Flowback Fracture Closure: A Key Factor for Estimating Effective Pore Volume
- Obinna Ezulike (University of Alberta) | Hassan Dehghanpour (University of Alberta) | Claudio Virues (Nexen ULC) | Robert V. Hawkes (Trican Well Service Ltd) | R. Steven Jones Jr. (Newfield Exploration)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- October 2016
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 567 - 582
- 2016.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Probabilistic uncertainty reduction, Fracture closure effects, Two Phase Flowback Tank Model, Fracture geometry independent estimates, Representative effective fracture pore-volume
- 4 in the last 30 days
- 644 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
The importance of evaluating well productivity after hydraulic fracturing cannot be overemphasized. This has necessitated the improvement in the quality of rate and pressure measurements during flowback of multistage-fractured wells. Similarly, there have been corresponding improvements in the ability of existing transient models to interpret multiphase flowback data. However, the complexity of these models introduces high uncertainty in the estimates of resulting parameters, such as fracture pore volume (PV), half-length, and permeability. This paper proposes a two-phase tank model for reducing parameter uncertainty and estimating fracture PV independent of fracture geometry. This study starts by use of rate-normalized-pressure (RNP) plots to observe changes in fluid-flow mechanisms from multistage- fractured wells. The fracture “pressure-supercharge” observations form the basis for developing the proposed two-phase tank model. This model is a linear relationship between RNP and time, useful for interpreting flowback data in wells that show pseudosteady-state behavior (unit slope on log-log RNP plots). The linear relationship is implemented on a simple Monte Carlo spreadsheet. This is then used to estimate and conduct uncertainty analysis on effective fracture PV by use of probabilistic distributions of average fracture compressibility and gas/water saturations. Also, the proposed model investigates the contributions of various drive mechanisms during flowback (fracture closure, gas expansion, and water depletion) by use of quantitative drive indices similar to those used in conventional reservoir engineering. Application of the proposed tank model to flowback data from 15 shale-gas and tight-oil wells estimates the effective fracture PV and initial average gas saturation in the active fracture network. The results show that fracture-PV estimation is most sensitive to fracture closure compared with gas expansion and water depletion, making fracture closure the primary drive mechanism during early-flowback periods. Also, the initial average gas saturation for all wells is less than 20%. The parameters estimated from the proposed model could be used as input guides for more-complex studies (such as discrete-fracture-network modeling and transient-flowback simulation). This reduces the number of unknown parameters and uncertainty in output results from complex models.
|File Size||840 KB||Number of Pages||16|
Abbasi, M. A., Ezulike, D. O., Dehghanpour, H. et al. 2014. A Comparative Study of Flowback Rate and Pressure Transient Behavior in Multifractured Horizontal Wells Completed in Tight Gas and Oil Reservoirs. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 17 (March): 82–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2013.12.007.
Adefidipe, O. A., Dehghanpour, H. and Virues, C. J. 2014. Immediate Gas Production from Shale Gas Wells: A Two-Phase Flowback Model. Presented at the SPE Unconventional Resources Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 1–3 April. SPE-168982-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/168982-MS.
Alkouh, A., McKetta, S. and Wattenbarger, R. A. 2014. Estimation of Effective-Fracture Volume Using Water-Flowback and Production Data for Shale-Gas Wells. J Can Pet Technol 53 (5): 290–303. SPE-166279-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/166279-PA.
Almulhim, A., Alharthy, N., Tutuncu, A. N. et al. 2014. Impact of Imbibition Mechanism on Flowback Behavior: A Numerical Study. Presented at the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, 10–13 November. SPE-171799-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/171799-MS.
Bello, R. and Wattenbarger, R. A. 2010. Multi-Stage Hydraulically Fractured Horizontal Shale Gas Well Rate Transient Analysis. Presented at the SPE North Africa Technical Conference and Exhibition, Cairo, 14–17 February. SPE-126754-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/126754-MS.
Cheng, Y. 2012. Impact of Water Dynamics in Fractures on the Performance of Hydraulically Fractured Wells in Gas-Shale Reservoirs. J Can Pet Technol 51 (2): 143–151. SPE-127863-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/127863-PA.
Clarkson, C. R. 2012. Modeling 2-Phase Flowback of Multi-FracturedHorizontal Wells Completed in Shale. Presented at the SPE Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, 30 October–1 November. SPE-162593-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/162593-MS.
Clarkson, C. R. and McGovern, J. M. 2005. Optimization of CBM Reservoir Exploration and Development Strategies through Integration of Simulation and Economics. SPE Res Eval & Eng 8 (6): 502–519. SPE-88843-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/88843-PA.
Clarkson, C. R. and Williams-Kovacs, J. 2013. Modeling Two-Phase Flowback of Multifractured Horizontal Wells Completed in Shale. SPE J. 18 (4): 795–812. SPE-162593-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/162593-PA.
Crafton, J. W. 1998. Well Evaluation Using Early Time Post-Stimulation Flowback Data. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 27–30 September. SPE-49223-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/49223-MS.
Crafton, J. W. and Gunderson, D. W. 2006. Use of Extremely High Time-Resolution Production Data to Characterize Hydraulic Fracture Properties. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 24–27 September. SPE-103591-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/103591-MS.
Crafton, J. W. and Gunderson, D. W. 2007. Stimulation Flowback Management – Keeping a Good Completion Good. Society of Petroleum Engineers. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Anaheim, California, 11–14 November. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/110851-MS.
Ezulike, D. O. and Dehghanpour, H. 2014a. Modelling Flowback as a Transient Two-Phase Depletion Process. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 19 (July): 258–278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2014.05.004.
Ezulike, D. O. and Dehghanpour, H. 2014b. A Workflow for Flowback Data Analysis – Creating Value out of Chaos. Presented at the SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Denver, 25–27 August. SPE-2014-1922047-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.15530/urtec-2014-1922047.
Ezulike, D. O. and Dehghanpour, H. 2015. A Complementary Approach for Uncertainty Reduction in Post-Flowback Production Data Analysis. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 27, 2 (November): 1074–1091. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2015.09.059.
Ezulike, D. O., Dehghanpour, H. and Hawkes, R. V. 2013. Understanding Flowback as a Transient 2-Phase Displacement Process: An Extension of the Linear Dual-Porosity Model. Presented at the SPE Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, 5–7 November. SPE-167164-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/167164-MS.
Ghanbari, E. and Dehghanpour, H. 2016. The Fate of Fracturing Water. A Field and Simulation Study, Fuel. 163 (January): 282–294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.09.040.
IHS Harmony. 2016. Software. http://fekete.com/SAN/WebHelp/Piper/WebHelp/c-gs-EOS.htm (accessed 10 May 2016).
Jones, R. S. Jr., Pownall, B. and Franke, J. 2014. Estimating Reservoir Pressure from Early Flowback Data. Presented at the SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Denver, 25–27 August. SPE-2014-1934785-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.15530/urtec-2014-1934785.
Li, C., Lafollette, R., Sookprasong, A. et al. 2013. Characterization of Hydraulic Fracture Geometry in Shale Gas Reservoirs Using Early Production Data. Presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Beijing, 26–28 March. IPTC-16896-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2523/16896-MS.
Newman, G. H. 1973. Pore-Volume Compressibility of Consolidated, Friable, and Unconsolidated Reservoir Rocks Under Hydrostatic Loading. J Pet Technol 25 (2): 129–134. SPE-3835-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/3835-PA.
Sawabini, C. T., Chilingar, G. V. and Allen, D. R. 1974. Compressibility of Unconsolidated, Arkosic Oil Sands. SPE J. 14 (2): 132–138. SPE-4058-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/4058-PA.
Virues, C., Chin, A., Turko, F. et al. 2013. Application of Rate Transient Analysis Workflow in Unconventional Reservoirs: Horn River Shale Gas Case Study. Presented at the SPE Unconventional Resources Conference amd Exhibition, Brisbane, Australia, 11–13 November. SPE-167042-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/167042-MS.
Williams-Kovacs, J. D. and Clarkson, C. R. 2013. Stochastic Modeling of Multi-Phase Flowback from Multi-Fractured Horizontal Tight Oil Wells. Presented at the SPE Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, 5–7 November. SPE-167232-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/167232-MS.
Xu, Y., Adefidipe, O. A. and Dehghanpour, H. 2015. Estimating Fracture Volume Using Flowback Data from the Horn River Basin: A Material Balance Approach. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 25 (July): 253–270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2015.04.036.
Zhou, Q., Dilmore, R., Kleit, A. et al. 2016. Evaluating Fracture-Fluid Flowback in Marcellus Using Data-Mining Technologies. SPE Prod & Oper SPE-173364-PA (in press; posted February 2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/173364-PA.
Zolfaghari, A., Dehghanpour, H., Ghanbari, E. et al. 2016. Fracture Characterization Using Flowback Salt-Concentration Transient. SPE J. 21 (1): 233–244. SPE-168598-PA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/168598-PA.