE-180033-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/180033-MS.
Shadravan, A., Narvaez, G., Alegria, A. et al. 2015a. Engineering the Mud-Spacer-Cement Rheological Hierarchy Improves Wellbore Integrity. Presented at the SPE E&P Health, Safety, Security and Environmental Conference-Americas, Denver, 16–18 March. SPE-173534-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/173534-MS.
Shadravan, A., Tarrahi, M., and Amani, M. 2015b. Intelligent Cement Design: Utilizing Machine Learning Algorithms to Assure Effective Long-term Well Integrity. Presented at the Carbon Management Technology Conference, Sugar Land, Texas, 17–19 November. CMTC-440236-MS. https://doi.org/10.7122/440236-MS.
Shadravan, A., Tarrahi, M., and Amani, M. 2016. Agile Data-Driven Fluid Design: Predicting the Properties of Drilling, Spacer and Cement Slurry Fluids. Oral presentation given at the 2016 AADE Fluids Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 12–13 April. AADE-16-FTCE-07.
Shi, J. Q. and Choi, T. 2011. Gaussian Process Regression Analysis for Functional Data. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.
Subrahmanya, N., Xu, P., El-Bakry, A. et al. 2014. Advanced Machine Learning Methods for Production Data Pattern Recognition. Presented at the SPE Intelligent Energy Conference and Exhibition, Ultrecht, The Netherlands, 1–3 April. SPE-167839-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/167839-MS.
Tarrahi, M. and Shadravan, A. 2016a. Inverse Modeling for Fluid System Characterization through Machine Learning Algorithms. Presented at the SPE Bergen One Day Seminar, Bergen, Norway, 20 April. SPE-180034-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/180034-MS.
Tarrahi, M. and Shadravan, A. 2016b. Advanced Big Data Analytics Improves HSE Management. Presented at the SPE Bergen One Day Seminar, Bergen, Norway, 20 April. SPE-180032-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/180032-MS.
Tarrahi, M., Jafarpour, B., and Ghassemi, A. 2013. Assimilation of Microseismic Data into Coupled Flow and Geomechanical Reservoir Models with Ensemble Kalman Filter. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 30 September–2 October. SPE-166510-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/166510-MS.
Tarrahi, M., Jafarpour, B., and Ghassemi, A. 2015. Integration of Microseismic Monitoring Data Into Coupled Flow and Geomechanical Models With Ensemble Kalman Filter. Water Resour. Res. 51 (7): 5177–5197. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016264.
Theodoridis, S., Pikrakis, A., Koutroumbas, K. et al. 2010. Introduction to Pattern Recognition: A Matlab Approach. Burlington, Massachusetts: Academic Press. Williams, C. K. and Rasmussen, C. E. 2006. Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.