Enhanced Oil Recovery in Liquid-Rich Shale Reservoirs: Laboratory to Field
- Najeeb Alharthy (Colorado School of Mines) | Tadesse Weldu Teklu (Colorado School of Mines) | Hossein Kazemi (Colorado School of Mines) | Ramona M Graves (Colorado School of Mines) | Steven B Hawthorne (Energy & Environmental Research Center (EERC)) | Jason Braunberger (Energy & Environmental Research Center (EERC)) | Basak Kurtoglu (Marathon Oil)
- Document ID
- Society of Petroleum Engineers
- SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
- Publication Date
- February 2018
- Document Type
- Journal Paper
- 137 - 159
- 2018.Society of Petroleum Engineers
- Liquid Rich Shale Reservoirs, Enhanced oil recovery in Unconventional Reservoirs
- 18 in the last 30 days
- 973 since 2007
- Show more detail
- View rights & permissions
|SPE Member Price:||USD 12.00|
|SPE Non-Member Price:||USD 35.00|
Production of tight oil from shale reservoirs in North America reduces oil imports and has better economics than natural gas. Currently, there is a strong interest in oil production from Bakken, Eagle Ford, Niobrara, and other tight formations. However, oil-recovery fraction for Bakken remains low, which is approximately 4–6% of the oil in place. Even with this low oil-recovery fraction, a recent United States Geological Survey study stated that the Bakken and Three Forks recoverable reserves are estimated to be 7.4 billion bbl; thus, a large volume of oil will remain unrecovered, which was the motivation to investigate the feasibility of enhanced oil recovery (EOR) in liquid-rich shale reservoirs such as Bakken.
In this paper, we will present both laboratory and numerical modeling of EOR in Bakken cores by use of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane/ethane-solvent mixture (C1/C2), and nitrogen (N2). The laboratory experiments were conducted at the Energy and Environmental Research Center (EERC). The experiments recovered 90+% oil from several Middle Bakken cores and nearly 40% from Lower Bakken cores. To decipher the oil-recovery mechanisms in the experiments, a numerical compositional model was constructed to match laboratory-oil-recovery results. We concluded that solvent injection mobilizes matrix oil by miscible mixing and solvent extraction in a narrow region near the fracture/matrix interface, thus promoting countercurrent flow of oil from the matrix instead of oil displacement through the matrix. Specifically, compositional-modeling results indicate that the main oil-recovery mechanism is miscible oil extraction at the matrix/fracture interface region. However, the controlling factors include repressurization, oil swelling, viscosity and interfacial-tension (IFT) reduction, diffusion/advection mass transfer, and wettability alteration.
We scaled up laboratory results to field applications by means of a compositional numerical model. For field applications, we resorted to the huff ’n’ puff protocol to assess the EOR potential for a North Dakota Middle Bakken well. We concluded that long soak times yield only a small amount of additional oil compared with short soak times, and reinjecting wet gas, composed of C1, C2, C3, and C4+, produces nearly as much oil as CO2 injection.
|File Size||3 MB||Number of Pages||23|
Adekunle, O. 2014. Experimental Approach to Investigate Minimum Miscibility Pressure in the Bakken. Master’s thesis, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado.
Alharthy, N. 2015. Compositional Modeling of Multiphase Flow and Enhanced Oil Recovery Prospects in Liquid-Rich Unconventional Reservoirs. PhD dissertation, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado.
Alharthy, N. S., Al Kobaisi, M., Kazemi, H. et al. 2012. Physics and Modeling of Gas Flow in Shale Reservoirs. Presented at the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, 11–14 November. SPE-161893-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/161893-MS.
Alharthy, N., Nguyen, T., Teklu, T. et al. 2013. Multiphase Compositional Modeling in Small-Scale Pores of Unconventional Shale Reservoirs. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 30 September–2 October. SPE-166306-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/166306-MS.
Archie, G. E. 1942. The Electrical Resistivity Log as an Aid in Determining Some Reservoir Characteristics. Trans. AIME 146 (1): 54–62. SPE-942054-G. https://doi.org/10.2118/942054-G.
Chen, C., Balhoff, M. T., and Mohanty, K. K. 2014. Effect of Reservoir Heterogeneity on Primary Recovery and CO2 Huff ‘n’ Puff Recovery in Shale-Oil Reservoirs. SPE Res Eval & Eng 17 (3): 404–413. SPE-164553-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/164553-PA.
Clarkson, C. R. 2013. Production Data Analysis of Unconventional Gas Wells: Review of Theory and Best Practices. Int. J. Coal Geol. 109–110 (1April): 101–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2013.01.002.
Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2013. Annual Energy Look Outlook 2013 With Projections to 2030. US EIA, US Department of Energy, Washington, DC, April 2013.
Firoozabadi, A. 1999. Thermodynamics of Hydrocarbon Reservoirs. New York City: McGraw-Hill.
Fuller, E. N., Ensley, K., and Giddings, J. C. 1969. Diffusion of Halogenated Hydrocarbons in Helium: The effect of Structure on Collision Cross Sections. J. Phys. Chem. 73 (11): 3679–3685. https://doi.org/10.1021/j100845a020.
Gamadi, T. D., Sheng, J. J., Soliman, M. Y. et al. 2014. An Experimental Study of Cyclic CO2 Injection to Improve Shale Oil Recovery. Presented at SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, 12–16 April. SPE-169142-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/169142-MS.
Gaswirth, S. B., Marra, K. R., Cook, T. A. et al. 2013. Assessment of Undiscovered Oil Resources in the Bakken and Three Forks Formations, Williston Basin Province, Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota, 2013. US Geological Survey Fact Sheet, 2013–3013, Denver, April 2013.
Haines, H. and Monger, T. 1990 A Laboratory Study of Natural Gas Huff-n-Puff. Presented at Annual Technical Meeting, Calgary, 10–13 June. PETSOC-90-78. https://doi.org/10.2118/90-78.
Hawthorne, S. B., Gorecki, C. D., Sorensen, J. A. et al. 2013. Hydrocarbon Mobilization Mechanisms from Upper, Middle, and Lower Bakken Reservoir Rocks Exposed to CO2. Presented at the SPE Unconventional Resources Conference Canada, Calgary, 5–7 November. SPE-167200-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/167200-MS.
Hawthorne, S. B., Miller, D. J., Gorecki, C. D. et al. 2014. A Rapid Method for Determining CO2/Oil MMP and Visual Observations of CO2/Oil Interactions at Reservoir Conditions. Energy Procedia 63: 7724–7731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.806.
Hayduk, W. and Minhas, B. S. 1982. Correlations for Prediction of Molecular Diffusivities in Liquids. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 60 (2): 295–299. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450600213.
Hoteit, H. 2011. Proper Modeling of Diffusion in Fractured Reservoirs. Presented at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, The Woodlands, Texas, 21–23 February. SPE-141937-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/141937-MS.
Kazemi, H. 2015. Subsurface Pores–Physics of Flow in Petroleum Reservoirs. In Pore Scale Phenomena: Frontiers in Energy and Environment, ed. J. Poate, T. Illangasekare, H. Kazemi et al., Chap. 2, 13–33. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
Krishna, R. and Taylor, R. 1986. Multicomponent Mass Transfer: Theory and Applications. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley Interscience. Kurtoglu, B. 2013. Integrated Reservoir Characterization and Modeling in Support of Enhanced Oil Recovery for Bakken. PhD dissertation, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado.
Leahy-Dios, A. and Firoozabadi, A. 2007. Unified Model for Nonideal Multicomponent Molecular Diffusion Coefficients. AIChE J. 53 (11): 2932–2939. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.11279.
Nagarajan, N. R., Honarpour, M. M., Sampath, K. et al. 2004. Comparison of Gas-Condensate Relative Permeability Using Live Fluid vs. Model Fluids. Oral presentation of paper SCA2004-09 given at the International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts, Abu Dhabi, 5–9 October.
Orangi, A., Nagarajan, N., Honarpour, M. et al. 2011. Unconventional Shale Oil and Gas-Condensate Reservoir Production, Impact of Rock, Fluid, and Hydraulic Fractures. Presented at SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, 24–26 January. SPE-140536-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/140536-MS.
Peng, D.-Y. and Robinson, D. B. 1976. A New Two-Constant Equation of State. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundamen. 15 (1): 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1021/i160057a011.
Shen, L. and Chen, Z. 2007. Critical Review of the Impact of Tortuosity on Diffusion. Chem. Eng. Sci. 62 (14): 3748–3755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2007.03.041.
Sheng, J. J. 2015. Enhanced Oil Recovery in Shale Reservoirs by Gas Injection. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 22 (January): 252–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2014.12.002.
Shoaib, S. and Hoffman, B. 2009. CO2 Flooding the Elm Coulee Field. Presented at the SPE Rocky Mountain Petroleum Technology Conference, Denver, 14–16 April. SPE-123176-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/123176-MS.
Sigmund, P. M. 1976. Prediction of Molecular Diffusion at Reservoir Conditions. Part 1–Measurement and Prediction of Binary Dense Gas Diffusion Coefficients. J Can Pet Technol 15 (2): 48–57. PETSOC-76-02-05. https://doi.org/10.2118/76-02-05.
Sigmund, P. M. 1976. Prediction of Molecular Diffusion at Reservoir Conditions. Part II–Estimating the Effects of Molecular Diffusion and Convective Mixing in Multicomponent Systems. J Can Pet Technol 15 (3): 53–62. PETSOC-76-03-07. https://doi.org/10.2118/76-03-07.
Teklu, T. 2015. Experimental and Numerical Study of Carbon Dioxide Injection Enhanced Oil Recovery in Low-Permeability Reservoirs. PhD dissertation, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado.
Teklu, T. W., Alharthy, N., Kazemi, H. et al. 2014. Phase Behavior and Minimum Miscibility Pressure in Nanopores. SPE Res Eval & Eng 17 (3): 396–403. SPE-168865-PA. https://doi.org/10.2118/168865-PA.
Theloy, C. 2014. Integration of Geological and Technological Factors Influencing Production in the Bakken Play. PhD dissertation, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado.
Wilke, C. R. 1950. Diffusional Properties of Multicomponent Gases. Chem. Eng. Prog. 46: 95–104.
Wilke, C. R. and Chang, P. 1955. Correlation of diffusion coefficients in dilute solutions. AIChE J. 1 (2): 264–270. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690010222.